Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.1.0
+1 Signatures and hashes [ok] License and Notice file [ok] Contains "incubating" in binary release [ok] Thanks, — Jialin Qiao Apache IoTDB PMC XiaoYu 于2022年4月9日周六 14:48写道： > + 1 (non-binding)， > > i checked > > [√] Download links are valid. > > [√] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > [√] NOTICE and LICENSE is good for me （header and license file） > > 陈明雨 于2022年4月9日周六 14:14写道： > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > I checked: > > 1. [x] Download link is legitimate. > > 2. [x] Checksum and PGP signature are legitimate. > > 3. [x] DISCLAIMER or DISCLAIMER-WIP is included. > > 4. [x] Code matches the current release. > > 5. [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. > > > > > > By the way, I found there are old releases in > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc > > These old releases can be removed from `dist/dev`. The `dist/dev` only > includes latest release version. > > > > -- > > > > 此致！Best Regards > > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > > > Email: > > chenmin...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > At 2022-04-07 11:48:47, "Wang Weibing" wrote: > > >Thank you for notice! > > >I have just updated https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/brpc/KEYS > > >Please use this URL instead. > > > > > >Thanks > > >Weibing Wang > > > > > >On 2022/04/06 14:26:35 sebb wrote: > > >> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 06:49, Wang,Weibing wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hello IPMC, > > >> > > > >> > The Apache brpc community has voted and approved the release of > Apache > > >> > brpc (Incubating) 1.1.0. We now kindly request the IPMC members > > >> > review and vote for this release. > > >> > > > >> > brpc is an industrial-grade RPC framework with extremely high > performance, > > >> > and it supports multiple protocols, full rpc features, and has many > > >> > convenient tools. The current release provides some new features > > >> > such as ipv6 and uds support, and fixes many bugs. > > >> > > > >> > brpc community vote thread: > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6p7lqprok26r3ko456mpwb77vq4lx0qf > > >> > > > >> > Vote result thread: > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/o9k0prhdrpg975mr8prnrf3ghnmzvl3d > > >> > > > >> > The release candidate: > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.1.0/ > > >> > > > >> > This release has been signed with a PGP available here: > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS > > >> > > >> Sorry, but that URL is not suitable for KEYS. > > >> Please only use: > > >> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/brpc/KEYS > > >> > > >> > Git tag for the release: > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/1.1.0 > > >> > > > >> > Build guide and get started instructions can be found at: > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/blob/master/docs/en/getting_started.md > > >> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary > number > > >> > of votes is reached. > > >> > > > >> > Please vote accordingly: > > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release of Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.1.0 > > >> > [ ] +0 > > >> > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please specify the reason) > > >> > > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Weibing Wang > > >> > Apache brpc (Incubating) > > >> > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > >- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC5
We are still looking for one additional vote. Any volunteers? On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 7:53 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating > (RC5) which brings support for Spark 3.0. > > > The podling dev vote thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.apache.org/msg00112.html > > And the result: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.apache.org/msg00123.html > > Tag: v0.5.0-incubating-rc5 (a803d295d90b39881ccc3de93467a2af199e2dcd) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/tree/v0.5.0-incubating-rc5 > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree > /0.5.0-incubating-rc5/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetoree-1020 > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]
Yes, most of them are Kconfig, defconfig and .ld files. I think all of them are generated files so do not need a license header. We could introduce a rat.exclude file in our repo to exclude these generated files. And thanks for the pointer. Let me check the LICENSE file as well. Abdelatif Guettouche 于2022年4月9日周六 20:47写道： > > The first one is include/sys/epoll.h, I think it is a 3 clause BSD > license, > which is compatible with AL so should not be a big problem but I tried to > grep 'epoll.h' in the NOTICE file, I got nothing. > > Yes, that's a 3 clause BSD licensed file. We have an entry for it in > the LICENSE file: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/blob/master/LICENSE#L722 > There are a bunch of others there as well. > > Regarding the non-source code files you found, we have Kconfig and > documentation files that got no license headers on them, are those > counted by rat? > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 2:34 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) > wrote: > > > > I saw you guys have already removed the DISLAIMER file in the repo. > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5910 > > > > I ran a rat check on the nuttx tarball, and there are still 2569 files > with > > unapproved license. > > I filtered out 778 the .h and .c files without the AL license. > > The first one is include/sys/epoll.h, I think it is a 3 clause BSD > license, > > which is compatible with AL so should not be a big problem but I tried to > > grep 'epoll.h' in the NOTICE file, I got nothing. > > So I wonder whether we have included all the necessary information in our > > NOTICE file. > > > > I think this is a great step forward. If we could finally make this > release > > possible without a DISCLAIMER, then it is time for the nuttx project to > > graduate! > > > > Thanks. > > > > Alin Jerpelea 于2022年4月7日周四 16:26写道： > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > > > 10.3.0. > > > > > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > > > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.3.0. > > > > > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > > > incubator release. > > > > > > NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on > > > standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit > > > microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX > > > are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and > > > other common RTOS’s (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not > > > available under these standards, or for functionality that is not > > > appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()). > > > > > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > > > involved in the build process. > > > > > > Apache NuttX community vote and result thread: > > > Result: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8rh20pb2t589psk4pq64rjfk756nljbc > > > Vote: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/21tkdpnjg9y24onplynt2fnl2hcytjk3 > > > > > > SCM Information: > > > Release tag: nuttx-10.3.0-RC0 > > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > > > c18075779548fcba3f2978689888af8c3b9c959c > > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > > > 4a2aa6d8cffb6eef45d445ca42a3653f700a2565 > > > > > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.3.0-RC0/ > > > [2] > > > > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.3.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes > > > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > [4] > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Alin Jerpelea > > > > > > Apache NuttX > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]
> The first one is include/sys/epoll.h, I think it is a 3 clause BSD license, which is compatible with AL so should not be a big problem but I tried to grep 'epoll.h' in the NOTICE file, I got nothing. Yes, that's a 3 clause BSD licensed file. We have an entry for it in the LICENSE file: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/blob/master/LICENSE#L722 There are a bunch of others there as well. Regarding the non-source code files you found, we have Kconfig and documentation files that got no license headers on them, are those counted by rat? On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 2:34 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > > I saw you guys have already removed the DISLAIMER file in the repo. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5910 > > I ran a rat check on the nuttx tarball, and there are still 2569 files with > unapproved license. > I filtered out 778 the .h and .c files without the AL license. > The first one is include/sys/epoll.h, I think it is a 3 clause BSD license, > which is compatible with AL so should not be a big problem but I tried to > grep 'epoll.h' in the NOTICE file, I got nothing. > So I wonder whether we have included all the necessary information in our > NOTICE file. > > I think this is a great step forward. If we could finally make this release > possible without a DISCLAIMER, then it is time for the nuttx project to > graduate! > > Thanks. > > Alin Jerpelea 于2022年4月7日周四 16:26写道： > > > Hello all, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > > 10.3.0. > > > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.3.0. > > > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > > incubator release. > > > > NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on > > standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit > > microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX > > are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and > > other common RTOS’s (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not > > available under these standards, or for functionality that is not > > appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()). > > > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > > involved in the build process. > > > > Apache NuttX community vote and result thread: > > Result: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8rh20pb2t589psk4pq64rjfk756nljbc > > Vote: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/21tkdpnjg9y24onplynt2fnl2hcytjk3 > > > > SCM Information: > > Release tag: nuttx-10.3.0-RC0 > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > > c18075779548fcba3f2978689888af8c3b9c959c > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > > 4a2aa6d8cffb6eef45d445ca42a3653f700a2565 > > > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.3.0-RC0/ > > [2] > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.3.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes > > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > [4] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Alin Jerpelea > > > > Apache NuttX > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]
I saw you guys have already removed the DISLAIMER file in the repo. https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5910 I ran a rat check on the nuttx tarball, and there are still 2569 files with unapproved license. I filtered out 778 the .h and .c files without the AL license. The first one is include/sys/epoll.h, I think it is a 3 clause BSD license, which is compatible with AL so should not be a big problem but I tried to grep 'epoll.h' in the NOTICE file, I got nothing. So I wonder whether we have included all the necessary information in our NOTICE file. I think this is a great step forward. If we could finally make this release possible without a DISCLAIMER, then it is time for the nuttx project to graduate! Thanks. Alin Jerpelea 于2022年4月7日周四 16:26写道： > Hello all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version > 10.3.0. > > The Apache NuttX community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache NuttX (Incubating) version 10.3.0. > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator release. > > NuttX is a real-time operating system (RTOS) with an emphasis on > standards compliance and small footprint. Scalable from 8-bit to 64-bit > microcontroller environments, the primary governing standards in NuttX > are Posix and ANSI standards. Additional standard APIs from Unix and > other common RTOS’s (such as VxWorks) are adopted for functionality not > available under these standards, or for functionality that is not > appropriate for deeply- embedded environments (such as fork()). > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > involved in the build process. > > Apache NuttX community vote and result thread: > Result: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8rh20pb2t589psk4pq64rjfk756nljbc > Vote: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/21tkdpnjg9y24onplynt2fnl2hcytjk3 > > SCM Information: > Release tag: nuttx-10.3.0-RC0 > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > c18075779548fcba3f2978689888af8c3b9c959c > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > 4a2aa6d8cffb6eef45d445ca42a3653f700a2565 > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.3.0-RC0/ > [2] > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.3.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [4] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Please vote accordingly: > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > Alin Jerpelea > > Apache NuttX >
[DISCUSSION] Incubating proposal of Kvrocks
Hi all We would like to propose Kvrocks [1] as a new apache incubator project, you can find the proposal [2] of Kvrocks for more detail. Kvrocks is a distributed key-value NoSQL database, supporting the rich data structure and be widely used by many internet business for example, the recommendation service can use hashes to store user characteristics and the sorted set to sort them. For supporting more users, Kvrocks also have good integration and ecosystem compatibility with other NoSQL database API and script. In comparison to current open source NoSQL database like Redis, which also has rich data structure, Kvrocks data be stored in disk storage, but the redis data be stored in memory, it means the cost is higher and the capacity is limited when compare to disk storage solution, this is why we created Kvrocks project to solve the cost and capacity issues by using disk storage solution, the following are key features of Kvrocks: - Compatibly support Redis protocol and data structures (String/List/Hash/Set/Sorted-set/Bitmap/GEO/Sorted-Int) - Disk-Based, all data and updates always persist on the disk - Proxyless centralized cluster - Stored procedures based on Lua script - Transaction(no strict ACID) - Publish-Subscribe - Tunable consistency(In-Progress) Kvrocks was designed to decrease the cost of memory and increase the capacity while compared to Redis. Also, Kvrocks aims to become a distributed multi-model NoSQL database in the future. We will provide more features to expand its usage scenarios but all data structures on disk. Kvrocks is fully compatible with Redis in term of protocol. We believe that the Kvrocks project will provide the diversity value for community if Kvrocks is introduced into the Apache incubator. I will help this project as champion and many thanks to 4 mentors : Jean-Baptiste Onofre [jbono...@apache.org], Xiaoqiao He [hexiaoq...@apache.org], Xun Liu[ liu...@apache.org], Von Gosling[vongosl...@apache.org]. [1] https://github.com/KvrocksLabs/kvrocks [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/KvrocksProposal Regards Liang
