Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread Jiafeng.Zhang 
 +1 (non-binding)

Good luck!

Jiafeng.Zhang
Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org


hulk  于2022年8月24日周三 13:34写道：

>  +1 (non-binding)
>
> Good luck!
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs  wrote:
> >
> >  +1 (non-binding)
> > we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > benjobs.
> >
> >
> >  Replied Message 
> > From tison 
> > Date 08/24/2022 11:56
> > To Incubator  >
> > Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> call
> > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
> the
> > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
> >
> > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> Incubator
> > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > [2]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> - Hulk Lin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-- 
张家峰

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread hulk 
 +1 (non-binding)

Good luck!

On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs  wrote:
>
>  +1 (non-binding)
> we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator
>
>
>
> Best,
> benjobs.
>
>
>  Replied Message 
> From tison 
> Date 08/24/2022 11:56
> To Incubator 
> Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
>
> The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator
> PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal



-- 
Best Regards,
- Hulk Lin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Xiaofeng 
Hi,

Will checking license compatible be a feature in the future?

Regards,
Xiaofeng

Justin Mclean  于 2022年8月23日周二 16:13写道：

> Hi,
>
> So taking a quick look at a SkyWalking release [1] I can see a couple of
> minor issues with LICNSE and NOTICE. You may want to fix these.
>
> Hints:
> Is OpenCensus mentioned in LICENSE?
> Does prometheus client_model have a NOTICE file?
> Does mavin-wrapper have a NOTICE file?
>
> Also there is a compiled code (a jar) in the source release. Source
> release cannot include compiled code.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
> 1.
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/skywalking/9.1.0/apache-skywalking-apm-9.1.0-src.tgz
> <
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/skywalking/9.1.0/apache-skywalking-apm-9.1.0-src.tgz
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread Sherlock Homles 
+1 (non-binding)
StreamPark is a wonderful project. I have used it in production
environment for a long time. Best wishes and Many thanks.

Qingrong wang  于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道：
>
> +1 (no-binding)
>
> StreamPark is a very greate project.  Good luck!
>
> 陈卓宇  于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck!
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhuoyu Chen
> >
> > tison  于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道：
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion 
> > > thread:
> > >
> > > > Hi Chris,
> > > >
> > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose
> > > slogan writes:
> > > >
> > > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users 
> > > >> to
> > > connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams.
> > > >
> > > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not 
> > > > specifically
> > > focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and
> > > management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming 
> > > applications.
> > >
> > > > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> > >
> > > I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read
> > > through it:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > tison.
> > >
> > >
> > > tksonjk tk  于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道：
> > >
> > > > -1,  (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain
> > > in
> > > > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not 
> > > > company-related?
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> > > > call
> > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check 
> > > > > out
> > > > the
> > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> > > > >
> > > > > Please cast your vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> > > > Incubator
> > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > tison.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread benjobs 
 +1 (non-binding)
we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator



Best,
benjobs.


 Replied Message 
>From tison 
Date 08/24/2022 11:56
To Incubator 
Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi all,

Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].

Please cast your vote:

[ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
[ ] +0, I don't care either way
[ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...

The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator
PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.

Best,
tison.

[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread shaokang lv 
+1 (no-binding)

StreamPark is a nice project.  Good luck!

Best,
Shaokang Lv

Qingrong wang  于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道：

> +1 (no-binding)
>
> StreamPark is a very greate project.  Good luck!
>
> 陈卓宇  于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck!
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhuoyu Chen
> >
> > tison  于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道：
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion
> thread:
> > >
> > > > Hi Chris,
> > > >
> > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator)
> whose
> > > slogan writes:
> > > >
> > > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical
> users to
> > > connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams.
> > > >
> > > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not
> specifically
> > > focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and
> > > management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming
> applications.
> > >
> > > > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> > >
> > > I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please
> read
> > > through it:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > tison.
> > >
> > >
> > > tksonjk tk  于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道：
> > >
> > > > -1,  (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you
> explain
> > > in
> > > > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not
> company-related?
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would
> like to
> > > > call
> > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please
> check out
> > > > the
> > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> > > > >
> > > > > Please cast your vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> > > > Incubator
> > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > tison.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread Qingrong wang 
+1 (no-binding)

StreamPark is a very greate project.  Good luck!

陈卓宇  于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck!
>
> Best,
> Zhuoyu Chen
>
> tison  于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread:
> >
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose
> > slogan writes:
> > >
> > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to
> > connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams.
> > >
> > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically
> > focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and
> > management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming applications.
> >
> > > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> >
> > I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read
> > through it:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > tksonjk tk  于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道：
> >
> > > -1,  (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain
> > in
> > > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> > >
> > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> > > call
> > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
> > > the
> > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> > > >
> > > > Please cast your vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
> > > >
> > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> > > Incubator
> > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > tison.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
> > > >
> > >
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread 陈卓宇 
+1 (non-binding)

StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck!

Best,
Zhuoyu Chen

tison  于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道：

> Hi,
>
> I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread:
>
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose
> slogan writes:
> >
> >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to
> connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams.
> >
> > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically
> focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and
> management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming applications.
>
> > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
>
> I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read
> through it:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> tksonjk tk  于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道：
>
> > -1,  (non-binding)
> >
> > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain
> in
> > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> >
> > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> > call
> > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
> > the
> > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
> > >
> > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> > Incubator
> > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > tison.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread tison 
Hi,

I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread:

> Hi Chris,
>
> I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose
slogan writes:
>
>> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to
connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams.
>
> Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically
focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and
management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming applications.

> Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?

I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read
through it: https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3

Best,
tison.


tksonjk tk  于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道：

> -1,  (non-binding)
>
> Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in
> detail, thanks. and if you work for
> a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
>
> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> call
> > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
> the
> > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
> >
> > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> Incubator
> > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> > [2]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread tksonjk tk 
-1,  (non-binding)

Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in
detail, thanks. and if you work for
a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?

On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...
>
> The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
Incubator
> PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
>

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread tison 
Please vote in the thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/dowk7mtw26vg74qcpx4ttjvn9tkwt5qk

Best,
tison.


tison  于2022年8月24日周三 11:49写道：

> Thanks for your participation! I'll start a vote now.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Goson zhang  于2022年8月24日周三 09:40写道：
>
>> +1 (non-binding), good luck!
>>
>> david zollo  于2022年8月23日周二 23:20写道：
>>
>> > if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Best Regards
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC
>> > David
>> > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
>> > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
>> > ---
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:55 PM huajie wang  wrote:
>> >
>> > > related notes:
>> > >
>> > > 1. StreamPark is my learning project in the early stage, Not a
>> > company-led
>> > > project and No company employees are involved
>> > > 2. StreamPark is open-sourced on GitHub on my behalf, no company is
>> > > associated with it
>> > > 3. I contacted the initial committers and contributors, they are all
>> > happy
>> > > to donate the project to asf, and agreed to sign the iCLA
>> > > 4. I will contact the companies to come forward and sign the CCLA
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > To sum up, the StreamPark project will be donated in the name of
>> > > individuals. StreamPark has been learning and practicing the Apache
>> Way
>> > > since it was open-sourced.
>> > > We have built a small community, have a group of users, and are very
>> > > willing to donate StreamPark to the Apache foundation.
>> > > We are looking forward to building a more prosperous community by
>> > following
>> > > the Apache Way. Contribute to the development of the software.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > benjobs
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > david zollo  于2022年8月21日周日 19:35写道：
>> > >
>> > > > I want to know about how do you understand no organization? If you
>> work
>> > > for
>> > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not
>> > company-related?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Best Regards
>> > > >
>> > > > ---
>> > > > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC & Apache
>> > > > Incubator Mentor
>> > > > David
>> > > > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
>> > > > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
>> > > > ---
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:22 PM Sheng Wu <
>> wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Sheng Wu  于2022年8月18日周四 22:15写道：
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Several questions
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 1. Many source codes in the repository declare `Licensed to the
>> > > Apache
>> > > > > > Software Foundation (ASF)`[1], which is wrong. As an
>> > > out-of-foundation
>> > > > > > project, `licensed to the ASF`. Could you correct this?
>> > > > > > The correct header should be like this
>> > > > > > ```
>> > > > > > /*
>> > > > > >  * Copyright 2018 x
>> > > > > >  *
>> > > > > >  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
>> "License");
>> > > > > >  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the
>> License.
>> > > > > >  * You may obtain a copy of the License at
>> > > > > >  *
>> > > > > >  * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>> > > > > >  *
>> > > > > >  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
>> > > software
>> > > > > >  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
>> > BASIS,
>> > > > > >  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express
>> or
>> > > > > implied.
>> > > > > >  * See the License for the specific language governing
>> permissions
>> > > and
>> > > > > >  * limitations under the License.
>> > > > > >  */
>> > > > > > ```
>> > > > > > 2. `com.streamxhub` is used for the package of source codes, as
>> > well
>> > > > > > as `https://streamxhub.com/`  <
>> https://streamxhub.com/> <
>> > https://streamxhub.com/> <
>> > > https://streamxhub.com/> <
>> > > > https://streamxhub.com/> is used for
>> > > > > project website. Is
>> > > > > > streamxhub a company/legal entity? Who or which company owns
>> this
>> > > > > > project? `.com` usually means a company. We may need an SGA in
>> the
>> > > > > > donation process.
>> > > > > > 3. I can't see the initial committers' GitHub accounts, could
>> you
>> > > make
>> > > > > > them clear in the proposal?
>> > > > > > 4. I can see at least 59 GitHub accounts/contributors
>> contributed
>> > to
>> > > > > > this project, and the initial committer team has 7 members, how
>> > about
>> > > > > > the other 52? Such as GitHub ID(xxyykkxx) #14 on the contributor
>> > > list.
>> > > > > > He/she has over 12k LOC. Would ppl like him/her to submit ICLA?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I found this in the doc
>> > > > > ```
>> > > > > Once StreamPark is approved to join Apache Incubator, the Initial
>> > > > > committers will submit iCLA(s). The code is already licensed under
>> > > > > Apache Software

[VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread tison 
Hi all,

Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].

Please cast your vote:

[ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
[ ] +0, I don't care either way
[ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because...

The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator
PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.

Best,
tison.

[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread tison 
Thanks for your participation! I'll start a vote now.

Best,
tison.


Goson zhang  于2022年8月24日周三 09:40写道：

> +1 (non-binding), good luck!
>
> david zollo  于2022年8月23日周二 23:20写道：
>
> > if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > ---
> > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC
> > David
> > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
> > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
> > ---
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:55 PM huajie wang  wrote:
> >
> > > related notes:
> > >
> > > 1. StreamPark is my learning project in the early stage, Not a
> > company-led
> > > project and No company employees are involved
> > > 2. StreamPark is open-sourced on GitHub on my behalf, no company is
> > > associated with it
> > > 3. I contacted the initial committers and contributors, they are all
> > happy
> > > to donate the project to asf, and agreed to sign the iCLA
> > > 4. I will contact the companies to come forward and sign the CCLA
> > >
> > >
> > > To sum up, the StreamPark project will be donated in the name of
> > > individuals. StreamPark has been learning and practicing the Apache Way
> > > since it was open-sourced.
> > > We have built a small community, have a group of users, and are very
> > > willing to donate StreamPark to the Apache foundation.
> > > We are looking forward to building a more prosperous community by
> > following
> > > the Apache Way. Contribute to the development of the software.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > benjobs
> > >
> > >
> > > david zollo  于2022年8月21日周日 19:35写道：
> > >
> > > > I want to know about how do you understand no organization? If you
> work
> > > for
> > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not
> > company-related?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC & Apache
> > > > Incubator Mentor
> > > > David
> > > > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
> > > > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:22 PM Sheng Wu  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sheng Wu  于2022年8月18日周四 22:15写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Several questions
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Many source codes in the repository declare `Licensed to the
> > > Apache
> > > > > > Software Foundation (ASF)`[1], which is wrong. As an
> > > out-of-foundation
> > > > > > project, `licensed to the ASF`. Could you correct this?
> > > > > > The correct header should be like this
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > > /*
> > > > > >  * Copyright 2018 x
> > > > > >  *
> > > > > >  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
> "License");
> > > > > >  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the
> License.
> > > > > >  * You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > > > > >  *
> > > > > >  * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > > > >  *
> > > > > >  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> > > software
> > > > > >  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
> > BASIS,
> > > > > >  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express
> or
> > > > > implied.
> > > > > >  * See the License for the specific language governing
> permissions
> > > and
> > > > > >  * limitations under the License.
> > > > > >  */
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > > 2. `com.streamxhub` is used for the package of source codes, as
> > well
> > > > > > as `https://streamxhub.com/`  <
> https://streamxhub.com/> <
> > https://streamxhub.com/> <
> > > https://streamxhub.com/> <
> > > > https://streamxhub.com/> is used for
> > > > > project website. Is
> > > > > > streamxhub a company/legal entity? Who or which company owns this
> > > > > > project? `.com` usually means a company. We may need an SGA in
> the
> > > > > > donation process.
> > > > > > 3. I can't see the initial committers' GitHub accounts, could you
> > > make
> > > > > > them clear in the proposal?
> > > > > > 4. I can see at least 59 GitHub accounts/contributors contributed
> > to
> > > > > > this project, and the initial committer team has 7 members, how
> > about
> > > > > > the other 52? Such as GitHub ID(xxyykkxx) #14 on the contributor
> > > list.
> > > > > > He/she has over 12k LOC. Would ppl like him/her to submit ICLA?
> > > > >
> > > > > I found this in the doc
> > > > > ```
> > > > > Once StreamPark is approved to join Apache Incubator, the Initial
> > > > > committers will submit iCLA(s). The code is already licensed under
> > > > > Apache Software 2.0.
> > > > > Since no organization owns StreamPark, there's no entity to sign
> the
> > > > > SGA. We will ask the top 20 contributors to sign iCLAs for IP
> > > > > clearance.
> > > > > ```
> > > > >
> > > > > I think <4> should be fine, just feel a little surprised to see a
> > > > > `.com` domain only belonging to an

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread Goson zhang 
+1 (non-binding), good luck!

david zollo  于2022年8月23日周二 23:20写道：

> if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> ---
> Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC
> David
> Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
> Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
> ---
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:55 PM huajie wang  wrote:
>
> > related notes:
> >
> > 1. StreamPark is my learning project in the early stage, Not a
> company-led
> > project and No company employees are involved
> > 2. StreamPark is open-sourced on GitHub on my behalf, no company is
> > associated with it
> > 3. I contacted the initial committers and contributors, they are all
> happy
> > to donate the project to asf, and agreed to sign the iCLA
> > 4. I will contact the companies to come forward and sign the CCLA
> >
> >
> > To sum up, the StreamPark project will be donated in the name of
> > individuals. StreamPark has been learning and practicing the Apache Way
> > since it was open-sourced.
> > We have built a small community, have a group of users, and are very
> > willing to donate StreamPark to the Apache foundation.
> > We are looking forward to building a more prosperous community by
> following
> > the Apache Way. Contribute to the development of the software.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > benjobs
> >
> >
> > david zollo  于2022年8月21日周日 19:35写道：
> >
> > > I want to know about how do you understand no organization? If you work
> > for
> > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not
> company-related?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC & Apache
> > > Incubator Mentor
> > > David
> > > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
> > > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
> > > ---
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:22 PM Sheng Wu 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sheng Wu  于2022年8月18日周四 22:15写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > Several questions
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Many source codes in the repository declare `Licensed to the
> > Apache
> > > > > Software Foundation (ASF)`[1], which is wrong. As an
> > out-of-foundation
> > > > > project, `licensed to the ASF`. Could you correct this?
> > > > > The correct header should be like this
> > > > > ```
> > > > > /*
> > > > >  * Copyright 2018 x
> > > > >  *
> > > > >  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
> > > > >  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
> > > > >  * You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > > > >  *
> > > > >  * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > > >  *
> > > > >  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> > software
> > > > >  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
> BASIS,
> > > > >  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
> > > > implied.
> > > > >  * See the License for the specific language governing permissions
> > and
> > > > >  * limitations under the License.
> > > > >  */
> > > > > ```
> > > > > 2. `com.streamxhub` is used for the package of source codes, as
> well
> > > > > as `https://streamxhub.com/`  <
> https://streamxhub.com/> <
> > https://streamxhub.com/> <
> > > https://streamxhub.com/> is used for
> > > > project website. Is
> > > > > streamxhub a company/legal entity? Who or which company owns this
> > > > > project? `.com` usually means a company. We may need an SGA in the
> > > > > donation process.
> > > > > 3. I can't see the initial committers' GitHub accounts, could you
> > make
> > > > > them clear in the proposal?
> > > > > 4. I can see at least 59 GitHub accounts/contributors contributed
> to
> > > > > this project, and the initial committer team has 7 members, how
> about
> > > > > the other 52? Such as GitHub ID(xxyykkxx) #14 on the contributor
> > list.
> > > > > He/she has over 12k LOC. Would ppl like him/her to submit ICLA?
> > > >
> > > > I found this in the doc
> > > > ```
> > > > Once StreamPark is approved to join Apache Incubator, the Initial
> > > > committers will submit iCLA(s). The code is already licensed under
> > > > Apache Software 2.0.
> > > > Since no organization owns StreamPark, there's no entity to sign the
> > > > SGA. We will ask the top 20 contributors to sign iCLAs for IP
> > > > clearance.
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > > I think <4> should be fine, just feel a little surprised to see a
> > > > `.com` domain only belonging to an individual group.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > 5. How does this community/entity/org determine the initial
> committer
> > > > > candidate? Would others be happy with the current candidate list?
> > > > > Would others like to join the initial team?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.1-incubating-rc1

2022-08-23 Thread Jia Yu 
Incubator IPMC, we have been stuck here for two weeks and only received 1
binding vote. Many users in our community are waiting for this release. I
am not sure what's going on with the voting process. Please help us and
cast your votes!

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 10:57 AM Jia Yu  wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Could someone give us 2 more binding votes? It has been 12 days since we
> started this voting process..
>
> Sedona website also provides a script for you to check a couple items [1].
> We would really appreciate it if someone can help us!
>
> Thanks,
> Jia
>
> [1] https://sedona.apache.org/community/vote/
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 3:28 PM Jia Yu  wrote:
>
>> Dear Sedona mentors,
>>
>> Could you please cast your vote here? It has been 9 days. We still need 2
>> more +1 binding votes.
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>> Jia
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:21 AM Kanchan Chowdhury 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> We need more votes to release Apache Sedona incubating version 1.2.1. I
>>> am
>>> sorry to bother you all again on this. Please help us in releasing this
>>> version. Thank you.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Kanchan Chowdhury
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 9:38 PM Kanchan Chowdhury >> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>>> >
>>> > The dist source package is already there under the link to Source code
>>> > and binaries
>>> > <
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sedona/1.2.1-incubating-rc1/__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!fv01PRb3ntFajskuYPXyjziQDaRnDU-zt5chF2n-K_rubXqsFqRG5cV0fZf3ozqiOYVUbyVTjx0y$
>>> >.
>>> > Could you please clarify whether you mean something else? Thank you.
>>> >
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> > Kanchan Chowdhury
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 1:46 PM Kanchan Chowdhury <
>>> kanchan...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Dear All,
>>> >>
>>> >> Could you please look into the details in the voting email and vote
>>> >> accordingly? I am sorry to bother you again with this. Thank you for
>>> your
>>> >> time.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Kanchan Chowdhury
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 7:55 PM Kanchan Chowdhury <
>>> kanchan...@apache.org>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi all,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.2.1-incubating-rc1. Please
>>> >>> refer to the changes listed at the bottom of this email.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Sedona Community vote thread:
>>> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/511gjndxmdxh4g2rzwyxppjc00orz3s3
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Sedona community vote result thread:
>>> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/jyb3yp2wpnhp8kx7t8dnls8xljwqflxr
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Release notes:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/bcb1803c24dc9decfb113a31db8fc14433be025b/docs/setup/release-notes.md
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Build instructions:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.2.1-incubating-rc1/docs/setup/compile.md
>>> >>>
>>> >>> GitHub tag:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/releases/tag/sedona-1.2.1-incubating-rc1
>>> >>>
>>> >>> GPG public key to verify the Release:
>>> >>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/sedona/KEYS
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Source code and binaries:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sedona/1.2.1-incubating-rc1/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until at least 3 "+1"
>>> PMC
>>> >>> votes are cast
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please vote accordingly:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Checklist for reference (because of DISCLAIMER-WIP, other checklist
>>> >>> items are not blockers):
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] Download links are valid.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>>> >>> release.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> For a detailed checklist  please refer to:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread david zollo 
if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved.



Best Regards

---
Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC
David
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
---


On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:55 PM huajie wang  wrote:

> related notes:
>
> 1. StreamPark is my learning project in the early stage, Not a company-led
> project and No company employees are involved
> 2. StreamPark is open-sourced on GitHub on my behalf, no company is
> associated with it
> 3. I contacted the initial committers and contributors, they are all happy
> to donate the project to asf, and agreed to sign the iCLA
> 4. I will contact the companies to come forward and sign the CCLA
>
>
> To sum up, the StreamPark project will be donated in the name of
> individuals. StreamPark has been learning and practicing the Apache Way
> since it was open-sourced.
> We have built a small community, have a group of users, and are very
> willing to donate StreamPark to the Apache foundation.
> We are looking forward to building a more prosperous community by following
> the Apache Way. Contribute to the development of the software.
>
>
> Best,
> benjobs
>
>
> david zollo  于2022年8月21日周日 19:35写道：
>
> > I want to know about how do you understand no organization? If you work
> for
> > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > ---
> > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC & Apache
> > Incubator Mentor
> > David
> > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo
> > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
> > ---
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:22 PM Sheng Wu 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sheng Wu  于2022年8月18日周四 22:15写道：
> > > >
> > > > Several questions
> > > >
> > > > 1. Many source codes in the repository declare `Licensed to the
> Apache
> > > > Software Foundation (ASF)`[1], which is wrong. As an
> out-of-foundation
> > > > project, `licensed to the ASF`. Could you correct this?
> > > > The correct header should be like this
> > > > ```
> > > > /*
> > > >  * Copyright 2018 x
> > > >  *
> > > >  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
> > > >  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
> > > >  * You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > > >  *
> > > >  * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > >  *
> > > >  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> software
> > > >  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
> > > >  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
> > > implied.
> > > >  * See the License for the specific language governing permissions
> and
> > > >  * limitations under the License.
> > > >  */
> > > > ```
> > > > 2. `com.streamxhub` is used for the package of source codes, as well
> > > > as `https://streamxhub.com/`  <
> https://streamxhub.com/> <
> > https://streamxhub.com/> is used for
> > > project website. Is
> > > > streamxhub a company/legal entity? Who or which company owns this
> > > > project? `.com` usually means a company. We may need an SGA in the
> > > > donation process.
> > > > 3. I can't see the initial committers' GitHub accounts, could you
> make
> > > > them clear in the proposal?
> > > > 4. I can see at least 59 GitHub accounts/contributors contributed to
> > > > this project, and the initial committer team has 7 members, how about
> > > > the other 52? Such as GitHub ID(xxyykkxx) #14 on the contributor
> list.
> > > > He/she has over 12k LOC. Would ppl like him/her to submit ICLA?
> > >
> > > I found this in the doc
> > > ```
> > > Once StreamPark is approved to join Apache Incubator, the Initial
> > > committers will submit iCLA(s). The code is already licensed under
> > > Apache Software 2.0.
> > > Since no organization owns StreamPark, there's no entity to sign the
> > > SGA. We will ask the top 20 contributors to sign iCLAs for IP
> > > clearance.
> > > ```
> > >
> > > I think <4> should be fine, just feel a little surprised to see a
> > > `.com` domain only belonging to an individual group.
> > >
> > >
> > > > 5. How does this community/entity/org determine the initial committer
> > > > candidate? Would others be happy with the current candidate list?
> > > > Would others like to join the initial team?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/streamxhub/streamx/blob/v1.0.0-beta.1/streamx-flink/streamx-flink-core/src/main/java/com/streamxhub/streamx/flink/core/java/function/HBaseQueryFunction.java#L4
> > > >
> > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟
> > > > Twitter, wusheng1108
> > > >
> > > > Sherlock Homles  于2022年8月18日周四 21:34写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > StreamPark is a very great project. I have used it for a long time.
> > > > >
> > > > > tison  于2022年8月18日周四 21:15写道：
> > > > > >
> > > >

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean 
Hi,

So taking a quick look at a SkyWalking release [1] I can see a couple of minor 
issues with LICNSE and NOTICE. You may want to fix these.

Hints:
Is OpenCensus mentioned in LICENSE?
Does prometheus client_model have a NOTICE file?
Does mavin-wrapper have a NOTICE file?

Also there is a compiled code (a jar) in the source release. Source release 
cannot include compiled code.

Kind Regards,
Justin

1. 
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/skywalking/9.1.0/apache-skywalking-apm-9.1.0-src.tgz

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu 
Justin Mclean  于2022年8月23日周二 15:50写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> Also remember that it’s only code that ends up in the release and not all 
> dependancies that impact the LICENSE and NOTICE files.

Agree. The tool would not be perfect, it just reduces the workload
from a manual dependencies analysis.

Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108

>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu 
Yu Xiao  于2022年8月23日周二 15:44写道：
>
> Hi
>
> It is very good.
>
> Will the following features be available in the future ：
>
> Comparison of license files with dependencies (e.g. license files with
> missing some).

It is available if you directly use GHA.
SkyWalking uses this
- GHA 
https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/77ba2d553d77a4acacd8b2498cb09ea983a9baf4/.github/workflows/skywalking.yaml#L57

The tool would resolve the licenses of runtime dependencies and apply
this 
template(https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/77ba2d553d77a4acacd8b2498cb09ea983a9baf4/.github/workflows/skywalking.yaml#L81)
to do binary license checking(use `git diff`).

Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108

>
> Best wishes!
>
> Yu Xiao
> Apache ShenYu
>
> Sheng Wu  于2022年8月23日周二 15:00写道：
> >
> > Hi podlings
> >
> > Apache SkyWalking graduated from the incubator years ago, but we still
> > remember we were struggling to keep licenses of dependencies well
> > organized and listed correctly.
> > So, SkyWalking PMC/Committer worked with the community starting to
> > build a tool to help with the license header and dependencies checker.
> >
> > I am honored to share that, this tool is well built and widely used in
> > and out of the ASF projects.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes
> >
> > Apache SkyWalking eyes is a full-featured license tool to check and
> > fix license headers and resolve dependencies' licenses, with various
> > languages support.
> > No matter whether your source codes are in hybrid license headers, or
> > a monorepo requires a consistent tool to check dependencies from
> > different dependency management tools. It works.
> >
> > Also, as GitHub Action is widely used in the ASF projects, SkyWalking
> > eyes provide integration with GHA, as well as binary tar and docker
> > image[1] for other CI platforms.
> >
> > We hope this project could help incubating projects, especially new
> > podlings, to analyze dependencies easier.
> >
> > [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/skywalking-eyes
> >
> > Sheng Wu 吴晟
> > Twitter, wusheng1108
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean 
Hi,

Also remember that it’s only code that ends up in the release and not all 
dependancies that impact the LICENSE and NOTICE files. 

Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean 
Hi,

Automated tools are a great help and can reduce the time required for this 
work, but please remember they will not find every issues. I’ve see this time 
and time again in incubating projects.

Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Yu Xiao 
Hi

It is very good.

Will the following features be available in the future ：

Comparison of license files with dependencies (e.g. license files with
missing some).

Best wishes!

Yu Xiao
Apache ShenYu

Sheng Wu  于2022年8月23日周二 15:00写道：
>
> Hi podlings
>
> Apache SkyWalking graduated from the incubator years ago, but we still
> remember we were struggling to keep licenses of dependencies well
> organized and listed correctly.
> So, SkyWalking PMC/Committer worked with the community starting to
> build a tool to help with the license header and dependencies checker.
>
> I am honored to share that, this tool is well built and widely used in
> and out of the ASF projects.
>
> https://github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes
>
> Apache SkyWalking eyes is a full-featured license tool to check and
> fix license headers and resolve dependencies' licenses, with various
> languages support.
> No matter whether your source codes are in hybrid license headers, or
> a monorepo requires a consistent tool to check dependencies from
> different dependency management tools. It works.
>
> Also, as GitHub Action is widely used in the ASF projects, SkyWalking
> eyes provide integration with GHA, as well as binary tar and docker
> image[1] for other CI platforms.
>
> We hope this project could help incubating projects, especially new
> podlings, to analyze dependencies easier.
>
> [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/skywalking-eyes
>
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
> Twitter, wusheng1108
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu 
Hi podlings

Apache SkyWalking graduated from the incubator years ago, but we still
remember we were struggling to keep licenses of dependencies well
organized and listed correctly.
So, SkyWalking PMC/Committer worked with the community starting to
build a tool to help with the license header and dependencies checker.

I am honored to share that, this tool is well built and widely used in
and out of the ASF projects.

https://github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes

Apache SkyWalking eyes is a full-featured license tool to check and
fix license headers and resolve dependencies' licenses, with various
languages support.
No matter whether your source codes are in hybrid license headers, or
a monorepo requires a consistent tool to check dependencies from
different dependency management tools. It works.

Also, as GitHub Action is widely used in the ASF projects, SkyWalking
eyes provide integration with GHA, as well as binary tar and docker
image[1] for other CI platforms.

We hope this project could help incubating projects, especially new
podlings, to analyze dependencies easier.

[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/skywalking-eyes

Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache EventMesh (incubating) 1.6.0-rc1

2022-08-23 Thread mikexue 
Hi Chao Zhang,

After you import the KEYS, did you trust the new key, perhaps you
missed this step or did you need to list your keys, to check if the
key import step was not successful.

Best regards
Mike Xue

Chao Zhang  于2022年8月23日周二 11:53写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> I just download the KEYS file and import it but I cannot verify the signature.
>
> ```
> gpg --import KEYS
> gpg --verify apache-eventmesh-1.6.0-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> apache-eventmesh-1.6.0-incubating-source.tar.gz
> ```
>
> It reports:
>
> ```
> gpg: Signature made Sun 14 Aug 2022 04:37:12 PM CST
> gpg:using RSA key EB0B0EE0AA11B1A437B5DB9E59632DD43B216CE5
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> ```
>
> Best regards
> Chao Zhang
>
> https://github.com/tokers
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:21 PM 李晓双  wrote:
> >
> > Hello Incubator Community,
> >
> >   This is a call for a vote to release Apache EventMesh(Incubating) version
> > 1.6.0 rc1
> >
> >   The Apache EventMesh community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> > release
> > Apache EventMesh(Incubating) version 1.6.0 rc1
> >
> > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> > incubator release.
> >
> > EventMesh community vote thread:
> > • https://lists.apache.org/thread/bs6hg19ttldx6ztop85osjwf0kdmtdx8
> >
> > Vote result thread:
> > • https://lists.apache.org/thread/hs36127ynjnf7vqcb9cl62qj9dcnfrr5
> >
> > The release candidate:
> > •https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/eventmesh/1.6.0-rc1/
> >
> >   Git tag for the release:
> >   • https://github.com/apache/incubator-eventmesh/tree/v1.6.0-rc1
> >   Release notes:
> >   •
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eventmesh/blob/v1.6.0-rc1/release-node.md
> >
> >   The artifacts signed with PGP key
> > EB0B0EE0AA11B1A437B5DB9E59632DD43B216CE5, corresponding to
> > lixiaoshu...@apache.org, that can be found in keys file:
> >   • https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/eventmesh/KEYS
> >
> >   The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> >   Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >   [ ] +1 approve
> >   [ ] +0 no opinion
> >   [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks,
> > On behalf of Apache EventMesh(Incubating) community
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache MXNet to a TLP

2022-08-23 Thread Xiaoqiao He 
+1. Good luck!

- He Xiaoqiao

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:00 AM Charles Zhang 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Good luck!
>
> Willem Jiang  于2022年8月23日周二 08:21写道：
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Willem Jiang
> >
> > Twitter: willemjiang
> > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:41 PM Joe Evans 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Apache Incubator community,
> > >
> > > The Apache MXNet (incubating) community has discussed[1] graduating to
> a
> > > top level project and passed a community vote[2][3]. We have also
> > > discussed[4] graduating in the Incubator community.
> > >
> > > In the incubator discussion, some branding issues[5] were brought up.
> We
> > > have fixed the issues[6] we were able to and discussed the others with
> > > trademarks@. This work is ongoing. In addition, a few website
> issues[7]
> > > were brought up which were subsequently resolved[8].
> > >
> > > Based on the positive feedback from the incubator discussion, we would
> > like
> > > to start a vote on graduating Apache MXNet (incubating) to a top level
> > > project.
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote as one of the following options:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Yes, I support Apache MXNet (incubating) graduating from the
> > Apache
> > > Incubator to a top level project.
> > >
> > > [ ] +0 No opinion.
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 No, the Apache MXNet (incubating) project is not ready to
> > graduate,
> > > because ...
> > >
> > > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Here is a brief overview of the progress of the Apache MXNet
> (incubating)
> > > project and community since entering the incubator:
> > >
> > > Community
> > >
> > >-
> > >
> > >38 new PPMC members were added, bringing the total number of PPMC
> > >members to 51
> > >-
> > >
> > >56 new committers were added (which include new PPMC members),
> > bringing
> > >the total number of committers to 87
> > >-
> > >
> > >The total number of contributors is now 870 and growing.
> > >
> > > Project
> > >
> > >-
> > >
> > >18 releases by 13 different release managers. All compliance issues
> > have
> > >been resolved with the 1.9.0 and 2.0.beta releases.
> > >-
> > >
> > >MXNet website is now compliant with Apache Project Website
> > requirements
> > >-
> > >
> > >MXNet has completed the project maturity self assessment[9]
> > >
> > >
> > > References:
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l9h2qgb2vqs2y0cm46wh83sgomr9w190
> > >
> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/py1nw6whov78sch5kkm1gcg7cv3zb2sv
> > >
> > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8bngc6qcb33n0jo6m1rw0ylwlqzkmgx
> > >
> > > [4] https://lists.apache.org/thread/3rxzjcmo2y457y6r8ohz1j4qv49joyo6
> > >
> > > [5] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6brq4jg1x3hnt0sr3phboh2vwoo33db1
> > >
> > > [6] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/21036
> > >
> > > [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/j29jcv0zdkvx7vyy701qnfhnj09fzv8o
> > >
> > > [8] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/21054
> > >
> > > [9]
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+MXNet
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is the proposed resolution:
> > >
> > > —--
> > >
> > > Establish the Apache MXNet Project
> > >
> > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
> > >
> > > the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
> establish
> > >
> > > a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> maintenance
> > >
> > > of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
> > >
> > > related to a flexible and efficient library for Deep Learning.
> > >
> > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
> > >
> > > (PMC), to be known as the "Apache MXNet Project", be and hereby is
> > >
> > > established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the Apache MXNet Project be and hereby is responsible
> for
> > >
> > > the creation and maintenance of software related to a flexible and
> > >
> > > efficient library for Deep Learning; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache MXNet" be and
> > >
> > > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> > >
> > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache MXNet
> > >
> > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
> > >
> > > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache MXNet
> Project;
> > >
> > > and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> > >
> > > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache MXNet Project:
> > >
> > > * Anirudh Subramanian 
> > >
> > > * Bing Xu 
> > >
> > > * Bob Paulin 
> > >
> > > * Carin Meier 
> > >
> > > * Chiyuan Zhang 
> > >
> > > * Chris Olivier 
> > >
> > > * Dick Carter