Re: [VOTE] Accept XTable into the ASF Incubator

2023-12-17 Thread Ismaël Mejía
+1 (binding)

Regards,
Ismaël



On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 6:03 AM Ayush Saxena  wrote:

> +1(Binding)
>
> -Ayush
>
> > On 17-Dec-2023, at 10:23 AM, Hitesh Shah  wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > — Hitesh
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 20:17 Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> jcama...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am
> starting
> >> this official vote for the XTable project.
> >>
> >> Here is the proposal -
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/XTable+Proposal
> >>
> >> Please cast your vote:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1, bring XTable into the Incubator
> >> [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> >> [ ] -1, do not bring XTable into the Incubator, because...
> >>
> >> This majority vote is open for at least 96 hours (due to the weekend).
> >>
> >> Only votes from Incubator PMC members are binding, but other votes are
> >> welcome!
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jesús
> >>
> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rx9z8ffrf37qjhpkf1vp5rqg5lhht7jm
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

2023-12-08 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Thanks for the info PJ, done !

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:29 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:

> Hi Ismaël,
> Could you make a request to join the Incubator PMC? ASF members will
> be accepted into the PMC. It's just that podling mentors need to be
> part of the PMC.
> Requests are made to the priv...@incubator.apache.org list.
>
> Regards,
> PJ
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 23:20, Ismaël Mejía  wrote:
> >
> > Hello Jesus,
> >
> > I am interested on both contributing to this project as a committer, and
> as
> > an ASF member I want to volunteer to mentor the project during
> incubation.
> > I am a committer and part of the PMC of both Apache Beam and Apache Avro
> so
> > I am close to this space so glad to help where I can.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ismaël
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:24 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> jcama...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator - OneTable.
> > >
> > > OneTable[1] is an omni-directional converter for table formats that
> > > facilitates interoperability across data processing systems and query
> > > engines. Currently, OneTable supports widely adopted open-source table
> > > formats such as Apache Hudi, Apache Iceberg, and Delta Lake.
> > >
> > > Here is the proposal -
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/OneTable+Proposal
> > >
> > > I would be the Champion of the project. I will mentor and help the
> project
> > > through the incubator with Hitesh Shah [hit...@apache.org], Stamatis
> > > Zampetakis [zabe...@apache.org], and Jean-Baptiste Onofré [
> > > jbono...@apache.org].
> > >
> > > We are looking forward to your feedback!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jesús
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/onetable-io/onetable
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

2023-12-07 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Hello Jesus,

I am interested on both contributing to this project as a committer, and as
an ASF member I want to volunteer to mentor the project during incubation.
I am a committer and part of the PMC of both Apache Beam and Apache Avro so
I am close to this space so glad to help where I can.

Regards,
Ismaël


On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:24 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator - OneTable.
>
> OneTable[1] is an omni-directional converter for table formats that
> facilitates interoperability across data processing systems and query
> engines. Currently, OneTable supports widely adopted open-source table
> formats such as Apache Hudi, Apache Iceberg, and Delta Lake.
>
> Here is the proposal -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/OneTable+Proposal
>
> I would be the Champion of the project. I will mentor and help the project
> through the incubator with Hitesh Shah [hit...@apache.org], Stamatis
> Zampetakis [zabe...@apache.org], and Jean-Baptiste Onofré [
> jbono...@apache.org].
>
> We are looking forward to your feedback!
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
> [1] https://github.com/onetable-io/onetable
>


Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Avro - Rust Library donation `avro-rs`

2021-06-03 Thread Ismaël Mejía
There were no -1 votes, therefore this IP clearance vote passes by lazy
consensus. Thank you!

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:41 AM Ismaël Mejía  wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Avro PMC has voted to accept the donation of "avro-rs", which
> is a Rust language implementation of Apache Avro [1].
>
> Please vote to accept this contribution.
>
> This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],
> open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ismaël Mejía
>
> Apache Avro PMC
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/avro-rust-library.html
> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Avro - Rust Library donation `avro-rs`

2021-05-28 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Hi Incubator PMC,

The Apache Avro PMC has voted to accept the donation of "avro-rs", which
is a Rust language implementation of Apache Avro [1].

Please vote to accept this contribution.

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],
open for at least 72 hours.

Thanks,

Ismaël Mejía

Apache Avro PMC

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/avro-rust-library.html
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/


Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Airflow to TLP

2018-12-07 Thread Ismaël Mejía
+1 (non-binding)

Great to see this project becoming a TLP !

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:35 PM Arthur Wiedmer  wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018, 15:38 Jakob Homan 
> > Hello-
> >
> > The Airflow podling community has VOTEd[0] to graduate, following a
> > very successful DISCUSS[1].  Accordingly I'm bringing the resolution
> > up for an IPMC VOTE.
> >
> > The podling result was:
> > Overall: 21 x +1 votes, 0 x -1 votes
> >
> > Binding +1 x 11: Kaxil, Tao, Bolke, Fokko, Maxime, Arthur, Hitesh,
> > Chris, Sid, Ash, Jakob.
> > Non-binding +1 x 10: Daniel, Shah, Stefan, Kevin, Marc, Sunil,
> > Adityan, Deng, Neelesh, Sai
> >
> > Since entering the Incubator in 2016, the Airflow community has:
> >* successfully produced 7 releases
> >* added 9 new committers/PPMC members
> >* built a diverse group of committers from multiple different employers
> >* had more than 3,300 JIRA tickets opened
> >* completed the project maturity model with positive responses[2]
> >
> > Here's my binding +1.  The VOTE will run for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jakob
> >
> > [0]
> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/airflow-dev/201812.mbox/%3c115b1380-619d-41d7-a30e-9c041cd4d...@gmail.com%3E
> > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/%3c0a763b0b-7d0d-4353-979a-ac6769eb0...@gmail.com%3E
> > [2]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Maturity+Evaluation
> >
> > 
> >
> > Establish the Apache Airflow Project
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
> > the public, related to workflow automation and scheduling
> > that can be used to author and manage data pipelines.
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Airflow Project",
> > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > Foundation; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Airflow Project be and hereby is
> > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > related to workflow automation and scheduling that can be
> > used to author and manage data pipelines; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Airflow" be
> > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > of the Apache Airflow Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > responsibility of the Apache Airflow Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > Apache Airflow Project:
> >
> > * Alex Guziel 
> > * Alex Van Boxel 
> > * Arthur Wiedmer 
> > * Ash Berlin-Taylor 
> > * Bolke de Bruin 
> > * Chris Riccomini 
> > * Dan Davydov 
> > * Fokko Driesprong 
> > * Hitesh Shah 
> > * Jakob Homan 
> > * Jeremiah Lowin 
> > * Joy Gao 
> > * Kaxil Naik 
> > * Maxime Beauchemin 
> > * Siddharth Anand 
> > * Sumit Maheshwari 
> > * Tao Feng 
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Bolke de Bruin
> > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Airflow, to
> > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Airflow PMC be and hereby is
> > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > Apache Airflow Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Airflow Project be and hereby
> > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > Incubator Airflow podling; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > Incubator Airflow podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > Project are hereafter discharged.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Auto-cleaning up Stale PRs

2018-09-19 Thread Ismaël Mejía
While I agree that autoclosing PRs can be unwelcoming. I don't see
clearly the argument of INFRA in the ticket.

> The policy of no-write-access for bots is a requirement by the foundation 
> legal team. We cannot allow write access to repos without an ICLA.

Labeling and closing the PR in github does not imply write-access from
the bot into the 'real' gitbox repository, so I don't see how this can
be an issue, or are we in a gray area (in case bot automation of
metadata can have legal issues which I doubt since this is not part of
the source distribution).

As a precedent we had Probot/Stale enabled for Apache Beam so I
suppose that this should be possible for Airflow too.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 5:55 PM Sid Anand  wrote:
>
> Apache Airflow has, at any point, >200 PRs open. During the slower summer
> months, we've been merging 100-200 PRs a month. We have been growing the
> community -- we have <600 contributors, ~200 companies using it, and 20+
> committers. A person is promoted to "Committer" in recognition for work
> he/she has done without an expectation of future work in maintaining the
> code base. Hence, minting new committers doesn't always translate into
> greater bench strength where merging PRs is concerned. That said, we are
> actively adding new committers. The last 4-5 committers we added have been
> super active maintainers, so the coverage on PRs and questions has been
> getting better.
>
> There are many causes of Cold-case PRs:
>
>1. Submitter is not actively responding
>   1. One example is that we requested tests and they were never written
>   2. Discussion ensued on the PR and the submitter did not accept the
>   community's feedback
>2. Committers didn't get to it in a timely manner and after a while the
>engagement fell
>
> We are in a better position now to handle (2) -- this was not the case a
> year ago. We're at least able to keep up with our in-flow of PRs
> week-to-week, but are still having challenges with the
> previously-established backlog. But, (1) is also a contributor to stale PRs.
>
> We do have a lot of stale PRs to manually handle -- I spent all of Summer
> 2017 pinging submitters of old PRs and I find myself in the same position
> now.
>
> Probot/stale is a useful tool. It has legitimate use-cases. A policy
> reflects the health/mentality/approaches of the community. A tool like this
> enforces the policy. Let's not overlook adoption of what would be a very
> useful tool to the community due to a meta conversation about policy. I
> think everyone on this list cares about growing a healthy and vibrant
> community. We also care about being efficient with our spare time.  This
> tools can help us manage both.
>
> Also, I am not suggesting that we close JIRA, just stale PRs. JIRAs need to
> be kept open so we don't lose visibility of bugs/features/etc... This tool
> doesn't handle JIRA closing anyway.
>
> -s
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:37 AM Mark Thomas  wrote:
>
> > On 12/09/18 19:16, Sid Anand wrote:
> > > A stale PR is defined by a policy -- for example, 60 days without any
> > > movement on the PR.
> >
> > Automatically closing such issues is not going to do anything to aid
> > community building and is likely to actively damage such efforts.
> >
> > > Stale PRs would be bad experiences in general for community members, but
> > > after no movement for 60 days, this is just about cleaning up PRs that
> > are
> > > not getting feedback from the committers or PR submitters.
> >
> > That is the wrong solution the problem.
> >
> > If reporters of issues are not responding to questions and there is
> > genuinely nothing the community can do to progress the issue without
> > their input then closing the issue is fair enough. But that should very
> > much be the exception rather than the rule. In projects I am involved in
> > I probably do that a handful of times a year. However, even in a good
> > chunk of those cases, the main reason for the lack of response from the
> > OP is that the community did not respond to the original report for an
> > excessively long time.
> >
> > If the committers are not responding to issues in a timely manner then
> > the solution is to start looking for more committers.
> >
> > Reporting an issue is often the first interaction someone new to the
> > community has with the project. It should be treated as an opportunity
> > to attract new members to the community and to grow the project.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > >
> > > -s
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Dave Fisher 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi -
> > >>
> > >> I was pointing out a potential community problem which is what we are
> > >> about here in the Incubator.
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:27 AM, Sid Anand  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> A stale PR has not activity for some length of time.
> > >> https://github.com/probot/stale
> > >>
> > >> The policy file example shown on that link it pretty easy to 

Re: [VOTE] Livy to enter Apache Incubator

2017-05-31 Thread Ismaël Mejía
ation =
>>
>> Documentation can be found on the Livy website http://livy.io/
>>
>> The Livy web site is version controlled on the ‘gh-pages’ branch of the
>> above repository.
>> Additional documentation is provided on the github wiki:
>> https://github.com/cloudera/livy/wiki
>> APis are documented within the source code as JavaDoc style documentation
>> comments.
>>
>> = Initial Source =
>>
>> The initial source code for Livy is hosted at
>> https://github.com/cloudera/livy
>>
>> = Source and Intellectual Property submission plan =
>>
>> The Livy codebase and web site is currently hosted on GitHub and will be
>> transitioned to the ASF repositories during incubation. Livy is already
>> licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. Cloudera has collected ICLAs and
>> CCLAs from all committers. There are, however, some contributions recently
>> from authors that have not signed the CCLA and ICLA. If necessary for a
>> successful SGA, we’ll seek the necessary documentation or replace the
>> contributions.
>>
>> The “Livy” name is not a registered trademark. We will need to do a
>> trademark search and make sure it is available for the Apache Foundation
>> prior to graduation.
>>
>> Cloudera currently owns the domain name: http://livy.io/. Once all the
>> documentation has moved over to ASF infrastructure, the main landing page
>> will become livy.incubator.apache.org and the old domain will just act as
>> a
>> redirect.
>>
>> = External Dependencies =
>>
>> The list below covers the non-Apache dependencies of the project and their
>> licenses.
>>
>>  * Jetty: Apache 2.0
>>  * Dropwizard Metrics: Apache 2.0
>>  * FasterXML Jackson: Apache 2.0
>>  * Netty: Apache 2.0
>>  * Scala: BSD
>>  * Py4J: BSD
>>  * Scalatra: BSD
>>
>> Build/test-only dependencies:
>>
>>  * Mockito: MIT
>>  * JUnit: Eclipse
>>
>> = Required Resources =
>>
>> == Mailing Lists ==
>>
>>  * priv...@livy.incubator.apache.org (PPMC)
>>  * d...@livy.incubator.apache.org (dev mailing list)
>>  * u...@livy.incubator.apache.org (User questions)
>>  * comm...@livy.incubator.apache.org (subscribers shouldn’t be able to
>> post)
>>  * iss...@livy.incubator.apache.org (subscribers shouldn’t be able to
>> post)
>>
>> == Git Repository ==
>>
>> git://git.apache.org/incubator-livy
>>
>> == Issue Tracking ==
>>
>> We would like to import our current JIRA project into the ASF JIRA, such
>> that our historical commit message and code comments continue to reference
>> the appropriate bug numbers.
>>
>> = Initial Committers =
>>
>>  * Marcelo Vanzin (van...@cloudera.com)
>>  * Alex Man (alex@alexman.space)
>>  * Jeff Zhang (zjf...@gmail.com)
>>  * Saisai Shao (ss...@hortonworks.com)
>>  * Kostas Sakellis (kos...@cloudera.com)
>>
>> = Affiliations =
>>
>> The initial set of committers includes people employed by Cloudera and
>> Hortonworks as well as one currently independent contributor.
>>
>> = Additional Interested Contributors =
>>
>> Those interested in getting involved with the project as we enter
>> incubation
>> are encouraged to list themselves here.
>>
>>   * Ismaël Mejía (ieme...@apache.org)
>>
>> = Sponsors =
>>
>> == Champion ==
>>
>> Sean Busbey (bus...@apache.org)
>>
>> == Nominated Mentors ==
>>
>>  * Bikas Saha (bi...@apache.org)
>>  * Brock Noland (br...@phdata.io)
>>  * Luciano Resende (lrese...@apache.org)
>>
>> == Sponsoring Entity ==
>>
>> We ask that the Incubator PMC sponsor this proposal.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org