AW: Podling board reports are due November 12
Hi, I removed Empire-db from the March, June, September, December schedule so it's only in the Oct/Jan/Apr/Jul group (last report was in October, so that should be ok) Greetings Jörg -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2008 08:43 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: Podling board reports are due November 12 On 11/10/08, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: Martijn Dashorst Is it possible that empire-db is listed wrong for reporting this month? Looks like it. I moved it to the Oct/Jan/Apr/Jul group. However Empire-db was/is already on the group-3 March, June, September, December. Now duplicated. I think the problem is that PPMCs are not removing their projects from the Monthly schedule after the end of the first three months. They need to also ensure that they have chosen a Group. The Clutch report shows that not all have. I wonder whether algorthmic assignment might be better eg first letter Robert -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE RESULTS] (was AW: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release, 2nd round)
Hello, The final tally of the vote is: +1 votes: 5 (3 binding, 2 non-binding) Jörg Reiher (non-binding) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rainer Döbele (non-binding) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ant elder (binding) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Martijn Dashorst (binding) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Fischer (binding) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 votes: 0 -1 votes: 0 This exceeds the minimum three +1 votes required and the proposal passes. I shall now make the release and prepare a release announcement. Thanks, Joerg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release, 2nd round
Hello, the community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to make the release. Release proposal apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote result apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Release proposal apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote result apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200810.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] My vote is +1 (non binding) Joerg Jörg Reiher Softwareentwickler Tel. +49 7531 / 45716-14 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESTEAM Software GmbH Blarerstraße 56 D-78462 Konstanz Geschäftsführer: David Matthew Bond, Rainer Döbele Sitz: Konstanz, Amtsgericht Freiburg HRB 381845 Internet: www.esteam.de http://www.esteam.de/
AW: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release
Hello, I've got the following questions regarding the KEYS file and the md5+sha hashes for a release: There is actually a KEYS file located at http://people.apache.org/~reiher/Empire-db-incubating/KEYS Is there something wrong with it or do we have to put it in any other place? I used gpg to generate the MD5 and SHA hashes. The output of gpg differs from what would be produced by md5sum, because gpg formats the values with blanks between each HEX-String, md5sum doesn't. Is this a problem? If so, the Apache guideline should take this into account (http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#md5) So far, thanks for your help Greetings joerg -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Thomas Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Samstag, 6. September 2008 15:35 An: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache- empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release I checked the Release candidate against the incubator release check list [1] and found the following: - All Files unpack correctly. - The code builds from source. - the status page is not up to date. - All files have a valid md5 sum, sha hash and are signed properly. However, the format of the md5 and sha sum files is not linux standard, making automatic checks more difficult. I am not sure whether that causes mirroring problems. - There is not yet a KEYS file. - The NOTICE and various LICENSE files are ok, except the following: -- The asf part is not the first part of the /NOTICE file in the db and the struts2 extension. See [2] -- freemarker is not in the /NOTICE file of the struts2 extension. However, the freemarker License requires it. The appropriate passage from the Freemarker license needs to be copied into the NOTICE file. -- The HSQLDB library is not mentioned in the /NOTICE file of the db part. Ihe HSQL License does not require it, but I'd add it anyway. - The Servlet API and JSP API are contained in the struts 2 extension distribution. The Source code is not included; neither there is a prominent notice to where it can be obtained. This is against the CDDL License [3] and apache licensing policy [4]. - The README Files are ok except the following: -- The README File of the struts2 extension is misleading. It is said there that This Extension works with the Sysdeo-DevLoader. I'd hope it works in a standalone servlet container as well ? -- The README should contain information how the code can be built from source. In the db part it should say where the build.xml is located; in the struts2 extension this part misses. - The documentation of the struts2 extension is a bit sparse. It contains javadocs and a small Readme. Perhaps the documentation from the web site can be included ? - There is a file apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating.tar.gzmd5, which content does not fit its name. Probably it is there by error. - The example applications contain all the libraries in the /lib directory again. For bandwith reasons, it would be better to supply an ant script which compiles and packages the examples by using the /lib files. - The RAT reports look good. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html [3] http://www.sun.com/cddl/cddl.html [4] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Regarding the license issues, I regret that I am forced to vote -1 on this Release Candidate. I am sorry that I could not check the RC while the vote was on the dev list, but I had a lot of work to do this week. Regards, Thomas P.S. Who is responsible for updating the status page ? Should that be done by the mentor, or can I as IPMC member also do that ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release
Hello, The community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to make the release. Release proposal: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200808.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote result: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-empire-db-dev/200809.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Jörg Jörg Reiher Softwareentwickler Tel. +49 7531 / 45716-14 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESTEAM Software GmbH Blarerstraße 56 D-78462 Konstanz Geschäftsführer: David Matthew Bond, Rainer Döbele Sitz: Konstanz, Amtsgericht Freiburg HRB 381845 Internet: www.esteam.de http://www.esteam.de/
