Re: This list is for how not why?
Can you tell me what podling is? http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Podling HTH -- Kevin
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal: Splitting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HREUNITING the Community?
Florian, Yes, I see the licensing topic and that there are different views on that. However, I don't know if that requires to set-up all community efforts a second time. Simon posted one possible creative solution. Setting up a parallel project IMHO is wrong. -Can you help me to understand this Simon posted one possible creative solution? It seems the discussion is making progress. I like to think this is appropriate to be seen in Initial source files (was: OpenOffice: were are we now?) thread than here. -- Kevin
Re: Recuse as mentor?
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.orgwrote: Its seems that you have a high level of mistrust for certain persons and are not prepared to reach out magnanimously to all parties in an attempt to bring them together. I see this as creating ongoing problems. As a student and only follow the mailing list about this OO.o project few days ago and knowing some of the key people here, I do not share the same opinion about Jim. In fact, I feel Jim is one of the few people can bring different parties together. Senses of honest, open and forgiving community bring a youngster like me to be more involved in this movement. I have faith that he can do this. If men were angels, no government would be necessary James Madison.
Re: OpenOffice and the ASF
First time posting to this list and has been reading it for few days now. Permit my naive question, can both organizations (TDF and Apache) separate from their own licensing dependencies and establish an independent entity (or something that works) to develop some code that can benefit both parties? -- Kevin ___ This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is prohibited. ___
Re: [VOTE] Accept Rave into the Incubator
+1 On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote: +1 Craig On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Ate Douma wrote: Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal and also copied as text below. Please vote. [ ] +1 Accept Rave into the incubator [ ] +0 Don't care' [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: I'll close the vote at Tuesday morning 1st March CET to accommodate for the coming weekend. That's a little over 5 days from now. Regards, Ate Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation Chair, OpenJPA PMC c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Kevin ___ This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is prohibited. ___
Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
Would it be a good idea to translate this page to other languages? Or something is more urgent for translation than this? I can try to help. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com Hi everyone, I'm pleased to report that the vote to accept Wave into the ASF incubator was overwhelmingly positive. By my tally, there have been 88 votes over the past 3+ days, including 18 IPMC binding votes, 8 votes by members of the ASF, and no -1 votes. Of those 88 votes, due to a slight process confusion (and an issue of reply-to settings), 22 votes were only registered on the existing wave-protocol Google Group. The 18 binding votes: Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, Mark Struberg, Michael McCandless, Ralph Goers, Tim Williams, and Upayavira The 8 non-IMPC members who are ASF members: Ate Douma, Brett Porter, Leif Hedstrom, Marcel Offermans, Niklas Gustavsson, Richard Hall, Santiago Gala, and Vincent Siveton The 68 non-binding votes: a2c, Adirondack, Alain Levesque, Albonobo, Alex North, Andreas Kuckartz, Andrian Kurniady, Anthony Watkins, Bart Thate, benediktus dwi hari prasetyo, Bertine van Hövell, Charles Goddard, Chris Harvey, Christopher Brind, Dan Peterson, Dave Woollard, David Wang, David Westbrook, Davide Carnovale, Edward J. Yoon, Eelco Hillenius, florent andré, Florian Rohrweck, Francis De Brabandere, Gamer-Z, Help Earth Foundation,Honza Rameš, Ian Boston, Ian Roughley,Isabel Drost, Jack Park, James R. Purser, Jeff Forsyth, Jeremy ngl, John Edstrom, JR Smith, Kevin Lau, Lahiru Gunathilake, Manfred Herrmann, Mark Kovacevich, Matias Molinas, Matt Richards, Matthew Cua1, Michael MacFadden, MiCHiLU/Takanao Endoh, Mohammad Nour, Nathanael Abbotts, Noriyo, Paul Lindner, Petru, Riu6, Sander W G van der Waal, Scott Wilson, shigech...@gmail.com, Sophia Parafina, Soren Lassen, STenyaK, Tad Glines, ThomasWrobel, Tish Shute, Vitality, and Yasushi Ando The primary voting thread (there were a few side threads that sprawled that aren't linked here): http://apache.markmail.org/message/v2c4cnewpczdxzny [ The following Google Group archives the other 22 unofficial, non-binding votes: http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/4fc26d16cde74380 ] The proposal that was approved: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal Looking forward to growing Wave in the Apache way, -Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Wave Protocol group. To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wave-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comwave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. -- Kevin ___ This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is prohibited. ___
