Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Woden into the WS PMC
This is great news! Congratulations to everyone involved in Woden! Paul - Thanks for running the WS and Incubator votes. Lawrence Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/08/2007 03:20 AM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Woden into the WS PMC The vote has been running for 72 hours and therefore I call this vote: 8 +1s, no 0s, no -1s. +1s from: Paul Fremantle Yoav Shapira Kevan Miller Matthieu Riou Niclas Hedman Ant Elder Bill Stoddard Matt Hogstrom I'd like to offer Woden my congratulations on their successful graduation! Paul On Dec 8, 2007 5:06 AM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 4, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: I still vote +1 as I am convinced that the WS PMC will be able to deal with that if it becomes a problem. My +1 ... same comments. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oxygenating the Web Service Platform, www.wso2.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[results] Woden Graduation from Incubation Committer Vote
I'd like to inform the general Apache Incubator community that Woden has started the graduation process. Woden recently held a committer vote to determine whether the project was ready for graduation. The results (detailed in the e-mail below) were a resounding 8 +1 votes and no -1 votes. As Woden is set to graduate into the Web Services project as a subproject the next step is for the WS PMC to decide whether they will accept Woden as a subproject. I've requested a vote on the WS PMC list. I will share the results of the WS PMC vote once they're in and hope to be in a position to call for a graduation vote on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list shortly. Thanks, Lawrence - Forwarded by Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM on 11/26/2007 09:20 PM - Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/26/2007 08:32 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject [results] Woden Graduation from Incubation Committer Vote The results from the Woden Graduation from Incubation committer vote are in. Woden received eight +1 votes and no -1 votes from the following people: Paul Fremantle (mentor) Chathura Herath Jeremy Hughes John Kaputin Lawrence Mandel Arthur Ryman Davanum 'Dims' Srinivas (mentor) Sanjiva Weerawarana (mentor) Next I'll ask the WS PMC to vote and inform the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list of our progress. Lawrence - Forwarded by Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM on 11/26/2007 08:27 PM - Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2007 07:04 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject [vote] Woden Graduation from Incubation Woden team, as discussed on today's status call, the time has come to propose graduation from the Apache Incubator [1] to the Apache Web Services project [2]. All of the graduation prerequisite items have been completed (see the Woden status file [3]) and Woden has been functioning as an Apache project following the Apache way for some time. Here's how the graduation process will proceed according to the Apache Incubator guidelines for graduating to a subproject [4]: 1. A vote is held for the Woden committers to decide whether we think the project is ready for graduation. This vote will be held on woden-dev at ws.apache.org. 2. A vote is held with the Apache Web Services PMC to decide whether they will accept Woden as a Web Services subproject. this vote will be held on pmc at ws.apache.org. 3. A vote is held for the Incubator PMC to decide whether the Incubator project will sign off on the graduation proposal. This vote will be held on general at incubator.apache.org. This e-mail is a call for step 1, the Woden committers vote. Unlike a release vote, this vote does not have to do with a code deliverable but rather is concerned with the way in which Woden is managed, run, and developed. The Woden status file [3] contains many questions that we've all worked to address since entering the incubator. At it simplest, the question is - does Woden exemplify the Apache Way [5]? Woden committers - Please cast your vote on woden-dev by Friday, November 23, 2007. (*Note that while binding votes are restricted to Woden committers anyone is welcome to voice their opinion.) Here's my +1 and my congratulations to everyone for working to get Woden into shape for graduation. Lawrence [1]http://incubator.apache.org [2]http://ws.apache.org [3]http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html [4]http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject [5]http://incubator.apache.org/learn/theapacheway.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] Community diversity: current concerns and suggestions for improvement
I'd like to echo Eelco's comments in their entirety replacing Wicket with Woden. And, I'd like to add that I think 3 would significantly limit the number of new projects entering the incubator. Lawrence Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/2007 08:43 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Community diversity: current concerns and suggestions for improvement 3) Limit the number of new non-ASF initial committers for incubating projects People who were not ASF committers but come in via a newly incubating project do not get their commit rights via the normal ASF meritocracy rules. We might want to limit the number of such commiters, to limit the number of people who get in via this shortcut. The downside of such a limitation, as someone mentioned in discussions, is that getting new committers in this way is also an opportunity to convert more people to the ASF way. If I think about Wicket, this limitation would have been a problem, since at the time Wicket started incubation, only one of the team members (of the 10+) was already involved an ASF committer. I'm not sure what benefits such a rule would have. True, you don't have much insight in how people of incubating projects got into the project before incubation, but on the other hand, it shouldn't really matter as the incubation is meant for coaching the project members into the ASF way, or at least validating that they can behave in the ASF way for the ASF projects concerned. I believe this should be viewed entirely independent of what they do or have done in outside projects. In other words, I believe ASF should only be concerned about how ASF projects are affected. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
Hi Noel, Has the November board report deadline changed? The top of the November 2007 board report page [1] states that the reports are due to the Incubator PMC by 14 November 2007 . [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2007 Lawrence Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/11/2007 03:45 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE! ... from: Abdera Lokahi NMaven ServiceMix Woden WSRP4J XAP Yoko They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
Thanks Luciano. I must have missed the e-mail. At any rate, the Woden section of the report has been completed. Lawrence Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/11/2007 08:25 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE! Yes, Noel sent an e-mail [1] about a week ago... [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg15800.html On Nov 11, 2007 5:16 PM, Lawrence Mandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Noel, Has the November board report deadline changed? The top of the November 2007 board report page [1] states that the reports are due to the Incubator PMC by 14 November 2007 . [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2007 Lawrence Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/11/2007 03:45 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE! ... from: Abdera Lokahi NMaven ServiceMix Woden WSRP4J XAP Yoko They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig
Is there any particular reason you want this podling to be sponsored by the Incubator PMC (which is generally done for projects that intend to turn into their own top level project) Is this true? I thought all new projects had to go through the incubator. Woden [1] is an incubator project that plans to graduate and join the WS PMC. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/ Lawrence Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/18/2007 04:02 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig On 9/18/07, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The proposal is also available on wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal. We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to the proposal. Is there any particular reason you want this podling to be sponsored by the Incubator PMC (which is generally done for projects that intend to turn into their own top level project) rather than having it sponsored by the Lucene PMC (where Hadoop currently resides)? It seems to me that the close relationship between Pig and Hadoop implies that they very well might best be served under the same roof. -garrett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP-Clearance for MyFaces / Portlet Bridge RI
Manfred, You need to build the site (run build.xml in the Site project) and then run svn update on people.apache.org to pull the changes from SVN into the public site. Lawrence Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/07/2007 08:56 AM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc MyFaces Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject IP-Clearance for MyFaces / Portlet Bridge RI I committed a new ip-clearance document a few days ago: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/jsr-301-ri.xml Well, it does not show up yet on the http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ page. Is the incubator site automatically rebuilt periodically? If not, can someone please do this manually? Thanks. --Manfred - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Board Reports - Missing and Reviews
Whoops! With vacations and kids being born we missed the Aug report. I've now updated the Woden section of the report. If we're not in time we'll report again in Sept. John - This isn't the first time we've missed the report deadline. I think we need someone in charge of these reports. Seeing as you volunteered to handle the WS board reports can you handle the Incubator board reports as well? Thanks, Lawrence Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/25/2007 06:26 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Board Reports - Missing and Reviews Due to the Board's schedule, there's been some extra time this month, but time's up. The Report (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2007) needs to be completed, and PMC Members should review. Missing: lokahi, stdcxx, woden, wsrp4j. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Missing reports
Woden last reported in May and will report again in August. I've removed the Woden entry from the June report. Lawrence Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/15/2007 10:21 AM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: Missing reports Hi, On 6/15/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The June report still needs input from the following podlings: Take that with a grain of salt, the report page seems to (again) be out of sync with the reporting schedule. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Woden Board Report
I was about to post the Woden report but John beat me to it. The report is now up. Lawrence Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/14/2007 07:34 AM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Woden Board Report Where is the Incubator Report for WODEN? http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2007 --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fw: [VOTE] Declare Woden 1.0.0 M5
Hi Bill, We newbies at Woden have been getting some conflicting messages about the release process for projects in incubation. Back in our M2 timeframe (Dec. 2005) Dims asked us to cross post to the incubator and ws pmc lists [1]. We'd like to follow the proper etiquette but at times we haven't been clear about what that is. I see that the incubation policy document has been updated with specific instructions for incubating projects that wish to create a release [2]. These instructions follow your request that the vote only be posted to the general list. We'll follow this defined process for future milestones. Thanks to all those that updated the documentation for the incubator release policy. [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200512.mbox/ajax/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Thanks, Lawrence Mandel William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/21/2006 01:21 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org cc Subject Re: Fw: [VOTE] Declare Woden 1.0.0 M5 There have been no +0 or -1 votes. I'd like to ask the Incubator PMC again to review this request and vote on it. Etiquite point, not specifically at John himself; Don't crosspost to closed lists! Votes are held on the open lists, that is, your project's dev list, and the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Trust that all PMC members are subscribed to the dev/general public list :) Only matters of people (e.g. considering committership and pmc membership) and confidences should be forwarded to the private lists, all other dialogs, especially releases and development discussion and decisions must be in public. Congrats on hitting this milestone by the way! Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error when committing updated status document
I just updated the Woden status document on the incubator website. The file built fine and looks good on my machine. I committed the XML file (woden.xml) without issue. When I try to commit the HTML file (woden.html) I consistently get the error: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: Inconsistent line ending style svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: File '...\woden.html' has inconsistent newlines Has anyone seen this when updating the incubator site? Any suggestions to resolve this issue? Thanks, Lawrence Mandel
Woden milestone 4 declared!
Mar. 13, 2006 - Woden milestone 4 declared! Congratulations to the Woden team! Woden milestone 4 integrates extension SOAP components into the WSDL component model, includes validation of Service components and introduces a user guide to the Woden site. Download the milestone and view the release notes at http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M4-incubating/. More information can be found on the Woden website - http://incubator.apache.org/woden Lawrence Mandel
Re: Error when committing updated status document
Thanks! Solved by opening the file in wordpad, which converts all the eol characters to the same type. Lawrence Mandel Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/13/2006 06:46 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: Error when committing updated status document On 3/13/06, Lawrence Mandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just updated the Woden status document on the incubator website. The file built fine and looks good on my machine. I committed the XML file (woden.xml) without issue. When I try to commit the HTML file (woden.html) I consistently get the error: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: Inconsistent line ending style svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: File '...\woden.html' has inconsistent newlines Has anyone seen this when updating the incubator site? Any suggestions to resolve this issue? That indicates that the file has an svn:eol-style set, but when you edited it you inserted line endings that conflict with what's in the rest of the file. If the file has \r\n line endings your changes need the same thing, if the file has \n line endings, ditto. -garrett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [vote] Declare Woden 1.0.0 M4
Noel, You're correct. The status file is out of date. I will update it with the news of M4 after the release. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The W3C schema is not included in these packages. Lawrence Mandel Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/2006 02:06 PM Please respond to general@incubator.apache.org To general@incubator.apache.org cc woden-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject RE: [vote] Declare Woden 1.0.0 M4 The packages look fine. Is http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html up to date? This reflects M4, but the STATUS file (the aforementioned document) only goes as far as M2. M3 was declared in January, implying that the STATUS file has fallen behind. Please update your STATUS file. Also, please confirm whether or not the W3C schema are in these packages. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vote] Declare Woden 1.0.0 M4
Following the release process for projects in incubation, I'd like to request approval for Woden to declare milestone 4. A vote was held on the woden-dev list [1] where M4 received 5 +1 votes and no negative votes. The votes collected are as follows: John Kaputin +1 Lawrence Mandel +1 Dims +1 Jeremy Hughes +1 Arthur Ryman +1 As required of releases from projects in incubation, the distributable archives contain incubating in their names. The M4 archives can be found at http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M4-incubating/. My original post summarizing Woden 1.0.0 M4 can be found at [2]. Please vote by 5pm EST, Monday, Mar. 13, 2006. Thanks, Lawrence Mandel [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/ [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200603.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woden milestone 3 declared!
Jan. 26, 2006 - Woden milestone 3 declared! Congratulations to the Woden team! Woden milestone 3 includes parsing logic for WSDL 2.0 service, import, and include elements into both element and component models and validation of binding elements and components. Download the milestone and view the release notes at http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M3-incubating/. More information can be found on the Woden website - http://incubator.apache.org/woden Lawrence Mandel
[vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD Jan. 24
*note: I'm resending this message as I don't believe it showed up on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lawrence Mandel Following the release process for projects in incubation, I'd like to request approval for Woden to declare milestone 3. A vote was held on the woden-dev list where M3 received 5 +1 votes and no negative votes. The votes collected are as follows: John Kaputin +1 Lawrence Mandel +1 Dims +1 Jeremy Hughes +1 Arthur Ryman +1 As required of releases from projects in incubation, the distributable archives contain incubating in their names. The M3 archives can be found at http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M3-incubating/. My original post summarizing Woden 1.0.0 M3 is below. Please vote by 5pm EST, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2006. Thanks, Lawrence Mandel - Forwarded by Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM on 01/22/2006 03:22 PM - Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/18/2006 04:55 PM Please respond to woden-dev To woden-dev@ws.apache.org cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate - please vote by EOD Thursday, Jan. 19 Woden committers, I'd like to request your vote on the status of M3. I've placed a Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate build at http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M3-incubating/ The Woden M3 candidate includes the major work items from the M3 plan. Specifically, the following items are complete in the M3 Candidate: Parsing of WSDL 2.0 import and include (DOM) WSDL 2.0 Service parsing (DOM) Implement validation logic for Binding Unit tests for validation logic for Binding Integrate W3C WSDL 2.0 Binding tests into Woden test suite The following items are incomplete in the M2 plan: Unit tests for import and include parsing (DOM) WSDL 2.0 HTTP Binding extension (DOM) Unit tests for HTTP Binding extension (DOM) Unit tests for Service parsing (DOM) Investigate WSDL 2.0 parsing with StAX Update technical documentation about Woden design and implementation on Wiki Create initial user documentation In an effort to make Woden more immediately usable, we deferred HTTP Binding extension work to M4 in favour of adding support for WSDL import and include elements. StAX will continue to be an investigation item until the DOM implementation is close to complete or we get more development help. John and I are working on user documentation and should have it ready for the Woden site around the proposed M3 release on Friday. Automated tests for the parser continue to require attention but, as John has conducted manual testing and the W3C test suite has been integrated into the Woden automated test suite, we are in good shape for M3. Both John and I think Woden is in good shape to declare M3 as solid progress has been made on the parser and the validator. At this point we'd like to ask the Woden committers to vote on the status of M3. John and I both vote +1 (so +2). Please vote ASAP. We will collect votes until EOD (5pm EST) Thursday, Jan. 19. If there are no negative votes I will then request WS and Incubator PMC approval to release M3 by EOD Friday, Jan. 20. Once the PMCs approve, M3 will be declared and a link will be placed on the Woden site. (Feel free to reply to this note with any concerns over this process.) Thanks, Lawrence Mandel
Re: [vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD Jan. 24
Sanjiva, Sorry about violating Apache netiquette. This was not intentional. I had previously been asked to send this vote to the incubator and ws pmc lists and was advised to send it to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well. To be honest, I'm feeling pretty lost wrt the correct process to release a milestone driver from an incubator project and would appreciate guidance from the community. The information I have is to: 1. Hold a vote amongst the project's committers on the project's mailing list. 2. Request approval from the incubator and, in Woden's case, WS pmcs by sending an e-mail requesting a vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assuming no negative votes, the milestone can be released. I think it would be useful to formally declare this process on the incubator site so all incubator projects have a defined process to follow. BTW, as you said that my mail did make it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED], have you seen any replies? I have yet to see one. Thanks, Lawrence Mandel Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/24/2006 06:40 PM Please respond to woden-dev To general@incubator.apache.org cc woden-dev@ws.apache.org woden-dev@ws.apache.org Subject Re: [vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD Jan. 24 On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:54 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote: *note: I'm resending this message as I don't believe it showed up on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lawrence please don't send to general@ and a private list (the PMC lists). That's against Apache email netiquette .. Unless I am mistaken your mail did make it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sanjiva. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
