Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache MXNet to a TLP

2022-08-17 Thread Michael Wall 
+1

Good job sticking to it and congrats.

Mike

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 4:51 PM Wei Chu  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> It's great to see the growth of MXNet. Thanks to Joe for driving the 
> graduation!
>
> Wei
>
> On 2022/08/17 14:40:54 Joe Evans wrote:
> > Hi Apache Incubator community,
> >
> > The Apache MXNet (incubating) community has discussed[1] graduating to a
> > top level project and passed a community vote[2][3]. We have also
> > discussed[4] graduating in the Incubator community.
> >
> > In the incubator discussion, some branding issues[5] were brought up. We
> > have fixed the issues[6] we were able to and discussed the others with
> > trademarks@. This work is ongoing. In addition, a few website issues[7]
> > were brought up which were subsequently resolved[8].
> >
> > Based on the positive feedback from the incubator discussion, we would like
> > to start a vote on graduating Apache MXNet (incubating) to a top level
> > project.
> >
> > Please cast your vote as one of the following options:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Yes, I support Apache MXNet (incubating) graduating from the Apache
> > Incubator to a top level project.
> >
> > [ ] +0 No opinion.
> >
> > [ ] -1 No, the Apache MXNet (incubating) project is not ready to graduate,
> > because ...
> >
> > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Here is a brief overview of the progress of the Apache MXNet (incubating)
> > project and community since entering the incubator:
> >
> > Community
> >
> >-
> >
> >38 new PPMC members were added, bringing the total number of PPMC
> >members to 51
> >-
> >
> >56 new committers were added (which include new PPMC members), bringing
> >the total number of committers to 87
> >-
> >
> >The total number of contributors is now 870 and growing.
> >
> > Project
> >
> >-
> >
> >18 releases by 13 different release managers. All compliance issues have
> >been resolved with the 1.9.0 and 2.0.beta releases.
> >-
> >
> >MXNet website is now compliant with Apache Project Website requirements
> >-
> >
> >MXNet has completed the project maturity self assessment[9]
> >
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l9h2qgb2vqs2y0cm46wh83sgomr9w190
> >
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/py1nw6whov78sch5kkm1gcg7cv3zb2sv
> >
> > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8bngc6qcb33n0jo6m1rw0ylwlqzkmgx
> >
> > [4] https://lists.apache.org/thread/3rxzjcmo2y457y6r8ohz1j4qv49joyo6
> >
> > [5] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6brq4jg1x3hnt0sr3phboh2vwoo33db1
> >
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/21036
> >
> > [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/j29jcv0zdkvx7vyy701qnfhnj09fzv8o
> >
> > [8] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/21054
> >
> > [9]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+MXNet
> >
> >
> > Here is the proposed resolution:
> >
> > —--
> >
> > Establish the Apache MXNet Project
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
> >
> > the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
> >
> > a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
> >
> > of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
> >
> > related to a flexible and efficient library for Deep Learning.
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
> >
> > (PMC), to be known as the "Apache MXNet Project", be and hereby is
> >
> > established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache MXNet Project be and hereby is responsible for
> >
> > the creation and maintenance of software related to a flexible and
> >
> > efficient library for Deep Learning; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache MXNet" be and
> >
> > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> >
> > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache MXNet
> >
> > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
> >
> > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache MXNet Project;
> >
> > and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> >
> > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache MXNet Project:
> >
> > * Anirudh Subramanian 
> >
> > * Bing Xu 
> >
> > * Bob Paulin 
> >
> > * Carin Meier 
> >
> > * Chiyuan Zhang 
> >
> > * Chris Olivier 
> >
> > * Dick Carter 
> >
> > * Eric Xie 
> >
> > * Furkan Kamaci 
> >
> > * Haibin Lin 
> >
> > * Henri Yandell 
> >
> > * Hongliang Liu 
> >
> > * Indhu Bharathi 
> >
> > * Jackie Wu 
> >
> > * Jason Dai 
> >
> > * Jian Zhang 
> >
> > * Joe Evans 
> >
> > * Joe Spisak 
> >
> > * Jun Wu 
> >
> > * Leonard Lausen 
> >
> > * Liang Depeng 
> >
> > * Ly Nguyen 
> >
> > * Madan Jampani 
> >
> > * Marco de Abreu 
> >
> > * Markus

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.2.0 release

2020-10-18 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 (binding)

Checked
Incubating in name
signature and checksums
code compiles and test run
no unexpected binaries
DISCLAIMER
LICENCES and NOTICE look good

Good work, sorry the delay in voting

Mike

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 12:50 AM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>
> Folks, we are down one vote to finish this release. Would a PMC member please 
> check the release and vote?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Antoine
>
> > On Oct 12, 2020, at 6:22 AM, Vinayakumar B  wrote:
> >
> > Carrying my +1 from podling's vote to here.
> >
> > -Vinay
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:46 AM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, anyone with time to vote on this release?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Antoine
> >>
> >>> On Oct 9, 2020, at 5:09 AM, Michael Wall  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Antoine,
> >>>
> >>> I'll take a look this weekend.
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:12 AM Antoine Toulme 
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Any chance we may get more votes from the incubator? Please advise.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Antoine
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sep 30, 2020, at 23:58, Furkan KAMACI 
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I checked:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Incubating in name
> >>>>> - DISCLAIMER exists
> >>>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> >>>>> - No unexpected binary files
> >>>>> - Checked PGP signatures
> >>>>> - Checked checksums
> >>>>> - Code compiles
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind Regards,
> >>>>> Furkan KAMACI
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:34 AM Antoine Toulme 
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> >>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tuweni/1.2.0-incubating/
> >>>>>> <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tuweni/1.2.0-incubating/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release tag is present here:
> >>>>>>
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/releases/tag/v1.2.0-incubating
> >>>>>> <
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/releases/tag/v1.2.0-incubating
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This release includes the following changes:
> >>>>>> New:
> >>>>>> * Ethash hashing support
> >>>>>> * EVMC support
> >>>>>> * Simplify distribution down to one binary and source artifacts
> >>>>>> * Added doc build
> >>>>>> Changes:
> >>>>>> * Refactor discv5, testing it with an eth2 client
> >>>>>> * Simplified and streamlined LES to match ETH devp2p subprotocols
> >>>>>> Bug fixes:
> >>>>>> * Fixes #141 - Generated Maven pom.xml have incorrect information
> >>>>>> * Fix SecureScuttlebutt setup.
> >>>>>> Misc:
> >>>>>> * Added codecov and tests adding coverage
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here is the release thread on the d...@tuweni.apache.org  >>>>>> d...@tuweni.apache.org> list:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re9128953304e3bdc3a80012e623b63e0d122b5aa261410f24c7041bf%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re9128953304e3bdc3a80012e623b63e0d122b5aa261410f24c7041bf@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release vote has passed with the following votes (
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r47854c9fe57147b12f9158504c9310650a9abfae0c8daf35347d1f03%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r47854c9fe57147b12f9158504c9310650a9abfae0c8daf35347d1f03@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>>> )
> >>>>>> 3 +1:
> >>>>>> Antoine Toulme
> >>>>>> Furkan Kamaci
> >>>>>> Vinayakumar B
> >>>>>> 0 +0
> >>>>>> 0 -1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release vote is open at least until 10/3 12pm PST time.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Antoine
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.2.0 release

2020-10-09 Thread Michael Wall 
Antoine,

I'll take a look this weekend.

Mike

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:12 AM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>
> Any chance we may get more votes from the incubator? Please advise.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> > On Sep 30, 2020, at 23:58, Furkan KAMACI  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
> >
> > I checked:
> >
> > - Incubating in name
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - Checked PGP signatures
> > - Checked checksums
> > - Code compiles
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Furkan KAMACI
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:34 AM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tuweni/1.2.0-incubating/
> >>  >>>
> >> The release tag is present here:
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/releases/tag/v1.2.0-incubating
> >>  >>>
> >>
> >> This release includes the following changes:
> >> New:
> >> * Ethash hashing support
> >> * EVMC support
> >> * Simplify distribution down to one binary and source artifacts
> >> * Added doc build
> >> Changes:
> >> * Refactor discv5, testing it with an eth2 client
> >> * Simplified and streamlined LES to match ETH devp2p subprotocols
> >> Bug fixes:
> >> * Fixes #141 - Generated Maven pom.xml have incorrect information
> >> * Fix SecureScuttlebutt setup.
> >> Misc:
> >> * Added codecov and tests adding coverage
> >>
> >> Here is the release thread on the d...@tuweni.apache.org  >> d...@tuweni.apache.org> list:
> >>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re9128953304e3bdc3a80012e623b63e0d122b5aa261410f24c7041bf%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >> <
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re9128953304e3bdc3a80012e623b63e0d122b5aa261410f24c7041bf@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >>>
> >>
> >> The release vote has passed with the following votes (
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r47854c9fe57147b12f9158504c9310650a9abfae0c8daf35347d1f03%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >> <
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r47854c9fe57147b12f9158504c9310650a9abfae0c8daf35347d1f03@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >>> )
> >> 3 +1:
> >> Antoine Toulme
> >> Furkan Kamaci
> >> Vinayakumar B
> >> 0 +0
> >> 0 -1
> >>
> >> The release vote is open at least until 10/3 12pm PST time.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Antoine
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

2020-08-18 Thread Michael Wall 
Thanks for the follow up Ciyong.  You are right, -vv did not enable
verbose. If I had used -VV (with capital V's) I would have gotten
output.

Good luck on the vote.

Mike

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 2:43 AM Chen, Ciyong  wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you for your time to review and vote.
>
> Regarding your questions:
> > - Does anything with mshadow need to change now that it has passed 
> > clearance.
> From source code release perspective, I don't think there's anything we need 
> to change as mshadow is already in the code base with the correct license 
> header. CC @Sheng to see if any comments.
>
> > - I tried running tests a couple of ways after the build I build but they 
> > just hung for 15 min before I control-c'd them.  Maybe I didn't wait long 
> > enough, but there was no indication anything was running.
> The test suite contains lots of test cases which will be very time consuming, 
> " ctest -vv" doesn't enable the verbose output thus looks like it hung as no 
> output on the terminal.
> By using "ctest --verbose" which turns on the verbose and will give more 
> details for all the test cases.
> Currently, the entire test suite will run through many different 
> configurations of hardware and docker image via CI pipeline.
>
> Thanks,
> -Ciyong
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wall 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 9:54 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1
>
> +1 from me
>
> Checked
> - signatures
> - incubating in name
> - License, Notice and Disclaimer
> - Compiled from source with CPP bindings using 
> https://mxnet.apache.org/versions/1.6/get_started/build_from_source#install-mxnet-for-python,
> https://mxnet.apache.org/versions/1.6/get_started/cpp_setup and 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/1.7.0.rc1/config/linux.cmake
>
> Couple of questions
> - Does anything with mshadow need to change now that it has passed clearance.
> - I tried running tests a couple of ways after the build I build but they 
> just hung for 15 min before I control-c'd them.  Maybe I didn't wait long 
> enough, but there was no indication anything was running.
>
> Here is the run
>
> ```
> [0/1] Running tests...
> Test project 
> /home/mikewall/Desktop/mxnet-1.7.0/apache-mxnet-src-1.7.0.rc1-incubating/build
> Start 1: AllTestsInmxnetUnitTests
> ^Cninja: build stopped: interrupted by user.
> ```
>
> And here is my history fwiw
>
> ```
> sudo apt-get install -y build-essential git ninja-build ccache 
> libopenblas-dev libopencv-dev cp config/linux.cmake config.cmake rm -rf build 
> cmake -S. -Bbuild -DUSE_CPP_PACKAGE=1 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -GNinja 
> cmake --build build cmake --build build --target test cd build && ctest -vv 
> ```
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:27 PM Sheng Zha  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > Since the blocking issue has been resolved, would you mind changing your 
> > vote? Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sheng
> >
> > On 2020/07/26 01:27:39, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > -1 (binding) as this release contains code that hasn’t gone though IP 
> > > clearance (mshadow).
> > >
> > > I checked:
> > > - incubating in name
> > > - disclaimer exists
> > > - LICENSE and NOTICE have improved but I did not do an exhaustive
> > > check
> > > -  No unexpected binary file
> > > - ASF files have ASF headers
> > > - unable to compile from source
> > >
> > > It also seems that this code may have been released before the
> > > PPMC/IPMC vote is over see [1][2][3][4] There are also branding and
> > > trademark issue with this site [5] This is in addition to the issues
> > > previously noted with releases, branding and trademarks.[6]
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. https://sourceforge.net/projects/apache-mxnet.mirror/
> > > 2.
> > > https://repo.gradle.org/gradle/simple/repo/ai/djl/mxnet/mxnet-native
> > > -mkl/1.7.0-b/ 3. https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/ai.djl.mxnet
> > > 4.
> > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0=nd=mxnet=v=d=
> > > 50_Search=Go
> > > 5. https://djl.ai
> > > 6. https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253
> > > 
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

2020-08-17 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 from me

Checked
- signatures
- incubating in name
- License, Notice and Disclaimer
- Compiled from source with CPP bindings using
https://mxnet.apache.org/versions/1.6/get_started/build_from_source#install-mxnet-for-python,
https://mxnet.apache.org/versions/1.6/get_started/cpp_setup and
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/1.7.0.rc1/config/linux.cmake

Couple of questions
- Does anything with mshadow need to change now that it has passed clearance.
- I tried running tests a couple of ways after the build I build but
they just hung for 15 min before I control-c'd them.  Maybe I didn't
wait long enough, but there was no indication anything was running.

Here is the run

```
[0/1] Running tests...
Test project 
/home/mikewall/Desktop/mxnet-1.7.0/apache-mxnet-src-1.7.0.rc1-incubating/build
Start 1: AllTestsInmxnetUnitTests
^Cninja: build stopped: interrupted by user.
```

And here is my history fwiw

```
sudo apt-get install -y build-essential git ninja-build ccache
libopenblas-dev libopencv-dev
cp config/linux.cmake config.cmake
rm -rf build
cmake -S. -Bbuild -DUSE_CPP_PACKAGE=1 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -GNinja
cmake --build build
cmake --build build --target test
cd build && ctest -vv
```

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:27 PM Sheng Zha  wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> Since the blocking issue has been resolved, would you mind changing your 
> vote? Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Sheng
>
> On 2020/07/26 01:27:39, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > -1 (binding) as this release contains code that hasn’t gone though IP 
> > clearance (mshadow).
> >
> > I checked:
> > - incubating in name
> > - disclaimer exists
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE have improved but I did not do an exhaustive check
> > -  No unexpected binary file
> > - ASF files have ASF headers
> > - unable to compile from source
> >
> > It also seems that this code may have been released before the PPMC/IPMC 
> > vote is over see [1][2][3][4] There are also branding and trademark issue 
> > with this site [5] This is in addition to the issues previously noted with 
> > releases, branding and trademarks.[6]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> >
> > 1. https://sourceforge.net/projects/apache-mxnet.mirror/
> > 2. 
> > https://repo.gradle.org/gradle/simple/repo/ai/djl/mxnet/mxnet-native-mkl/1.7.0-b/
> > 3. https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/ai.djl.mxnet
> > 4. 
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0=nd=mxnet=v=d=50_Search=Go
> > 5. https://djl.ai
> > 6. https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.1.0-incubating release

2020-07-08 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 (binding carry over from PPMC vote)

Mike

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE
> - Build and src distribution
> - ASF header
> - No binary
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 8 juil. 2020 à 01:12, Antoine Toulme  a écrit :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We're voting on the distributions available here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tuweni/1.1.0-incubating/ 
> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tuweni/1.1.0-incubating/>
> >
> > The release tag is present here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/releases/tag/v1.1.0-incubating 
> > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/releases/tag/v1.1.0-incubating>
> >
> > This release includes the following changes:
> > New:
> > * Implement DNS discovery reader, reading from goerli and mainnet
> > * Implement #71 - short hash string
> > * Implement #72 - Upgrade codec dependency by @ajsutton
> > * #74 and #75 enhance UInt256 performance by @shemnon
> >
> > Changes:
> > * Move to slf4j from logl
> > * Simplify address and hash classes
> > * Expose the ability to destroy public keys directly
> >
> > Bug fixes:
> > * Fix for issue #50 - FileBackedFingerprintRepository throws NPE if 
> > fingerPrintFile has no parent Dir
> > * Fix for issue #78 - Dist tar.gz and zip contain duplicate items
> > * Fix for issue #82 - Fix Windows tests by @shemnon
> >
> > Misc:
> > * Adopt github actions to run CI
> > * Upgrade to Gradle 6.3
> > * Fix for issue #63 docker to build
> >
> > Here is the release thread on the dev list of Apache Tuweni:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61c9ed43cb388ead54060714564c871aa8420bf9617492569e668a2a%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >  
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61c9ed43cb388ead54060714564c871aa8420bf9617492569e668a2a@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E>
> > Here is the result of the vote:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2b2726f9b00e7c6f0b13c43329843195d5572747f19e83a6c798bb1e%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >  
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2b2726f9b00e7c6f0b13c43329843195d5572747f19e83a6c798bb1e@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E>
> >
> > 4 +1:
> > Antoine Toulme
> > Danno Ferrin
> > Furkan Kamaci
> > Michael Wall
> > 0 +0
> > 0 -1
> >
> > The vote has passed. We have 2 mentor votes, and will require a new vote on 
> > the general incubator list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Antoine
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pegasus into the Apache incubation

2020-06-18 Thread Michael Wall 
Looks interesting, +1 (binding)

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:28 AM Yu Li  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Good luck!
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 19:19, agile6v  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:42 PM Tao Wu 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > After [the discussion of Pegasus proposal](
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d2dc725389e1e6d0b525f85201c6219973a568ed075837601fd6bd0b%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > ),
> > > I would like to call a vote to accept this project into the Apache
> > > Incubator.
> > >
> > > The proposal is here:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/PegasusProposal
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote:
> > >
> > >   [ ] +1, bring Pegasus into Incubator
> > >   [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > >   [ ] -1, do not bring Pegasus into Incubator, because...
> > >
> > > The vote will open for at least 72 hours and only votes from the IPMC
> > > members are considered binding, but other votes are welcome!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Wu Tao
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc2

2020-02-20 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

- Compiled without OpenCV
- signatures look good
- reviewed DISCLAIMER-WIP and added to
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17329

Mike

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:07 AM Jason Dai  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> I checked:
>
>  - incubating in name
>
>  - LICENSE / NOTICE
>
>  - Signatures and checksum good
>
>  - DISCLAIMER exists
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Jason
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:42 AM Tianqi Chen 
> wrote:
>
> > +1(binding), I checked
> >
> > - Keys,
> > - sha512
> > - DISCLAIMER-WIP, LICENSE, NOTICE
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - Code compiles under nvcc, g++7(need to set DEV=0 to skip warnings)
> >
> > TQ
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:14 AM Przemysław Trędak 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Community,
> > >
> > > This is a gentle reminder to test and vote on this release.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Przemyslaw Tredak
> > >
> > > On 2020/02/10 18:17:26, Przemys��aw Tr��dak 
> wrote:
> > > > Dear Community,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.6.0,
> release
> > > candidate 2.
> > > >
> > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release.
> > > >
> > > > Vote thread:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6dd3088c053fa111ef93412ac1b07c193d5eeb99dc82eadb99f7562b%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > > Result thread:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6f6118010596532484ee5e38a8c2ebbe5d2e8abd7a40e6964cd43367%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc2/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is 1.6.0.rc2:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/1.6.0.rc2
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is 6eec9da55c5096079355d1f1a5fa58dcf35d6752:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/6eec9da55c5096079355d1f1a5fa58dcf35d6752
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 release this package as 1.6.0
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Przemysław Trędak
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

2020-02-09 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

Good luck

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 7:34 PM Gary Wong  wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020, 4:25 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Feb 9, 2020, at 2:10 PM, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik  >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:54 PM Konstantin Boudnik 
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello.
> > >>>
> > >>> As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I
> > >> would like
> > >>> to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please cast your vote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  [ ] +1, bring NLPCraft into Incubator
> > >>>  [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > >>>  [ ] -1, do not bring NLPCraft into Incubator, because...
> > >>
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Roman.
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept YuniKorn into Apache Incubator

2020-01-11 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

Good luck

Mike

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 1:31 PM Furkan KAMACI 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> 11 Oca 2020 Cmt, saat 20:50 tarihinde Dave Meikle 
> şunu
> yazdı:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > All the best,
> > Dave
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 17:47, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vino...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting YuniKorn into the Apache
> Incubator.
> > >
> > > Please see the discussion thread [1].
> > >
> > > Please see the full proposal:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/YuniKornProposal
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept YuniKorn into the Incubator
> > > [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of YuniKorn
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept YuniKorn because …
> > >
> > > The vote will be open at least for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Incubator PMC member votes are binding. Everyone else is welcomed to
> vote
> > > too (mark them as non-binding if you can)!
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > +Vinod
> > >
> > > [1] [DISCUSS] YuniKorn Proposal
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/59a3fc019119352f06e75a2bae5c25cd1b652282d7a59b85ed2188cf%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept NuttX into the Apache Incubator

2019-12-04 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

Interesting project and interested to watch how this progresses.  If you
need more mentor, I am happy to help.

Mike

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:48 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:30 AM 俊平堵  wrote:
> > ...I would like to call a VOTE to accept NuttX into the
> > Apache Incubator...
>
> Enthusiastic +1 (binding)
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.9.0-incubating

2019-10-07 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding - carry over as well

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:58 AM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> Carrying over my +1 (binding)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 5, 2019, at 8:08 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Apache Tuweni 0.9.0-incubating.
> >
> > Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would
> now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
> tarball on the Tuweni Download page.
> > Note we have collected 3 +1 votes from IPMC members and have therefore
> the necessary minimum votes.
> >
> > The following changes were made since 0.8.2:
> > * Scuttlebutt improvements: we now support calling the social graphs and
> additional RPC methods.
> > * Hobbits v3 support: we use binary messages.
> > * SSZ improvements for homogeneous types
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Antoine
> >
> > Vote thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/95256d891a80a3bb9edabddebe8bddf6a3ad246b541a6b75665d10a2@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Vote result:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/caf4b015c6b0bdf94e44af2fc07e41f41dff9016e7e55ebd9811d215@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1.rc0

2019-09-24 Thread Michael Wall 
Cc'ing dev@mxnet.i.a.o this time

Mike

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019, 17:47 Michael Wall  wrote:

> FYI, the release notes link to
> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html which is returning
> a 404.  Maybe related to the new website?  Same for
> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/versions/master/install/index.html which
> is the first result of my Google search for 'install mxnet'.
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 1:26 AM Tao Lv  wrote:
>
>> Thank you Mike! I'm sorry for missing your vote on dev@.
>>
>> To other MXNet mentors, may I have your opinion on this vote?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -tao
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:54 PM Michael Wall  wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > - Built from src without opencv
>> > - sha512 signature are good
>> > - gpg key for release manager in
>> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS and gpg
>> > --verify
>> >   passes
>> > - many but not all of the license issues from the 1.5.0 release have
>> been
>> >   addressed, see
>> >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5365cdab7dee08d220e32decc76fd54aa05e29bc891c416828cb64d2@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>> >   Ticket tracking these is
>> >   https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542
>> >   where all the license issues are being tracked for the 1.6 release
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:34 AM Tao Lv  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dear community,
>> > >
>> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1,
>> release
>> > > candidate 0.
>> > >
>> > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the
>> release.
>> > >
>> > > Vote thread:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32f9e98d3409c84c01703ce89843510b0f5c47a54d6d5327f6279050@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>> > >
>> > > Result thread:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/964c0a228c2d6bfbb8428be8c1454f660b8b4a684d334cfbdf317f57@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
>> at:
>> > >
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.5.1.rc0/
>> > >
>> > > The tag to be voted upon is 1.5.1.rc0:
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.5.1.rc0
>> > >
>> > > The release hash is  c9818480680f84daa6e281a974ab263691302ba8  :
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/c9818480680f84daa6e281a974ab263691302ba8
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > KEYS file available:
>> > >
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Notes
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 release this package as #
>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Best Regards,
>> > >
>> > > -tao
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1.rc0

2019-09-24 Thread Michael Wall 
FYI, the release notes link to
https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html which is returning a
404.  Maybe related to the new website?  Same for
https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/versions/master/install/index.html which
is the first result of my Google search for 'install mxnet'.

Mike

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 1:26 AM Tao Lv  wrote:

> Thank you Mike! I'm sorry for missing your vote on dev@.
>
> To other MXNet mentors, may I have your opinion on this vote?
>
> Thanks,
> -tao
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:54 PM Michael Wall  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Built from src without opencv
> > - sha512 signature are good
> > - gpg key for release manager in
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS and gpg
> > --verify
> >   passes
> > - many but not all of the license issues from the 1.5.0 release have been
> >   addressed, see
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5365cdab7dee08d220e32decc76fd54aa05e29bc891c416828cb64d2@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >   Ticket tracking these is
> >   https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542
> >   where all the license issues are being tracked for the 1.6 release
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:34 AM Tao Lv  wrote:
> >
> > > Dear community,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1, release
> > > candidate 0.
> > >
> > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> > >
> > > Vote thread:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32f9e98d3409c84c01703ce89843510b0f5c47a54d6d5327f6279050@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > Result thread:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/964c0a228c2d6bfbb8428be8c1454f660b8b4a684d334cfbdf317f57@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.5.1.rc0/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is 1.5.1.rc0:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.5.1.rc0
> > >
> > > The release hash is  c9818480680f84daa6e281a974ab263691302ba8  :
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/c9818480680f84daa6e281a974ab263691302ba8
> > >
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Notes
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 release this package as #
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > -tao
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1.rc0

2019-09-22 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 (binding)

- Built from src without opencv
- sha512 signature are good
- gpg key for release manager in
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS and gpg
--verify
  passes
- many but not all of the license issues from the 1.5.0 release have been
  addressed, see
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5365cdab7dee08d220e32decc76fd54aa05e29bc891c416828cb64d2@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
  Ticket tracking these is
  https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542
  where all the license issues are being tracked for the 1.6 release


On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:34 AM Tao Lv  wrote:

> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1, release
> candidate 0.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32f9e98d3409c84c01703ce89843510b0f5c47a54d6d5327f6279050@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> Result thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/964c0a228c2d6bfbb8428be8c1454f660b8b4a684d334cfbdf317f57@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.5.1.rc0/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is 1.5.1.rc0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.5.1.rc0
>
> The release hash is  c9818480680f84daa6e281a974ab263691302ba8  :
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/c9818480680f84daa6e281a974ab263691302ba8
>
>
> KEYS file available:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Notes
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release this package as #
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -tao
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.2

2019-09-06 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 (binding/carry over)

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 4:13 AM Furkan KAMACI  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 (Binding - Carrying my vote)
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:15 AM Kevin Ratnasekera 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 ( binding )
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On 06/09/2019 06:37, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> > > Apache Tuweni 0.8.2.
> > > >
> > > > Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we
> would
> > > now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
> > > tarball on the Tuweni Download page.
> > > > Note we have collected 3 +1 votes from IPMC members and have
> therefore
> > > the necessary minimum votes.
> > > >
> > > > Changelog:
> > > > * Only include necessary code for testing Ethereum
> > > > * Fix provenance of SECP256K1 class
> > > > * Fix header of SECP256K1 class
> > > > * Fix stage task
> > > > * Make build reproducible
> > > > * Trace ProgPow algorithm in class explicitly
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Antoine
> > > >
> > > > Vote thread:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/462f6c76c9f3d9a7ea09e3cf6c46ded8e775cb52db4edf30f8d43f0c@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > > Vote result:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8ba2027f5981d8337a277a43244714a748167d4ca27301519687aa5d@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > jbono...@apache.org
> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept DolphinScheduler(was EasyScheduler) into Apache Incubator

2019-08-23 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

Mike Wall

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:29 PM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:11 AM ShaoFeng Shi 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I believe the DolphinScheduler project will bring value to ASF. The team
> is
> > very open and the community is already very active. Glad to see it to
> join
> > the incubator.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
> > Apache Kylin PMC
> > Email: shaofeng...@apache.org
> >
> > Apache Kylin FAQ: https://kylin.apache.org/docs/gettingstarted/faq.html
> > Join Kylin user mail group: user-subscr...@kylin.apache.org
> > Join Kylin dev mail group: dev-subscr...@kylin.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Furkan KAMACI  于2019年8月23日周五 下午5:32写道：
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > +1!
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Furkan KAMACI
> > >
> > > 23 Ağu 2019 Cum, saat 12:25 tarihinde Sheng Wu <
> > wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>
> > > şunu yazdı:
> > >
> > > > Julian Feinauer  于2019年8月23日周五
> 下午5:20写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Your proposal looks good and the initiual PPMC already looks
> > 'diverse'.
> > > > > Furthermore, it seems like you have a good mentoring team on board.
> > > > >
> > > > > One 'minor' concern is that I think it is best to use Apaches Infra
> > for
> > > > CI
> > > > > and Issue tracking.
> > > > > Which I would greatly prefer over using Github issues.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Julian
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your supports.
> > > >
> > > > In the proposal, Jenkins means Apache INFRA Jenkins. I just changed
> the
> > > > proposal text to `Apache Jenkins`.
> > > >
> > > > I think GitHub Issue tracker is an open option, as many ASF projects
> > are
> > > > using it already, and GitHub issue notifications have been achieved
> in
> > > the
> > > > mail list.
> > > > Due to the team requires to use that, I think should be OK.
> > > >
> > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟
> > > >
> > > > Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin
> > > > Twitter, wusheng1108
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > But overall, a clear +1 (binding) from my side.
> > > > >
> > > > > Julian
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 23.08.19, 11:14 schrieb "Kevin Ratnasekera" <
> > > djkevincr1...@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:09 AM Sheng Wu 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After the discussion of DolphinScheduler(was EasyScheduler)
> > > > proposal
> > > > > > (discussion thread:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d3ac53bddf91391e54f63d042a0b3d60f2aecfbb99780bcc00b4db6e@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > ),
> > > > > > I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache
> > > Incubator.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please cast your vote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   [ ] +1, bring DolphinScheduler into Incubator
> > > > > >   [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > > > >   [ ] -1, do not bring DolphinScheduler into Incubator,
> > > because...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours and only votes from
> > the
> > > > > Incubator
> > > > > > PMC are binding.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ==
> > > > > > Abstract
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DolphinScheduler is a distributed ETL scheduling engine with
> > > > > powerful DAG
> > > > > > visualization interface. DolphinScheduler focuses on solving
> > the
> > > > > problem of
> > > > > > 'complex task dependencies & triggers' in data processing.
> Just
> > > > like
> > > > > its
> > > > > > name, we dedicated to making the scheduling system out of the
> > > box.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Current project name of DolphinScheduler is EasyScheduler,
> > will
> > > > > change it
> > > > > > after it is accepted by Incubator.*
> > > > > > Proposal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DolphinScheduler provides many easy-to-use features to
> > accelerate
> > > > > > the engineering efficiency on data ETL workflow job. We
> > propose a
> > > > new
> > > > > > concept of 'instance of process' and 'instance of task' to
> let
> > > > > developers
> > > > > > to tuning their jobs on the running state of workflow instead
> > of
> > > > > changing
> > > > > > the task's template. Its main objectives are as follows:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >- Define the complex tasks' dependencies & triggers in a
> DAG
> > > > > graph by
> > > > > >dragging and dropping.
> > > > > >- Support cluster HA.
> > > > > >- Support multi-tenant and parallel or serial backfilling
> > > data.
> > > > > >- Support automatical failure job retry and recovery.
> > > > > >- Support many data task types and process priority, task
> > > > > priority and
> > > > > >relative task timeout alarm.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For now, DolphinScheduler has a fairly huge community in
> China.
> > > It
> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.5.0.rc2

2019-07-14 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

- Verified signatures
- license looks good
- build libmxnet.so successfully

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 1:25 AM Sheng Zha  wrote:

> Dear IPMC members,
>
> It would be great if you could help with the vote. Thank you.
>
> -sz
>
> On 2019/07/10 09:33:34, Lai Wei  wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.0, release
> > candidate 2.
> >
> > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/50fe473a3e03c891caccb8cae8e5195bb740a4758f7688790dff70df@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Result thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/641cf0fddce623ff352ba9c7655938c0d16337bae4a8d290956ea130@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.5.0.rc2/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is 1.5.0.rc2:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.5.0.rc2
> >
> > The release hash is 75a9e18:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/75a9e187d00a8b7ebc71412a02ed0e3ae489d91f
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key, KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.0+Release+Notes
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 release this package as ...
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Lai
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

2019-05-12 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding.

Verified signatures
License and disclaimer looked good
incubator in the name

Couple of issues I would like to see addressed before the next release

1 - Standard way to run rat, see
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/14936
2 - I would really like to be able to build the shared library ,
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/14937

Thanks

Mike

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:49 AM Sheng Zha  wrote:

> As of now we still need one more binding vote for this release to pass.
> We'd appreciate it very much if people w/ binding votes on this list could
> help out. Thanks.
>
> -sz
>
> On 2019/05/07 05:51:09, Junru Shao  wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > This is a gentle remainder that our vote for releasing Apache MXNet
> > (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0 has been going on for more than 70 hours.
> We
> > need 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes for this release.
> > Please help us out if you are available :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Junru
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > Therefore, it is more clear to say “the vote will be open for at
> least
> > > 72 hours, until we got enough votes”.
> > >
> > > So why not say that? :-) Sometime vote will take longer than 72 hours.
> > > Have your mentor or any other IPMC member voted on this release? If
> not do
> > > you  know why?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

2019-04-09 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

Lots of hard work, congrats.

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:42 PM Olivier Lamy  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
> Good job!!
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 20:41, Geertjan Wielenga
>  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache NetBeans podling community brings the resolution, after
> > discussion[1], to become a top level Apache project up for the IPMC vote.
> > The PPMC community vote[2] resulted in 64 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes,
> > further details about the project and what has been done is found in the
> > related discussion thread[1].
> >
> > We have had a long and eventful incubation period and are looking forward
> > to graduating and continuing our development and community work with and
> > around Apache NetBeans.
> >
> > The vote is open for 72 hours, assuming that at that stage there are at
> > least 3 +1 votes and nothing left open for discussion.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Geertjan
> > on behalf of Apache NetBeans PPMC
> >
> > 1.
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/648834cdb10ce55aff2c6c8dd3c32454a74711c6289f385e456b74d8@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > 2.
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/72e59c722580fef2cbaa637735691a549756aeaa72c4cbf52265fbe0@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
> >
> > -
> >
> > Establish the Apache NetBeans Project
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
> the
> > Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a
> > Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
> related
> > to providing a development environment, tooling platform, and application
> > framework.
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
> (PMC),
> > to be known as the "Apache NetBeans Project", be and hereby is
> established
> > pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache NetBeans Project be and hereby is responsible
> for
> > the creation and maintenance of software related to providing a
> development
> > environment, tooling platform, and application framework; and be it
> further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache NetBeans" be and
> > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> direction
> > of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache NetBeans Project,
> and
> > to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the
> > scope of responsibility of the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache NetBeans Project:
> >
> > * Anton Epple 
> > * Antonio Vieiro 
> > * Aristides Villarreal 
> > * Arunava Sinha 
> > * Ate Douma 
> > * Attila Kelemen 
> > * Bertrand Delacretaz 
> > * Bruno Flávio 
> > * Bruno Souza 
> > * Christian Lenz 
> > * Constantin Drabo 
> > * David Heffelfinger 
> > * Daniel Gruno 
> > * Dusan Balek 
> > * Eirik Bakke 
> > * Emilian Bold 
> > * Emmanuel Hugonnet 
> > * Eric Barboni 
> > * Florian Vogler 
> > * Geertjan Wielenga 
> > * Glenn Holmer 
> > * Ivar Grimstad 
> > * James Gosling 
> > * Jan Lahoda 
> > * Jan Pirek 
> > * Jaroslav Tulach 
> > * Jean-Marc Borer 
> > * Jiří Kovalský 
> > * Joerg Michelberger 
> > * Johan Vos 
> > * John Kostaras 
> > * John McDonnell 
> > * Josh Juneau 
> > * José Pereda 
> > * Junichi Yamamoto 
> > * Kirk Pepperdine 
> > * Lars Bruun-Hansen 
> > * Laszlo Kishalmi 
> > * Leonardo Zanivan 
> > * Mark Stephens 
> > * Mark Struberg 
> > * Martin Entlicher 
> > * Martin Klähn 
> > * Matthias Bläsing 
> > * Michael Müller 
> > * Michael Nascimento 
> > * Michel Graciano 
> > * Neil C Smith 
> > * Ralph Benjamin Ruijs 
> > * Reema Taneja 
> > * Shai Almog 
> > * Simon Phipps 
> > * Svatopluk Dedic 
> > * Sven Reimers 
> > * Thilina Ranathunga 
> > * Timon Veenstra 
> > * Tomas Mysik 
> > * Tomas Zezula 
> > * Tushar Joshi 
> > * Vladimir Voskresensky 
> > * Wade Chandler 
> > * Zoran Sevarac 
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Geertjan Wielenga be
> appointed
> > to the office of Vice President, Apache NetBeans, to serve in accordance
> > with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
> Bylaws
> > of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
> > disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache NetBeans Project be and hereby is tasked with
> the
> > migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator NetBeans podling;
> and
> > be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
> > NetBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
> > discharged.
> >
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-03-20 Thread Michael Wall 
I did find this, https://github.com/RainBlock.  Looks like code around
ethereum.  Maybe too close?

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:59 AM Antoine Toulme  wrote:

> Yes, you’ve been very flexible, thank you.
>
> Anybody with strong opinions, please chime in.
>
> I’ll start looking for marks around rainblock.
>
> > On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:15 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I'm fine w/ anything...
> >
> >> On Mar 19, 2019, at 6:53 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we will need a made up name, and we likely need a name that is
> rather unambiguous across languages.
> >>
> >> Based on our previous proposals, would you be ok with “RainBlock”?
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Apache PawPaw
> >>>
> >>>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Michael Wall  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Since Cava is the Guava for blockchains, what about sticking with the
> >>>> fruit/veggie theme?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jackfruit
> >>>> Jambolan
> >>>> Jocote
> >>>> Kumquat
> >>>> KangKong
> >>>> Kabosu
> >>>>
> >>>> I also saw the word postcava which is the "the inferior vena cava of
> >>>> vertebrates higher than fishes" according to
> >>>> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/postcava.  But is seemed
> like a
> >>>> name you could use after Cava.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just brainstorming.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:19 AM Jim Jagielski 
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> What is somewhat funny is that the "SkyWalking" podling is on the
> cusp of
> >>>>> graduation. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:42 AM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> All, the results are in, from VP Legal:
> >>>>>>> I am happy to approve the name in isolation. Specifically, the
> >>>>> community must refrain from linking the project to any Star Wars
> >>>>> references. The view of the community is that the community is
> likely to
> >>>>> find that difficult. It was therefore agreed to look for a different
> name.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We need to pick another name.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:32 PM, Dave Fisher 
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi -
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:10 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Dave Fisher 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi -
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I went to look at the Trademark name search and something is
> either
> >>>>> messed up or autocorrected.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165 <
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165
> >Establish
> >>>>> whether "Apache Obiwarn" is a Suitable Name
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Isn’t the name supposed to be Obiwan and not Obiwarn?
> >>>>>>>> No, the name is Obiwarn. With a r.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well, my bad eye sight had my brain auto-correcting to what I
> expected
> >>>>> to see. Then Daniel wrote what he did.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> OK. Let’s look into Obiwarn and deal with Apple autocorrecting it
> to
> >>>>> Obiwan … more Jedi mind tricks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Dave
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please look into it. Sorry, color me confused.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-03-19 Thread Michael Wall 
Since Cava is the Guava for blockchains, what about sticking with the
fruit/veggie theme?

Jackfruit
Jambolan
Jocote
Kumquat
KangKong
Kabosu

I also saw the word postcava which is the "the inferior vena cava of
vertebrates higher than fishes" according to
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/postcava.  But is seemed like a
name you could use after Cava.

Just brainstorming.

Mike



On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:19 AM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> What is somewhat funny is that the "SkyWalking" podling is on the cusp of
> graduation. :)
>
> > On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:42 AM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> >
> > All, the results are in, from VP Legal:
> >> I am happy to approve the name in isolation. Specifically, the
> community must refrain from linking the project to any Star Wars
> references. The view of the community is that the community is likely to
> find that difficult. It was therefore agreed to look for a different name.
> >
> > We need to pick another name.
> >
> >> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:32 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >>> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:10 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>  On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Dave Fisher 
> wrote:
> 
>  Hi -
> 
>  I went to look at the Trademark name search and something is either
> messed up or autocorrected.
> 
>  PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165>Establish
> whether "Apache Obiwarn" is a Suitable Name
> 
>  Isn’t the name supposed to be Obiwan and not Obiwarn?
> >>> No, the name is Obiwarn. With a r.
> >>
> >> Well, my bad eye sight had my brain auto-correcting to what I expected
> to see. Then Daniel wrote what he did.
> >>
> >> OK. Let’s look into Obiwarn and deal with Apple autocorrecting it to
> Obiwan … more Jedi mind tricks.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >>
> 
>  Please look into it. Sorry, color me confused.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Dave
> 
> > On Mar 4, 2019, at 12:20 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > Thx. We'll wait for the decision.
> >
> >> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:05 AM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The ticket is now open:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Antoine
> >>
> >>> On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Perfect, thank you.
> >>>
>  On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf 
> wrote:
> 
>  Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 15:09:39 -0800:
> > I am happy to mention that you mentioned this term on list.
> 
>  Thanks.
> 
> > What language should I use?
> 
>  The public part of PNS tickets should be factual, so I'd say:
>  .
>  "In the _Star Wars_ universe there exists a character named
> Obi-Wan Kenobi"
>  .
>  with a link to Wikipedia for good measure.
> 
>  Cheers,
> 
>  Daniel
> 
> >> On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf <
> d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> >>
> >> Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 09:10:08 -0800:
> >>> I’ll open a pooling name search ticket for Obiwarn and will
> test the waters over there.
> >>
> >> When you create a PNS ticket, please note on it the existence of
> >> .
> 
> 
> -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-26 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

Verified
- Release files in correct location
- Release files have the word incubating in their name
- Digital signature and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER file exist
- LICENSE and NOTICE files exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE text correct
- Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or NOTICE
- License information is not mentioned in NOTICE
- All source files have ASF headers
- Contents of the release match with what's tagged in version control
- No unexpected binary files in the release

Non verified
- NOTICE year not correct, unfortunate it was updated when the release was
cut again
Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
- Was not able to compile.  Stopped after 10 min, is
https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/versions/master/install/build_from_source.html
right place to look?  Instructions could be clearer

Good work fixing the licensing.

Mike

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:34 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> HI,.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I didn’t have time to check all of the licenses so there may be some work
> that’s still needed there, but it looks fairly comprehensive.
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE looks OK
> - NOTICE need year updating
> - No unexpected binary files
> - All ASF files have ASF headers
> - I didn’t compile from source and assume others have
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-21 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 binding

Looking forward to this.

Mike

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:17 AM Pierre Smits  wrote:

> +1
>
> Congratulations on reaching this milestone.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 13:14 Furkan KAMACI  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:11 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > > On Feb 20, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The
> > > > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
> > > >
> > > > We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project
> in
> > > [2].
> > > > I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made
> > there.
> > > >
> > > > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept
> > the
> > > > new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> > > >
> > > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority
> vote.
> > > > Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are
> > binding.
> > > > It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment
> > stating
> > > > whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
> > > >
> > > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it
> open
> > > for
> > > > longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
> > > > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past
> discussions!
> > > > Antoine
> > > >
> > > > [1]:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > [2]:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > [3]:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
> > > > [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Sent from my phone
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

2019-02-05 Thread Michael Wall 
Interesting proposal.  I would be interested in helping.  Seems like you
don't need anymore mentors so I can volunteer in any capacity you need.

I think you are going to have trouble with the name though as
https://cava.com/ is a great restaurant.

Mike

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:36 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> Hi -
>
> I would also be happy to volunteer as a Mentor to this podling.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> > On Feb 5, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Kenneth Knowles  wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I would like to volunteer as an additional mentor.
> >
> > Kenn
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:57 PM Justin Mclean 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Nice proposal. Just a couple of  comments.
> >>
> >>> The project is well established and counts 2 active committers. Some
> >> contributions were made from the community.
> >>
> >> Being that small may be a concern, the ASF prefers project with a
> >> community around them, but it’s not always a barrier to entry see for
> >> example Apache PLC4X.
> >>
> >>> Blockchain protocol developers organize well in communities, and some
> >> lively discussions take place over Twitter, Gitter, Telegram.
> >>
> >> At the ASF all decisions need to be made on the mailing list not on any
> >> external platform mentioned above. Would the project be OK with moving
> >> discussions to a mailing list and having them in an asynchronous manner?
> >>
> >>> We will remain in incubation for a period of no less than a year so we
> >> can properly invest and build a community of users, contributors and
> >> committers around our goals.
> >>
> >> Most projects take more than a year to graduate, two years is usual but
> >> some projects do take longer. Is the project OK with that and will your
> >> mentors stay around for that long?
> >>
> >>> '''Initial Committers'''
> >>>
> >>> Antoine Toulme (toulmean at apache dot org) *
> >>
> >> Seem odd to only list one initial committer, all initial committer s are
> >> on the PPMC and you would need a minimum of 3 active people. The IPMC
> >> generally likes to see 5.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Justin
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-26 Thread Michael Wall 
Lars,

Interesting proposal.  Can you talk more about who this training is for?  I
can't tell if it is for internal use, like helping new mentors and PMC
Chairs, or external use like teaching companies how the ASF does business
or how to use a specific Apache project.  Maybe it is all of that.

Thanks

Mike

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 7:49 AM Lars Francke  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> this is the result of the discussion I started in December 2018[1].
>
> I would like to start this thread to get feedback on a proposal we've been
> working on for a project focused on developing training material for Apache
> & 3rd party projects.
>
> The full proposal can be found here <
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrainingProposal>
>
> Disclaimer: It is a bit different than most other proposals as it basically
> starts at zero.
>
> Our main goals for this discussion are:
> * Finding mentors and interested contributors
> * Discuss whether this should be a Incubator project, straight to TLP or a
> Central Service
> * Sharpen the scope of the project
>
> While I personally have a relatively long history as a contributor,
> committer etc. at Apache I've never been a mentor before so we would love
> for some experienced people to help us out.
>
> We're looking forward to all kinds of feedback.
>
> Cheers,
> Lars
>
> [1] <
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cb4d7eef73e0d526e0124944c3d37325aa892675351a1eed0a25de3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Iceberg project for incubation

2018-11-15 Thread Michael Wall 
+1 (binding)

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:03 AM Olivier Lamy  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 03:07, Ryan Blue  wrote:
>
> > The discuss thread seems to have reached consensus, so I propose
> accepting
> > the Iceberg project for incubation.
> >
> > The proposal is copied below and in the wiki:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IcebergProposal
> >
> > Please vote on whether to accept Iceberg in the next 72 hours:
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept Iceberg for incubation
> > [ ] -1, reject the Iceberg proposal because . . .
> >
> > Thank you for reviewing the proposal and voting,
> >
> > rb
> > --
> > Iceberg Proposal Abstract
> >
> > Iceberg is a table format for large, slow-moving tabular data.
> >
> > It is designed to improve on the de-facto standard table layout built
> into
> > Apache Hive, Presto, and Apache Spark.
> > Proposal
> >
> > The purpose of Iceberg is to provide SQL-like tables that are backed by
> > large sets of data files. Iceberg is similar to the Hive table layout,
> the
> > de-facto standard structure used to track files in a table, but provides
> > additional guarantees and performance optimizations:
> >
> >- Atomicity - Each change to the table is will be complete or will
> fail.
> >“Do or do not. There is no try.”
> >- Snapshot isolation - Reads use one and only one snapshot of a table
> at
> >some time without holding a lock.
> >- Safe schema evolution - A table’s schema can change in well-defined
> >ways, without breaking older data files.
> >- Column projection - An engine may request a subset of the available
> >columns, including nested fields.
> >- Predicate pushdown - An engine can push filters into read planning
> to
> >improve performance using partition data and file-level statistics.
> >
> > Iceberg does NOT define a new file format. All data is stored in Apache
> > Avro, Apache ORC, or Apache Parquet files.
> >
> > Additionally, Iceberg is designed to work well when data files are stored
> > in cloud blob stores, even when those systems provide weaker guarantees
> > than a file system, including:
> >
> >- Eventual consistency in the namespace
> >- High latency for directory listings
> >- No renames of objects
> >- No folder hierarchy
> >
> > Rationale
> >
> > Initial benchmarks show dramatic improvements in query planning. For
> > example, in Netflix’s Atlas use case, which stores time-series metrics
> from
> > Netflix runtime systems and 1 month is stored across 2.7 million files in
> > 2,688 partitions:
> >
> >- Hive table using Parquet:
> >   - 400k+ splits, not combined
> >   - Explain query: 9.6 minutes wall time (planning only)
> >- Iceberg table with partition filtering:
> >   - 15,218 splits, combined
> >   - Planning: 10 seconds
> >   - Query wall time: 13 minutes
> >- Iceberg table with partition and min/max filtering:
> >   - 412 splits
> >   - Planning: 25 seconds
> >   - Query wall time: 42 seconds
> >
> > These performance gains combined with the cross-engine compatibility are
> a
> > very compelling story.
> > Initial Goals
> >
> > The initial goal will be to move the existing codebase to Apache and
> > integrate with the Apache development process and infrastructure. A
> primary
> > goal of incubation will be to grow and diversify the Iceberg community.
> We
> > are well aware that the project community is largely comprised of
> > individuals from a single company. We aim to change that during
> incubation.
> > Current Status
> >
> > As previously mentioned, Iceberg is under active development at Netflix,
> > and is being used in processing large volumes of data in Amazon EC2.
> >
> > Iceberg license documentation is already based on Apache guidelines for
> > LICENSE and NOTICE content.
> > Meritocracy
> >
> > We value meritocracy and we understand that it is the basis for an open
> > community that encourages multiple companies and individuals to
> contribute
> > and be invested in the project’s future. We will encourage and monitor
> > participation and make sure to extend privileges and responsibilities to
> > all contributors.
> > Community
> >
> > Iceberg is currently being used by developers at Netflix and a growing
> > number of users are actively using it in production environments. Iceberg
> > has received contributions from developers working at Hortonworks,
> WeWork,
> > and Palantir. By bringing Iceberg to Apache we aim to assure current and
> > future contributors that the Iceberg community is meritocratic and open,
> in
> > order to broaden and diversity the user and developer community.
> > Core Developers
> >
> > Iceberg was initially developed at Netflix and is under active
> development.
> > We believe Netflix will be of interest to a broad range of users and
> > developers and that incubating the project at the ASF will help us build
> a
> > diverse, sustainable community.
> > Alignment
> >
> > Iceberg utilizes

Requesting write access to the Incubator Wiki

2018-10-02 Thread Michael Wall 
Hello,

I am requesting write access to the incubator wiki.  My wiki username is
the same as my Apache username, mjwall.  I am a new mentor for Apache MXNet.

Thanks

Mike