Re: header notices for mirrors a.o/dist/incubator

2008-09-19 Thread Simon Laws 
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> You spelled artifacts wrong:
> Verify downloaded artefacts
> other than that, looks good.
>
> Looks like a couple of graduated projects (cxf and tuscany) might want to
> consider removing their incubator artifacts (they are in the archive).
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Thursday 18 September 2008 12:36:58 am David Crossley wrote:
> > I noticed that the apache.org/dist/incubator distribution area
> > had no header file to explain itself. Hence each mirror was
> > missing that information.
> >
> > I created it now, modelling it on other ASF distribution areas.
> >
> > This now has the disclaimer from
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers
> > (except i snipped the phrase "sponsored by the 'name of sponsor'").
> >
> > It also encourages people to assist each project to mature.
> >
> > It also encourages them to verify the downloaded artefacts.
> >
> > Please review.
> >
> > These files are in SVN at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/dist
> >
> > --oOo---
> >
> > I reckon that each project should have its own similar default
> > mirror headers. Like other TLPs, they should encourage people
> > to instead go via its project website download pages.
> > i.e. following the mirroring guidelines at
> > http://apache.org/dev/#releases
> >
> > What do others reckon?
> >
> > -David
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Dan

Thanks for reminding us. I'll raise it on the Tuscany list.

Regards

Simon

Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org

2008-06-20 Thread Simon Laws 
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Mike Edwards <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Raymond Feng wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> One of the steps for TLP migration is to add Tuscany to
> >> http://www.apache.org. We need to have a title (hover text) for
> Tuscany.
> >> What should we have?
> >>
> >> What about "A Distributed Composite Application Framework Implementing
> >> SCA"?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Raymond
> >>
> > Raymond,
> >
> > I think that's a little long - how about something shorter and punchier?
> >
> > "Composite SOA Applications using SCA"
>
> Sounds better.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Yours,  Mike.
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

I fall in between Mike and Raymond...

"Composite SOA Application framework using SCA"
or
"Build composite SOA Applications using SCA"

As we are not actually delivering composite SOA applications but the means
to build them.

Simon

Re: Requesting proper karma for Tuscany Committers to access repo/private/committers

2008-04-16 Thread Simon Laws 
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 16:24 -0700, Luciano Resende escribió:
> > Could someone on the IPMC please help us get the proper karma to some
> > Tuscany committers that does not have access to
> > repo/private/committers. From a thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following
> > committers does not have proper access :
> >
> > agrove ajborley amita edwardsmj frankb fuhwei gwinn isilval jmarino
> > jsdelfino kelvingoodson kwilliams slaws svkrish
> >
> > BTW, I'm asking this here, per infra@ request.
>
> done. jsdelfino was already added by joes at r648453
>
> Regards
> Santiago
>
> >
> > Thanks
>
> --
> Santiago Gala
> http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/ 
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks Santiago for sorting us out so quickly. Just tried it and I can
report it now works for me.

Regards

Simon

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuscany SCA Java 1.1 released

2008-02-05 Thread Simon Laws 
The Apache Tuscany team are delighted to announce the 1.1 release of the
Java SCA project.

Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service Component
Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
application development. These specifications are being standardized by
OASIS as part of the Open Composite Services Architecture (Open CSA).

The Tuscany SCA Java 1.1 release adds a number of features including a JMS
binding, improved policy support and an implementation extension for
representing client side Javascript applications as SCA components.

For full details about the release and to download the distributions please
go to:

http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-releases.html

To find out more about OASIS Open CSA go to:

http://www.oasis-opencsa.org

Apache Tuscany welcomes your help. Any contribution, including code,
testing, contributions to the documentation, or bug reporting is always
appreciated. For more information on how to get involved in Apache Tuscany
visit the website at:

http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany

Thank you for your interest in Apache Tuscany!

The Apache Tuscany Team.

---

Tuscany is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache Software
Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Web services PMC. Incubation
is required of all newly accepted projects until a further review
indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making
process have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful
ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection
of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that
the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.

Tuscany Java SCA Release 1.1-incubating and new Incubator distribution policy

2008-02-01 Thread Simon Laws 
Hi

The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev
list [1] I am posting here before proceeding to copy the artifacts up to
www.apache.org/dist/incubator.

The proposal it to use a similar release structure to the one we already use
[2]

tuscany/
  native/
  java/
 das/
 sca/
1.1-incubating/
   release artifacts here
 sdo/

Please advise

Thanks

Simon

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg26970.html
[2] http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/tuscany/

[RESULT][VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-31 Thread Simon Laws 
On Jan 31, 2008 2:30 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified
> > some
> > > issues.
> > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html
> > >
> > > A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues
> > as
> > > discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thread
> > in
> > > parallel with the project vote thread as the material content of the
> > > release
> > > hasn't changed significantly and I don't want to delay before getting
> > IPMC
> > > eyeballs on it.
> > >
> > > The ongoing thread in the Tuscany community can be found here
> > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27401.html
> > >
> > > The release includes a set of bug-fixes and new function such as the
> > > implementation of binding.jms. You can see a list of changes at:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3a/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES
> > >
> > > The signed binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the
> > Maven
> > > staging repository are listed at the following links.
> > >
> > > SVN Tag:
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3a/
> > >
> > > Stage maven repo:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/>
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/>
> > >
> > > RAT report:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt>
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt>
> > >
> > > Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) :
> > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/>
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/>
> > >
> > > Please review and approve the release. This vote will remain open for
> > at
> > > least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your attention,
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
> Quick update.
>
> We brought the project vote to a successful conclusion -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27556.html
>
> We worked with sebb to track down his build issue and explain the missing
> files in the source archive -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27521.html
>
> This vote is still open for a little while.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
Hi,

I'm glad to conclude that this release is now passed with +1s from the
following IPMC members:

Matthieu Riou
Kevan Miller
Ant Elder

and with 1 non-binding +1 from:

Raymond Feng

No -1 or 0 votes.

Thanks to everyone, and particularly to sebb, for all the feedback and for
making this release a good one.

Simon

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-31 Thread Simon Laws 
On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
>   ...ant
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >  Hi,
> >
> > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified
> some
> > issues.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html
> >
> > A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues as
> > discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thread in
> > parallel with the project vote thread as the material content of the
> > release
> > hasn't changed significantly and I don't want to delay before getting
> IPMC
> > eyeballs on it.
> >
> > The ongoing thread in the Tuscany community can be found here
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27401.html
> >
> > The release includes a set of bug-fixes and new function such as the
> > implementation of binding.jms. You can see a list of changes at:
> >
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3a/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES
> >
> > The signed binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the
> Maven
> > staging repository are listed at the following links.
> >
> > SVN Tag:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3a/
> >
> > Stage maven repo:
> > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/>
> >
> > RAT report:
> > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt>
> >
> > Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) :
> > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/>
> >
> > Please review and approve the release. This vote will remain open for at
> > least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thank you for your attention,
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
Quick update.

We brought the project vote to a successful conclusion -
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27556.html

We worked with sebb to track down his build issue and explain the missing
files in the source archive -
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27521.html

This vote is still open for a little while.

Regards

Simon

[VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-28 Thread Simon Laws 
 Hi,

The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some
issues.

http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html

A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues as
discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thread in
parallel with the project vote thread as the material content of the release
hasn't changed significantly and I don't want to delay before getting IPMC
eyeballs on it.

The ongoing thread in the Tuscany community can be found here

http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27401.html

The release includes a set of bug-fixes and new function such as the
implementation of binding.jms. You can see a list of changes at:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3a/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES

The signed binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the Maven
staging repository are listed at the following links.

SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3a/

Stage maven repo:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/maven/

RAT report:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/rat-1.1-RC3a.txt

Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) :
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3a/

Please review and approve the release. This vote will remain open for at
least 72 hours.

Thank you for your attention,

Simon

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-27 Thread Simon Laws 
On Jan 25, 2008 12:50 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > Hi sebb
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for the detailed review.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you tell me what you mean by
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually
> being
> > > > > > > distributed are OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Surely the archive bundles are also distributed?
> > > >
> > > > I meant that the files in the
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) :
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/>
> > > < http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/>
> > > >  > > >
> > > > are actually being distributed.
> > > >
> > > > I took Ant Elder's comment to mean that these were not being
> > > distributed.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > snip..
> > > > >
> > > > > Also can you tell me if you consider that the issues you have
> found to
> > > > be
> > > > > blocking issues?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I think the discrepancies in the LICENSE file need to be
> addressed.
> > > >
> > > > Also, comparing the SVN tag with the source archive shows that there
> > > > are quite a few files and directories that are missing from the
> source
> > > > archive.
> > > >
> > > > There are several files in the source archive that are not in SVN,
> > > > which probably should be in SVN, for example:
> > > >
> > > > BUILDING
> > > > CHANGES
> > > > DISCLAIMER
> > > > LICENSE
> > > > NOTICE
> > > > README
> > > > RELEASE_NOTES
> > > > demos/alert-aggregator-webapp/build-dependency.xml
> > > > demos/xml-bigbank/build-dependency.xml
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/interop/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/InteropDatabindingTestCase.java
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterService.java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterServiceClient.java
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterServiceClientImpl.java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterServiceImpl.java
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/DatabindingTestCase.java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/GreeterService.java
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/GreeterServiceClientImpl.java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/GreeterServiceImpl.java
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/DatabindingTestCase.java
> > > > samples/calculator-webapp/build.xml
> > > > samples/calculator-ws-webapp/build.xml
> > > > samples/chat-webapp/build.xml
> > > > samples/feed-aggregator-webapp/build.xml
> > > > samples/he

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-25 Thread Simon Laws 
On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > Hi sebb
> > >
> > > Thank you for the detailed review.
> > >
> > > Can you tell me what you mean by
> > >
> > > On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being
> > > > > distributed are OK.
> > > >
> > > > Surely the archive bundles are also distributed?
> >
> > I meant that the files in the
> >
> > 
> > Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) :
> > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/>
> < http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/>
> >  >
> > are actually being distributed.
> >
> > I took Ant Elder's comment to mean that these were not being
> distributed.
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > snip..
> > >
> > > Also can you tell me if you consider that the issues you have found to
> > be
> > > blocking issues?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I think the discrepancies in the LICENSE file need to be addressed.
> >
> > Also, comparing the SVN tag with the source archive shows that there
> > are quite a few files and directories that are missing from the source
> > archive.
> >
> > There are several files in the source archive that are not in SVN,
> > which probably should be in SVN, for example:
> >
> > BUILDING
> > CHANGES
> > DISCLAIMER
> > LICENSE
> > NOTICE
> > README
> > RELEASE_NOTES
> > demos/alert-aggregator-webapp/build-dependency.xml
> > demos/xml-bigbank/build-dependency.xml
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/interop/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/InteropDatabindingTestCase.java
>
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterService.java
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterServiceClient.java
>
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterServiceClientImpl.java
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/GreeterServiceImpl.java
>
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/jaxbgen/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/jaxbdatabinding/DatabindingTestCase.java
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/GreeterService.java
>
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/GreeterServiceClientImpl.java
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/GreeterServiceImpl.java
>
> >
> >
> itest/databindings/sdogen/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/sdodatabinding/DatabindingTestCase.java
> > samples/calculator-webapp/build.xml
> > samples/calculator-ws-webapp/build.xml
> > samples/chat-webapp/build.xml
> > samples/feed-aggregator-webapp/build.xml
> > samples/helloworld-dojo-webapp/build-dependency.xml
> > samples/helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp/build.xml
> > samples/helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp/build-dependency.xml
> >
> > There are also a lot of files in SVN, which are not in the source
> archive:
> >
> > demos/alert-aggregator-webapp/alert-aggregator.svg
> > demos/bigbank-account/bigbank.svg
> > demos/bigbank-calculator/src/test
> > demos/secure-bigbank/secure-bigbank-account/bigbank.svg
> > demos/secure-bigbank/secure-bigbank-calculator/src/test
> > demos/xml-bigbank/xml-bigbank.svg
> > distribution/standalone/src/main/resources
> > distribution/tomcat/src/test
> > distribution/webapp/src/test
> > distribution/webapp/src/main/resources
> > itest/admin/src/test/java/test
> > itest/contribution-import-export/export-java/src/test
> > itest/contribution-import-export/export-wsdl/src/test
> > itest/contribution-import-export/export-wsdl/src/main/java
> > itest/contribution-multiple/src/main
> > itest/databindings/config.svg
> > itest/databindings/databinding.svg
> > itest/databindings/interop.svg
> > itest/domain/src/main/java/org
> > itest/interop-s

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread Simon Laws 
Hi sebb

Thank you for the detailed review.

Can you tell me what you mean by

On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being
> > distributed are OK.
>
> Surely the archive bundles are also distributed?
>
>
snip..

Also can you tell me if you consider that the issues you have found to be
blocking issues?

Thanks

Simon

[VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-23 Thread Simon Laws 
Hi,

The Tuscany project had a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish the
Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release. The vote thread on tuscany-dev has
7 +1s and an archive can be found at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27321.html

The release includes new function and bug fixes. You can see a list of
changes at:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES


The signed binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the Maven
staging repository are listed at the following links.

SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3/

Stage maven repo:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/maven/


RAT report:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/rat-1.1-RC3.txt

Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) :
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/

Please review and approve the release. This vote will remain open for at
least 72 hours.

Thanks,

Simon

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-17 Thread Simon Laws 
On 10/18/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It looks pretty good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
>
>
> > On 10/17/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >
> > I wonder if we could shorten this just a little.  How about:
> >>
> >> "...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
> >> and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge
> >> to the public, that simplifies the development, deployment and
> management
> >> of distributed applications built as compositions of service
> components.
> >> These components may be implemented with a range of technologies and
> >> connected using a variety of communication protocols. This software
> will
> >> implement relevant open standards including, but not limited to, the
> >> SCA and SDO standards defined by the OASIS OpenCSA member section."
> >
> >
> > That sounds ok to me, is everyone else happy with these words?
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sounds ok to me.

Simon