Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.1 [RC1]
On 2019-03-08, Julian Feinauer wrote: > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > votes are reached. > Please vote accordingly: > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 [RC2]
repeating my +1 vote from the dev list Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 [RC1]
On 2018-11-23, Christofer Dutz wrote: > This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.2.0. > The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.2.0. > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator release. +1 (binding) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 [RC2]
On 2018-09-26, Christofer Dutz wrote: > This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.1.0. just copying over my binding +1 from the plc4x-dev list to here, it still stands :-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Need Write Access to Wiki
On 2018-01-01, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi Stefan, > You're already listed as a contributor on the wiki. You have write access. Great, thanks. I didn't check after I has to re-create the account, I simply expected I had been removed there as well. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Need Write Access to Wiki
Hi all looks as if my old wiki account no longer exists, please grant me write access to the Incubator Wiki. Username: StefanBodewig Thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator
On 2017-12-15, Justin Mclean wrote: > This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows > [] +1 Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator because ... +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of EasyAnt into Ant
On 2013-03-13, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: I hope the Ant PMC will consider electing deserving committers to the PMC rather sooner than later. The Ant PMC has done so in the past and I trust it to keep doing so ;-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of EasyAnt into Ant
On 2013-03-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Please cast your votes over the graduation of Easyant as a subproject of Ant. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator
+1 Stefan On 2012-07-21, Prescott Nasser wrote: Hey all, The Lucene.Net community feels ready to graudate. Our internal vote was a success (~40 +1's and a bit of a mess because we had a number of mailing lists which spread our vote out - sorry about that spam). We had some concerns regarding the size and activity of our community, however, with addition of two new committers just recently we feel that we are still growing as a community and that graduating will only help us build our community further. Dev Mailing List: http://s.apache.org/FQF User Mailing List: http://s.apache.org/P6f Our [Proposal] Resolution thread in general (http://s.apache.org/Qv6) didn't garner many comments, but we take silence as your proposal looks good Once again our resolution is located: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template I'll leave this vote open for at least 72 hours: [+1] We need some time apart to appreciate each other [-1] We'd like you to stay because... Thanks all, ~Prescott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Shepherd for EasyAnt
On 2012-07-04, Dave Fisher wrote: On Jul 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Le 3 juil. 2012 à 19:00, Jukka Zitting a écrit : On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote: The primary target for Easyant will be being a subproject of Ant. This may be EasyAnt's goal, I'm not entirely sure it matches Ant's goal. At one point in time every project entering incubation had to be sponsored by an existing TLP or the board and it didn't imply the podling would graduate to the existing TLP at all. The you need a sponsoring TLP notion seems to have gone now. By the time EasyAnt entered incubation Ant became the sponsoring TLP so there was one, not because Ant was comitted to accept it as a sub-project IIRC. I'm not saying Ant would reject it, but it is not a no-brainer either. This part of the discussion should be held on dev@ant 8-) Is there something that the Incubator can do for EasyAnt that the Ant PMC can't? If not, I don't see a need to wait for this to happen. I guess that the incubation process for EasyAnt was about training the people attached to the project so they learn how to build a proper ASF community, release, and check IP clearance. Training people and growing a community (maybe by attracting existing Ant contributors). If it had been clear Ant was willing to accept Ant as a subproject back then, we likely would have taken the IP-clearing route instead (which has happened for other stuff in the past). How has the refactoring due to an expected contributor's unwillingness to sign an ICLA effected the project? This issue makes me think that the main purpose of going through the incubator was to inoculate the project's IP, not that there is anything wrong with that. This fell out as a side-effect. When EasyAnt entered incubation nobody expected this. IP stuff seemed to be without any problems as all contributors agreed with the move to the ASF - it wasn't before we started collecting ICLAs that we saw the problem (the contributor in question simply never answered any attempt to reach out to him for several months). Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Lucene.NET status
On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zitting wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zitting wrote: Your contribution report [1] shows some people who've contributed lots of patches but aren't committers yet. What's up with that? Many of those contributions happened before Lucene.NET re-entered incubation, the people have been let down back then and never came back when Lucene.NET came back to life. That's a good reminder of the importance of bringing in new committers when you can. Without a constant stream of new people a project will eventually lose steam as existing committers lose interest or become otherwise occupied for whatever other reason. Yes, absolutely. This is something that's not only true for Lucene.Net or just incubating projects. I'm pretty sure some of our existing projects have missed such opportunities as well. In Lucene.Net's case I'm pretty sure the team will take the right steps, they've been welcoming contributors warmly so far. Not having added new people to the roster is the major (if not only) obstacle to graduation from my POV. I've been involved with quite a few podlings with similar problems in attracting longer-term contributors. In my experience the best way to solve that problem is to change your mindset of expecting most such people to be just one-off contributors. If you instead treat them as your next new committers and engage with them as peers, many (though of course not all) will respond in kind and actually become more involved. Many developers, especially from commercial backgrounds, tend to treat such contributors as just users reporting a problem. A typical interaction goes like What's the problem? Do you have a test case? OK, let me fix it (when I get around to it). A better approach is something like What's the problem? OK, here are some pointers to the relevant bits in code. How do you think this should be fixed? This is a really good advice and one that I (even after 10+ years around here) should follow more often. Thank you for stating it so clearly. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Lucene.NET status
First of all, many thanks, Jukka. On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zitting wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: One of the mentors (Stefan Bodewig) has indicated he wants to start pushing for graduation. UPDATE: Unfortunately, we have not made any progress on this - hopefully we can have a more conclusive update next check in. Our development/committers group is small, and work sometimes happens in bursts and then stalls - something we need to work on a bit. Looking at the svn history I see a long history of sustained month-after-month commit activity. More activity is of course always great, but I don't think this is something you need to worry about at least as a graduation issue. Agreed. However, the one thing I am a bit worried about is that I couldn't tell when was the last time you added a new committer to the team. Never. Your contribution report [1] shows some people who've contributed lots of patches but aren't committers yet. What's up with that? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?versionId=-1issueStatus=allselectedProjectId=12310290reportKey=com.sourcelabs.jira.plugin.report.contributions%3AcontributionreportNext=Next Many of those contributions happened before Lucene.NET re-entered incubation, the people have been let down back then and never came back when Lucene.NET came back to life. Is there a way to get a contribution report for the last year only or something similar? Filtering by version likely won't cut it. Of the top ten people some already are committers (Digy and Prescott) and only two other names ring a bell (I haven't been involved with Lucene.NET prior to becoming a mentor). Many contributions to Lucene.NET are one-off contributions and so far almost all contributors have been content with discussing their issues in JIRA. Unfortunately. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate RAT as Apache Creadur Project
+1 (binding) Stefan On 2012-03-11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: As recommended[1]: * the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as the Apache Creadur Project * the proposed charter has been reviewed[3] The penultimate stage is this VOTE by the incubator community. The VOTE is open to all but only IPMC votes are binding. I will tally the results no earlier than noon UTC on Thursday, March 22, 2012[4]. Robert [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201203.mbox/%3C4F53968D.7070908%40apache.org%3E [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201203.mbox/%3C4F53B9FB.4030404%40apache.org%3E [4] http://www.worldtimeserver.com/convert_time_in_UTC.aspx?y=2012mo=3d=22h=12mn=0 -8--- [ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below) [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling -- -8-- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to the comprehension and auditing of software distributions for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Creadur Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Creadur Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to the comprehension and auditing of software distributions; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Creadur be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Creadur Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Creadur Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Creadur Project: * Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org * Brian E Fox bri...@apache.org * David Crossley cross...@apache.org * David Blevins dblev...@apache.org * Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org * Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org * Jochen Wiedmann joc...@apache.org * Niall Pemberton nia...@apache.org * Robert Burrell Donkin rdon...@apache.org * Ross Duncan Gardler rgard...@apache.org * Sebastian Bazley s...@apache.org NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Robert Burrell Donkin be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Creadur, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Creadur PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Creadur Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Creadur Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator RAT podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator RAT podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project
+1 Stefan On 2012-02-26, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-) See [2] for a draft of the charter, excluding the list of initial committers. Unless anyone jumps into this thread, I'll assume that the current list of committers would be fine. Please read, review and jump in - but this is a vote on the principle of graduating now. This VOTE is open to all, and I'll tally this no early than Wednesday, 29 Feb 2012 17:00 UTC. Robert --8--- [ ] +1 the RAT community feels ready to graduate as Apache Creadur [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Do not graduate RAT at this time --- [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel [2] Suggested Draft Charter: WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to the comprehension and auditing of software distributions for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Creadur Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Creadur Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to the comprehension and auditing of software distributions for distribution at no charge to the public RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Creadur be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Creadur Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Creadur Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Creadur Project: ... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Robert Burrell Donkin be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Creadur, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Creadur PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Creadur Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Creadur Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator RAT podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator RAT podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4g incubating
On 2012-01-23, Prescott Nasser wrote: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release. This is very similar to our release at the end of November, however we have used generics where appropriate to give it a better feel for .Net developers. SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_4g_RC1/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4g-incubating-RC1/ Repeating my vote from the dev list +1 With Benson's vote we have two IPMC +1s and still need a third one. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4g incubating
On 2012-01-25, sebb wrote: Various stemmers are mentioned in the LICENSE file; their license appears to require a notice in the NOTICE file. What Prescott said. The last release had notices and the Lucene.NET community was told neither of those was required (so they were moved to the ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.txt file). Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Apache Creator suitability
On 2012-01-15, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: I found very little evidence that creadur is extensively used in commerce, outside Creadur GmbH and a wildlife artist. Creadur GmbH sells modelling clay so I don't think there is any potential for confusion. Apache Creadur looks good to me. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc6
On 11/19/11 6:00 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP. There are some differences between the svn tag and the source distribution. The tag doesn't have any DISCLAIMER and the names in the POMs are different (Apache OpenNLP in the release vs OpenNLP in the tag) the same is true for some xdocs. Are you sure the tag is what the release has been cut from? The scm URLs inside the tag point to rc5 if this is of any help. Otherwise sigs and hashes are good. NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER appear to be where they are required in the release artifacts. RAT is reasonably happy and I was able to build from the source distribution. I'd be happy to give you my +1 if we can come up with an svn tag that matches your release artifacts. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc6
On 2011-11-25, Jörn Kottmann wrote: On 11/25/11 12:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I'd be happy to give you my +1 if we can come up with an svn tag that matches your release artifacts. I created a branch based on rc5. Did some changes there and run the maven release tool from that branch. The release was build correctly, but somehow the tagging went wrong. I copied now the correct revision of the release branch to the rc6. Yes, only white-space differences now, which are to be expected. +1 for the release artifacts and the tag in svn revision 1206177 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
On 2011-11-25, Benson Margulies wrote: I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file based on recent traffic here. If anything this is a case of ask and get three different answers as the Lucene.NET community added the stuff to the NOTICE file because I as a mentor told them to. Sorry about that. This is the same kind of acknowledgement the Lucene Java project has in their NOTICE file as well, for example. Can anybody please point me to the result of the conversation that defines our current understanding of what goes into NOTICE and what doesn't so I don't give bad advice to podlings? I'm pretty sure this must have changed over the years and I was conditioned with a different interpretation from what it is now. Is it http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-notice (which fortunately don't disagree with each other) ? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
On 2011-11-25, ant elder wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is not a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!) Not including something in the NOTICE that must be required might be a blocking problem but including just a little more than is necessary isn't IMHO. If it was a podling release with so much unnecessary stuff that it showed they didn't really understand the requirements maybe thats worth voting against so they go and sort it out but for something like this i think its ok to say sort it out later Agreed. I'll make sure it gets sorted out before the next release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-458 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
On 2011-11-23, sebb wrote: On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Release candidate artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/ The source archive is missing several chunks of what is in the SVN tag. None of the following directory trees are in the source archive: branding/ docs/ lib/ Yes, this is deliberate. Are none of these needed for building/testing the software? lib contains tools that developers need to test or build certain parts. All of them can be downloaded separately and in fact many .NET developers will have their own copy of NUnit already. There is no point in bundling them with the release. They are in svn for convenience. See the last point in https://cwiki.apache.org/LUCENENET/road-map.html It is an issue the community will be addressing. branding and docs are website only things. The SVN tag contains lots of .exe files under the lib tree. Is it *really* necessary for these to be in SVN? See above. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
On 2011-11-23, Prescott Nasser wrote: I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and ready for your testing and voting. This release has one IPMC +1 so far (mine) and needs at least two more. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PATCH] Incubator site copyright years
On 2011-11-15, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: The copyright years stamped onto every incubator page should probably be updated. For some reason, non-ascii characters are stomped when I run the site build so I'd be really grateful if someone could update the site.vsl (or explain how I can stop the stomping). I'll do the former (need to update the RAT page for the new release anyway) and will try to do the later when I see it happen to myself as well 8-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PATCH] Incubator site copyright years
On 2011-11-15, sebb wrote: On 15 November 2011 15:41, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-11-15, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: The copyright years stamped onto every incubator page should probably be updated. For some reason, non-ascii characters are stomped when I run the site build so I'd be really grateful if someone could update the site.vsl (or explain how I can stop the stomping). I'll do the former (need to update the RAT page for the new release anyway) and will try to do the later when I see it happen to myself as well 8-) The only page that is causing problems to me is the IP clearance page for Lucene Kuromoji http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/lucene-kuromoji.html where Velocity creates something different for the last glyph of newspaper than what is in svn. I've tried to use numeric entities but that didn't change anything (left them in anyway). Since the page that is currently online is as broken as the one I was about to commit I just went ahead. The copyright year can be auto-generated, see: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1202268view=rev Yes, thanks, I merged your change with mine 8-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[ANN] Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 Released
The Apache RAT team is pleased to announce the Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 release! Release Audit Tool (RAT) is a tool to improve accuracy and efficiency when checking releases. It is heuristic in nature: making guesses about possible problems. It will produce false positives and cannot find every possible issue with a release. It's reports require interpretation. Version 0.8 improves the command line interface, supports more file types when adding license headers and makes it easier to detect custom licenses. A full list of changes can be found at http://incubator.apache.org/rat/RELEASE_NOTES.txt Source and binary distributions are available for download from the Apache mirrors via: http://incubator.apache.org/rat/downloads.html When downloading, please verify signatures using the KEYS file available at the above location when downloading the release. For complete information on Apache RAT, including instructions on how to submit bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache RAT website: http://incubator.apache.org/rat/ Disclaimer: Apache RAT is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator. Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. Stefan Bodewig, on behalf of the Apache RAT community pgp2O5NCqk1tu.pgp Description: PGP signature
[RESULT] Release Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 based on RC2
On 2011-11-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: the RAT community has voted to release Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 with four +1s by PPMC members, all of whom are IPMC members as well. With no additional votes from the general list this vote has now passed and I'll start the publish/wait for mirrors/announce cycle. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 based on RC2
Hi all, the RAT community has voted to release Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 with four +1s by PPMC members, all of whom are IPMC members as well. svn tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/tags/apache-rat-0.8RC2/ tarballs: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/apache-rat-0.8RC2/ Release Notes: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/apache-rat-0.8RC2/RELEASE_NOTES.txt Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-171/org/apache/rat/ Original Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-rat-dev/20.mbox/%3C87r51hrfbg.fsf%40v35516.1blu.de%3E Do we want to release this as RAT 0.8? Vote will be open for 72 hours and close at about 0700 UTC on November 15th 2011. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Add committer to asf-authorization-template
On 2011-08-15, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Can anybody with write access update the auth file and add leadpipe to the OGNL podling please? Done Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: How to submit IP Clearance
On 2011-08-08, Simon Willnauer wrote: the apache lucene project currently works on a code donation for Kuromoji Japanese Analyzer [1]. ICLA, CLA and code grant have been received and as far as I know we now need to submit the ip-clearance.xml file to the incubator website. Correct. By submit it is understood you add it to the incubator website, see http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html This has to be done by somebody with write access to the Incubator svn. After that you start a lazy consensus vote on the Incubator general list prefixed with [IP CLEARANCE] in the subject, wait 72 hours, tally the result, done. I am wondering how I submit this or who is going to commit this. I think as a member I can commit to the incubator svn but I don't want to do this without explicit permission though. IMHO, if you already have the karma then just do it (same for Olivier). Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.0 RC 3
On 2011-08-07, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Release candidate 3 for Apache Lucy (incubating) version 0.2.0 can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~marvin/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0-rc3/ See the CHANGES file at the top level of the archive for information about the content of this release. No kind of functional testing performed, just the normal sanity checks. PGP verification passes with the KEYS file found in http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucy/KEYS - MD5 sum looks good as well. What kind of SHA algo has been used for the .sha file? I've tried all sha*sum tools on my Ubuntu box but neither returns a result that looks close to your .sha file. LICENSE and NOTICE look good, tag and tarball are identical, there are 100 files where RAT doesn't recognize the license (because it doesn't recognize the ICU license for example). A report created with RAT's current trunk and Ant can be found here http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0-rc3.rat.txt Yes, I've seen the excludes file but didn't want to allow you any cheating ;-) Inside the snowstem module there are a few files that don't carry a this file is generated notice but not any sort of license either, I guess these should be fixed (maybe for the next release as you'll likely get enough +1s anyway). Rest looks good to me. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.0 RC 3
On 2011-08-09, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 02:45:30PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: No kind of functional testing performed, just the normal sanity checks. Great, thank you for the review! What kind of SHA algo has been used for the .sha file? SHA512. GPG was used to produce all sigs and sums. $ gpg --print-md SHA512 apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0.tar.gz apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0.tar.gz: 435CE486 CC933673 6A8D6526 C0B31526 8091B64F 637472E5 70D16513 3EB54054 E4617DEB E6DA4F3B 3C4842D3 CA4D3B8A 5B904960 ECF9EF88 3CDD9416 A8E8CF19 I've tried all sha*sum tools on my Ubuntu box but neither returns a result that looks close to your .sha file. The sum in the .sha artifact file is the same as the one produced by sha512sum, though -- just the formatting is different: $ sha512sum apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0.tar.gz 435ce486cc9336736a8d6526c0b315268091b64f637472e570d165133eb54054e4617debe6da4f3b3c4842d3ca4d3b8a5b904960ecf9ef883cdd9416a8e8cf19 apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0.tar.gz I can confirm that. For some reason I thought the first few numbers didn't match yesterday. So the sha512sum is good as well. You might want to use a different extension in the future (.sha512) to reduce the confusion in particular since most Java projects only provide sha1 hashes. Unfortunately, one of the downsides of using GPG to produce the sums is that the resulting file cannot be used with e.g. sha512sum --check: The same is true for the mvn generated checksum files most Java projects use. Those files only contain the hash with no file name of the file they apply to. At least this is true for the Java artifacts I have reviewed in the past. However, if I use openssl on my Mac to produce the .md5 and the .sha, I also get files that XXXsum --check can't parse. So unless we want to require the Lucy RM to produce the sums on a system with the XXXsum executables installed (e.g. Linux), we aren't guaranteed to generate sum files that XXXsum can chew. I don't think we have ever required anything like that, don't worry. There are 100 files where RAT doesn't recognize the license (because it doesn't recognize the ICU license for example). A report created with RAT's current trunk and Ant can be found here http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0-rc3.rat.txt Yes, I've seen the excludes file but didn't want to allow you any cheating ;-) Heh. I don't really like using the excludes, as I'm wary of inadvertently globbing files that shouldn't be excluded. When I looked through the files I thought that had just happened - I no longer do so, see below. It would be nice if we could comment the rat-excludes file and have the relevant comment show up next to each excluded file in the report, as that would make auditing easier. Sounds like an enhancement request for RAT. Inside the snowstem module there are a few files that don't carry a this file is generated notice but not any sort of license either, I guess these should be fixed (maybe for the next release as you'll likely get enough +1s anyway). With the exception of one JSON file, those files with no licenses are verbatim imports from the Snowball project: http://snowball.tartarus.org/license.php We have not bothered to insert the licensing arrangement into the text of the Snowball software. Understood. I would be hesitant to insert copyright and licensing notices into those files when the Snowball people have chosen to omit them. We do include the relevant information in NOTICE, though. Yes, that's OK. Just from looking at the source files it wasn't clear to me that this was the case. It wouldn't have helped in my case if you had a README inside the snowstem directory as I was only looking at the RAT report, but a small pointer there might help others. That one JSON file is used for testing and is derived from Snowball source materials; I would have inserted a this file is generated comment, but JSON is officially a commentless format. Instead, there is a README file which sits right next to it in the directory which contains the following: The file 'tests.json' and this file were autogenerated by update_snowstem.pl. 'tests.json' contains materials from the Snowball project. See the LICENSE and NOTICE files for more information. This is great. As for votes, RC 3 has already garnered three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members: Chris Mattmann, Joe Schaefer, and myself -- so in all likelihood it will be going forward. I know. After your explanations (and pointing out that I'm unable to compare two numbers 8-) you now have my +1 as well. [rat:report] C:/Users/stefan.bodewig/Desktop/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0/log This file is not a part of the Lucy distribution, and I assume it was created as a side-effect
Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item
On 2011-08-03, Henri Yandell wrote: [By which I mean the following checklist item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. ] I'm proposing that the following is added to the process for a new podling: 1) The podling are to list the individuals/entities who need to grant rights for any existing software moving to the ASF. These may be either ICLAs or Software Grants. [Ideally this would be listed, or at least described, in the proposals]. 2) Podlings are expected to have completed this item after 3 months of reporting within the Incubator. It's understood that this may not be the case, in which case they will continue to report monthly until the item is complete (explaining the current status in their report). Additionally: 3) Existing podlings are grandfathered in until the end of the year, at which point they will have to start reporting monthly if they have not completed the item. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3 month deadline on CLA item
On 2011-08-02, Henri Yandell wrote: As can be seen elsewhere, I'm on a self-given mission to clean up the history of podlings by getting them to sign off on the following checklist item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. I view this as the first item that a podling should be dealing with, along with setting up the committers and getting that first codebase in. By comparison, a website is a nice to have and community is just icing. Dealing with, completing is a different issue. Proposal time. In parallel to cleaning up history, I'd like to stop the rot going forward. I'd like to propose that each new podling has 3 months (or another calendar length if that feels too short/too long) to get the checklist item signed off. I'm partial to 3 months as we would make them report monthly until they have the item signed off, perhaps with 6 months as a 'do we retire the podling?' checkpoint. +1 in general but three month may be too short, I'm leaning to the report monthly until done with a checkpoint - and six month feels good to me. Currently I'm mentor of a podling where one of the original contributors who enthusiastically supported the move to the ASF has gone MIA for several month now without any sort of CLA or grant in sight. In such a situation you hope your reminder mails have been lost, there is some sort of vacation and things will work out. You wait until you realize it is time to act because nothing is going to happen. In such a case three month get eaten up quickly. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3 month deadline on CLA item
On 2011-08-03, Henri Yandell wrote: Stefan wrote: Currently I'm mentor of a podling where one of the original contributors who enthusiastically supported the move to the ASF has gone MIA for several month now without any sort of CLA or grant in sight. In such a situation you hope your reminder mails have been lost, there is some sort of vacation and things will work out. You wait until you realize it is time to act because nothing is going to happen. In such a case three month get eaten up quickly. And resolving this is the #1 priority issue for the project right? :) It has become so a few weeks ago, yes. 8-) [obviously I don't know the details; could be it's a situation where the previous license was fair enough, in which case I'd look to just live with that license and wash my hands of it all :) ]. The previuos license is the Apache License 2.0, this shouldn't pose any problem. In the concrete case much of the code is in plugins that can be simply removed and/or rewritten. The latter might be a good way to attract new devs. --- So from this I seem to see support. I'll kick off a vote, incorporating the feedback above. Thank you Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.2.1 - voting based on RC2
On 2011-04-04, Josh Thompson wrote: The release artifact, sums, and GPG signature can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.2.1-RC2-incubating/ SVN tag from which artifact was exported: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.2.1-RC2/ +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.1-incubating-rc3
On 2011-03-28, Henry Saputra wrote: We need one more IPMC VOTE to continue with the release plan. Signatures and checksums match, svn tag and archive seem to be identical (except for the line feeds in DISCLAIMER.txt, a non-issue), RAT is happy. +1 (IPMC binding) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.2.1
On 2011-03-29, Josh Thompson wrote: Bump. We'd really like to get this release out. Could we get a couple more votes? Josh, it usually helps if you mention you need additional IPMC votes in your initial mail. In many cases (I'd hope) there are three mentors who are IPMC members and have already voted. The release artifact, sums, and GPG signature can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.2.1-RC1-incubating/ SVN tag from which artifact was exported: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.2.1-RC1/ Signature and checksums look match, tag and tarball are identical except for line-feeds and the absence of Dojo in svn, RAT is reasonably happy. +1 I also think you don't need to add Dojo to the NOTICE file in particular since you could opt to use the BSD license instead of the Academic Free License. Strictly speaking only version 3.0 of the AFL is listed in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a but since the Dojo sources say version = 2.1 and you could opt for BSD anyway I don't think this needs to be fixed immediately. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.1-incubating-rc3
On 2011-03-30, Henry Saputra wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Signatures and checksums match, svn tag and archive seem to be identical (except for the line feeds in DISCLAIMER.txt, a non-issue), RAT is happy. We will check and make fix if necessary for the DISCLAIMER.txt file in next release. This is a platform issue and nothing you need to (or likely even could) fix. The file inside the archive will have line-feeds matching the platform of the release manager while the files in svn (should) match the platform of the working copy. I was surprised it was just this one file so you may want to check whether it has svn:eol-style set. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.4.0-incubating
On 2011-03-23, Andrei Savu wrote: Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for convenience. Source and binary files: http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.4.0-incubating-candidate-2 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-028 The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/tags/release-0.4.0-incubating +1 Looks good to me. For your next release you may want to investigate whether you can add license headers to the confluence files in your source tree and the docs you generate from them. I'm neither familiar enough with Confluence nor the tools you use to create the documentation to know whether this is possible at all. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.4.0-incubating
On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote: But the main issue is that the binary distribution contains lots of 3rd party products which are not mentioned in either the NOTICE file or the LICENSE file. They likely are supposed to be in the - unfortunately empty - license files inside the lib directory. Whether it requires attribution or not, 3rd party product licenses must be recorded in the LICENSE file. The standard method is to include the text in the file, but it may be allowable to just include a pointer to the license elsewhere in the distribution. This pointer is missing, you are correct. I think these issues are sufficient to block the release. Of the binary convenience build. If the whirr project wanted to release the source tarball alone, the problems you have found wouldn't apply. The source tarball looks good to me. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.4.0-incubating
On 2011-03-07, Andrei Savu wrote: Source and binary files: http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.4.0-incubating-candidate-0 The binary contains among other things the Bouncycastle provider so I think you have to do some extra work (see http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html) but I don't see Whirr mentioned on http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ and can't find any crypto notice inside the README. RAT flags a few .sh, .css and .html files that are without any license header. The binary distribution contains lots of jars that I can't easily match to the license files in the tarball. What is aws-ec2-1.0-beta-9.jar's license (likely jcloud's but how would I know)? Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/dist/KEYS Note the file is different from http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/whirr/KEYS which doesn't contain your key. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.4.0-incubating
On 2011-03-08, Andrei Savu wrote: We will restart the vote with a new release candidate soon. Thank you Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
We need one more IPMC vote (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2)
Hi all, so far Benson and I have voted +1 so this vote still needs a third IPMC member voting. If anybody can find the time to review the distribution ZIPs, that would be great. Stefan PS: RAT reports on both ZIPs are here http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/Lucene.NET/ On 2011-03-02, Troy Howard wrote: All, I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is available and ready for your testing and voting. This will be our first release since returning to the Incubator. We look forward to your input. Release candidate artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/2.9.2-incubating-RC2/dist/ SVN tag revision: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_2_RC2 PPMC Vote Thread: http://bit.ly/eGcbYY The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Lucene.Net PMC votes are cast. Please cast your votes! [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Thanks to everyone involved for the hard work and contributions which made this release possible. Thanks, Troy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2
On 2011-03-02, Troy Howard wrote: PPMC Vote Thread: http://bit.ly/eGcbYY This vote contains my vote as a mentor of Lucene.NET, so there already is one IPMC +1, but let me repeat it here to make tallying easier. Please cast your votes! [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 (binding) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduation of the Chemistry Podling
On 2011-02-11, Nick Burch wrote: I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation. +1 - I approve of the Chemistry graduation 0 - I've not had time to look into it, sorry -1 - There's an issue with graduation at this time, which is +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation
On 2011-01-27, Troy Howard wrote: Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan 12th, we now have three mentors signed up and would like to call a vote to accept Lucene.Net into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is included below and can also be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal Please cast your votes: [X] +1 Accept Lucene.Net for incubation [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] EasyAnt incubator
On 2011-01-24, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Ant PMC for a new EasyAnt podling. The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EasyAntProposal [X] +1 to accept EasyAnt into the Incubator [] 0 don't care [] -1 object and reason why. +1 (binding, if that helps when counting) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] accept Easyant for incubation
On 2011-01-18, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: I am going to be a mentor of EasyAnt. I am looking for other people willing to volunteer for that too. Count me in. I've added my name to the proposal page on the Wiki as well. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene.Net return to the Incubator
On 2011-01-18, Troy Howard wrote: If I recall correctly we need at least two mentors before the Incubator PMC can vote on our proposal. Is there anyone else willing to help us out as Mentor? Yes, me. I've just added my name to the propsal page. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [IP-CLEARANCE] Bushel Donation to Apache Ant
Hi, it's been almost 90 hours since I started the thread, I haven't seen any -1s and even two +1s (thanks Mohammad and Siegfried). So by lazy consensus the process has finished successfully and Bushel can be imported. Thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[IP-CLEARANCE] Bushel Donation to Apache Ant
Hi all, the people behind the Bushel project at Google Code[1] which provides limited OSGi support to Apache Ivy want to donate their codebase for integration into Ivy. The code can be found at JIRA issue IVY-1241[2], all three authors (one of them is Ant PMC member Nicolas Lalevée) signed software grants and the Ant PMC voted to accept the donation. The form is already online at http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/bushel.html but I forgot to add it to the index (done now, should become world-visible soonish). 72hrs waiting period for -1s start now. Thanks Stefan [1] http://code.google.com/p/bushel/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1241 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] OODT Graduation to TLP
On 2010-11-11, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Please VOTE on the below resolution for promoting OODT to an Apache TLP and graduating from the Incubator. The VOTE is open for 72 hrs. [ ] +1 Accept OODT's graduation from the Incubator [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't accept OODT's graduation from the Incubator because... +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: The link to the ip clearance of Ant Groovy Front is incorrect
On 2010-10-09, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: It is pointing to the User Admin Felix stuff: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html Can someone fix it please ? Fixed in svn, will be fixed online within a few hours. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
On 2010-08-19, Joe Schaefer wrote: Now that the board has declared there are no legal obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to restart the vote. - Original Message From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to remove the current rule that requires 3 votes from IPMC members to approve a vote on a new committer, effectively delegating the decision to the PPMC. Additionally the pre-ack would be removed, but no other process changes are anticipated. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: RAT can be dangerous
On 2010-08-17, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Ross, while I understand the All it does part I don't get the dangerous part. It becomes dangerous if people start to believe it did more than scan for licenses. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Future of RAT
On 2010-08-11, Niall Pemberton wrote: The real point though is not size - its *activity*. [absolutely correct observation of low activity snipped] My concern is if RAT goes TLP then it may be a small step away from not being able to get 3 PMC votes. I understand that and share the concern to some degree. RAT has probably never been the primary project for any of its contributors. Most of us jumped in to scratch specific itches and other than that RAT is a side project somewhere down the list of projects we contribute to regularly. Pretty far down. That being said, we are aware of the problem and have tried to address that by adding four more committers last December, that doesn't seem to have been enough. One reason probably is that RAT does what it is supposed to do well enough for most of us - the feedback of people who said RAT was so important to them that it should become a TLP indicates it is good enough for most other people as well. In a way RAT has already been mature and in maintenance mode when it entered incubation. So yes, development activity is low. OTOH patches get applied and releases are made if there is anything to fix. I'm sure we could have gotten more people to vote if it had been necessary on the last release, it just wasn't necessary so people preferred to work on other things rather than checking releases. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: an experiment
On 2010-08-11, Joe Schaefer wrote: From: Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com +1 to IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process for voting in new committers (one question, would they need an ACK from IPMC - similar to how PMC's send a note to the board for an ACK for new pmc members)? That certainly sounds like a reasonable thing to do, sure. +1 In the 2nd question, significant committers, are we asking mentors to identify such candidates for addition to IPMC, especially release managers for example? if so, +1 for that as well. Absolutely, especially RM's that have gotten into the habit of running RAT themselves. There isn't anything that would stop a mentor from proposing a podling committer who is not an ASF member as an IPMC member today, is there? I'd expect you'd get the required votes for people who have been RMs or contributed significantly from enough other IPMC members. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Future of RAT
On 2010-08-10, ant elder wrote: How about keeping it here at the Incubator? I was going to suggest that as well - as a subproject, not as an eternal podling. But I understand Ross point of sending the wrong signal. Infra would be fine with me if infra wanted to absorb rat. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Future of RAT
On 2010-08-10, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on the team that would be able to? Jochen has sure be joking here. The team list he pointed at contains at least two current PMC chairs (haven't checked too closely) as well as a bunch of former PMC chairs. To me RAT's scope feels too small for a TLP. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Future of RAT
On 2010-08-10, Mark Struberg wrote: RAT is very important and helpful, but I don't think it's big enough to justify an own TLP. It previously was under codehaus and I agree it would best fit under the maven TLP. RAT RAT Maven Plugin. RAT initially was developed at Google Code. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: VOTE: Release Apache RAT 0.7
On 2010-08-08, Dennis Lundberg wrote: JIRA lists 6 unresolved issues for version 0.7. thank you for the heads-up. Is the plan to reschedule them for a future version? I've rescheduled one to 0.8 and moved the five remaining ones to unscheduled. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: IVY SVN duplicated under Ant and Incubator SVN
On 2010-06-11, sebb wrote: Ivy started out as an Incubator project with code in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/ It is now an Ant sub-project with code in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/ However the incubator SVN tree still has files in it It is gone now. Thanks for the heads-up Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] - Graduate Log4PHP as a subproject of Logging project
On 2010-03-04, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: This vote is to ask that the IPMC approve the graduation of Log4PHP as a sub-project of Apache Logging. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT][IP-CLEARANCE] Ant Groovy Front
On 2009-12-18, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Given there will be a full weekend over the next 72 hours I'll wait at least 96 hours for -1s. Closer to 100 than 96 hours and no -1s, so I conclude the clearance process has completed successfully. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[IP-CLEARANCE] Ant Groovy Front
Hi all, Ant PMC member Nicolas Lalevee has written an Ant ProjectHelper implementation that allows build files to be written in Groovy that he wants to donate to the ASF. The codebase can be found attached to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347, the ip-clearance form has been committed to svn a few minutes ago and should become available at http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ant-groovy-front.html soon. Given there will be a full weekend over the next 72 hours I'll wait at least 96 hours for -1s. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension
On 2009-07-14, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote: I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Sling as Top Level Project
On 2009-05-29, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Sling as a Top Level Project [1]. Based on this feedback, I would like to launch the vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Sling as a Top Level Project to the Board. +1 to recommend Sling's graduation Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Graduate Apache Sling as Top Level Project
On 2009-05-25, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote: The Sling podling has voted on asking the Incubator PMC to support its graduation as a top level project. The vote passed with 23 +1 votes (8 of which from PPMC members), no 0 and no -1 votes. The vote thread can be found at [1], the result at [2]. Sling has been in the Incubator since September 5th, 2007. During its incubation, Sling has ... * produced two releases * added two committers/PPMC members * added a documentation committer * received numerous contributions Finally, let me quote our Champion Jukka Zitting: mentor hat on Day employees are still behind the majority of Sling commits, but the project has shown ability to welcome new ideas and contributors and to include them as equal members in the development and decision making processes. I've been watching sling-dev since Sling entered the incubator and can confirm Jukka's description. A big +1 for Sling's graduation. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating
On 2009-03-31, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of the JempBox library included in PDFBox. The release candidate is available for review at http://people.apache.org/~jukka/pdfbox/jempbox-0.8.0-incubating/ [X] +1 Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not approve this release because... +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] apache-rat-project 0.6rc3
On 2009-03-19, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/ The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.6/ a whole lot of files to check. The SVN tag is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/tags/apache-rat-project-0.6/ Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] apache-rat-project 0.6rc2
On 2009-03-14, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: I have prepared a staging repository for 0.6, which you can view on https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-4fdaf205188c41/ Compared to Roberts previous rc1, I have mainly changed documentation and license issues (seems we never used RAT to check the RAT sources ... ;-) Ran a few tests, everything looks fine. +1 Please cast your vote: Jochen [X] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Shindig for Incubation
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007. [ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] RAT to enter incubator
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept project Buildr for incubation
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to incubate Buildr. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RESULT] Ivy has Graduated as an Ant Subproject
Hi, during the vote the following people have cast their +1 Antoine Levy-Lambert Craig L Russell Gilles Scokart Jean T. Anderson Martijn Dashorst Matthieu Riou Niclas Hedhman Noel J. Bergman Robert Burrell Donkin Stefan Bodewig Stephane Bailliez Steve Loughran Xavier Hanin Yoav Shapira ten of whom are Incubator PMC members. With no -1s this vote has passed. Congratulations to the Ivy team and good luck! Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] graduate stdcxx to TLP
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We invite everyone to vote to approve this proposal. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Let Ivy Graduate as an Ant Subproject
Hi all, the Ivy community has voted to graduate as an Ant subproject[1][2] and the Ant PMC has accepted Ivy[3][4]. I've updated Ivy's status file[5]. So this is the mandatory Incubator PMC vote. Should Ivy be allowed to graduate as an Ant Subproject? [ ] Yes [ ] No This vote is going to run for 72 hours, closing on Thursday October, 11th about half past 7am GMT. Hope I got my timezone calculations right ;-) Stefan Footnotes: [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ivy-dev/200709.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ivy-dev/200709.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/200709.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/200710.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [5] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ivy.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Let Ivy Graduate as an Ant Subproject
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should Ivy be allowed to graduate as an Ant Subproject? [X] Yes [ ] No +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPMC Votes when Graduating to a Suproject (was Re: [VOTE] Let Ivy Graduate as an Ant Subproject)
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, the Ivy community has voted to graduate as an Ant subproject[1][2] and the Ant PMC has accepted Ivy[3][4]. I've updated Ivy's status file[5]. So this is the mandatory Incubator PMC vote. Should Ivy be allowed to graduate as an Ant Subproject? [ ] Yes [ ] No This vote is going to run for 72 hours, closing on Thursday October, 11th about half past 7am GMT. It is my understanding that, if a PMC has voted to accept a subproject, no IPMC vote is required. Hmm, http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject says we need a graduation approval vote (which this is supposed to be 8-). +1 anyhow, Thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE][policy] Release Distribution Directory
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --8--- [ ] +1 Insist that releases are distributed within http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Do not apply this policy patch (reasons appreciated) +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Request to accept the Sling project for Incubation
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As described in [1], please acknowledge this request to enter the Sling project into incubation. The Jackrabbit PMC has voted (see the vote request [2] and results [3]) to approve the Sling project (see the proposal [4]) for incubation. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Change Mentor to Mentors in Incubator Policy
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Craig L. Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ASL vs AL in RAT (was Re: [VOTE] approve release of CXF 2.0-incubator-RC)
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This reminds me... can someone work on updating RAT so that it use AL instead of ASL? Done 8-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a first alpha release of Ivy. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html In summary we have 7 +1 votes: 5 from PPMC members and 2 non-binding, and no 0s or -1s. We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this version. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] log4net graduation
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There had been several individuals who had submitted patches that had been incorporated, however no individual had established a pattern of submissions which would suggest them as a potential additional committer. I've been watching the log4net project for a long time now and can attest that this actually has happened in the case of Ron. He was the first one who showed enough interest in long-term contibutions and was quickly voted in as a committer. The user community of log4net is huge and goes far beyond what is visible on the user list. I've been doing .NET development IRL for the past 2+ years, have seen several shops doing .NET development over that time, log4net was everywhere. The log4net-dev community appears healthy and I believes warrants graduation from the incubator and has my +1 as mentor and incubator PMC member. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, can I request the creation of the svn directory for ivy before the grant is received, or shall I wait for this one ? No, we just must not import any code before the grant is recorded. You don't need to bother infrastructure with svn issues, BTW, I should be able to handle that. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You don't need to bother infrastructure with svn issues, BTW, I should be able to handle that. Just found out that I cannot create the initial directory - and didn't want to grant myself the right to do so, either. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: === Nominated Mentors === Antoine Levy-Lambert Stephane Baillez Steve Loughran Due to the mail system outage the past weekend my email accepting a mentor role came a bit late. The final vote should include my name as well. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache TSIK
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: There is a proposed PGP package being discussed in Jakarta Commons. Would there be any overlap at lower levels (not at the WS layer) between them, providing for some collaboration? This strikes me as orthogonal, Same here. but it might be of interest that I'm currently working on a to-be-BSD-licensed (or equivalent) PGP C library. Interesting, yes. The goal of the commons component is to provide an easier API for the simple task of signing a stream or verifying the signature. This is what the Maven and Ant build tools would need today. En-/Decryprion may come later as well. There already exist at least two license compatible Java libraries that provide OpenPGP functionality (bouncycastle.org and cryptix.org) so the component is also going to provide an implementation agnostic interface. Bindings to command line invocations of OpenPGP compatible toolkits or JNI bindings to a C-library would certainly be possible as well. BTW, its properly called OpenPGP. We started with PGP (based on ignorance, mainly 8-) but have made up our mind already and will call it commons-openpgp. Unless we broaden the scope even more so it would become commons-crypto - in which case there'd be more overlap with XML security or TSIK. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gump for incubating projects?
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating projects? (other than actually doing the work, of course ;) This last one is probably the biggest obstacle, as whoever does the work needs to be at least slightly familiar with both, the incubating project and Gump. I'll be happy to lend a hand where needed. Also note that Gump can't work on Maven builds yet, so all projects that use Maven exclusively (say, Geronimo) will need to also provide a vanilla Ant build file in CVS. AFAIU Maven offers a plugin to create those and as a bonus can create a (hopefully) proper Gump descriptor as well. In this case most of the work has been done and all that's needed is referencing the project in Gump's default profile, which I offer to do (just tell me, where to look for the descriptor). Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
