Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

[roryqi]

Just curious.  What's the relationship between Nessie and Polaris?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2024年7月31日周三 20:09写道：

> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for your email. Much appreciated!
>
> I agree with the requirements to join the incubator, I share the same
> vision.
>
> The codebase is there, public, under the Apache license. So, I think
> we are good here :)
>
> About the community, it's a small one, but present, vibrant, and eager
> to grow. We have a lot of enthusiasm around this proposal (and also
> Polaris open source). I think it would be a great podling.
>
> The split between PPMC / ocmmitters is unusual because of the
> community build goal. The team had a lot of feedback and interest from
> different parties, including some Apache projects.
> When I prepared the proposal with the team (that included people
> listed in the PPMC), we wanted to involve anyone helping the project
> to grow. It's not necessary code contributions, it's everything to:
> 1. Help in the design (for instance Jack Ye is helping on the Apache
> Iceberg REST impl vision)
> 2. Help to grow the community by including other communities (for
> instance Anoop proposed to bridge with Apache XTable, John with Apache
> Kafka, Robert with Project Nessie)
> 3. Mentor committers and other PPMC (that's my role mostly :)) in
> addition of the regular mentor. For instance, Tyler could be a great
> mentor thanks to his experience on Apache Beam.
>
> So about the commits:
> - Polaris started on a private repo at Snowflake including code that
> it was not possible to push open source (Snowflake specific). So, we
> had to change the history to remove these commits and have a clean
> open source codebase
> - You are right, not all PPMC members have committed on the repo, same
> about the committers. The reason they are there is that either:
>1. Their contributions are not code
>2. Their contributions are not yet there, but they plan to contribute
> I think it happens pretty often to have people listed in the initial
> committers without commit (for instance, I think on Gravitino, Ashish
> Singh is on the initial committer list without a commit afair).
>
> I understand your comment, and it's important to me.
> If it's a concern for you, I'm happy to rework the initial committer
> list with the team (also removing PPMC list to use the default layout)
> and grow the PPMC/committers when in the incubator.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:47 AM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In general, projects joining the incubator need two things:
> > - A codebase
> > - a community around it
> >
> > While this isn't a hard requirement, building either while in incubation
> can be difficult.
> >
> > The first issue I see is it’s not clear to me that there is a community
> here.
> >
> > The split between PPMC / committers is also unusual.
> >
> > It also seems there’s a disconnect between the people who have
> contributed to the project and those on the initial PMC/committer list. I
> understand history has been lost. Is there any reason why history wasn’t
> preserved? But given it comes from a single vendor, I would assume that the
> commits in the new repo would then give an accurate representation of who
> is involved from outside that vendor since the plan/announcement to make it
> open source. However looking at the commits, 80%+ of the people involved
> come from that single vendor which and most of the proposed PPMC/committers
> have no activity in the project. How have these people contributed?
> >
> > Looking closer, other than jbonofre or snazy, I can see these commits
> from non-Snowflake people, and that is it.
> > anoopj - 1 commit (fixing a basic typo)
> > ajantha-bhat - 2 commits (minor doc changes)
> >
> > From the information provided, it seems that a lot of the proposed PMCs
> have not been involved with the project at all. Mentors are there to help a
> project, adding extra existing PMC members to the PPMC to just help out is
> also rather unusual. So both the PPMC/committer split and the composition
> seem problematic to me.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) 0.9.0 RC2

[roryqi]

Yes, you can read the readme of riffle. They are developed by the same
person.

PJ Fanning  于2024年7月8日周一 08:04写道：

> +1 (binding)
>
> I note that Uniffle is still using a DISCLAIMER-WIP and highlighting
> that you have yet to complete the work to review the 3rd party source
> that you use in Uniffle. It would be great if the PPMC could get
> around to completing this work.
>
> * Downloads ok
> * src and bin tar.gz files have valid checksums and signatures
> * DISCLAIMER-WIP included
> * LICENSE and NOTICE are included but have yet to be updated to
> provide the details of 3rd party source
> * no unexpected binaries
> * source headers ok
> * builds ok
> * bin artifact extracts ok and shell scripts seem to work.
>
> ScanOSS SBOM Workbench suggests that there is 3rd party source from
> AWS EMR and Zuston/Riffle. Is there iaSoftware Grant Agreement for
> Zuston/Riffle [1]?
>
> [1] https://github.com/zuston/riffle
>
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 at 21:44, Enrico Minack  wrote:
> >
> > Hello Incubator Community,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) version
> > 0.9.0 RC2
> >
> > The Apache Uniffle community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release
> > Apache Uniffle (Incubating) version 0.9.0 RC2
> >
> > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> > incubator release.
> >
> > Uniffle community vote thread:
> > • https://lists.apache.org/thread/zr9q7q6d96rrdljnsbylddrj6x1gxs3c
> >
> > Vote result thread:
> > • https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8r7kv0hxj0th19y2bcv152gbzf7bh6k
> >
> > The release candidate:
> > • https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/uniffle/0.9.0-rc2/
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > • https://github.com/apache/incubator-uniffle/tree/v0.9.0-rc2
> >
> > Release notes:
> > • https://uniffle.apache.org/download/release-notes-0.9.0
> >
> > The artifacts signed with PGP key [89AD4F3770D32175], corresponding to
> > [enric...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file:
> > • https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/uniffle/KEYS
> >
> > As the DISCLAIMER-WIP shows, this release still left some license
> > problems, which will be gradually resolved during incubation.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [] +1 approve
> > [] +0 no opinion
> > [] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks,
> > On behalf of Apache Uniffle (Incubating) community
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator

[roryqi]

+1 (non-binding).

Cheng Pan  于2024年5月30日周四 19:14写道：

> +1(non-binding), good luck!
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan
>
>
> > On May 29, 2024, at 23:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Following the discussion about Gravitino [1], I would like to start
> > the formal vote to accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator.
> >
> > As reminder, this is the Gravitino Proposal:
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator
> > [ ] 0, I don't care either way
> > [ ] -1, do not accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator, because ...
> >
> > The vote will run for one week starting from today.
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] GravitinoProposal to the incubator

[roryqi]

+1 (non-binding).

Rory

Xiaoqiao He  于2024年5月27日周一 15:04写道：

> +1. Good Luck!
>
> Best Regards,
> - He Xiaoqiao
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 1:47 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I would be willing to be an additional mentor or join the initial set
> of
> > > team members if there is interest.
> >
> > Thanks, Larry, for offering. I’ve added you to the proposal as a mentor.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept HertzBeat Into the ASF Incubator

[roryqi]

+1, Thanks.

Xin Wang  于2024年4月3日周三 09:43写道：

> +1, binding
>
> Xun Liu  于2024年4月3日周三 08:58写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Xun Liu
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:33 AM zhongyi tan 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Good luck
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 在 2024/4/2 20:15，“Zhang Yonglun” > > zhangyong...@apache.org>> 写入:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who has already taken the time to vote.
> > >
> > >
> > > I just wanted to gently remind that our voting process is nearing its
> > > deadline, and we're still hoping to gather more input. Your thoughts
> > > and opinions truly matter to us.
> > >
> > >
> > > Your participation in the vote will not only shape our decisions but
> > > also ensure that we consider a diverse range of perspectives. We value
> > > every voice and want to make sure everyone has the opportunity to
> > > contribute.
> > >
> > >
> > > If you haven't already, please take a moment to cast your vote. And if
> > > you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach out to
> > > me anytime.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for your time and consideration.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Zhang Yonglun
> > >
> > >
> > > Zhang Yonglun mailto:zhangyong...@apache.org
> >>
> > > 于2024年3月29日周五 14:24写道：
> > > >
> > > > Hi Incubator,
> > > >
> > > > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for
> > HertzBeat[1],
> > > > I am starting this official vote for the HertzBeat project.
> > > >
> > > > Here is their proposal:
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HertzBeatProposal
> > > <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HertzBeatProposal
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Please cast your vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1, bring into the Incubator
> > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > > [ ] -1, do not bring HertzBeat into the Incubator, because...
> > > >
> > > > The vote will open for one week from today.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/snxcdyvqgvhgjdmfv4l192g9tdf8w7rn
> <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/snxcdyvqgvhgjdmfv4l192g9tdf8w7rn>
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Zhang Yonglun
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >  > > general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Xin
>

Re: [VOTE] Have Amoro join the Incubator

[roryqi]

+1, great project !

ConradJam  于2024年3月4日周一 10:40写道：

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best
>
> Bi Yan  于2024年3月4日周一 10:19写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best Wishes ~
> > Yann
> >
> > On 2024/03/03 01:44:24 Justin Mclean wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Following on from the discussion of the Amoro proposal [1][2], let's
> > vote on having it join the Incubator.
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, have it join the Incubator as an incubating project
> > > [ ] +0, I have no strong opinion either way
> > > [ ] -1, do not have it join the Incubator because...
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/AmoroProposal
> > > 2. https://lists.apache.org/thread/7t2bm6x19zq2d79cn8jj2wqd3f2t3k00
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best
>
> ConradJam
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gluten Into the ASF Incubator

[roryqi]

+1 (non-binding). Exciting project!

Nicholas Jiang  于2024年1月4日周四 11:13写道：

> +1(non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Nicholas Jiang
>
> On 2024/01/04 02:47:41 ShaoFeng Shi wrote:
> > Hi Incubator,
> >
> > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal[1],
> > I am starting this official vote for the Gluten project.
> >
> > Here is their proposal:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/GlutenProposal
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1, bring into the Incubator
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > [ ] -1, do not bring Gluten into the Incubator, because...
> >
> > The vote will open for one week from today.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xgsm75t721vgnlthgy84909ggqok77j4
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
> > Apache Kylin PMC member,
> > Apache Incubator PMC member,
> > Email: shaofeng...@apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept XTable into the ASF Incubator

[roryqi]

+1

larry mccay  于2023年12月19日周二 05:30写道：

> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:32 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I'm contributing to the Apache Hadoop project and mentoring Hive
> > contributors in my company. It's a great initiative. The project looks
> > interesting to me and can be really useful to the ecosystem.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rakesh
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 9:48 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> > jcama...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am
> starting
> > > this official vote for the XTable project.
> > >
> > > Here is the proposal -
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/XTable+Proposal
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, bring XTable into the Incubator
> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > [ ] -1, do not bring XTable into the Incubator, because...
> > >
> > > This majority vote is open for at least 96 hours (due to the weekend).
> > >
> > > Only votes from Incubator PMC members are binding, but other votes are
> > > welcome!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jesús
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rx9z8ffrf37qjhpkf1vp5rqg5lhht7jm
> > >
> >
>

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Uniffle (incubating) 0.6.0 available

[roryqi]

Hi all,

Apache Uniffle (incubating) Team is glad to announce the new release of
Apache Uniffle (incubating) 0.6.0.

Apache Uniffle (incubating)  is a high performance, general purpose Remote
Shuffle
Service for distributed compute engines like Apache Spark <
https://spark.apache.org/>,
Apache Hadoop MapReduce , Apache Flink <
https://flink.apache.org/>
and so on.So We are aiming to make Uniffle a universal shuffle service for
distributed compute engines.


Download Links: https://uniffle.apache.org/download/


Release Notes: https://uniffle.apache.org/download/release-notes-0.6.0


Website: https://uniffle.apache.org


Uniffle Resources:

- Issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-uniffle/issues

- Mailing list: d...@uniffle.apache.org


- Apache Uniffle (incubating) Team

[RESULT][VOTE]. Release Apache Uniffle (incubating) 0.6.0 rc2

[roryqi]

Hi all

Thanks for reviewing and voting for Apache Uniffle (incubating) 0.6.0 rc2,
I am happy to announce the release voting has passed with 3binding votes,
no +0 or -1 votes. Binding votes are from IPMC

  -- Jerry Shao
  -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  --  Xun Liu

The voting thread is
https://lists.apache.org/thread/n2wdb76jc6vxx7mh9rs1qr1jqylk0xmc

Many thanks for all our mentors helping us with the release procedure, and
all IPMC helped us to review and vote for Apache Uniffle (incubating)
release.

Thanks

On behalf of Apache Uniffle (incubating)  community

[VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle (incubating) 0.6.0 rc2

[roryqi]

Hello Incubator Community,
   This is a call for a vote to release Apache Uniffle (incubating)
version 0.6.0 rc2
   The Apache Uniffle community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Uniffle (incubating) version 0.6.0 rc2
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release.

 Uniffle community vote thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread/snhnx8hyzn1ogxjpxh3fh13jy1vl2d50

 Vote result thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread/7ykhjdbn8dr16bmxgfp8c351rh3oyz5y

 The release candidate:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/uniffle/0.6.0-rc2/

 Git tag for the release:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-uniffle/commits/v0.6.0-rc2

  The artifacts signed with PGP
key 95757CB677E6B5FA46C1760D0803111904129129 , corresponding to
ror...@apache.org, that can be found in key files:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/uniffle/KEYS

   Please vote accordingly:

   [ ] +1 approve
   [ ] +0 no opinion
   [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

   More detail checklist  please refer:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist

  Steps to validate the release, Please refer to:
https://linkis.apache.org/community/how-to-verify

Thanks,
On behalf of Apache Uniffle (incubating) community