[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Closing out this vote for the votes monitor to catch. 1.2.1 RC1 was voted on and released quite some time back. -- Hitesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: At least in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined bundle for the checksums. Have you looked at the Hadoop releases? http://www.us.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-1.1.2/ -- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: At least in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined bundle for the checksums. Have you looked at the Hadoop releases? http://www.us.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-1.1.2/ That's why I was very careful in phrasing my statement: hadoop *ecosystem* (*) since I didn't want to get into the argument around the fact that it may be beneficial for Apache Hadoop project itself to reconsider its release practices around producing message digest information. But regardless, there's no reason for a podling not to follow established practices that a majority of ASF release do follow. Thanks, Roman. (*) it is like saying Earth's ecosystem -- the planet itself doesn't count :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Thanks for taking a look Seb. Let me mix the issues you mentioned and Ill upload a new tarball. thanks mahadev On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar maha...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them binding. mahadev (IPMC, PPMC) ddas (IPMC, PPMC) acmurthy (IPMC) jitendra (PPMC) yusaku (PPMC) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ambari-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCALF7aMQpzbUDT3_A=4rumvqk+y6pq5sgnsl4jr-zypuo1r0...@mail.gmail.com%3E The staging Staging site is: http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc0/ The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be separate files for each hash type. Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. The archive file does not match the source tag, as it contains lots of .pyc files, i.e. compiled Python source. These should not be present in the source archive, and I would not expect to find them under a /src/ directory in any archive. with user docs at: http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html and dev docs at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development SVN source tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc0 The NOTICE file does not have the correct format - in particular the component name is missing. Also the year looks wrong, and there is a typo in the 4th line. The file should start Apache Ambari Copyright year(s) The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Note: developed at not developed by See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice-text As far as I can tell from the quoted license, it looks to me like the Puppet module does not require attribution, so should not appear in the NOTICE file The KEYS file does not have a header for the second key There are a lot of files without AL headers. Some of these are the Puppet source; some are JSON which unfortunately does not support comments, but there are others that could and should have AL headers. PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C One can look into the issues fixed in this release at https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Other issues: the website does not have a disclaimer, nor does it have an obvious link back to the Incubator or the ASF site. There are some other missing required elements. The License links must point to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ The prinary mention of the Ambari name must use as an adjective (The Ford car is blue) an *not* a noun (The Ford is blue) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be separate files for each hash type. Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. In what way are they wrong? It is a perfectly well defined output format that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for tamper detection is in fact wrong. -- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be separate files for each hash type. Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. In what way are they wrong? It is a perfectly well defined output format that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for tamper detection is in fact wrong. Is there any particular reason to introduce this type of inconsistency? At least in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined bundle for the checksums. This makes the job of the tools that automatically download apache tarballs and ingest them into a build pipeline more complicated without much obvious benefit. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be separate files for each hash type. Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. In what way are they wrong? It is a perfectly well defined output format that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for tamper detection is in fact wrong. [So why are those two in the mds file?!] But that's not the primary intention of the hashes anyway; hashes are intended for checking that a download has succeeded. Proper tamper detection requires signatures. -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them binding. mahadev (IPMC, PPMC) ddas (IPMC, PPMC) acmurthy (IPMC) jitendra (PPMC) yusaku (PPMC) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ambari-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCALF7aMQpzbUDT3_A=4rumvqk+y6pq5sgnsl4jr-zypuo1r0...@mail.gmail.com%3E The staging Staging site is: http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc0/ with user docs at: http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html and dev docs at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development SVN source tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc0 PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C One can look into the issues fixed in this release at https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) thanks mahadev
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar maha...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them binding. mahadev (IPMC, PPMC) ddas (IPMC, PPMC) acmurthy (IPMC) jitendra (PPMC) yusaku (PPMC) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ambari-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCALF7aMQpzbUDT3_A=4rumvqk+y6pq5sgnsl4jr-zypuo1r0...@mail.gmail.com%3E The staging Staging site is: http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc0/ The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be separate files for each hash type. Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. The archive file does not match the source tag, as it contains lots of .pyc files, i.e. compiled Python source. These should not be present in the source archive, and I would not expect to find them under a /src/ directory in any archive. with user docs at: http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html and dev docs at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development SVN source tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc0 The NOTICE file does not have the correct format - in particular the component name is missing. Also the year looks wrong, and there is a typo in the 4th line. The file should start Apache Ambari Copyright year(s) The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Note: developed at not developed by See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice-text As far as I can tell from the quoted license, it looks to me like the Puppet module does not require attribution, so should not appear in the NOTICE file The KEYS file does not have a header for the second key There are a lot of files without AL headers. Some of these are the Puppet source; some are JSON which unfortunately does not support comments, but there are others that could and should have AL headers. PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C One can look into the issues fixed in this release at https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Other issues: the website does not have a disclaimer, nor does it have an obvious link back to the Incubator or the ASF site. There are some other missing required elements. The License links must point to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ The prinary mention of the Ambari name must use as an adjective (The Ford car is blue) an *not* a noun (The Ford is blue) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
