Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Kasper Sørensen]

Thanks for the CouchDB example Noah. Will try to do something similar.

Now another "little thing" ... How do we get the downloadable zip files
etc. available on the download server of Apache? I see that all large files
go through a link like this:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/couchdb/binary/win/1.5.0/setup-couchdb-1.5.0_R16B02.exe

I imagine that's to support download mirrors etc... Is that kinda stuff
already taken care of by Ankit's release procedure, or do we need to do
something more for the distribution part of the release?


2014/1/22 Noah Slater 

> Congrats!
>
> On 21 January 2014 13:05, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
> > HI All,
> >
> > The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating is closed. The vote passes
> > with 4(+1) votes.
> >
> > Following IPMC votes were received.
> >
> > *+1*
> > hsaputra
> > mfranklin
> > arvind
> > nslater
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Ankit
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Noah Slater]

See this:

https://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html

On 22 January 2014 14:23, Kasper Sørensen
 wrote:
> Thanks for the CouchDB example Noah. Will try to do something similar.
>
> Now another "little thing" ... How do we get the downloadable zip files
> etc. available on the download server of Apache? I see that all large files
> go through a link like this:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/couchdb/binary/win/1.5.0/setup-couchdb-1.5.0_R16B02.exe
>
> I imagine that's to support download mirrors etc... Is that kinda stuff
> already taken care of by Ankit's release procedure, or do we need to do
> something more for the distribution part of the release?
>
>
> 2014/1/22 Noah Slater 
>
>> Congrats!
>>
>> On 21 January 2014 13:05, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
>> > HI All,
>> >
>> > The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating is closed. The vote passes
>> > with 4(+1) votes.
>> >
>> > Following IPMC votes were received.
>> >
>> > *+1*
>> > hsaputra
>> > mfranklin
>> > arvind
>> > nslater
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Ankit
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Noah Slater
>> https://twitter.com/nslater
>>



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Noah Slater]

Congrats!

On 21 January 2014 13:05, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
> HI All,
>
> The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating is closed. The vote passes
> with 4(+1) votes.
>
> Following IPMC votes were received.
>
> *+1*
> hsaputra
> mfranklin
> arvind
> nslater
>
>
> Regards
> Ankit



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

Missing one +1 from Dave

On Tuesday, January 21, 2014, Ankit Kumar
>
wrote:

> HI All,
>
> The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating is closed. The vote passes
> with 4(+1) votes.
>
> Following IPMC votes were received.
>
> *+1*
> hsaputra
> mfranklin
> arvind
> nslater
>
>
> Regards
> Ankit
>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Ankit Kumar]

HI All,

The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating is closed. The vote passes
with 4(+1) votes.

Following IPMC votes were received.

*+1*
hsaputra
mfranklin
arvind
nslater


Regards
Ankit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

Cool, thanks Dave!

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Dave Brondsema  wrote:
> +1
>
> In addition to that JIRA ticket, I also appreciate the clarification earlier 
> in
> this email thread about exactly which file is being voted on for release.  I 
> was
> unsure since there were so many jar files.  The source zip looks good to me.
>
>
> On 1/19/14 12:17 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>> HI Dave, just want to clarify if any concern or issue you raised
>> should block the RC or could we get +1 from you given the new JIRA
>> Kasper filed to fix the LICENSE?
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Dave Brondsema  wrote:
>>> Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,
>>>
>>> Congrats on getting this far with your first release so far.  Here's a few
>>> questions and concerns:
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file should only have what's needed.  In your git repo, the last 
>>> 3
>>> lines I don't think should be there.  The NOTICE file in the source jar 
>>> files
>>> look better though.  More info on brevity:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201312.mbox/%3CCAAS6%3D7jc2bHJK_H14bRFEkuDhvfECKw7Qz3%3DaXuMBhQTuWHx1g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>  However, the NOTICE files in the source jar files do not have "Apache" or
>>> "incubating" in the Metamodel name.  (If you do re-spin this release you can
>>> bump 2013 to 2014 at that point too - I do realize you started this release 
>>> in
>>> 2013, no problem)
>>>
>>> The *.asc.md5 and *.asc.sha1 files are hashes of PGP signatures and seem
>>> unnecessary to me.  Not a blocker, but I wouldn't bother creating them for
>>> future releases.  Less unnecessary files to look at is better.
>>>
>>> I see your PGP key is at http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/metamodel/KEYS
>>> too.  Good.
>>>
>>> I am not familiar with policies specifically for maven .jar releases.  I 
>>> would
>>> think the DISCLAIMER file would still be required.
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html doesn't mention it, but
>>> wouldn't it be appropriate in META-INFO alongside LICENSE and NOTICE?  
>>> Perhaps
>>> someone else can shed some light on this.
>>>
>>> -Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/13/14 7:32 AM, Ankit Kumar wrote:
 Hi All,

 Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
 MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
 This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.

 The tag to be voted on is
 v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating

 Release artifacts are signed with the following
 key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc

 Release engineer public key id:
 B68FA0EF


 The staging repository for this release can be found
 at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/

 Source jars can be found here:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/

 Result thread link from dev mailing list:
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E


 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.

 The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
 majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.

 Regards
 Ankit

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
>>> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
>>> http://www.splike.com : programming
>>>   <><
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> http://www.splike.com : programming
>   <><
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Dave Brondsema]

+1

In addition to that JIRA ticket, I also appreciate the clarification earlier in
this email thread about exactly which file is being voted on for release.  I was
unsure since there were so many jar files.  The source zip looks good to me.


On 1/19/14 12:17 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> HI Dave, just want to clarify if any concern or issue you raised
> should block the RC or could we get +1 from you given the new JIRA
> Kasper filed to fix the LICENSE?
> 
> - Henry
> 
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Dave Brondsema  wrote:
>> Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,
>>
>> Congrats on getting this far with your first release so far.  Here's a few
>> questions and concerns:
>>
>> The NOTICE file should only have what's needed.  In your git repo, the last 3
>> lines I don't think should be there.  The NOTICE file in the source jar files
>> look better though.  More info on brevity:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201312.mbox/%3CCAAS6%3D7jc2bHJK_H14bRFEkuDhvfECKw7Qz3%3DaXuMBhQTuWHx1g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>  However, the NOTICE files in the source jar files do not have "Apache" or
>> "incubating" in the Metamodel name.  (If you do re-spin this release you can
>> bump 2013 to 2014 at that point too - I do realize you started this release 
>> in
>> 2013, no problem)
>>
>> The *.asc.md5 and *.asc.sha1 files are hashes of PGP signatures and seem
>> unnecessary to me.  Not a blocker, but I wouldn't bother creating them for
>> future releases.  Less unnecessary files to look at is better.
>>
>> I see your PGP key is at http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/metamodel/KEYS
>> too.  Good.
>>
>> I am not familiar with policies specifically for maven .jar releases.  I 
>> would
>> think the DISCLAIMER file would still be required.
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html doesn't mention it, but
>> wouldn't it be appropriate in META-INFO alongside LICENSE and NOTICE?  
>> Perhaps
>> someone else can shed some light on this.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>> On 1/13/14 7:32 AM, Ankit Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>>
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
>>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>>
>>> Release engineer public key id:
>>> B68FA0EF
>>>
>>>
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found
>>> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>>
>>> Source jars can be found here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
>>>
>>> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
>>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ankit
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
>> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
>> http://www.splike.com : programming
>>   <><
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 



-- 
Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
  <><

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Kasper Sørensen]

Although I didn't author the mail, I would say YES, this is the file we're 
voting on since the URL provided points to its directory (which is otherwise 
only hashes and maven metadata stuff).

Kasper

From: Noah Slater [nsla...@apache.org]
Sent: 19 January 2014 19:28
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

Yep, I'm happy to give a +1 but would still like clarification on
whether this file:

http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip

... Is *the* file we're voting on. The email could make this clearer.

On 19 January 2014 18:45, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra  
> wrote:
>> I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
>> Kasper's new JIRA task filed?
>
> My freelance vote is not needed, and I'm not going to set a precedent
> where Mentors don't have to vote because they can count on people like
> me to let them off the hook. (See <http://s.apache.org/Kca>.)  When
> the vote is tallied, there is no need to include me in the list,
> because I have withdrawn the vote I cast earlier. This RC will already
> pass with enough +1 votes from MetaModel's Mentors -- which is as it
> should be.  Kudos!
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>



--
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Noah Slater]

Yep, I'm happy to give a +1 but would still like clarification on
whether this file:

http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip

... Is *the* file we're voting on. The email could make this clearer.

On 19 January 2014 18:45, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra  
> wrote:
>> I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
>> Kasper's new JIRA task filed?
>
> My freelance vote is not needed, and I'm not going to set a precedent
> where Mentors don't have to vote because they can count on people like
> me to let them off the hook. (See .)  When
> the vote is tallied, there is no need to include me in the list,
> because I have withdrawn the vote I cast earlier. This RC will already
> pass with enough +1 votes from MetaModel's Mentors -- which is as it
> should be.  Kudos!
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

Sounds good to me Marvin.

I agree mentors votes are the ones should count most. I just want to make
sure no -1 VOTE from IPMCs about this RC.

- Henry

On Sunday, January 19, 2014, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra 
> >
> wrote:
> > I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
> > Kasper's new JIRA task filed?
>
> My freelance vote is not needed, and I'm not going to set a precedent
> where Mentors don't have to vote because they can count on people like
> me to let them off the hook. (See .)  When
> the vote is tallied, there is no need to include me in the list,
> because I have withdrawn the vote I cast earlier. This RC will already
> pass with enough +1 votes from MetaModel's Mentors -- which is as it
> should be.  Kudos!
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra  wrote:
> I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
> Kasper's new JIRA task filed?

My freelance vote is not needed, and I'm not going to set a precedent
where Mentors don't have to vote because they can count on people like
me to let them off the hook. (See .)  When
the vote is tallied, there is no need to include me in the list,
because I have withdrawn the vote I cast earlier. This RC will already
pass with enough +1 votes from MetaModel's Mentors -- which is as it
should be.  Kudos!

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

HI Dave, just want to clarify if any concern or issue you raised
should block the RC or could we get +1 from you given the new JIRA
Kasper filed to fix the LICENSE?

- Henry

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Dave Brondsema  wrote:
> Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,
>
> Congrats on getting this far with your first release so far.  Here's a few
> questions and concerns:
>
> The NOTICE file should only have what's needed.  In your git repo, the last 3
> lines I don't think should be there.  The NOTICE file in the source jar files
> look better though.  More info on brevity:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201312.mbox/%3CCAAS6%3D7jc2bHJK_H14bRFEkuDhvfECKw7Qz3%3DaXuMBhQTuWHx1g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>  However, the NOTICE files in the source jar files do not have "Apache" or
> "incubating" in the Metamodel name.  (If you do re-spin this release you can
> bump 2013 to 2014 at that point too - I do realize you started this release in
> 2013, no problem)
>
> The *.asc.md5 and *.asc.sha1 files are hashes of PGP signatures and seem
> unnecessary to me.  Not a blocker, but I wouldn't bother creating them for
> future releases.  Less unnecessary files to look at is better.
>
> I see your PGP key is at http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/metamodel/KEYS
> too.  Good.
>
> I am not familiar with policies specifically for maven .jar releases.  I would
> think the DISCLAIMER file would still be required.
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html doesn't mention it, but
> wouldn't it be appropriate in META-INFO alongside LICENSE and NOTICE?  Perhaps
> someone else can shed some light on this.
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On 1/13/14 7:32 AM, Ankit Kumar wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>
>> Release engineer public key id:
>> B68FA0EF
>>
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found
>> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>
>> Source jars can be found here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
>>
>> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ankit
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> http://www.splike.com : programming
>   <><
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
Kasper's new JIRA task filed?

- Henry

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Kasper Sørensen
>  wrote:
>
>> I've made a task for the additional licenses in the LICENSE file that you 
>> mention: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-34
>>
>> Do tell if this task is somehow not sufficient to mend the issue that you 
>> identified.
>
> Looks good to me!  I withdraw my -1 vote.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

Noah, can we address these with next release or do you think should
block the release?


On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater  wrote:
> Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:
>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Is it common to have asc.md5 and asc.sha1? They seem redundant to me.
>
> Sigs and hashes: OK
>
> DEPENDENCIES is in the release, but not in the Git tag. I guess that's
> okay? It's the only difference.
>
> What is HEADER.txt doing in the source?
>
> (Sorry for not catching these on the original vote.)
>
> On 13 January 2014 13:32, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>
>> Release engineer public key id:
>> B68FA0EF
>>
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found
>> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>
>> Source jars can be found here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
>>
>> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ankit
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Kasper Sørensen
 wrote:

> I've made a task for the additional licenses in the LICENSE file that you 
> mention: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-34
>
> Do tell if this task is somehow not sufficient to mend the issue that you 
> identified.

Looks good to me!  I withdraw my -1 vote.

Thanks,

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Kasper Sørensen]

Hi Marvin,

I've made a task for the additional licenses in the LICENSE file that you 
mention: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-34

Do tell if this task is somehow not sufficient to mend the issue that you 
identified.

Kind regards,
Kasper


From: Marvin Humphrey [mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: 15 January 2014 18:14
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra  wrote:
> Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE file extra
> lines of information?

In the NOTICE file in the release candidate, the last three lines with content
are...

Portions of this software were originally based on the following:

Copyright 2010-2013 Human Inference Enterprise B.V.

These have been licensed to the Apache Software Foundation under a
software grant.

The committer who added those lines is Kaspar Sørenson, who works for Human
Inference.  If Human Inference wants that copyright notice, it's here to stay.
(Nobody else should mess with it now that it's there -- modifying copyright
notices is potentially illegal.)  The last line about the software grant is
superfluous and IMO ought to be removed -- but it is innocuous and does not
block release.

The LICENSE file, however, contains many licenses which do not apply to the
source package.  The extraneous licenses are for jar files which will be
bundled with a binary, but that is not what the ASF releases.

The extra material in the LICENSE file should ordinarily block if this were a
TLP release.  However, what we have here is a licensing documentation bug, not
a legal issue which would put the Foundation at risk, and I think Incubator
lenience should come into play.

I'm going to lodge a binding -1 vote for now, but I am willing to remove it if
the MetaModel podling presents a plan for fixing up LICENSE in their next
release.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Kasper Sørensen]

This was an early copy-paste / inspiration from other NOTICE files of 
incubation projects that have been granted to the ASL by commercial 
organizations. For instance we looked at Wave and found this:

Portions of this software were developed at Google Inc. and
have been kindly donated to the Apache Software Foundation.

From: Marvin Humphrey [mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: 15 January 2014 18:14
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra  wrote:
> Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE file extra
> lines of information?

In the NOTICE file in the release candidate, the last three lines with content
are...

Portions of this software were originally based on the following:

Copyright 2010-2013 Human Inference Enterprise B.V.

These have been licensed to the Apache Software Foundation under a
software grant.

The committer who added those lines is Kaspar Sørenson, who works for Human
Inference.  If Human Inference wants that copyright notice, it's here to stay.
(Nobody else should mess with it now that it's there -- modifying copyright
notices is potentially illegal.)  The last line about the software grant is
superfluous and IMO ought to be removed -- but it is innocuous and does not
block release.

The LICENSE file, however, contains many licenses which do not apply to the
source package.  The extraneous licenses are for jar files which will be
bundled with a binary, but that is not what the ASF releases.

The extra material in the LICENSE file should ordinarily block if this were a
TLP release.  However, what we have here is a licensing documentation bug, not
a legal issue which would put the Foundation at risk, and I think Incubator
lenience should come into play.

I'm going to lodge a binding -1 vote for now, but I am willing to remove it if
the MetaModel podling presents a plan for fixing up LICENSE in their next
release.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Kasper Sørensen]

The HEADER.txt file was originally used by a maven plugin similar to Apache Rat 
to check license headers. But I guess now it is unnecessary and should be 
removed.

From: Henry Saputra [henry.sapu...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 January 2014 19:52
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

I think DEPENDENCIES are generated by Maven.

Hmm I am not sure about HEADER.txt, we'll bring the discussion back to
MetaModel podling dev for another round.

- Henry

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater  wrote:
> Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:
>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Is it common to have asc.md5 and asc.sha1? They seem redundant to me.
>
> Sigs and hashes: OK
>
> DEPENDENCIES is in the release, but not in the Git tag. I guess that's
> okay? It's the only difference.
>
> What is HEADER.txt doing in the source?
>
> (Sorry for not catching these on the original vote.)
>
> On 13 January 2014 13:32, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>
>> Release engineer public key id:
>> B68FA0EF
>>
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found
>> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>
>> Source jars can be found here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
>>
>> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ankit
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

HI Marvin,

As usual, thanks for the useful review.

We will revise the LICENSE and NOTICE files in MetaModel podling dev
list and come back for VOTE.


- Henry

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra  
> wrote:
>> Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE file extra
>> lines of information?
>
> In the NOTICE file in the release candidate, the last three lines with content
> are...
>
> Portions of this software were originally based on the following:
>
> Copyright 2010-2013 Human Inference Enterprise B.V.
>
> These have been licensed to the Apache Software Foundation under a
> software grant.
>
> The committer who added those lines is Kaspar Sørenson, who works for Human
> Inference.  If Human Inference wants that copyright notice, it's here to stay.
> (Nobody else should mess with it now that it's there -- modifying copyright
> notices is potentially illegal.)  The last line about the software grant is
> superfluous and IMO ought to be removed -- but it is innocuous and does not
> block release.
>
> The LICENSE file, however, contains many licenses which do not apply to the
> source package.  The extraneous licenses are for jar files which will be
> bundled with a binary, but that is not what the ASF releases.
>
> The extra material in the LICENSE file should ordinarily block if this were a
> TLP release.  However, what we have here is a licensing documentation bug, not
> a legal issue which would put the Foundation at risk, and I think Incubator
> lenience should come into play.
>
> I'm going to lodge a binding -1 vote for now, but I am willing to remove it if
> the MetaModel podling presents a plan for fixing up LICENSE in their next
> release.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

I think DEPENDENCIES are generated by Maven.

Hmm I am not sure about HEADER.txt, we'll bring the discussion back to
MetaModel podling dev for another round.

- Henry

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater  wrote:
> Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:
>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Is it common to have asc.md5 and asc.sha1? They seem redundant to me.
>
> Sigs and hashes: OK
>
> DEPENDENCIES is in the release, but not in the Git tag. I guess that's
> okay? It's the only difference.
>
> What is HEADER.txt doing in the source?
>
> (Sorry for not catching these on the original vote.)
>
> On 13 January 2014 13:32, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>
>> Release engineer public key id:
>> B68FA0EF
>>
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found
>> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>
>> Source jars can be found here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
>>
>> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ankit
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Noah Slater]

Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:

http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip

Is it common to have asc.md5 and asc.sha1? They seem redundant to me.

Sigs and hashes: OK

DEPENDENCIES is in the release, but not in the Git tag. I guess that's
okay? It's the only difference.

What is HEADER.txt doing in the source?

(Sorry for not catching these on the original vote.)

On 13 January 2014 13:32, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>
> The tag to be voted on is
> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following
> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>
> Release engineer public key id:
> B68FA0EF
>
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found
> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>
> Source jars can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>
> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
>
> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>
> Regards
> Ankit



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra  wrote:
> Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE file extra
> lines of information?

In the NOTICE file in the release candidate, the last three lines with content
are...

Portions of this software were originally based on the following:

Copyright 2010-2013 Human Inference Enterprise B.V.

These have been licensed to the Apache Software Foundation under a
software grant.

The committer who added those lines is Kaspar Sørenson, who works for Human
Inference.  If Human Inference wants that copyright notice, it's here to stay.
(Nobody else should mess with it now that it's there -- modifying copyright
notices is potentially illegal.)  The last line about the software grant is
superfluous and IMO ought to be removed -- but it is innocuous and does not
block release.

The LICENSE file, however, contains many licenses which do not apply to the
source package.  The extraneous licenses are for jar files which will be
bundled with a binary, but that is not what the ASF releases.

The extra material in the LICENSE file should ordinarily block if this were a
TLP release.  However, what we have here is a licensing documentation bug, not
a legal issue which would put the Foundation at risk, and I think Incubator
lenience should come into play.

I'm going to lodge a binding -1 vote for now, but I am willing to remove it if
the MetaModel podling presents a plan for fixing up LICENSE in their next
release.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

Thanks for the input Dave, really useful.

Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE file extra
lines of information?

The NOTICE file in source jar should be the same with the one from git
repo. Could you tell me which NOTICE file in the source jar you were
referring to?

- Henry

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Dave Brondsema  wrote:
> Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,
>
> Congrats on getting this far with your first release so far.  Here's a few
> questions and concerns:
>
> The NOTICE file should only have what's needed.  In your git repo, the last 3
> lines I don't think should be there.  The NOTICE file in the source jar files
> look better though.  More info on brevity:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201312.mbox/%3CCAAS6%3D7jc2bHJK_H14bRFEkuDhvfECKw7Qz3%3DaXuMBhQTuWHx1g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>  However, the NOTICE files in the source jar files do not have "Apache" or
> "incubating" in the Metamodel name.  (If you do re-spin this release you can
> bump 2013 to 2014 at that point too - I do realize you started this release in
> 2013, no problem)
>
> The *.asc.md5 and *.asc.sha1 files are hashes of PGP signatures and seem
> unnecessary to me.  Not a blocker, but I wouldn't bother creating them for
> future releases.  Less unnecessary files to look at is better.
>
> I see your PGP key is at http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/metamodel/KEYS
> too.  Good.
>
> I am not familiar with policies specifically for maven .jar releases.  I would
> think the DISCLAIMER file would still be required.
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html doesn't mention it, but
> wouldn't it be appropriate in META-INFO alongside LICENSE and NOTICE?  Perhaps
> someone else can shed some light on this.
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On 1/13/14 7:32 AM, Ankit Kumar wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>
>> Release engineer public key id:
>> B68FA0EF
>>
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found
>> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>
>> Source jars can be found here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
>>
>> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ankit
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> http://www.splike.com : programming
>   <><
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Dave Brondsema]

Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,

Congrats on getting this far with your first release so far.  Here's a few
questions and concerns:

The NOTICE file should only have what's needed.  In your git repo, the last 3
lines I don't think should be there.  The NOTICE file in the source jar files
look better though.  More info on brevity:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201312.mbox/%3CCAAS6%3D7jc2bHJK_H14bRFEkuDhvfECKw7Qz3%3DaXuMBhQTuWHx1g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
 However, the NOTICE files in the source jar files do not have "Apache" or
"incubating" in the Metamodel name.  (If you do re-spin this release you can
bump 2013 to 2014 at that point too - I do realize you started this release in
2013, no problem)

The *.asc.md5 and *.asc.sha1 files are hashes of PGP signatures and seem
unnecessary to me.  Not a blocker, but I wouldn't bother creating them for
future releases.  Less unnecessary files to look at is better.

I see your PGP key is at http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/metamodel/KEYS
too.  Good.

I am not familiar with policies specifically for maven .jar releases.  I would
think the DISCLAIMER file would still be required.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html doesn't mention it, but
wouldn't it be appropriate in META-INFO alongside LICENSE and NOTICE?  Perhaps
someone else can shed some light on this.

-Dave


On 1/13/14 7:32 AM, Ankit Kumar wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
> 
> The tag to be voted on is
> v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following
> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
> 
> Release engineer public key id:
> B68FA0EF
> 
> 
> The staging repository for this release can be found
> at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
> 
> Source jars can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
> 
> Result thread link from dev mailing list:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> 
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
> 
> The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
> 
> Regards
> Ankit
> 



-- 
Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
  <><

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Ankit Kumar]

Hi All,

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.

The tag to be voted on is
v4.0.0-incubating:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating

Release artifacts are signed with the following
key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc

Release engineer public key id:
B68FA0EF


The staging repository for this release can be found
at:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/

Source jars can be found here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/

Result thread link from dev mailing list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E


Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.

The vote is open until <16th January 2014 14:00 CET> and passes if a
majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.

Regards
Ankit

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Henry Saputra]

Hi Marvin,

Sorry about the confusing message.

Looks like there was a misunderstanding on how to send VOTE request to
general@ list.

We will sort it out and try it again.

- Henry

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's and no 0 or -1
>> votes.
>>
>>  +1 (4 Total)
>> Henry Saputra
>> Juan Jose van der linden
>> Arvind Prabhakar
>> Matt Franklin
>>
>> 0 (0 Total)
>>
>> -1 (0 Total)
>>
>> * = Binding Vote
>>
>> The vote thread can be found here:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-metamodel-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAAHPopELo0OJx_rR6kGNjppKLMbFjw-%2BE8XyH68ds31%3DxD4t-A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>  Thanks to everyone who helped with this release.
>
> Hi,
>
> I found this message confusing at first because it refers to the result of the
> dev@metamodel VOTE thread, but appears to presents the result as final.  It
> seems that the MetaModel Mentors are on top of things, though:
>
> http://s.apache.org/oql (Henry Saputra)
>
> Ok, so next step please send RESULT thread reply to the VOTE thread to
> tally up the vote so we could bring the VOTE to the
> general@incubator.apache.org list to get final look or reviews by
> incubating community and IPMCs.
>
> To reinforce Henry, here's a relevant excerpt from the Incubator's policy on
> releases:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
> Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least
> three +1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page). If the
> majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary
> of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the
> Incubator PMC approve such a release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are
> required.
>
> So, although there are 4 IPMC +1 votes, the full IPMC has not yet been given
> an opportunity to review the release candidate.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Ankit Kumar  wrote:
> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's and no 0 or -1
> votes.
>
>  +1 (4 Total)
> Henry Saputra
> Juan Jose van der linden
> Arvind Prabhakar
> Matt Franklin
>
> 0 (0 Total)
>
> -1 (0 Total)
>
> * = Binding Vote
>
> The vote thread can be found here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-metamodel-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAAHPopELo0OJx_rR6kGNjppKLMbFjw-%2BE8XyH68ds31%3DxD4t-A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
>  Thanks to everyone who helped with this release.

Hi,

I found this message confusing at first because it refers to the result of the
dev@metamodel VOTE thread, but appears to presents the result as final.  It
seems that the MetaModel Mentors are on top of things, though:

http://s.apache.org/oql (Henry Saputra)

Ok, so next step please send RESULT thread reply to the VOTE thread to
tally up the vote so we could bring the VOTE to the
general@incubator.apache.org list to get final look or reviews by
incubating community and IPMCs.

To reinforce Henry, here's a relevant excerpt from the Incubator's policy on
releases:

http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases

Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least
three +1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page). If the
majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary
of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the
Incubator PMC approve such a release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are
required.

So, although there are 4 IPMC +1 votes, the full IPMC has not yet been given
an opportunity to review the release candidate.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating

[Ankit Kumar]

The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's and no 0 or -1
votes.

 +1 (4 Total)
Henry Saputra
Juan Jose van der linden
Arvind Prabhakar
Matt Franklin

0 (0 Total)

-1 (0 Total)

* = Binding Vote

The vote thread can be found here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-metamodel-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAAHPopELo0OJx_rR6kGNjppKLMbFjw-%2BE8XyH68ds31%3DxD4t-A%40mail.gmail.com%3E

 Thanks to everyone who helped with this release.


Regards

Ankit