[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hello everyone, The vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2 has failed to pass. +1 votes: - Julian Hyde - John D. Ament -1 votes: - Justin Mclean Other votes: - Larry McCay (-0) Thank you everyone for your feedback. The SDAP team has addressed the issues at hand and is currently voting on rc3 which I hope to present here for another vote in a few days. Thank you, Riley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hi, > If using DISCLAIMER-WIP, would we need to switch to that for all our release > artifacts? As far as I can see, the issues found in this thread that would > necessitate using the WIP disclaimer are present in 2 of the 3 artifacts. > Should the other artifact keep the standard DISCLAIMER? As per [1] - "If the standard DISCLAIMER is used then the release needs to comply with all ASF policies”. While some of the issues are minor, I believe each binary has a problem that merits a -1 vote. So your option is to fix those issues or use a DISCLAIMER-WIP. It is expected that an incubating project will use the plain DISCLAIMER before graduation. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
If using DISCLAIMER-WIP, would we need to switch to that for all our release artifacts? As far as I can see, the issues found in this thread that would necessitate using the WIP disclaimer are present in 2 of the 3 artifacts. Should the other artifact keep the standard DISCLAIMER? On 2023/01/03 05:16:09 Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > You may want to consider using a DISCLAIMER-WIP [1] until these issues are > sorted. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Thank you to Calvin, John, Justin, Larry for reviewing/voting. You raised some good points. SDAP is discussing on its dev@ list and I will argue there that they should address most or all in a new RC. A couple of responses to specific remarks. > On 2023/01/03 04:48:23 Justin Mclean wrote: > > First off you need to vote on a release artefact not a GitHub tag. The vote email contained this URL for staged artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ The GitHub tags mentioned elsewhere in the vote email were just intended to provide context. I would be grateful if everyone can focus discussion on those artifacts, not the various branches and tags in GitHub. > Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > Furthermore, with the new year, the copyright statements in the NOTICE > files are now out of date as you observed. I'm assuming this will require > a new release candidate? I am not a lawyer, but I think that it's OK to make a release in 2023 with a copyright notice of 2022 that as long as the release doesn't contain any work done in 2023. This is all moot, because it looks like this won't be final RC. > Frank Greguska wrote: > > What does ASL refer to in this context? I think that Larry meant 'Apache Software License'. Strictly, the license is these days called 'Apache License' and abbreviated 'AL'. Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
What does ASL refer to in this context? With respect to the branch differences: In general we use 'develop' as our active development branch; release branches are created from 'develop' and our release candidates are built from the release branches. Issues with a release are addressed in the release branch itself (as new development MAY have already started on 'develop'). Once approved release branches are merged to main/master branch and then deleted. Then main/master is merged into 'develop'. Thanks, - Frank On 2023/01/03 17:56:23 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > "In general, I would expect your main > branch to have a superset of the changes in your release branch." > > I checked, and the only differences between the release/1.0.0 branches and > the main branches are things like the NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files and adding in > missing ASF headers. In short I don't see any "functional" (ie code) changes > between the two. > > As to your question, I'm checking with the SDAP community to see what the > consensus is. > > Thanks, > Riley > > On 2023/01/03 17:35:09 larry mccay wrote: > > "I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the > > links you provide are on a different branch than the one we built the > > release from." > > > > Apologies, I was jumping around between github repos and got confused. > > > > That said, it seems to me that your release branch having the headers and > > dev and/or master branches not having them may point to a dev/release flow > > that may result in regressions. Perhaps you have a different Trunk or > > whatever your main branch is though. In general, I would expect your main > > branch to have a superset of the changes in your release branch. > > > > Just to be sure, you don't intend to only license the release > > branch's source as ASL, right? > > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:28 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > > Thank you for the notes. > > > > > > I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the > > > links you provide are on a different branch than the one we built the > > > release from. The release artifacts were built from the 'release/1.0.0' > > > branch in their respective repositories. That said, the 'requirements.txt' > > > file you linked present in the release does not contain such a header. > > > > > > Furthermore, with the new year, the copyright statements in the NOTICE > > > files are now out of date as you observed. I'm assuming this will require > > > a > > > new release candidate? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Riley > > > > > > On 2022/12/30 23:39:13 larry mccay wrote: > > > > I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 release review and wanted to > > > > let you know that it seems a bit cumbersome to review. > > > > Perhaps my experience with other projects is limited to similar > > > > conventions, though. > > > > > > > > The fact that the src artifacts aren't under a project specific root > > > ended > > > > up polluting my releases directory (where I review releases). This was > > > > my > > > > fault for not noticing the missing root but clearly outside my > > > > expectations. > > > > > > > > I also notice that each of what I would expect to just be separate > > > modules > > > > have their own tar balls and even github mirrors which is also awkward > > > for > > > > how I expect to review things - though not technically related to > > > > typical > > > > review requirements. > > > > > > > > These may be seen as less relevant to the specific release at hand and > > > more > > > > for the overall project structure and conventions but they would > > > certainly > > > > help in reviewing. > > > > > > > > I note that there are numerous files [1][2][3] and many more that may > > > > require Apache License headers. > > > > > > > > You can use something like the following in python files: > > > > # > > > > # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more > > > > # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with > > > > # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. > > > > # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version > > > > 2.0 > > > > # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with > > > > # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > > > # > > > > #http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > > # > > > > # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software > > > > # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, > > > > # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or > > > implied. > > > > # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > > > > # limitations under the License. > > > > # > > > > > > > > The NOTICE file has a copyright of 2017-2022 still and unless this goes > > > out > > > > in the next couple days that will be out of date. > > > > Duplicate and separate files like
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
"In general, I would expect your main branch to have a superset of the changes in your release branch." I checked, and the only differences between the release/1.0.0 branches and the main branches are things like the NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files and adding in missing ASF headers. In short I don't see any "functional" (ie code) changes between the two. As to your question, I'm checking with the SDAP community to see what the consensus is. Thanks, Riley On 2023/01/03 17:35:09 larry mccay wrote: > "I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the > links you provide are on a different branch than the one we built the > release from." > > Apologies, I was jumping around between github repos and got confused. > > That said, it seems to me that your release branch having the headers and > dev and/or master branches not having them may point to a dev/release flow > that may result in regressions. Perhaps you have a different Trunk or > whatever your main branch is though. In general, I would expect your main > branch to have a superset of the changes in your release branch. > > Just to be sure, you don't intend to only license the release > branch's source as ASL, right? > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:28 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > Thank you for the notes. > > > > I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the > > links you provide are on a different branch than the one we built the > > release from. The release artifacts were built from the 'release/1.0.0' > > branch in their respective repositories. That said, the 'requirements.txt' > > file you linked present in the release does not contain such a header. > > > > Furthermore, with the new year, the copyright statements in the NOTICE > > files are now out of date as you observed. I'm assuming this will require a > > new release candidate? > > > > Thanks, > > Riley > > > > On 2022/12/30 23:39:13 larry mccay wrote: > > > I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 release review and wanted to > > > let you know that it seems a bit cumbersome to review. > > > Perhaps my experience with other projects is limited to similar > > > conventions, though. > > > > > > The fact that the src artifacts aren't under a project specific root > > ended > > > up polluting my releases directory (where I review releases). This was my > > > fault for not noticing the missing root but clearly outside my > > > expectations. > > > > > > I also notice that each of what I would expect to just be separate > > modules > > > have their own tar balls and even github mirrors which is also awkward > > for > > > how I expect to review things - though not technically related to typical > > > review requirements. > > > > > > These may be seen as less relevant to the specific release at hand and > > more > > > for the overall project structure and conventions but they would > > certainly > > > help in reviewing. > > > > > > I note that there are numerous files [1][2][3] and many more that may > > > require Apache License headers. > > > > > > You can use something like the following in python files: > > > # > > > # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more > > > # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with > > > # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. > > > # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 > > > # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with > > > # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > > # > > > #http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > # > > > # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software > > > # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, > > > # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or > > implied. > > > # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > > > # limitations under the License. > > > # > > > > > > The NOTICE file has a copyright of 2017-2022 still and unless this goes > > out > > > in the next couple days that will be out of date. > > > Duplicate and separate files like NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER access > > > ingester, nexus and nexusproto as well as CONTRIBUTING.md which is in 2 > > but > > > not the other point to some organization issues. There should be some > > > effort put in to possibly make these modules under a common project > > rather > > > than what seem like separate projects. > > > > > > Some of the above make it pretty cumbersome to review even if not > > > technically blockers. > > > Addressing these sorts of things early will help contributors feel more > > > easily able to help out and can help build your community. > > > It will also help you get releases out easier. > > > > > > Hope the above is useful for you. > > > Happy to see a release coming together for the SDAP community and > > > congratulate you on tackling this milestone! > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
"I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the links you provide are on a different branch than the one we built the release from." Apologies, I was jumping around between github repos and got confused. That said, it seems to me that your release branch having the headers and dev and/or master branches not having them may point to a dev/release flow that may result in regressions. Perhaps you have a different Trunk or whatever your main branch is though. In general, I would expect your main branch to have a superset of the changes in your release branch. Just to be sure, you don't intend to only license the release branch's source as ASL, right? On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:28 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Thank you for the notes. > > I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the > links you provide are on a different branch than the one we built the > release from. The release artifacts were built from the 'release/1.0.0' > branch in their respective repositories. That said, the 'requirements.txt' > file you linked present in the release does not contain such a header. > > Furthermore, with the new year, the copyright statements in the NOTICE > files are now out of date as you observed. I'm assuming this will require a > new release candidate? > > Thanks, > Riley > > On 2022/12/30 23:39:13 larry mccay wrote: > > I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 release review and wanted to > > let you know that it seems a bit cumbersome to review. > > Perhaps my experience with other projects is limited to similar > > conventions, though. > > > > The fact that the src artifacts aren't under a project specific root > ended > > up polluting my releases directory (where I review releases). This was my > > fault for not noticing the missing root but clearly outside my > > expectations. > > > > I also notice that each of what I would expect to just be separate > modules > > have their own tar balls and even github mirrors which is also awkward > for > > how I expect to review things - though not technically related to typical > > review requirements. > > > > These may be seen as less relevant to the specific release at hand and > more > > for the overall project structure and conventions but they would > certainly > > help in reviewing. > > > > I note that there are numerous files [1][2][3] and many more that may > > require Apache License headers. > > > > You can use something like the following in python files: > > # > > # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more > > # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with > > # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. > > # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 > > # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with > > # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > # > > #http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > # > > # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software > > # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, > > # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or > implied. > > # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > > # limitations under the License. > > # > > > > The NOTICE file has a copyright of 2017-2022 still and unless this goes > out > > in the next couple days that will be out of date. > > Duplicate and separate files like NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER access > > ingester, nexus and nexusproto as well as CONTRIBUTING.md which is in 2 > but > > not the other point to some organization issues. There should be some > > effort put in to possibly make these modules under a common project > rather > > than what seem like separate projects. > > > > Some of the above make it pretty cumbersome to review even if not > > technically blockers. > > Addressing these sorts of things early will help contributors feel more > > easily able to help out and can help build your community. > > It will also help you get releases out easier. > > > > Hope the above is useful for you. > > Happy to see a release coming together for the SDAP community and > > congratulate you on tackling this milestone! > > > > It isn't clear to me that these should block your initial release - my > vote > > would be as follows: > > -0 for my vote at this time. > > > > 1. > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/requirements.txt > > 2. > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/setup.py > > 3. > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/collection_manager/main.py > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:30 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > > > Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of > > > reviewing and voting on the release. > > > > > > It is established that an official ASF
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hi, You may want to consider using a DISCLAIMER-WIP [1] until these issues are sorted. Thanks, Justin 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hi, It ’s also -1 (binding) do to licensing issues and compiled code in the releases. First off you need to vote on a release artefact not a GitHub tag. I checked: - release artifacts need incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - one LICENSE incorrectly includes "Copyright 2019 California Institute of Technology” - NOTICE should say “SDAP (incubating)” - Not all files have ASF headers - How is this code licensed and where did it come from? [1] - How is this code licensed and where did it come from? [2] - This file [3] include copyright 2018 - release contains compiled code [4] - LICENSE is not correct as the please contains 33rd party code e.g [5] "Copyright 2015 the original author or authors." Kind Regards, Justin 1. ./climatology/clim/orig/C/gaussinterp_C_code.tar 2. ./climatology/clim/orig/Fortran/armstrong_interp_code.tar 3. ./docs/conf.py 4. ./gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar 5. ./gradlew.bat - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Thank you for the notes. I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers that the links you provide are on a different branch than the one we built the release from. The release artifacts were built from the 'release/1.0.0' branch in their respective repositories. That said, the 'requirements.txt' file you linked present in the release does not contain such a header. Furthermore, with the new year, the copyright statements in the NOTICE files are now out of date as you observed. I'm assuming this will require a new release candidate? Thanks, Riley On 2022/12/30 23:39:13 larry mccay wrote: > I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 release review and wanted to > let you know that it seems a bit cumbersome to review. > Perhaps my experience with other projects is limited to similar > conventions, though. > > The fact that the src artifacts aren't under a project specific root ended > up polluting my releases directory (where I review releases). This was my > fault for not noticing the missing root but clearly outside my > expectations. > > I also notice that each of what I would expect to just be separate modules > have their own tar balls and even github mirrors which is also awkward for > how I expect to review things - though not technically related to typical > review requirements. > > These may be seen as less relevant to the specific release at hand and more > for the overall project structure and conventions but they would certainly > help in reviewing. > > I note that there are numerous files [1][2][3] and many more that may > require Apache License headers. > > You can use something like the following in python files: > # > # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more > # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with > # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. > # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 > # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with > # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > # > #http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > # > # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software > # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, > # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. > # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > # limitations under the License. > # > > The NOTICE file has a copyright of 2017-2022 still and unless this goes out > in the next couple days that will be out of date. > Duplicate and separate files like NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER access > ingester, nexus and nexusproto as well as CONTRIBUTING.md which is in 2 but > not the other point to some organization issues. There should be some > effort put in to possibly make these modules under a common project rather > than what seem like separate projects. > > Some of the above make it pretty cumbersome to review even if not > technically blockers. > Addressing these sorts of things early will help contributors feel more > easily able to help out and can help build your community. > It will also help you get releases out easier. > > Hope the above is useful for you. > Happy to see a release coming together for the SDAP community and > congratulate you on tackling this milestone! > > It isn't clear to me that these should block your initial release - my vote > would be as follows: > -0 for my vote at this time. > > 1. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/requirements.txt > 2. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/setup.py > 3. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/collection_manager/main.py > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:30 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of > > reviewing and voting on the release. > > > > It is established that an official ASF release must not contain > > gradle-wrapper.jar [1], but in my opinion this is a problem that could > > be solved in the next incubating release. If a few IPMC members > > surface several issues this time around, the second release should be > > much cleaner. > > > > Julian > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-570 > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 5:44 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > There has a compiled code (gradle-wrapper jar) in the source release. > > > > > > [1] > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 5:46 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this > > vote to last to a week from now. > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Riley > > > > > > > > On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 release review and wanted to let you know that it seems a bit cumbersome to review. Perhaps my experience with other projects is limited to similar conventions, though. The fact that the src artifacts aren't under a project specific root ended up polluting my releases directory (where I review releases). This was my fault for not noticing the missing root but clearly outside my expectations. I also notice that each of what I would expect to just be separate modules have their own tar balls and even github mirrors which is also awkward for how I expect to review things - though not technically related to typical review requirements. These may be seen as less relevant to the specific release at hand and more for the overall project structure and conventions but they would certainly help in reviewing. I note that there are numerous files [1][2][3] and many more that may require Apache License headers. You can use something like the following in python files: # # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at # #http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. # The NOTICE file has a copyright of 2017-2022 still and unless this goes out in the next couple days that will be out of date. Duplicate and separate files like NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER access ingester, nexus and nexusproto as well as CONTRIBUTING.md which is in 2 but not the other point to some organization issues. There should be some effort put in to possibly make these modules under a common project rather than what seem like separate projects. Some of the above make it pretty cumbersome to review even if not technically blockers. Addressing these sorts of things early will help contributors feel more easily able to help out and can help build your community. It will also help you get releases out easier. Hope the above is useful for you. Happy to see a release coming together for the SDAP community and congratulate you on tackling this milestone! It isn't clear to me that these should block your initial release - my vote would be as follows: -0 for my vote at this time. 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/requirements.txt 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/setup.py 3. https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/blob/dev/collection_manager/collection_manager/main.py On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:30 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of > reviewing and voting on the release. > > It is established that an official ASF release must not contain > gradle-wrapper.jar [1], but in my opinion this is a problem that could > be solved in the next incubating release. If a few IPMC members > surface several issues this time around, the second release should be > much cleaner. > > Julian > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-570 > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 5:44 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > There has a compiled code (gradle-wrapper jar) in the source release. > > > > [1] > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz > > > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 5:46 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this > vote to last to a week from now. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Riley > > > > > > On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) > version 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > > > > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache > SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > > > > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > > > > > > > SDAP community vote thread: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > > > > > > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found > here: > > > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > > > > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > > > > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > > > > > > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
The Gradle wrapper is the only issue I saw. If you think it'll be a big issue to reroll the release my vote is +1. On Fri, Dec 30, 2022, 16:30 Julian Hyde wrote: > Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of > reviewing and voting on the release. > > It is established that an official ASF release must not contain > gradle-wrapper.jar [1], but in my opinion this is a problem that could > be solved in the next incubating release. If a few IPMC members > surface several issues this time around, the second release should be > much cleaner. > > Julian > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-570 > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 5:44 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > There has a compiled code (gradle-wrapper jar) in the source release. > > > > [1] > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz > > > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 5:46 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this > vote to last to a week from now. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Riley > > > > > > On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) > version 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > > > > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache > SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > > > > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > > > > > > > SDAP community vote thread: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > > > > > > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found > here: > > > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > > > > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > > > > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > > > > > > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > > > > > > > - nexusproto: > > > > - URL: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > > > - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f > > > > - ingester: > > > > - URL: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > > > - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea > > > > - nexus: > > > > - URL: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > > > - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 > > > > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ > > > > > > > > For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting > on are as follows: > > > > > > > > apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > > > > db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 > > > > > > > > apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > > > > da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd > > > > > > > > apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > > > > 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > > > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) > 1.0.0. > > > > > > > > The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are > cast and passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > > > > cast. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 > > > > [ ] +0 No opinion > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Riley > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best wishes！ > > CalvinKirs > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of reviewing and voting on the release. It is established that an official ASF release must not contain gradle-wrapper.jar [1], but in my opinion this is a problem that could be solved in the next incubating release. If a few IPMC members surface several issues this time around, the second release should be much cleaner. Julian [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-570 On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 5:44 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi, > > There has a compiled code (gradle-wrapper jar) in the source release. > > [1]https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 5:46 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this vote to > > last to a week from now. > > > > Thank you, > > Riley > > > > On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > > > 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP > > > (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > > > > > SDAP community vote thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > > > > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: > > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > > > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > > > > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > > > > > - nexusproto: > > > - URL: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > > - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f > > > - ingester: > > > - URL: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > > - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea > > > - nexus: > > > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > > - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 > > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ > > > > > > For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting on > > > are as follows: > > > > > > apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > > db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 > > > > > > apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > > da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd > > > > > > apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > > 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0. > > > > > > The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are cast > > > and passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > > > cast. > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 > > > [ ] +0 No opinion > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Riley > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > -- > Best wishes！ > CalvinKirs > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hi, There has a compiled code (gradle-wrapper jar) in the source release. [1]https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 5:46 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > Hello, > > In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this vote to > last to a week from now. > > Thank you, > Riley > > On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > > 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP > > (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > > > SDAP community vote thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > > > - nexusproto: > > - URL: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f > > - ingester: > > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea > > - nexus: > > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > > - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ > > > > For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting on are > > as follows: > > > > apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 > > > > apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd > > > > apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0. > > > > The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are cast > > and passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > > cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 > > [ ] +0 No opinion > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > Thank you, > > Riley > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Best wishes！ CalvinKirs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hello, In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this vote to last to a week from now. Thank you, Riley On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > 1.0.0-rc2. > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP > (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > SDAP community vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > - nexusproto: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f > - ingester: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea > - nexus: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ > > For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting on are as > follows: > > apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 > > apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd > > > apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0. > > The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are cast and > passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Thank you, > Riley > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
I am a mentor of SDAP. Forwarding my vote from the PPMC thread [1]: +1 (binding) Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/vh9472q76kzndcs55pmpjmld8snzn1ny On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 7:19 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > 1.0.0-rc2. > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP > (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > SDAP community vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > - nexusproto: > - URL: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f > - ingester: > - URL: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea > - nexus: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ > > For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting on are > as follows: > > apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 > > apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd > > > apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0. > > The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are cast > and passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Thank you, > Riley > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
[VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. SDAP community vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: - nexusproto: - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f - ingester: - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea - nexus: - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting on are as follows: apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0. The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are cast and passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Thank you, Riley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
