Re: technology sucks
Hi, On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:02:59 +0200 Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail. I apologise for missing it, it was not intentional. Sorry. Okay, then can the config of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] be changed? When? Who? How? -- By the way, I think whether intentional or not-intentional would be a critical issue rampant in the ASF world. I think that the diversity in the ASF (e.g. difference between httpd/apr and jakarta) to a certain extent should be allowable and acceptable in a sense. (Also, AAMOC) However, the thing is worse, people were not willing to pass the stories down from generation to generation by the oral tradition. SO, the new comers can not distinguish whether XX is intentional or not-intentional. (not-intentional can be interpreted as from *ignorance* due to the lack of bequest to the others) # ezmlm config, PMC voting rules, hard to figure up all. As a result, the different cultures co-exist within the ASF, without the respects to each projects. (maybe) -- A bad habit is easy to get into and hard to get rid of. ... NICE *PROVERB* ... and please take it seriously Take care. -- Tetsuya. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: technology sucks
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: Roy, Please note that [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is suffering the same disease. I said this before at that mailing list. Noone responded. It (nonfeasance) really humiliated me. I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail. I apologise for missing it, it was not intentional. Sorry. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: technology sucks
Please note that [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is suffering the same disease. It looks to me that projects@ has both an owner and a moderator (although it could use more moderators). Your comment (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] he.orgmsgNo=41) was about a Reply-To header. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: technology sucks
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:44:05 -0400 (Subject: RE: technology sucks) Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your comment (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=41) was about a Reply-To header. Oh, yes. yes. *** NOTE *** Lists without Reply-To Header would be sure to become inactive lists soon ... E-mail cultures/histories had shown, proven. Quite, technology sucks. I can easily imagine that many (especially, Paul Hammant) participants in that mailing list would have received *personal* mails which should go to the lists directly. The current config of infrastructure@ must be reasonable because that list is to become HELP DESK, not LIST FOR DISCUSSION. However, [EMAIL PROTECTED] must be LIST FOR DISCUSSION and strengthen the [AltRMI], [FTPServer] communities. The apparent difference there might be. Again and again, Lists without Reply-To Header would be sure to become inactive lists soon. Regards, __ Tetsuya [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: technology sucks
Lists without Reply-To Header ... If the PMC wants the list properties changed, perhaps because of requests from the list users, they can submit a request to have the list reconfigured. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
