Re: Wiki votes, was Re: Proposal for OFBiz to Join the ASF

2006-01-18 Thread Leo Simons
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:03:14AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
> [changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion  
> about this topic]

Grr, I just did exactly the same thing and wrote just about the
same thing. My thread view must be messed up...

In any case, +1 to what he said.

LSD


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Wiki votes, was Re: Proposal for OFBiz to Join the ASF

2006-01-17 Thread Erik Abele
[changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion  
about this topic]


On 18.01.2006, at 00:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki?   
(or "@)#!)#@ wiki", as I tend to think of them...)


Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be  
the 'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community.   
Feel free to also have on a wiki for collaboration to get it done,  
but after that, the final proposal should, IMO, go to the mail list.


Does anyone else feel this way?  Mail archives will live for years  
in distributed places.  Wiki's seem to be single-sourced and a lot  
more ephemeral


Thanks, Geir - there was a half written msg with exactly this topic  
in my outbox... I fully agree with you that at least anything which  
is subject to a vote should directly include all the relevant  
information - no links for substantial content, just for extras like  
fancy PDFs describing the architecture or tarballs of the initial  
codebase etc.


This may sound a bit picky but everything else unfortunately comes  
with too many disadvantages (no real archives, dead links, no offline  
access, etc.).


Cheers,
Erik



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature