Newsletter - Request for content
The end of the month is approaching again and I'm sure that, like me, a lot of you are focused on celebrating the new year. Once all that is over I'd like to post the December issue of the newsletter so if people can send any reports to me that would be great. Everyone is welcome to send summaries of any jakarta issues, those CC'd are so since they posted last time and are asked for a repeat effort or to try and prod others on the respective lists into taking over. In terms of timescale I'd like to pull the drafts together next weekend and post as soon as additions stop trickling in. If the timescale doesn't suit but you'd like to contribute then give me an idea of you'll have something ready and we can discuss how long we can wait. In the meantime, thanks everyone and Happy New Year! Rob P.S. Big thanks to Otis for beating the content request! As usual! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: [VOTE] Tapestry / Incubator]
+1 on accepting Tapestry as a Jakarta subproject under the mentorship of Andy Oliver, conditional upon successful incubation. Next steps would be identifying the list of initial committers, cvs tree(s), and mailing list(s). But this can wait until the incubator PMC signs off on the subproject. Original Message Subject: [VOTE] Tapestry / Incubator Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:35:31 -0500 From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry Contrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jakarta Project Management Committee List [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: 005001c2ada2$e6846a20$3dc41e42@howardczkz2sl3 Ok, all the votes are in, except for Mind Bridge who I believe is travelling. Not unexpected, all the votes were +1. Once again, we've voted to go forward and move Tapestry towards Jakarta, via Incubator. We're eagerly awaiting word from Jakarta about what the next steps should be. I've attached the proposal again, for reference. Although we have to migrate in through the Incubator, it looks like the proposal does not need to be changed. - Original Message - From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry Contrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 7:24 AM Subject: [Tapestry-contrib] [VOTE] Tapestry / Incubator As Andrew has pointed out, the roadmap into Jakarta is in transition. Looks like Tapestry gets to be the first project through the Incubator. Anyway, I believe this is more of a correction than a change of course, but deserves a vote anyway. Howard Lewis Ship +1 - Original Message - From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry Contrib [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jakarta Project Management Committee List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 10:09 PM Subject: [Tapestry-contrib] Apache Proposal AGAIN Hi All, The process for accepting a project into Apache has changed. Now all projects need to go through the Incubator [http://incubator.apache.org]. It is my opinion that this project already meets the criteria for acceptance into Jakarta however, the Apache board has added this step as a gate between here and Jakarta. I suspect the incubation period will be short. There is a catch. We will still have to apply to Jakarta after the incubation and the process for incubation is not very well defined. There will be a number of bumps in the road and issues to be addressed. However, I have the utmost confidence in this community and your talent and abillity to work together and make decisions. I am positive that this will be a fine addition to Apache in the end, in particular Jakarta. With that being said, please consider this issue and signify whether I should move forward with submitting the proposal to the incubator. Thanks, -Andy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Tapestry-contrib mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-contrib --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Tapestry-contrib mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-contrib [0] rationale Tapestry, currently housed at the SourceForge (http://tapestry.sf.net), is a component-based web application framework. Tapestry falls generally into the pull-MVC model of development. Tapestry is designed specifically around the creation of completely re-usable components. Components can easily be packaged into libraries and distributed within Jar files, even when they contain assets such as image files and stylesheets. Tapestry is organized around an abstraction that isolates application-specific logic from the details of the servlet API, such as HttpSession, request, response, URLs and query parameters. Tapestry is highly pluggable, allowing any and all behavior to be customized by subclassing appropriate base classes. Tapestry is specifically not a JSP taglib. Tapestry uses its own method for instrumenting HTML that is extremely non-obtrusive (it still previews properly in a WYSIWYG editor). Tapestry has well specified, separate roles for HTML producers and Java developers, and allows them to work together without interfering with each other. The goal of Tapestry is to shift much of the burden of developing web applications onto the framework, and free the developer to work cleanly and effectively without concern for the many small details of web application development. The primary function of
Re: [Fwd: [VOTE] Tapestry / Incubator]
Note a correction: dIon Gillard also agreed to be a sponsoring member. Those things are listed in the proposal which is posted here: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TapestryProposal -Andy Sam Ruby wrote: +1 on accepting Tapestry as a Jakarta subproject under the mentorship of Andy Oliver, conditional upon successful incubation. Next steps would be identifying the list of initial committers, cvs tree(s), and mailing list(s). But this can wait until the incubator PMC signs off on the subproject. Original Message Subject: [VOTE] Tapestry / Incubator Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:35:31 -0500 From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry Contrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jakarta Project Management Committee List [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: 005001c2ada2$e6846a20$3dc41e42@howardczkz2sl3 Ok, all the votes are in, except for Mind Bridge who I believe is travelling. Not unexpected, all the votes were +1. Once again, we've voted to go forward and move Tapestry towards Jakarta, via Incubator. We're eagerly awaiting word from Jakarta about what the next steps should be. I've attached the proposal again, for reference. Although we have to migrate in through the Incubator, it looks like the proposal does not need to be changed. - Original Message - From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry Contrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 7:24 AM Subject: [Tapestry-contrib] [VOTE] Tapestry / Incubator As Andrew has pointed out, the roadmap into Jakarta is in transition. Looks like Tapestry gets to be the first project through the Incubator. Anyway, I believe this is more of a correction than a change of course, but deserves a vote anyway. Howard Lewis Ship +1 - Original Message - From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry Contrib [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jakarta Project Management Committee List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 10:09 PM Subject: [Tapestry-contrib] Apache Proposal AGAIN Hi All, The process for accepting a project into Apache has changed. Now all projects need to go through the Incubator [http://incubator.apache.org]. It is my opinion that this project already meets the criteria for acceptance into Jakarta however, the Apache board has added this step as a gate between here and Jakarta. I suspect the incubation period will be short. There is a catch. We will still have to apply to Jakarta after the incubation and the process for incubation is not very well defined. There will be a number of bumps in the road and issues to be addressed. However, I have the utmost confidence in this community and your talent and abillity to work together and make decisions. I am positive that this will be a fine addition to Apache in the end, in particular Jakarta. With that being said, please consider this issue and signify whether I should move forward with submitting the proposal to the incubator. Thanks, -Andy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Tapestry-contrib mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-contrib --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Tapestry-contrib mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-contrib [0] rationale Tapestry, currently housed at the SourceForge (http://tapestry.sf.net), is a component-based web application framework. Tapestry falls generally into the pull-MVC model of development. Tapestry is designed specifically around the creation of completely re-usable components. Components can easily be packaged into libraries and distributed within Jar files, even when they contain assets such as image files and stylesheets. Tapestry is organized around an abstraction that isolates application-specific logic from the details of the servlet API, such as HttpSession, request, response, URLs and query parameters. Tapestry is highly pluggable, allowing any and all behavior to be customized by subclassing appropriate base classes. Tapestry is specifically not a JSP taglib. Tapestry uses its own method for instrumenting HTML that is extremely non-obtrusive (it still previews properly in a WYSIWYG editor). Tapestry has well specified, separate roles for HTML producers and Java developers, and allows them to work together without
Karma request for site2
Could I get sufficient karma to commit changes to jakarta-site2? Thanks! -- Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies http://www.lokitech.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
