Re: [RESULT] Naming for new Jakarta subproject
I've come to understand that a name Apache FOO does not violate the trademark FOO. As such, I don't think there's any problem with Apache Silk. Sanjiva. On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 00:49 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Apache Silk it is: > > > > [17]Apache Silk > > [ 0]Apache Web Bricks > > [ 0]Apache Web Commons (branding issue with Commons) > > [ 3]Apache Web Components > > [ 0]Apache Web Parts (conflict with Microsoft and sf.net) > > > > 20 +1 votes with 1 abstainer. > > > > So now we can finish the proposal, get it voted on and start with the fun > > stuff. > > Okay. I've been unable to get this resolved - for the following reasons: > > * Segue's SilkXxx web testing suite seems to clash on the trademark. > > * General lack of response on PRC on the trademark issue. We lack decision > making on the grey line at the moment - but after having this sit on the > back burner for many months I'm of the opinion that we clash too much with > the Segue trademark. > > * Jakarta Web Components matches Jakarta Http Components in pattern and > fits the proposals I've made on restructuring Jakarta (ie: they're both > groupings). > > So I'd like to suggest we go ahead with Jakarta Web Components. > > Any thoughts? And sorry for taking so long to bring this up, it's been on > my todo list since ApacheCon. > > Hen > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Naming for new Jakarta subproject
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote: Apache Silk it is: [17]Apache Silk [ 0]Apache Web Bricks [ 0]Apache Web Commons (branding issue with Commons) [ 3]Apache Web Components [ 0]Apache Web Parts (conflict with Microsoft and sf.net) 20 +1 votes with 1 abstainer. So now we can finish the proposal, get it voted on and start with the fun stuff. Okay. I've been unable to get this resolved - for the following reasons: * Segue's SilkXxx web testing suite seems to clash on the trademark. * General lack of response on PRC on the trademark issue. We lack decision making on the grey line at the moment - but after having this sit on the back burner for many months I'm of the opinion that we clash too much with the Segue trademark. * Jakarta Web Components matches Jakarta Http Components in pattern and fits the proposals I've made on restructuring Jakarta (ie: they're both groupings). So I'd like to suggest we go ahead with Jakarta Web Components. Any thoughts? And sorry for taking so long to bring this up, it's been on my todo list since ApacheCon. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jakarta Wiki] Update of "JakartaBoardReport-March2006" by HenriYandell
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by HenriYandell: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-March2006 The comment on the change is: Updating - latest items and time to prepare for the report in March -- Mention various TLP plans. + * Tapestry moving to TLP. + * Cactus/JMeter in favour of moving to TLP. + * Velocity against moving to TLP. + * Turbine against moving to TLP. + Mention legal audit of jars - status. - === Releases === + * 29 January 2006 - HiveMind 1.1.1 Released * 07 January 2006 - Tapestry 4.0 (final) Released * 28 December 2005 - Tapestry 4.0-rc-3 Released * 23 December 2005 - Commons File``Upload 1.1 Released @@ -39, +44 @@ Commons Validator + HiveMind + HttpComponents Tapestry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
