[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-site2 (in module jakarta-site2) failed

2006-06-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project jakarta-site2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 2 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 20 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- jakarta-regexp-package :  Java Regular Expression package
- jakarta-site2 :  The Jakarta site


Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/gump_work/build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2.html
Work Name: build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2 (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 1 sec
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/serializer.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/xalan-unbundled.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2]
CLASSPATH: 
/opt/jdk1.5/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/junit3.8.1/junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/build/resolver.jar
-
Buildfile: build.xml

CheckXSL:
 [xslt] Processing 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/site.xsl to 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp
 [xslt] Loading stylesheet 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/sitechk.xsl
   [delete] Deleting: 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp
 [xslt] Processing 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/news2content.xsl to 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp
 [xslt] Loading stylesheet 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/sitechk.xsl
   [delete] Deleting: 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp

news-gen:
[mkdir] Created dir: /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/target/news-gen
 [xslt] Processing /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/news.xml to 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/docs/site/rss.xml
 [xslt] Loading stylesheet 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/news2content.xsl
 [xslt] /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/news2content.xsl:28:36: 
Error! Had IO Exception with stylesheet file: common.xsl Cause: 
java.io.FileNotFoundException: 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/common.xsl (No such file or directory)
 [xslt] : Fatal Error! javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: 
ElemTemplateElement error: output-date Cause: 
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: ElemTemplateElement error: output-date
 [xslt] Failed to process /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/news.xml

BUILD FAILED
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/build.xml:47: Fatal error during 
transformation

Total time: 1 second
-

To subscribe to this information via syndicated feeds:
- RSS: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/rss.xml
- Atom: 
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/atom.xml

== Gump Tracking Only ===
Produced by Gump version 2.2.
Gump Run 2901062006, vmgump.apache.org:vmgump-public:2901062006
Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #36.

--
Apache Gump
http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: vmgump]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-site2 (in module jakarta-site2) failed

2006-06-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project jakarta-site2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 2 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 20 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- jakarta-regexp-package :  Java Regular Expression package
- jakarta-site2 :  The Jakarta site


Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/gump_work/build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2.html
Work Name: build_jakarta-site2_jakarta-site2 (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 1 sec
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/serializer.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/build/xalan-unbundled.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2]
CLASSPATH: 
/opt/jdk1.5/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/junit3.8.1/junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/build/resolver.jar
-
Buildfile: build.xml

CheckXSL:
 [xslt] Processing 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/site.xsl to 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp
 [xslt] Loading stylesheet 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/sitechk.xsl
   [delete] Deleting: 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp
 [xslt] Processing 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/news2content.xsl to 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp
 [xslt] Loading stylesheet 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/sitechk.xsl
   [delete] Deleting: 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/dummy.tmp

news-gen:
[mkdir] Created dir: /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/target/news-gen
 [xslt] Processing /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/news.xml to 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/docs/site/rss.xml
 [xslt] Loading stylesheet 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/news2content.xsl
 [xslt] /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/news2content.xsl:28:36: 
Error! Had IO Exception with stylesheet file: common.xsl Cause: 
java.io.FileNotFoundException: 
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/common.xsl (No such file or directory)
 [xslt] : Fatal Error! javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: 
ElemTemplateElement error: output-date Cause: 
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: ElemTemplateElement error: output-date
 [xslt] Failed to process /x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/news.xml

BUILD FAILED
/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2/build.xml:47: Fatal error during 
transformation

Total time: 1 second
-

To subscribe to this information via syndicated feeds:
- RSS: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/rss.xml
- Atom: 
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-site2/jakarta-site2/atom.xml

== Gump Tracking Only ===
Produced by Gump version 2.2.
Gump Run 2901062006, vmgump.apache.org:vmgump-public:2901062006
Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #36.

--
Apache Gump
http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: vmgump]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [site] Copyright dates

2006-06-01 Thread sebb

On 31/05/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 31/05/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 On Wed, 31 May 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:

 
 
  On Wed, 31 May 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
 
  On 5/31/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I updated the stylesheet to change the Copyright statement from
  1999-2005 to 1999-2006 a week or so ago.
 
  Of course this changes all the generated HTML pages.
 
  I've not yet updated them, as I wanted to double-check if this was
  needed or not (the stylesheet could be changed back).
 
  OR: would it be better to just change the copyright in files that have
  been updated this year?
 
 
  s/better/required/g.
 
  In other words, the copyright years in a file must include only the years
  in
  which that file was modified.
 
  Not sure if it's required for the sites. I suspect the concept of templating
  is perfectly acceptable and the copyright can be considered to refer to the
  whole site and not just the page in question.
 
  Worth a legal-discuss question.

 As he IM'd me, I took the liberty of unleashing this question on Cliff.
 You'll be surprised by the result of the conversation - drop the copyright
 from the footer and just update the copyright on the legal info page.

 Sounds good to me. Less to maintain.

+1

 All that having the copyright on each page does is provide a defense
 against an innocent infringement defence - which apparantly means when
 someone says they didn't know they were doing wrong. Not keeping the
 copyright up to date means that it'll expire in 93 years not 95, so not
 even a huge deal to worry about keeping it up to date.

 How does that sound?




At present, all the pages contain the footer:

Copyright (c) 1999-2005, The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_

where _Legal information_ is a link to the legal page (which
definitely needs updating to 2006!)

IIUC, the new footer would just be:

_Legal information_

Is that correct?

Or would it be better to have:

Copyright (c) The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_

i.e. remove just the dates from all footers.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [site] Copyright dates

2006-06-01 Thread Henri Yandell



On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, sebb wrote:


At present, all the pages contain the footer:

Copyright (c) 1999-2005, The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_

where _Legal information_ is a link to the legal page (which
definitely needs updating to 2006!)

IIUC, the new footer would just be:

_Legal information_

Is that correct?

Or would it be better to have:

Copyright (c) The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_

i.e. remove just the dates from all footers.


That sounds good - I'm pretty sure it's not going to be bad to do that and 
change it later. Not having the first part will seem quite out of context.


Once it's changed, I'll ping Cliff for confirmation.

Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [site] Copyright dates

2006-06-01 Thread Martin Cooper

On 6/1/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, sebb wrote:

 At present, all the pages contain the footer:

 Copyright (c) 1999-2005, The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal
information_

 where _Legal information_ is a link to the legal page (which
 definitely needs updating to 2006!)

 IIUC, the new footer would just be:

 _Legal information_

 Is that correct?

 Or would it be better to have:

 Copyright (c) The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_

 i.e. remove just the dates from all footers.

That sounds good - I'm pretty sure it's not going to be bad to do that and
change it later. Not having the first part will seem quite out of context.



I think it would be worth asking whether or not a copyright notice without
specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
- i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.

I guess the first question is: Do we care about our pages being copyrighted?
I would expect that we do, in which case I believe we should make people
aware of that. If we take the attitude that the copyright applies to the
site and not to the individual pages, then I guess we could go back to what
sebb was talking about in the first place, and use a boilerplate copyright
on each page.

--
Martin Cooper


Once it's changed, I'll ping Cliff for confirmation.


Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [site] Copyright dates

2006-06-01 Thread Henri Yandell



On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:


I think it would be worth asking whether or not a copyright notice without
specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
- i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.

I guess the first question is: Do we care about our pages being copyrighted?
I would expect that we do, in which case I believe we should make people
aware of that. If we take the attitude that the copyright applies to the
site and not to the individual pages, then I guess we could go back to what
sebb was talking about in the first place, and use a boilerplate copyright
on each page.


Mebbe we should bring it up on legal-discuss. The irritating thing with 
not being able to do boilerplate is that every site out there does 
boilerplate, from Slashdot to Microsoft to the BBC.


That way we can help get an ASF policy rather than just how we do things. 
We're the only project I've found so far who have a link from the 
copyright to a terms of use/legal info page, and I suspect that every ASF 
project uses boilerplate updating at the moment.


Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [site] Copyright dates

2006-06-01 Thread Roland Weber
Martin Cooper wrote:

 I think it would be worth asking whether or not a copyright notice
 without
 specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
 - i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.

My expectation is that copyright protection applies simply because
we own the copyright, not because of some notice being in the page.
The notice is just to make people aware of the fact.

But copyright is different from the USA here in Germany.

cheers,
  Roland

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [site] Copyright dates

2006-06-01 Thread sebb

On 01/06/06, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Martin Cooper wrote:

 I think it would be worth asking whether or not a copyright notice
 without
 specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
 - i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.

My expectation is that copyright protection applies simply because
we own the copyright, not because of some notice being in the page.
The notice is just to make people aware of the fact.


+1


But copyright is different from the USA here in Germany.



And in the UK probably too, but IANAL...

===

I'm going to revert the stylesheet back to 2005, and update the legal
page to 2006.

This will reduce the number of pages that are updated - until such
time as this discussion is resolved...

s///
(or perhaps I should sign off as s\\\ this time!)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]