mvn install - seems to work OK now
mvn site:site - seems to work OK now
The parent pom needs some work if the parent site is to be deployed -
a lot of the sections are empty, e.g. no license or description.
I could not work out how to create the distribution artefacts, so it
is impossible to say if they would be OK, but I did notice that the
jars that are created don't contain NOTICE or LICENSE files. For jars
that contain code, it would be helpful if the Manifests contained java
source and target versions.
The Manifests are generally a bit lacking in information. It would be
useful to have:
Built-By: User
Implementation-Version: 1.xx
X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.4 (e.g.)
X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.4 (e.g.)
Extension-Name: JMeter
Specification-Title: Apache Jakarta Cactus
Specification-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
Implementation-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache
Is the scratchpad directory tree necessary? It does not seem to be
used in the build.
Also, the image files in
documentation/dist/doc/images
seem to be corrupt.
Not sure what the purpose of the documentation tree is.
S///
On 01/02/2008, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK,
if anybody tried it, can you post your recommendations and impressions?
If not, I guess that it is OK, for a RC and I will continue with improving
the documentation.
Cheers, Petar.
On Jan 31, 2008 10:40 PM, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 7:34 AM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 3:26 PM, Magnus Grimsell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, the version of Cargo integrated is: 0.9
Ok, I've done some fixes for Cactus to work with Cargo 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
Once cargo releases 1.0 I'll be able to commit them.
One other quick question. My PGP key is signed only by Roy
Fielding(I missed
the
key-signing party in Atlanta :-)) so will I be able to make a
release?
I have never been involved in releasing Cactus. Maybe someone else can
share some light on this?
AFAIK you can (I've done several ASF releases and my key is signed by
nobody) - its nice to have but not required and the release signing
FAQ doesn't say its required:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#web-of-trust
Same view here. Key-signing's not a blocker.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Regards, Petar!
Karlovo, Bulgaria.
EOOXML objections
http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
Public PGP Key at:
http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9
Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
