Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta to the Attic; close down Jakarta PMC
On 10.11.11 19:01, Henri Yandell wrote: > A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to > close down the PMC. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] -1, because +1 "I go, and it is done; the bell invites me. Hear it not, Duncan, for it is a knell That summons thee to heaven or to hell." (Shakespeare, Macbeth) Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Jakarta Regexp to Attic
On 22.03.11 01:00, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on > the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. +1 Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Merge dev lists
Rahul Akolkar wrote: > [Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only] > > This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into > one development and one notifications list. For background including > timing, anticipated benefits and some discussion, see proposal [1] > thread. > > [ ] +1 > [X] -1 I'm only following JCS and I'm not interested in being flooded with anything more. Sorry. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list
On 15.10.09 00:49, Henri Yandell wrote: Slightly less tongue in cheek - maybe now is the time to move ORO, Regexp and ECS over to Commons. I thought, Attic was the correct place, at least for ECS? Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Announcements without Release Notes
Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > For example, I just got an email about Mailet 2.4 release, but there was no > link to release notes or a JIRA link that might show what was done between > 2.3 and 2.4. I couldn't find any information on the site either. So, my > questions are: > Maybe I just don't know where to look? > Am I the only one who would love to see projects' release notes? > Is there an easy way to get projects to include this type of information in > releases and make it easily accessible (i.e. don't require me to download, > unpackage, and look for a specific file) There used to be a maven-announcement-plugin which created a nice announcement including all the news from your changes.xml. Dunno about maven2. For an example look here: http://markmail.org/message/goecp6jy3llbxv6a HTH Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
OT: Java question: FileChannel.transferTo()
Hi folks, sorry for the off-topic question but I was bitten by a generic Java issue and I thought there might be a couple of experts out there. I tried to use FileChannel.transferTo() to copy large files efficiently. Now the common way to use this is inChannel.transferTo(0, inChannel.size(), outChannel); (I know that the number of bytes actually written may differ from the number of bytes requested so this would need a loop.) I found however that for counts bigger than 2GB (count is declared long), we get an OutOfMemory exception "Map failed" (Sun 32bit-JVM 1.5, Linux). Obviously, the JVM tries to use a memory-mapped file to do the copying and the address space is too small. Searching the net gave me some closed issues in the Sun bug database which basically told me that this should have been fixed long ago. Other than that, the problem seems to be widely undocumented/unknown. Could some kind soul please confirm that this error is supposed to happen (If not, please give JVM-version and OS)? Shouldn't this be handled by the JVM transparently? Anyone knowing an elegant workaround other than copying in small chunks? Your experiences are appreciated. Thanks for replying. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, the > Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and for > Harmony, to DB and XML! Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive > projects, has no connection to anything else... > I agree with Geir. The graph that includes Jakarta looks much more realistic than the other one. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories
Danny Angus wrote: > Yes.. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site2.html I've never seen this before. What link would have taken me there? From jakarta.apache.org, I mean? Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories
Hi Roland, Roland Weber wrote: > This one covers svn, but not the Ant part: > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html The ant part is covered by the readme in SVN. A hint in that file would have helped. Sorry for the fuzz. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories
sebb wrote: > Thanks; that's also fixed the missing updates. > > I wonder how it happened? That was me. I could have *sworn* that I copied these over by accident and as busy to remove them as fast as possible. Is this procedure "svn update - edit - ant - svn commit - svn update site" documented somewhere? I've never seen anything like this. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ANNOUNCE] JCS 1.3 released
Jakarta JCS 1.3 is now available. JCS is a distributed caching system written in Java. This release is the first official release of JCS under the Jakarta Project. JCS 1.3 has been uploaded to the usual places and is/will soon be available in either binary or source form from the following sources: - The maven1-repository under jcs as binary jcs-1.3.jar - The maven2-repository under org/apache/jcs/jcs/1.3 as binary jcs-1.3.jar - The JCS download page at http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/DownloadPage.html as binary and source distribution. Have fun. Bye, Thomas (on behalf of the JCS team) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corrected Result: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Voting has closed. Here are the results: > > +1 votes: > Hanson Char <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Aaron Smuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Rony G. Flatscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 0 votes: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -1 votes: None. (* denotes binding votes) The vote has passed. We will make the artifacts available as soon as possible. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
sebb wrote: > Sorry for the delay in responding. > > The NOTICE file is much clearer, and the Xerox license is identified, > so I am withdrawing my -1. > > When the rules have been clarified, the next release can implement any > changes if necessary. > > Sebastian Thanks, I will clarify the result now, based on your +1 I suppose? Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Martin van den Bemt wrote: > If you vote again your vote is binding too :) Next time. Thanks again for voting me in. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Hi Sebastian, sebb wrote: > However: > > http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html > > says much the same, and seems to be policy. As you can see from the SVN tag JCS_1_3 and the artifacts at my site, your concerns have been addressed and the license files have been fixed. I would like to ask you to be so kind as to re-vote on the subject, based on the new status. Regards, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Result: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Hi Roland, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Thomas, > >> I could not find any information about whether Rony Flatscher is a >> member of the PMC > > In the committers-only SVN module is a file board/committee-info.txt > which lists the PMCs of all Apache projects. It's (supposed to be ;-) > the authoritative source. Rony Flatscher is listed there as PMC member. I came across some commit message regarding asf-authorization which contained a list of members of the jakarta-pmc group and he was not listed there. So I was unsure. > I'm not sure myself how Sebastian's -1 will be weighed here. I would > have expected that the NOTICE and LICENSE files get fixed and he > changes his vote. As by his last mail on the topic, the content in > SVN did not get fixed. If you changed the release files manually, you > should commit those changes to SVN and give Sebastian some time to > change his vote. We were voting on the artifacts on people.apache.org/~tv/jcs/, not on SVN. This is at least what I understood the release-then-vote-policy means. I have committed the latest changes and moved the tag, however. If Rony is a PMC member we have a result of 3 +1 votes, which should be sufficient. However its up to the PMC to decide this. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Result: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Now, shall we release JCS as it is published there? > > [ ] +1 Yes, JCS 1.3 should be released > [ ] 0 I do not care > [ ] -1 No (give reasons) Voting has closed. Here are the results: +1 votes: Hanson Char <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Aaron Smuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rony G. Flatscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0 votes: none -1 votes: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (* denotes binding votes of PMC members) I could not find any information about whether Rony Flatscher is a member of the PMC, so would someone with the necessary insight please decide if this vote passed or not. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Actually, it's more than that. But so be it. I will update the files on > my site and kindly ask for a re-vote. Done. I chose the separate LICENSE file. The maven2-POM is also part of the distribution. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
sebb wrote: > The NOTICE file is not supposed to contain any licenses. I beg to differ, but I will not go into this again. > I suggest you remove the Xerox license header from it, and add it to > the LICENSE file, with the appropriate introduction. The LICENSE.txt file is supposed to contain the ASL 2.0 and nothing else. I created another file LICENSE.xerox and refer to it from the NOTICE file. > Sorry to keep going on about this, but there's only one other file to edit. Actually, it's more than that. But so be it. I will update the files on my site and kindly ask for a re-vote. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
sebb wrote: > I find the current NOTICE rather misleading - it looks as though the > whole of JCS is licensed under a Xerox licence. > > I think it's therefore important to fix this. >From re-reading the NOTICE file, I agree with you. My proposal to solve this is the following: ---8<--- Apache Jakarta JCS Copyright 2001-2007 The Apache Software Foundation. Portions Copyright (c) Xerox Corporation 1998-2001. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). This product includes software developed at Xerox Corporation which has been published under the following license: --- Copyright (c) Xerox Corporation 1998-2001. All rights reserved. Use and copying of this software and preparation of derivative works based upon this software are permitted. Any distribution of this software or derivative works must comply with all applicable United States export control laws. This software is made available AS IS, and Xerox Corporation makes no warranty about the software, its performance or its conformity to any specification. --- ---8<--- Could we agree on this version? Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
sebb wrote: > I don't think so. The NOTICE is not supposed to contain the license. It doesn't. It contains what I understand as "license header" of that one Xerox file and the associated copyright notice. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
sebb wrote: > Sorry, but: -1 > > There should be NOTICE files in all the archives (jar, zip etc). > The NOTICE file (found in SVN) needs to refer to Xerox - see > jcs-1.3\src\aspect\Trace.aj > > No KEYS file to check the signatures - and could not find it in SVN. > > Sourcefiles: > There should probably be AL2.0 headers in the .aj files (apart from > Trace.aj) > > -0 Other problems: > > Website: > The Changes report refers to CVS - this should really be SVN > The JCoverage report should really open in a new window, as is done > for Javadocs etc. > The Checkstyle report is in German, ideally it should be in English. All complaints have been fixed. The new versions are online. I beg for pardon again. I uploaded a copy of the KEYS file to both, the jar and the dist directory for your convenience. I'm not sure how to handle the Xerox copyright stuff. I included the whole text inside the NOTICE file for now. Don't know if that is appropriate. Would you please be so kind as to review again and vote again. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
sebb wrote: > But you _are_ still a committer... Yes, but then, everybody else in Jakarta is also potentially a committer for JCS and we would not want to list them all. By, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
sebb wrote: > Sorry, but: -1 > > There should be NOTICE files in all the archives (jar, zip etc). > The NOTICE file (found in SVN) needs to refer to Xerox - see > jcs-1.3\src\aspect\Trace.aj > > No KEYS file to check the signatures - and could not find it in SVN. > > Sourcefiles: > There should probably be AL2.0 headers in the .aj files (apart from > Trace.aj) One should not do those things in a hurry. Sorry for this. I will rebuild the stuff and upload it again. > > -0 Other problems: > > Website: > The Changes report refers to CVS - this should really be SVN Changed. > The JCoverage report should really open in a new window, as is done > for Javadocs etc. This is standard Maven stuff. How would you change that? > The Checkstyle report is in German, ideally it should be in English. Fixed. > Project Team: both tv and jvanzyl are committers Actually my contributions are very small, so I'm fine with the contributor status. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Now, shall we release JCS as it is published there? > > [X] +1 Yes, JCS 1.3 should be released > [ ] 0 I do not care > [ ] -1 No (give reasons) Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release JCS 1.3
Hi folks, After much discussion on the JCS developer list, the first official release of JCS (version 1.3) after leaving the Turbine project is ready to vote on. You can find the created artifacts here: site: http://people.apache.org/~tv/jcs/ jars: http://people.apache.org/~tv/jcs/jar/ dist: http://people.apache.org/~tv/jcs/dist/ Now, shall we release JCS as it is published there? [ ] +1 Yes, JCS 1.3 should be released [ ] 0 I do not care [ ] -1 No (give reasons) Voting is subject to the rules described in http://jakarta.apache.org/site/management.html The deadline is Sat, June 1 2007, 12:00 CET Note that the Jakarta PMC has the final word on whether the release is published or not. Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Henri Yandell wrote: > [ ] +1 I support the proposal > [ ] +0 I don't care > [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Bye, Thomas. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkZCAcQACgkQLrlGgoiBdALLHACfXHNOdEknt8KassAOg1Zw0aDS wrkAniK1x6C21S7olNH9xu5HRrvWFzxS =i6z1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move POI to TLP
+1 Nick Burch wrote: > After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we think POI > is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon, > lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the proposal for this, > which is attached below. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move Turbine to TLP
[X] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Thanks, Scott, for bringing this to life. Bye, Thomas. Scott Eade wrote: > The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the > Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own top > level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls for a > vote to take place. > > The proposal is available at: >http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-turbine/TLPTurbine > > For the interested, most of the discussion took place in the following > thread: >http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--TLP--tf3574436.html > > Here are the vote options: > [ ] +1 I support the proposal > [ ] +0 I don't care > [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... > > Voting will close in one week. > > Thanks, > > Scott > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project fulcrum-cache (in module jakarta-turbine-fulcrum) failed]
Bill Barker wrote: You need to: $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata $ cd metadata/project $ vi jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.xml $ svn ci Thanks for the help. It does change something but doesn't fix the problem completely. I added both dependencies as it is done in other projects (DB-Torque for example) but gump still complains about JCS. Two other complaints have javamail involved (javax.mail/mail-1.3.3.jar). I'm thankful for any further hint. RTFMs are welcome, just tell me which FM. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project fulcrum-cache (in module jakarta-turbine-fulcrum) failed]
Hi folks, we get those messages by gump that puzzle me. These are not uncommon dependencies I guess. I made sure that the two files exist on ibiblio. How do I know about which dependencies gump knows and which it doesn't know? Bye, Thomas. Original Message [...] The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependencies: commons-lang-2.1.jar jcs-20030822.182132.jar [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JIRA Developer rights on Torque and Turbine
Henri Yandell wrote: Something's wrong with the chair :) I missed the email asking for commit rights. Nevermind. Sorry about that, I've added you to both SVN and JIRA now. Thanks a lot. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JIRA Developer rights on Torque and Turbine
Henri Yandell wrote: You don't have commit rights to Turbine, so no on the Turbine JIRA bit. ??? Scott Eade sent message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce the vote result. Is something wrong with the vote? Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JIRA Developer rights on Torque and Turbine
Could some kind soul please add user tv as a developer to the Torque and Turbine projects. Thanks in advance. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jakarta Commit access
Hi folks, how is the common svn commit access supposed to work? I was trying to commit something to Fulcrum but got "403 Forbidden". I have commit access to Torque, however. Any hint is welcome. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
