A definite +1 for multiple exceptions in a catch{} block.
I have had a number of times I have wanted to do this,
but have had to create a private method and refer all
catch{} blocks to it.
Dan Lydick
> [Original Message]
> From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 10/29/04 12:38:48 PM
> Subject: Exception handling Was: Future JDK features 2 items
>
>
>
>
> 2/
> How about just being able to do multiple Exceptions in one block?
>
> try {
> ....
> } catch(JMSException, RemoteException, SQLException e) {
> }
>
> or possibly even:
>
> try {
> ....
> } catch( (JMSException | RemoteException | SQLException) e) {
> }
>
> The last one is interesting as it could be a larger concept allowing
> mixed-types; but from a finite set. Probably lots wrong with that idea :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
