Re: PMC Chair elelection

2002-03-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig

On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So Sam, if you are willing, a simple set of +1 votes from the PMC
 should be sufficient.
 
 Sure.

So here is my +1 as well.

Stefan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: PMC Chair elelection

2002-03-17 Thread Sam Ruby

 So Sam, if you are willing, a simple set of +1 votes from the PMC should be 
sufficient.

Sure.

- Sam Ruby


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: PMC Chair elelection

2002-03-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli

Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;)

I second this nomination... Sam's great at handling crap jobs :) :) :)
(Ok, ok... He's also great on great stuff... But that's not the point!)

Pier


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: PMC Chair elelection

2002-03-14 Thread costinm

On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Peter Donald wrote:

 +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;)

+1 - if he doesn't want it, he'll be even better for the job :-)

Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: PMC Chair elelection

2002-03-14 Thread Conor MacNeill

Pete,

 From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2002 7:56 PM
 To: Jakarta General List
 Subject: Re: PMC Chair elelection
 
 
 +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;)
 
 Nothing but good has come out of it so far so why mess with a good thing?
 

Pete,

True. The idea was to give any other folks who wanted to give it a shot, the 
opportunity to put themselves forward. It seems clear that if Sam is agreeable, he 
would be the only candidate, though I must acknowledge Geir, who indicated his 
willingness, even while supporting Sam.

So Sam, if you are willing, a simple set of +1 votes from the PMC should be sufficient.

Let me add mine to those already expressed.

+1

Conor


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




PMC Chair elelection

2002-03-13 Thread Conor MacNeill

The first order of business for the new PMC is the election of a Chair.

Would all PMC members indicate if they would be willing to act as Chair for
the next 12 months. Once each PMC member has indicated their availability,
we can proceed to an election.

If there are more than three candidates, I propose a preferential voting
system where each PMC member gives numbered preferences. If no candiate has
a clear majority, the votes from the candidate with the least number of
votes are distributed according to the indicated preferences. This process
continues until one candidate has a majority (4 votes).

If you are not happy with this process, that's OK - just -1 this email and
propose an alternative.

Conor


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]