Re: lucene

[Sebastian Ho]

Hi

Indexing JSP files is the same as any other files (e.g. text). 
If you do not want to include the JSP or HTML tags, you will need to
parse the file to extract all texts before indexing.
There are a lot of open source parsing for this purpose.

Sebastian Ho

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 16:54, shafipour elnaz wrote:
> hi every body,
> I want to use Lucene in my application for searching jsp files but i don't know how 
> could i index jsp files.Could any one help me. :(
>  
> Elnaz
> 
>   
> -
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: lucene

[Tim O'Brien]

Elnaz,
 
Please ask this question on the lucene-users list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).  To join this 
list, see the Jakarta page devoted to mailing list: 
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
 
Beofre doing that, I'd recommend reading all the online documentation for Lucene here 
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/index.html.  Lucene also contains a simple demo 
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/gettingstarted.html.
 
Tim O'Brien
Jakarta Receptionist

 


From: shafipour elnaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 6/23/2004 4:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lucene



hi every body,
I want to use Lucene in my application for searching jsp files but i don't know how 
could i index jsp files.Could any one help me. :(

Elnaz

   
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Jason van Zyl]

On 9/11/01 2:01 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> on 9/11/01 8:55 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> There's one
>> piece that someone of root authority needs to do, and I'll coordinate that
>> part.
> 
> Including getting a list of people who need commit access.

I'm getting the list together now. I've had a few responses so far so
hopefully the list will be complete soon. I will pass the info on to Sam
when I have all the pertinent info.
 
> -jon
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Jon Stevens]

on 9/11/01 8:55 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There's one
> piece that someone of root authority needs to do, and I'll coordinate that
> part.

Including getting a list of people who need commit access.

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Sam Ruby]

Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>I will gather the names of the committers and pass the info on the Sam or
>Brian so they can make the accounts. I'll also make the request for the
>mailing lists.

I'll do the bulk of the work (including the mailing lists).  There's one
piece that someone of root authority needs to do, and I'll coordinate that
part.  So, yes, pass the info to me once it becomes available.

- Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Ted Husted]

Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Do we know that all the current lucene committers have agreed to the switch?

I believe that all the active committers are on board. There were some
mertius committers that could not be reached, but I understand that the
decision was to just proceed based on the consent of the people working
on Lucene now. 

I think if we give them a working Jakarta Web site and a CVS, the rest
will quickly follow. 

I'm stepping through the Jakarta-Site2 default configuration, and
setting the docs up in a jakarta-lucene directory, that I can upload
when the CVS is online. 

I'm not a Velocity guru, but reckon you can help with that if I get
stuck ;-)

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel +1 716 737-3463
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Jason van Zyl]

On 9/11/01 11:17 AM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> I will join the lucene mailing list and we can work together from there to
>> move down the list of things to get done. Hopefully we can encourage the
>> existing developers to pitch in some time too to move things along.
> 
> Jason, 
> 
> I see that zenplex has a NYC address, but don't know if that is where
> you are situate. So if I don't hear from you, I'll assume you're caught
> up in the turmoil.

I am in Canada, probably the safest place in the world, so I am fortunate to
say that I'm ok. 
 
> Meanwhile, I'd say we should get the site and CVS setup for them, but
> expect the committers to repackage Lucene, and upload it to the CVS.

Sounds good.
 
> If you are in a position to get the intial mailing lists and CVS setup
> up, and have Apache accounts created for the committers, with karma for
> the Lucene CVS, let me know.

I will gather the names of the committers and pass the info on the Sam or
Brian so they can make the accounts. I'll also make the request for the
mailing lists.

Do we know that all the current lucene committers have agreed to the switch?

> In the meantime, I'll continue work on the
> Web site part of it so that is ready to post.

Ok.
 
> (I hope no one minds keeping up with business-as-usual during these
> troubling times. But if the rest of us don't carry on, then the
> terrorists win. That we cannot have.)
 
> -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
> -- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
> -- Tel +1 716 737-3463
> -- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Ted Husted]

Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I will join the lucene mailing list and we can work together from there to
> move down the list of things to get done. Hopefully we can encourage the
> existing developers to pitch in some time too to move things along.

Jason, 

I see that zenplex has a NYC address, but don't know if that is where
you are situate. So if I don't hear from you, I'll assume you're caught
up in the turmoil.

Meanwhile, I'd say we should get the site and CVS setup for them, but
expect the committers to repackage Lucene, and upload it to the CVS. 

If you are in a position to get the intial mailing lists and CVS setup
up, and have Apache accounts created for the committers, with karma for
the Lucene CVS, let me know. In the meantime, I'll continue work on the
Web site part of it so that is ready to post.

(I hope no one minds keeping up with business-as-usual during these
troubling times. But if the rest of us don't carry on, then the
terrorists win. That we cannot have.)

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel +1 716 737-3463
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Ted Husted]

OK. I'll get started on the Web site infrastructure in the morning, so
we will have a place to stand ;-)

Jason van Zyl wrote:
> 
> On 9/10/01 5:58 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > After being blind-sided by some other things, I'm actually ready to
> > begin.
> >
> > Jason mentioned that he wanted to help, but hasn't gotten back.
> 
> Ted,
> 
> I'm now subscribed to the lucene developer's list. I'll send a quick note to
> the list (if you haven't already) asking if any progress has been made on
> the initial list Jon made.
> 
> > Just proceed down your list from the Lucene mailing list?
> >
> > < http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >
> >
> 
> --
> 
> jvz.
> 
> Jason van Zyl
> 
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel +1 716 737-3463
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Jason van Zyl]

On 9/10/01 5:58 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> After being blind-sided by some other things, I'm actually ready to
> begin. 
> 
> Jason mentioned that he wanted to help, but hasn't gotten back.

Ted,

I'm now subscribed to the lucene developer's list. I'll send a quick note to
the list (if you haven't already) asking if any progress has been made on
the initial list Jon made.
 
> Just proceed down your list from the Lucene mailing list?
> 
> < http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >
> 


-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Jason van Zyl]

On 9/10/01 5:58 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> After being blind-sided by some other things, I'm actually ready to
> begin. 
> 
> Jason mentioned that he wanted to help, but hasn't gotten back.

I will join the lucene mailing list and we can work together from there to
move down the list of things to get done. Hopefully we can encourage the
existing developers to pitch in some time too to move things along.
 
> Just proceed down your list from the Lucene mailing list?
> 
> < http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >
> 
> -T.
> 

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] FW: Lucene Acceptance

[Jon Stevens]

on 9/10/01 2:58 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just proceed down your list from the Lucene mailing list?
> 
> < http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >
> 
> -T.

Sounds like a good start.

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene Acceptance

[Ted Husted]

Great! How do you want to do this? Start with the Web site and mailing
list and end with the CVS, or the other way around, or start at both
ends and work towards the middle ;-)

< http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >

Jason van Zyl wrote:
> 
> On 8/12/01 4:57 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Jon Stevens wrote:
> >> If you would like to take over and do the move, then that would be great. I
> >> have sent several emails to the Lucene list with instructions on what needs
> >> to be done. Check their list archives.
> >
> > OK, I found this:
> >
> > < http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >
> >
> > I'm out of town most of this week, but will start stepping down the list
> > if no one else is working on it.
> 
> I'm willing to help too, just back from a few days off but I use Lucene for
> several things and would like to see the move happen sooner rather than
> later :-)
> 
> > -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
> > -- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
> > -- Tel +1 716 737-3463
> > -- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --
> 
> jvz.
> 
> Jason van Zyl
> 
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel +1 716 737-3463
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene Acceptance

[Jason van Zyl]

On 8/12/01 4:57 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jon Stevens wrote:
>> If you would like to take over and do the move, then that would be great. I
>> have sent several emails to the Lucene list with instructions on what needs
>> to be done. Check their list archives.
> 
> OK, I found this:
> 
> < http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >
> 
> I'm out of town most of this week, but will start stepping down the list
> if no one else is working on it.

I'm willing to help too, just back from a few days off but I use Lucene for
several things and would like to see the move happen sooner rather than
later :-)
 
> -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
> -- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
> -- Tel +1 716 737-3463
> -- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene Acceptance

[Ted Husted]

Jon Stevens wrote:
> If you would like to take over and do the move, then that would be great. I
> have sent several emails to the Lucene list with instructions on what needs
> to be done. Check their list archives.

OK, I found this:

< http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/2626/2001/6/100/5924381/ >

I'm out of town most of this week, but will start stepping down the list
if no one else is working on it.

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel +1 716 737-3463
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Craig R. McClanahan]

+1 (back at home recovering from J1).

Craig


On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote:

> Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
> 
> +1 
> 
> I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
> 
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> > 
> > Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
> > 
> > 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> > voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
> > vote?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > -jon
> > 
> > +1
> > "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Jon S. Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > No vote:
> > Pierpaolo Fumagalli
> > Ted Husted
> > Geir Magnusson Jr.
> > Craig McClanahan
> > Sam Ruby
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Geir Magnusson Jr.]

Did you consider that we were out of functional email reach?

+1 from me - I haven't used it, but it comes highly recommended from a
source I trust (besides you...)

geir

Jon Stevens wrote:
> 
> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
> 
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
> vote?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -jon
> 
> +1
> "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jon S. Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> No vote:
> Pierpaolo Fumagalli
> Ted Husted
> Geir Magnusson Jr.
> Craig McClanahan
> Sam Ruby

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web?  See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
You have a genius for suggesting things I've come a cropper with!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Ted Husted]

Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?

+1 

I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.

Jon Stevens wrote:
> 
> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
> 
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
> vote?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -jon
> 
> +1
> "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jon S. Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> No vote:
> Pierpaolo Fumagalli
> Ted Husted
> Geir Magnusson Jr.
> Craig McClanahan
> Sam Ruby

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Jon Stevens]

on 6/6/01 6:02 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Re: sourceforge; there are a number of differences.  Has a community and a
> relationship or affinity with other Jakarta projects are key
> differentiators.  Again, by the latter measure, Lucene is a slightly weak
> Jakarta subproject (IMHO) - the only direct linkage I am aware of is by a
> non-Apache project, namely Scarab.  If this were a big concern to me, I
> would be insisting on a sandbox until the project grows up.

Part of the reason for the fact that there hasn't been a lot of Jakarta
project adoption is that the current license for Lucene is LGPL.

We are skirting that in Scarab because we have made it a 100% optional
dependency and we also do not have a real distribution of Scarab yet. It
could be done the same way in other Jakarta projects, but that hasn't been
the general theme for projects.

> But, all things considered, I don't see significant risk.  That's why I
> gave my +1.

The only major risk I could see is that the developers may or may not like
living under Jakarta, but that is something we won't know until after it
happens and is a common risk regardless of whether or not it is a top level
project or not.

-jon

-- 
"Open source is not available to commercial companies."
-Steve Balmer, CEO Microsoft



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Sam Ruby]

Conor MacNeill wrote:
>
> Why? It seems that commons-sandbox is becoming a mini sourceforge. I
thought
> commons was about small independent reusable components.

Lucene is an independent reusable component.

There are many measures of size - lines of code, size of community, etc.
By these measures, it would appear that lucene could either be considered a
slighly largish commons component, or a slighly smallish jakarta
subproject.

Re: sourceforge; there are a number of differences.  Has a community and a
relationship or affinity with other Jakarta projects are key
differentiators.  Again, by the latter measure, Lucene is a slightly weak
Jakarta subproject (IMHO) - the only direct linkage I am aware of is by a
non-Apache project, namely Scarab.  If this were a big concern to me, I
would be insisting on a sandbox until the project grows up.

But, all things considered, I don't see significant risk.  That's why I
gave my +1.

- Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Sam Ruby]

Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> Is 9 enough?

+1

- Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Conor MacNeill]

> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Do we have an initial list of committers?
>
> Unless it has a critical mass (read: three active developers), I would
> prefer commons-sandbox over a full fledged project.

Why? It seems that commons-sandbox is becoming a mini sourceforge. I thought
commons was about small independent reusable components. I don't know if
Lucene fits that bill, although it sounds "bigger" that that. IMHO, even
Cactus doesn't really belong there - it should probably be a top-level
project.

Conor




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Jon Stevens]

on 6/6/01 5:04 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Do we have an initial list of committers?

Sure...

http://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=3922

> Unless it has a critical mass (read: three active developers), I would
> prefer commons-sandbox over a full fledged project.

Is 9 enough?

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Sam Ruby]

Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
>
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
> vote?

Do we have an initial list of committers?

Unless it has a critical mass (read: three active developers), I would
prefer commons-sandbox over a full fledged project.

- Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

[Pier P. Fumagalli]

Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
> 
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members voted +1. The rest haven't
> voted (shame on you). Can I please get the rest of the people to cast a
> vote?

Just downloaded, and I must admit that it seems a nice piece of toy (for a
long time fan of swish-e :)... +1 if the community is willing to support
it...

Pier


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] jakarta

[Jon Stevens]

on 6/6/01 10:51 AM, "Cory Hubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just to rephrase myself.
> Don't want to offend any htdig ppl.  The term "limited scope" is in
> reference to it's projected application.  htdig is a web searching & index
> application.
> Lucene is a searching and index application aimed at any information
> retrival application.

It can also be embedded within stuff. For example, we have it embedded
within Scarab.

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

[Cory Hubert]

Just to rephrase myself.
Don't want to offend any htdig ppl.  The term "limited scope" is in
reference to it's projected application.  htdig is a web searching & index
application.
Lucene is a searching and index application aimed at any information
retrival application.



-Original Message-
From: Cory Hubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)


I think that you will find that htdig's scope is limited compared to what
lucene can do.  Lucene is far more than websearching and indexing.  It
utilizes some searching algorithms that htdig doesn't.

Lucene isn't a command line util.  But it can easily be added on.

Here is an idea.
There can be a lucene war file that you can drop into Tomcat or any
java/jsp container.  It can be deployed with it's own admin to setup the
searching and indexing module for you.
Sophisticated web searching done quickly.  With plenty of room for
enhancements.


-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)


>>Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I
>am and will
>>be the PMC sponsor).
>>
>>Lucene is a Java based search engine. Current license is
>LGPL, but Doug
>>is willing to switch things over to us. It has a developer
>community and
>>a user base (yes, I have commit status). Doug is a search
>engine god and
>>knows his stuff and this is a really top notch product. Years ago, he
>>worked on the vtwin project within Apple and I was an
>external alpha/beta
>>test member of that project as well.
>>
>>It will fit in well with Jakarta because this is something
>that a lot of
>>server based projects can use (and already do). Switching the
>license is
>>also a big plus for the code base. Having it under Jakarta
>will also give
>>it more visibility and I'm sure the project will thrive.
>>
>>He doesn't really have the time to maintain the project any
>longer, but
>>since there is an active community around it already, brining
>it within
>>Jakarta will bring over those developers and they all want to
>work within
>>Jakarta.
>>
>>Watcha think?

I'm using htdig for years but let'shave a look

+1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

[Cory Hubert]

I think that you will find that htdig's scope is limited compared to what
lucene can do.  Lucene is far more than websearching and indexing.  It
utilizes some searching algorithms that htdig doesn't.

Lucene isn't a command line util.  But it can easily be added on.

Here is an idea.
There can be a lucene war file that you can drop into Tomcat or any
java/jsp container.  It can be deployed with it's own admin to setup the
searching and indexing module for you.
Sophisticated web searching done quickly.  With plenty of room for
enhancements.


-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)


>>Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I
>am and will
>>be the PMC sponsor).
>>
>>Lucene is a Java based search engine. Current license is
>LGPL, but Doug
>>is willing to switch things over to us. It has a developer
>community and
>>a user base (yes, I have commit status). Doug is a search
>engine god and
>>knows his stuff and this is a really top notch product. Years ago, he
>>worked on the vtwin project within Apple and I was an
>external alpha/beta
>>test member of that project as well.
>>
>>It will fit in well with Jakarta because this is something
>that a lot of
>>server based projects can use (and already do). Switching the
>license is
>>also a big plus for the code base. Having it under Jakarta
>will also give
>>it more visibility and I'm sure the project will thrive.
>>
>>He doesn't really have the time to maintain the project any
>longer, but
>>since there is an active community around it already, brining
>it within
>>Jakarta will bring over those developers and they all want to
>work within
>>Jakarta.
>>
>>Watcha think?

I'm using htdig for years but let'shave a look

+1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

[GOMEZ Henri]

>>Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I 
>am and will
>>be the PMC sponsor).
>>
>>Lucene is a Java based search engine. Current license is 
>LGPL, but Doug
>>is willing to switch things over to us. It has a developer 
>community and
>>a user base (yes, I have commit status). Doug is a search 
>engine god and
>>knows his stuff and this is a really top notch product. Years ago, he
>>worked on the vtwin project within Apple and I was an 
>external alpha/beta
>>test member of that project as well.
>>
>>It will fit in well with Jakarta because this is something 
>that a lot of
>>server based projects can use (and already do). Switching the 
>license is
>>also a big plus for the code base. Having it under Jakarta 
>will also give
>>it more visibility and I'm sure the project will thrive.
>>
>>He doesn't really have the time to maintain the project any 
>longer, but
>>since there is an active community around it already, brining 
>it within
>>Jakarta will bring over those developers and they all want to 
>work within
>>Jakarta.
>>
>>Watcha think?

I'm using htdig for years but let'shave a look 

+1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

[Peter Donald]

At 11:36 AM 6/5/01 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
>
>Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I am and will
>be the PMC sponsor).
>
>Lucene is a Java based search engine. Current license is LGPL, but Doug
>is willing to switch things over to us. It has a developer community and
>a user base (yes, I have commit status). Doug is a search engine god and
>knows his stuff and this is a really top notch product. Years ago, he
>worked on the vtwin project within Apple and I was an external alpha/beta
>test member of that project as well.
>
>It will fit in well with Jakarta because this is something that a lot of
>server based projects can use (and already do). Switching the license is
>also a big plus for the code base. Having it under Jakarta will also give
>it more visibility and I'm sure the project will thrive.
>
>He doesn't really have the time to maintain the project any longer, but
>since there is an active community around it already, brining it within
>Jakarta will bring over those developers and they all want to work within
>Jakarta.
>
>Watcha think?

+1 It's a great project. If it has a community around then even better ;)

Cheers,

Pete

*-*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."   |
|  - John Kenneth Galbraith   |
*-*


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

[Ceki Gülcü]

At 11:36 05.06.2001 -0700, you wrote:

>Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I am and will
>be the PMC sponsor).
>
>Lucene is a Java based search engine. Current license is LGPL, but Doug
>is willing to switch things over to us. It has a developer community and
>a user base (yes, I have commit status). Doug is a search engine god and
>knows his stuff and this is a really top notch product. Years ago, he
>worked on the vtwin project within Apple and I was an external alpha/beta
>test member of that project as well.
>
>It will fit in well with Jakarta because this is something that a lot of
>server based projects can use (and already do). Switching the license is
>also a big plus for the code base. Having it under Jakarta will also give
>it more visibility and I'm sure the project will thrive.
>
>He doesn't really have the time to maintain the project any longer, but
>since there is an active community around it already, brining it within
>Jakarta will bring over those developers and they all want to work within
>Jakarta.
>
>Watcha think?

+1

I had heard of Lucene previously. I have not tried it myself but it sure sounds very 
impressive. Regards, Ceki



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

[Jason van Zyl]

Jon Stevens wrote:
> 
> Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I am and will
> be the PMC sponsor).
> 
> Lucene is a Java based search engine. Current license is LGPL, but Doug
> is willing to switch things over to us. It has a developer community and
> a user base (yes, I have commit status). Doug is a search engine god and
> knows his stuff and this is a really top notch product. Years ago, he
> worked on the vtwin project within Apple and I was an external alpha/beta
> test member of that project as well.
> 
> It will fit in well with Jakarta because this is something that a lot of
> server based projects can use (and already do). Switching the license is
> also a big plus for the code base. Having it under Jakarta will also give
> it more visibility and I'm sure the project will thrive.
> 
> He doesn't really have the time to maintain the project any longer, but
> since there is an active community around it already, brining it within
> Jakarta will bring over those developers and they all want to work within
> Jakarta.
> 
> Watcha think?
> 

+1

-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
http://tambora.zenplex.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

[Daniel F. Savarese]

>Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I am and will
>be the PMC sponsor).

+1

So when do we start using it on the jakarta site? :)

daniel



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]