Re: PROPOSAL: move Axis/C++ to direct subproject under WS
Sanjiva,
I agree on (Create axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED]) but my suggestion is to leave
existing
mailing lists as-is.
Thanks,
dims
--- Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose that we move the Axis/C++ implementation
to a direct sub-project under the WS project as a sibling of
Axis/Java. That mirrors the structure of Xerces-J and Xerces-C
apparently.
CVS:
Retain the current structure; i.e., both share ws-axis/.
Mailing lists:
Rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Temporarily alias axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED] to
axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??
(I'm a bit uneasy to suggest renaming the current axis-dev/user
lists, but that does seem reasonable and the intuitive thing
long term.)
PMC:
I suggest Susantha Kumara [EMAIL PROTECTED] be appointed
to the WS PMC to represent the Axis/C++ project.
Bugzilla:
Create new what-is-it-called (?)
What do you think?
Sanjiva.
=
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
cvs commit: ws-site/targets/axis/cpp linuser-guide.html
sanjaya 2003/11/03 05:15:18 Modified:targets/axis/cpp linuser-guide.html Log: added note under download source distribution - Deploying services Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +3 -2 ws-site/targets/axis/cpp/linuser-guide.html Index: linuser-guide.html === RCS file: /home/cvs/ws-site/targets/axis/cpp/linuser-guide.html,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- linuser-guide.html31 Oct 2003 21:16:15 - 1.1 +++ linuser-guide.html3 Nov 2003 13:15:18 - 1.2 @@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ p strongAXIS_HOME=/usr/local/apache/Axis/strong /p +pNote that inside $AXIS_HOME directory there is a file called axiscpp.conf. Make sure that it has read permissions. This file contains key, value pairs of paths used by the Axis Soap Engine. You can change the WSDDFILEPATH and AXISLOGPATH inside this file according to your choice./p pType the Following Command to build the service(You can always use makefiles instead of the following commands to build.)/p p strongcd $AXISCPP_HOME/src/server/samples/introptests/base/strong @@ -2106,8 +2107,8 @@ p strong$ g++ -g -O2 -o interopbase InteropBaseClient.o SOAPStruct.o InteropTestPortType.obr /strongstrong$AXISCPP_HOME/lib/axis/libaxiscpp_client.a $AXISCPP_HOME/lib/axis/libaxiscpp_mod.abr -/strongstrongL$AXISCPP_HOME/lib/xerces-c -lxerces-c -ldlbr -/strong strong$AXISCPP_HOME/src/client/lib/libaxiscpp_client.abr -/strong strong$AXISCPP_HOME/release/libaxiscpp_mod.a -L$AXISCPP_HOME/lib/xerces-c -lxerces-c -ldl/strong +/strong strong$AXISCPP_HOME/lib/axis/libaxiscpp_client.abr +/strong strong$AXISCPP_HOME/lib/axis/libaxiscpp_mod.a -L$AXISCPP_HOME/lib/xerces-c -lxerces-c -ldl/strong /p pStart the Apache Server(Assuming base service is deployed.)/p p
cvs commit: ws-site/targets/axis/cpp linuser-guide.pdf
sanjaya 2003/11/03 05:15:31 Modified:targets/axis/cpp linuser-guide.pdf Log: added note under download source distribution - Deploying services Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +187 -187 ws-site/targets/axis/cpp/linuser-guide.pdf Binary file
Re: Apache.WebServices.Next?
Hi Glen, I updated the WS-RM proposal to include your prototype as well and said that we'll commit both and combine the best of both to build the Sandesha implementation. OK? (Let's also discuss this when we meet and see whether there's a faster way to combine too.) (My understanding with Wiki stuff is that you just update the document .. I guess that works as long as people don't have fundamental disagreements!) Sanjiva. - Original Message - From: Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: Re: Apache.WebServices.Next? I've modified the Wiki pages to account for a) the need for a general extensibility architecture before we start having too many extensions, and b) the fact that there are currently two WS-RM prototypes over Axis (probably three, counting Dug's! But we won't see that one :)). --Glen - Original Message - From: Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:17 AM Subject: Apache.WebServices.Next? Folks, Please review the latest proposals that we are working on. We can have a VOTE next week to start the ball rolling for the following. As usual, feel free to sign up for anything you are interested in. #1: WS-FX - umbrella for WS-* specification implementation #2: WSS4J - WS-Security Implementation under WS-FX #3: SANDESHA - WS-Reliability Implementation under WS-FX URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?WebServicesProjectPages/WebServ icesProjectProposals Thanks, dims = Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PROPOSAL: move Axis/C++ to direct subproject under WS
OK that's fine .. its a bit inconsistent but obviously history
is important too.
I guess we need to do a vote on general@ next? I'll wait until
tomorrow to give people a chance to comment and then call for
a vote.
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: move Axis/C++ to direct subproject under WS
Sanjiva,
I agree on (Create axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED]) but my suggestion is
to leave existing
mailing lists as-is.
Thanks,
dims
--- Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose that we move the Axis/C++ implementation
to a direct sub-project under the WS project as a sibling of
Axis/Java. That mirrors the structure of Xerces-J and Xerces-C
apparently.
CVS:
Retain the current structure; i.e., both share ws-axis/.
Mailing lists:
Rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Temporarily alias axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED] to
axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??
(I'm a bit uneasy to suggest renaming the current axis-dev/user
lists, but that does seem reasonable and the intuitive thing
long term.)
PMC:
I suggest Susantha Kumara [EMAIL PROTECTED] be appointed
to the WS PMC to represent the Axis/C++ project.
Bugzilla:
Create new what-is-it-called (?)
What do you think?
Sanjiva.
=
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
RE: PROPOSAL: move Axis/C++ to direct subproject under WS
+1
Do not rename axis to axis-j.
--
Tom Jordahl
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: move Axis/C++ to direct subproject under WS
Sanjiva,
I agree on (Create axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED]) but my suggestion is
to leave existing
mailing lists as-is.
Thanks,
dims
--- Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose that we move the Axis/C++ implementation
to a direct sub-project under the WS project as a sibling of
Axis/Java. That mirrors the structure of Xerces-J and Xerces-C
apparently.
CVS:
Retain the current structure; i.e., both share ws-axis/.
Mailing lists:
Rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Temporarily alias axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED] to
axis-{dev,[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??
(I'm a bit uneasy to suggest renaming the current axis-dev/user
lists, but that does seem reasonable and the intuitive thing
long term.)
PMC:
I suggest Susantha Kumara [EMAIL PROTECTED] be appointed
to the WS PMC to represent the Axis/C++ project.
Bugzilla:
Create new what-is-it-called (?)
What do you think?
Sanjiva.
=
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
