Re: [gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?
Like Aaron said: On 31-08-2010 16:09:31 -0700, Tom Ellis wrote: > What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac? I tried to get some > scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is, > have a working fortran compiler. I looked in gmane and the most recent > discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. > > I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple > which has no fortran. or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix > when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient > ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired > hopefully? Well, I'm not sure what you're exaclty looking for, but our gcc-apple these days has a fortan USE-flag, which just installs a gfortran for you: % gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.1 (Gentoo 4.2.1_p5664, Apple Inc. build 5664) Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. So far it hasn't caused me any problems with software that requires fortran support, but I'm not a realy fortran user. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
Re: [gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?
That was the answer I was hoping for. I have a need to try again, so I will. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Aaron Wilson wrote: > gcc-apple does have fortran support (although I can remember when it > didn't), and you can also compile the standard version of gcc with fortran > support (this is how I have always done it to get the latest bells and > whistles for parallel computing) . Just add > >sys-devel/gcc fortran > > and/or > >sys-devel/gcc-apple fortran > > to your ${EPREFIX}/etc/portage/package.use > > > > Aaron > > > On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Tom Ellis wrote: > > > What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac? I tried to get > some scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which > is, have a working fortran compiler. I looked in gmane and the most recent > discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. > > > > I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on > gcc-apple which has no fortran. or did depend - I sort of lost interest in > prefix when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the > convenient ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then > he inquired hopefully? > > > > > > > -- Thomas Ellis Email: its1lou...@gmail.com Mobile: 805-895-6190 Fax: 805-962-6762
Re: [gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?
gcc-apple does have fortran support (although I can remember when it didn't), and you can also compile the standard version of gcc with fortran support (this is how I have always done it to get the latest bells and whistles for parallel computing) . Just add sys-devel/gcc fortran and/or sys-devel/gcc-apple fortran to your ${EPREFIX}/etc/portage/package.use Aaron On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Tom Ellis wrote: > What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac? I tried to get some > scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is, > have a working fortran compiler. I looked in gmane and the most recent > discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. > > I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple > which has no fortran. or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix when > I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient ebuild > system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired > hopefully? > >
[gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?
What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac? I tried to get some scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is, have a working fortran compiler. I looked in gmane and the most recent discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple which has no fortran. or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired hopefully?