Re: [gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?

2010-09-01 Thread Fabian Groffen
Like Aaron said:

On 31-08-2010 16:09:31 -0700, Tom Ellis wrote:
> What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac?  I tried to get some
> scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is,
> have a working fortran compiler.  I looked in gmane and the most recent
> discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. 
> 
> I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple
> which has no fortran.  or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix
> when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient
> ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired
> hopefully?

Well, I'm not sure what you're exaclty looking for, but our gcc-apple
these days has a fortan USE-flag, which just installs a gfortran for
you:

% gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.1 (Gentoo 4.2.1_p5664, Apple Inc. build 5664)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

So far it hasn't caused me any problems with software that requires
fortran support, but I'm not a realy fortran user.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level



Re: [gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?

2010-08-31 Thread Tom Ellis
That was the answer I was hoping for.  I have a need to try again, so I
will.

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Aaron Wilson  wrote:

> gcc-apple does have fortran support (although I can remember when it
> didn't), and you can also compile the standard version of gcc with fortran
> support (this is how I have always done it to get the latest bells and
> whistles for parallel computing) . Just add
>
>sys-devel/gcc fortran
>
> and/or
>
>sys-devel/gcc-apple fortran
>
> to your ${EPREFIX}/etc/portage/package.use
>
>
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Tom Ellis wrote:
>
> > What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac?  I tried to get
> some scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which
> is, have a working fortran compiler.  I looked in gmane and the most recent
> discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago.
> >
> > I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on
> gcc-apple which has no fortran.  or did depend - I sort of lost interest in
> prefix when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the
> convenient ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then
> he inquired hopefully?
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 

Thomas Ellis
Email: its1lou...@gmail.com
Mobile: 805-895-6190
Fax: 805-962-6762


Re: [gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?

2010-08-31 Thread Aaron Wilson
gcc-apple does have fortran support (although I can remember when it didn't), 
and you can also compile the standard version of gcc with fortran support (this 
is how I have always done it to get the latest bells and whistles for parallel 
computing) . Just add

sys-devel/gcc fortran

and/or

sys-devel/gcc-apple fortran

to your ${EPREFIX}/etc/portage/package.use



Aaron


On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Tom Ellis wrote:

> What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac?  I tried to get some 
> scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is, 
> have a working fortran compiler.  I looked in gmane and the most recent 
> discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago.  
> 
> I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple 
> which has no fortran.  or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix when 
> I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient ebuild 
> system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired 
> hopefully?
> 
> 




[gentoo-alt] I can haz fortran?

2010-08-31 Thread Tom Ellis
What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac?  I tried to get some
scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is,
have a working fortran compiler.  I looked in gmane and the most recent
discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago.

I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple
which has no fortran.  or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix
when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient
ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired
hopefully?