Re: [gentoo-amd64] AMD64 - Firefox, flash, java, mplayer and more....
Mark Knecht wrote: One problem I see with your suggestion is that I need to play wmv files from web links and the win32codecs flag for mplayer is masked out on my box. Until I set this positive in my chroot'ed environment all I got was audio. With it turned on I get video also. If this cannot be turned on in the 64-bit world then the 64-bit world wouldn't work for me. The win32codecs flag enables mplayer to use binary codecs written for Windows. Since for now these libraries are all 32 bit, they can't be called from 64-bit code. However, the 32-bit version of mplayer is able to use them. At least it does on my box. Sebastian Redl -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation [OT- html posts]
this is about private emails. emails in mailing lists should be short and concise. i wonder what the big archive-sites think about this.. What do they think about it now when people quote 100+ lines of text in order to give a one-sentence reply? I don't think the addition of a few tags and a bit of metadata is really a major problem. What about people who can't even use a proper mail client that quote other people's message properly ? -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] AMD64 - Firefox, flash, java, mplayer and more....
On 12/7/05, Milton Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mercredi 07 décembre 2005 à 11:46 -0500, Nuitari a écrit : > > > 1) If I build and boot a 32-bit version of Gentoo it is my > > > understanding that the AMD64 will be completely 32-bit compatible and > > > that I can run whatever any other IA-32 machine can run. Is this > > > correct? > > > > Yes > > > > > 2) If I build a 32-bit install is there anyway to run this 32-bit > > > environment within the 64-bit environment? I assume not. > > > > Yes, using a chroot > > You don't need a the whole chroot thing if you only want flash and java > working in your firefox. As my title said, I need flash, java and mplayer. One problem I see with your suggestion is that I need to play wmv files from web links and the win32codecs flag for mplayer is masked out on my box. Until I set this positive in my chroot'ed environment all I got was audio. With it turned on I get video also. If this cannot be turned on in the 64-bit world then the 64-bit world wouldn't work for me. > In this case: > * use firefox-bin (a 32bit firefox binary provided by portage) > * the (usual) 32 bit flash plugin > * a _32 bit_ libjavaplugin_oji.so : the java plugin file, you could copy > one from your other gentoo 32 bit system. I don't know if this is just > luck, but I only have dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02 which is compiled > in 64 bit and it does work! > > mplayerplug-in does not want to work for now as far as I have tested > (that is, not so much). Seems to be working for me in both the 32-bit and 64-bit worlds. The one problem I am having is that in all my environments mplayer is quitting early. (I.e. - not playing the complete file. Bummer! > > Hope that helps. > I think building and maintaining a whole 32bit chroot is really > annoying, and after all you can run most 32bits apps out of a chroot > with the provided emul packages. Yeah, I agree, but if I must I must! Thanks, Mark -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] xine - Station Agent - libdvdcss
Thanks. Which version of xine-ui have you emerged? I've got 0.99.4-r3 and I do not see that setting even when I'm Master of the Known Universe. Thanks, Mark On 12/8/05, theboywho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I remember something about the 'dvd.css_decryption_method' setting in xine. > Its on the 'media' tab in the xine configuration dialog box (you have to the > configuration experience level to master of the known universe on the GUI tab > to see it.). It has three possible settings key, disc and title. I think it > defaults to 'key', which works most of the time. Give the movie a go with it > set to 'disc' or 'title'. I have got movies to play with 'title' when they > wouldn't play with 'key'. > > Hope that helps! > > On Friday 09 December 2005 00:18, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Hi, > >I'm cross posting this to both gnetoo-user and gentoo-amd64. > > > >For the first time with a movie from Netflix I am unable to watch > > it on my AMD64 machine. The movie is "The Station Agent" circa 2003. > > It's been out on DVD for a while I believe, and it plays fine on my > > Mac Mini. > > > >When I try to play it I get a message that 'The source seems > > encrypted, and can't be read'. It goes on to say some things about > > libdvdcss, country laws, etc. > > > >Is this something anyone else has run into recently? > > > > lightning ~ # emerge -pv xine-ui libdvdcss > > > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies ...done! > > [ebuild R ] media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r3 +X -aalib +curl > > -libcaca +lirc +ncurses +nls +readline -xinerama 0 kB > > [ebuild R ] media-libs/libdvdcss-1.2.9 -doc -static 0 kB > > > > Total size of downloads: 0 kB > > lightning ~ # > > > >When I run in a terminal I get this: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ xine > > This is xine (X11 gui) - a free video player v0.99.4. > > (c) 2000-2004 The xine Team. > > libdvdread: Using libdvdcss version 1.2.9 for DVD access > > > > libdvdread: Attempting to retrieve all CSS keys > > libdvdread: This can take a _long_ time, please be patient > > > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.VOB at 0x0138 > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_0.VOB at 0x0201 > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_1.VOB at 0x37ca > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB at 0x00293bd4 > > libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB (0x00293bd4) > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 3 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB at 0x00293be0 > > libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB > > (0x00293be0)!! libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_03_0.VOB at 0x00294990 > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_03_1.VOB at 0x00294995 > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_04_0.VOB at 0x002d4238 > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_04_1.VOB at 0x002d423c > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > > libdvdread: Found 4 VTS's > > libdvdread: Elapsed time 3 > > > >I'm wondering if there is anything I should do before I main the > > DVD back tomorrow? I'll watch it on the big screen tonight. > > > > Thanks, > > Mark > > -- > theboywho > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] xine - Station Agent - libdvdcss
Hi, I remember something about the 'dvd.css_decryption_method' setting in xine. Its on the 'media' tab in the xine configuration dialog box (you have to the configuration experience level to master of the known universe on the GUI tab to see it.). It has three possible settings key, disc and title. I think it defaults to 'key', which works most of the time. Give the movie a go with it set to 'disc' or 'title'. I have got movies to play with 'title' when they wouldn't play with 'key'. Hope that helps! On Friday 09 December 2005 00:18, Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, >I'm cross posting this to both gnetoo-user and gentoo-amd64. > >For the first time with a movie from Netflix I am unable to watch > it on my AMD64 machine. The movie is "The Station Agent" circa 2003. > It's been out on DVD for a while I believe, and it plays fine on my > Mac Mini. > >When I try to play it I get a message that 'The source seems > encrypted, and can't be read'. It goes on to say some things about > libdvdcss, country laws, etc. > >Is this something anyone else has run into recently? > > lightning ~ # emerge -pv xine-ui libdvdcss > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > Calculating dependencies ...done! > [ebuild R ] media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r3 +X -aalib +curl > -libcaca +lirc +ncurses +nls +readline -xinerama 0 kB > [ebuild R ] media-libs/libdvdcss-1.2.9 -doc -static 0 kB > > Total size of downloads: 0 kB > lightning ~ # > >When I run in a terminal I get this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ xine > This is xine (X11 gui) - a free video player v0.99.4. > (c) 2000-2004 The xine Team. > libdvdread: Using libdvdcss version 1.2.9 for DVD access > > libdvdread: Attempting to retrieve all CSS keys > libdvdread: This can take a _long_ time, please be patient > > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.VOB at 0x0138 > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_0.VOB at 0x0201 > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_1.VOB at 0x37ca > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB at 0x00293bd4 > libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB (0x00293bd4) > libdvdread: Elapsed time 3 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB at 0x00293be0 > libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB > (0x00293be0)!! libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_03_0.VOB at 0x00294990 > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_03_1.VOB at 0x00294995 > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_04_0.VOB at 0x002d4238 > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_04_1.VOB at 0x002d423c > libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 > libdvdread: Found 4 VTS's > libdvdread: Elapsed time 3 > >I'm wondering if there is anything I should do before I main the > DVD back tomorrow? I'll watch it on the big screen tonight. > > Thanks, > Mark -- theboywho [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Gentoo on Asus K8S-MX
http://kerneltrap.org/node/4838 discussion appears pertinent. - Original Message - From: "Felipe Ribeiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:25 PM Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Gentoo on Asus K8S-MX I'm a slack user, and i'm gonna install gentoo on my amd64, i have an asus k8s-mx mobo, with sis5513 chipset. and i've read that the installation cd doesn't recognize the onboard ethernet card (sis190). Does anyone have this mobo? did gentoo installation recognize the ethernet card? if it doesn't, is there any way to recompile the kernel with the driver during the installation? Thanks in advance, Felipe Ribeiro -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] xine - Station Agent - libdvdcss
Hi, I'm cross posting this to both gnetoo-user and gentoo-amd64. For the first time with a movie from Netflix I am unable to watch it on my AMD64 machine. The movie is "The Station Agent" circa 2003. It's been out on DVD for a while I believe, and it plays fine on my Mac Mini. When I try to play it I get a message that 'The source seems encrypted, and can't be read'. It goes on to say some things about libdvdcss, country laws, etc. Is this something anyone else has run into recently? lightning ~ # emerge -pv xine-ui libdvdcss These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild R ] media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r3 +X -aalib +curl -libcaca +lirc +ncurses +nls +readline -xinerama 0 kB [ebuild R ] media-libs/libdvdcss-1.2.9 -doc -static 0 kB Total size of downloads: 0 kB lightning ~ # When I run in a terminal I get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ xine This is xine (X11 gui) - a free video player v0.99.4. (c) 2000-2004 The xine Team. libdvdread: Using libdvdcss version 1.2.9 for DVD access libdvdread: Attempting to retrieve all CSS keys libdvdread: This can take a _long_ time, please be patient libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.VOB at 0x0138 libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_0.VOB at 0x0201 libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_1.VOB at 0x37ca libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB at 0x00293bd4 libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB (0x00293bd4) libdvdread: Elapsed time 3 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB at 0x00293be0 libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB (0x00293be0)!! libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_03_0.VOB at 0x00294990 libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_03_1.VOB at 0x00294995 libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_04_0.VOB at 0x002d4238 libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_04_1.VOB at 0x002d423c libdvdread: Elapsed time 0 libdvdread: Found 4 VTS's libdvdread: Elapsed time 3 I'm wondering if there is anything I should do before I main the DVD back tomorrow? I'll watch it on the big screen tonight. Thanks, Mark -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] Fritz! WLan USB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Has anybody found the 64 bit driver for this wireless card? ndiswrapper doesn't work because the driver are only 32 bit, and I find anywhere info about chipset or if and how it is supported. Thanks a lot, Luigi - -- Public key GPG(0x073A0960) on http://keyserver.linux.it/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFDmMom+87qsQc6CWARAjRRAKCfB63AVIJJODbFk+D82DTeytHxrACY8j40 dwFTouSyMdonMF1GndurGw== =4RlA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] chrrot'ed environment not available to users
On 12/8/05, Billy Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Billy Holmes wrote: > > (2) copy the patch to sys-apps/l32/files > > sorry for replying to my own message, but just to let you know.. files > should be a directory: > > # mkdir -p /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32/files > > -- > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list > > Hi, I'm apparently not able to get the path edit quite right. It's asking about /home/32-bit. Please double check me if possible: 1) Everything, including the patch file, is copied to /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32: lightning ~ # ls -la /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32 total 20 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 Dec 8 15:31 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 Dec 8 15:08 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 948 Dec 8 15:32 Manifest drwxr-xr-x 3 root portage 4096 Dec 8 15:29 files -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 610 Dec 8 14:55 l32-1.1.ebuild lightning ~ # lightning ~ # ls -la /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32/files/ total 132 drwxr-xr-x 3 root portage 4096 Dec 8 15:29 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Dec 8 15:31 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 18011 Nov 2 16:13 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 143 Nov 3 10:13 Changelog -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 932 Nov 2 16:13 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 1795 Nov 3 10:13 Makefile -rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage58 Dec 8 15:32 digest-l32-1.1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root portage 4096 Nov 3 10:14 gentoo -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 6463 Nov 3 09:05 l32.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 2278 Nov 3 09:05 l32.1.pod -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 2369 Nov 3 07:59 l32.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 665 Dec 8 15:25 l32.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 51200 Dec 8 15:11 l32_1.1.tar -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 334 Dec 8 15:19 l32_h-gentoo.patch -rwxr-xr-x 1 root portage 285 Nov 2 16:13 mkman.sh lightning ~ # 2) I edited l32.h as follows to point at the chroot directory I built yesterday: lightning ~ # cat /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32/files/l32.h /* * Copyright 2005 by Billy Holmes * * Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are * permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice and * this notice are preserved. * * This file released under the GPLv2 license found here: * http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt */ #ifndef L32_INCLUDE_H #define L32_INCLUDE_H #define DEFAULT_LOWDIR "/mnt/gentoo32" #ifndef DEFAULT_LOWDIR #error "Please edit l32.h and define your DEFAULT_LOWDIR" #endif #define PACKAGE "l32" #define VERSION "1.1" #define COPYRIGHT "Copyright 2005 by Billy Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" #define LICENSE "Distributed under the GPL2" #endif lightning ~ # 3) I build the digest: lightning ~ # ebuild /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32/l32-1.1.ebuild digest >>> Generating digest file... <<< l32_1.1.tar.gz >>> Generating manifest file... <<< l32-1.1.ebuild <<< files/digest-l32-1.1 <<< files/l32_1.1.tar <<< files/COPYING <<< files/Changelog <<< files/INSTALL <<< files/Makefile <<< files/l32.1 <<< files/l32.1.pod <<< files/l32.c <<< files/l32.h <<< files/mkman.sh <<< files/l32_h-gentoo.patch <<< files/gentoo/l32_h-gentoo.patch <<< files/gentoo/l32-1.1.ebuild <<< files/gentoo/README >>> Computed message digests. lightning ~ # 4) I emerge it successfully: lightning ~ # emerge l32 Calculating dependencies ...done! >>> emerge (1 of 1) sys-apps/l32-1.1 to / >>> md5 files ;-) l32-1.1.ebuild >>> original instance of package unmerged safely. >>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache... >>> sys-apps/l32-1.1 merged. >>> clean: No packages selected for removal. >>> Auto-cleaning packages ... >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. lightning ~ # 5) Whether I run as root or user I get the same message: lightning ~ # l32 /bin/bash Unable to chroot(/home/32-bit): No such file or directory lightning ~ # exit logout [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ l32 /bin/bash Unable to chroot(/home/32-bit): No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ 6) My chroot directory is /mnt/gentoo32 as per the build instructions: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -la /mnt/ total 36 drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 Dec 7 11:19 . drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 Nov 4 15:24 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Jul 27 09:17 .keep drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 2 09:27 Musiclib drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 18 13:23 camera drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 27 09:17 cdrom drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 26 11:05 dvd drwx-- 2 root root 4096 Jul 27 09:17 floppy drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Aug 10 04:47 gentoo32 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 3 11:21 media [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -la /mnt/gentoo32/ total 72 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Aug 10 04:47 . drwxr-xr-x9 root root 4096 Dec 7 11:19 .. drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Dec 7 13:27 bin drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Jul 26 10:12 boot drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 13920 Dec 8 07:38 dev drwxr-xr-x 45 root root 4096 Dec 8 11:50 etc drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Jul 26 10:11 home drwxr-xr-x7 root root 4096 Dec 8 09:11 lib
RE: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation [OT- html posts]
-Original Message- From: Florian D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 2:18 PM To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation [OT- html posts] Bob Young wrote: > >" It's pretty rare that a modern email client can't deal > with html. I would argue that the very few desktops not using some > flavor of GUI should not force a limiting "least common denominator" > type policy. yeah. lets get rid of the minorities. I didn't suggest "getting rid" of them. I'm saying that it's true that when email, lists, and newsgroups first started, they didn't handle formatted text. However that seems poor justification for saying that it *must* remain that way now and forever more. At what point do we actually allow our selves to communicate with each other using more of the nuance and style that current technology easily allows us? If some wish to filter out html or KF such messages all together they are free to do so, current technology can very easily accommodate that. I just don't think it should be a faux pas to post in a richer format than plain text. > If a few extra Kbytes here or there in > an email message is really causing a problem for someone, then an > upgrade should probably be priority. Most messages are much larger > than they need to be anyway because people don't trim quotes. this is about private emails. emails in mailing lists should be short and concise. i wonder what the big archive-sites think about this.. What do they think about it now when people quote 100+ lines of text in order to give a one-sentence reply? I don't think the addition of a few tags and a bit of metadata is really a major problem. > Lastly there are some things that are just easier to communicate in a > html format, diagrams and tables come to mind, we've all seen ASCII > diagrams of various things and had to stare at them trying to > decipher what was the author actually trying to communicate. Even in > a mostly text message, bold, italic, enlarged/reduced, or colored > text used for emphasis or de-emphasis can make communication much > more clear. In short I just think that there is this "knee-jerk" > reaction to html email in the FLOSS community, and it isn't justified > by an objective evaluation. if you don´t like ascii graphics, then you don´t know the textmode quake project ;-) http://webpages.mr.net/bobz/ttyquake/ Actually I do like ASCII graphics, I just don't think it's the best method of representing many types of information. > Must we be constrained to communicate with each other via nothing > more sophisticated than plain text forever and ever? read Wittgenstein. plain text and very sophisticated. Sophisticated content, and the sophistication level of the medium used to deliver that content are two different things. Regards Bob Young -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] Gentoo on Asus K8S-MX
I'm a slack user, and i'm gonna install gentoo on my amd64, i have an asus k8s-mx mobo, with sis5513 chipset. and i've read that the installation cd doesn't recognize the onboard ethernet card (sis190). Does anyone have this mobo? did gentoo installation recognize the ethernet card? if it doesn't, is there any way to recompile the kernel with the driver during the installation? Thanks in advance, Felipe Ribeiro -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation [OT- html posts]
Bob Young wrote: -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Duncan Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:30 AM To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation Clemente Aguiar posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:31 +: How can I solve this problem? Mensagem First, please turn off HTML. Many on FLOSS (Free, Libre, and Open Source Software) type lists consider HTML posts the mark of spammers and malware authors, and may kill filter it or simply refuse to reply. I reply, but I make it a point of asking folks to please turn it off, and may not reply (and indeed, killfile) future posts if the HTML remains. I know that many share this opinion, and although I don't want to start a flame war, I do think there are some valid counter points in favor of html. Everyone is of course free to filter content based on his or her own preferences. However most of the reasons given against posting html aren't really all that strong. In fact the only thing http://www.emailreplies.com/ suggests is that recipients "*might* only be able to receive plain text emails." It goes on to note: "Most email clients however... are able to receive HTML and rich text messages." It's pretty rare that a modern email client can't deal with html. I would argue that the very few desktops not using some flavor of GUI should not force a limiting "least common denominator" type policy. yeah. lets get rid of the minorities. Even the two reasons listed in the above reply don't stand up very well to logical reasoning, it's obvious the OP was neither a spammer nor a malware author, filtering all html email on the basis of those two reasons alone is akin to throwing out the baby with the bath water. The other common reason given against html is storage space/bandwidth issues. This is a weak argument also; in cost per megabyte storage is dirt-cheap. Premium NNTP providers are advertising retention times of 90 days or more for large *binary* groups, where a single post can be several hundred megabytes. If a few extra Kbytes here or there in an email message is really causing a problem for someone, then an upgrade should probably be priority. Most messages are much larger than they need to be anyway because people don't trim quotes. this is about private emails. emails in mailing lists should be short and concise. i wonder what the big archive-sites think about this.. Lastly there are some things that are just easier to communicate in a html format, diagrams and tables come to mind, we've all seen ASCII diagrams of various things and had to stare at them trying to decipher what was the author actually trying to communicate. Even in a mostly text message, bold, italic, enlarged/reduced, or colored text used for emphasis or de-emphasis can make communication much more clear. In short I just think that there is this "knee-jerk" reaction to html email in the FLOSS community, and it isn't justified by an objective evaluation. if you don´t like ascii graphics, then you don´t know the textmode quake project ;-) http://webpages.mr.net/bobz/ttyquake/ Must we be constrained to communicate with each other via nothing more sophisticated than plain text forever and ever? read Wittgenstein. plain text and very sophisticated. Regards Bob Young cheers, f -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multiple X with multiple Keyboards
Hello, As it happens, I JUST stumbled across something covering /exactly/ what you are wanting to do! It's with the 6.9/7.0 xorg, so you'll have to be running at least the betas for that, but it looks fairly simple to configure, after that. Simply setup layouts (and the usual subordinate sections as necessary, note that compatible video cards is a must) for each station's config in xorg.conf, then test each layout using the described procedure, and then either start each server manually (using the command string given) as needed, or setup your display manager as described. good grief! The new xorgs came just in time :D Thank you. That is exactly what I was looking for. Kind regards, Christian -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation [OT- html posts]
-Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Duncan Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:30 AM To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation Clemente Aguiar posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:31 +: > How can I solve this problem? Transitional//EN"> Mensagem First, please turn off HTML. Many on FLOSS (Free, Libre, and Open Source Software) type lists consider HTML posts the mark of spammers and malware authors, and may kill filter it or simply refuse to reply. I reply, but I make it a point of asking folks to please turn it off, and may not reply (and indeed, killfile) future posts if the HTML remains. I know that many share this opinion, and although I don't want to start a flame war, I do think there are some valid counter points in favor of html. Everyone is of course free to filter content based on his or her own preferences. However most of the reasons given against posting html aren't really all that strong. In fact the only thing http://www.emailreplies.com/ suggests is that recipients "*might* only be able to receive plain text emails." It goes on to note: "Most email clients however... are able to receive HTML and rich text messages." It's pretty rare that a modern email client can't deal with html. I would argue that the very few desktops not using some flavor of GUI should not force a limiting "least common denominator" type policy. Even the two reasons listed in the above reply don't stand up very well to logical reasoning, it's obvious the OP was neither a spammer nor a malware author, filtering all html email on the basis of those two reasons alone is akin to throwing out the baby with the bath water. The other common reason given against html is storage space/bandwidth issues. This is a weak argument also; in cost per megabyte storage is dirt-cheap. Premium NNTP providers are advertising retention times of 90 days or more for large *binary* groups, where a single post can be several hundred megabytes. If a few extra Kbytes here or there in an email message is really causing a problem for someone, then an upgrade should probably be priority. Most messages are much larger than they need to be anyway because people don't trim quotes. Lastly there are some things that are just easier to communicate in a html format, diagrams and tables come to mind, we've all seen ASCII diagrams of various things and had to stare at them trying to decipher what was the author actually trying to communicate. Even in a mostly text message, bold, italic, enlarged/reduced, or colored text used for emphasis or de-emphasis can make communication much more clear. In short I just think that there is this "knee-jerk" reaction to html email in the FLOSS community, and it isn't justified by an objective evaluation. Must we be constrained to communicate with each other via nothing more sophisticated than plain text forever and ever? Regards Bob Young -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] chrrot'ed environment not available to users
On 12/8/05, Billy Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Billy Holmes wrote: > > (2) copy the patch to sys-apps/l32/files > > sorry for replying to my own message, but just to let you know.. files > should be a directory: > > # mkdir -p /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32/files > > -- > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list > > Thanks Billy. This looks like exactly what I am looking for. I'll try it out a bit later today. Cheers, Mark -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
Gavin Seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis: > I have a scsi tape with an initio controller. 'dmesg' sees initio 360p. > But when I use mt I get > ' mt -f /dev/st0 eject > /dev/st0: No such device or address' > Where will the tape be? > Thanks. If it is an external tape drive, make sure to have it turned on when you boot, especially if you have SCSI tape support compiled into the kernel. You can turn it off after booting, if you want; that's what I do. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.chemoelectric.org Esperantistoj rajtas skribi al [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'And now we're going to go try to comfort people in that part of the world.' -- Bush, referring to the southeastern U.S. pgp4RLioHrFjU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] chrrot'ed environment not available to users
Billy Holmes wrote: (2) copy the patch to sys-apps/l32/files sorry for replying to my own message, but just to let you know.. files should be a directory: # mkdir -p /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32/files -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] chrrot'ed environment not available to users
Mark Knecht wrote: What's the proper way to make this work for a user? I find myself confused by the idea of making too much of the /mnt/gentoo32 directory that's why I made this little program and an ebuild to go with it: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111367 http://www.gonoph.net/node/37 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Aug 10 04:47 gentoo32 you'll have to: (0) Make sure you have a portage overlay directory setup: mkdir /usr/local/portage ; edit /etc/make.conf and add PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" (1) copy the ebuild and patch to your portage overlay directory (default: /usr/local/portage/) I put it in sys-apps (/usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32) on my system. (2) copy the patch to sys-apps/l32/files (3) edit the patch to so that /home/32-bit changes to /mnt/gentoo32 (4) type "ebuild /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/l32/$EBUILD digest" where EBUILD is the name of the ebuild you saved. (5) type "emerge -avt l32" (6) run it like this as a normal user: l32 /bin/bash or you can run any program in your chroot.. it doesn't have to be /bin/bash -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] chrrot'ed environment not available to users
Hi, Thanks for the help yesterday. I now have a partially populated chroot'ed environment that runs Firefox and a few other things. Unfortunately it's not available to users: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ linux32 chroot /mnt/gentoo32 /bin/bash chroot: cannot change root directory to /mnt/gentoo32: Operation not permitted [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ The Gentoo setup doc doesn't cover this point. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=3 What's the proper way to make this work for a user? I find myself confused by the idea of making too much of the /mnt/gentoo32 directory available to users. It shouldn't be anything more than is available in a normal install. Is it an issue about permissions on the mount itself? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -la /mnt/ | grep gentoo32 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Aug 10 04:47 gentoo32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Or is part of the solution that I have to create user accounts within the chroot'ed environment that somehow match my top level user account? Anyway, thanks in advance for you help. cheers, Mark -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
Brett Johnson wrote: As an example, look for your primary hard drive entry (hda, hde, sda etc). There should be a similar entry for st0 after it detects the tape drive. he could also post a gzip'd copy of his dmesg, or better yet.. provide a link to it. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
Hi, root is in tape group. I cannot use mt as a user anyway. I can't see initio in 'dmesg' anymore, also?? Thanks On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 08:13 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Gavin Seddon posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:57:31 +: > > >>> But when I use mt I get > >>> ' mt -f /dev/st0 eject > >>> /dev/st0: No such device or address' > > > Yes /dev/st0 is there. How should I start the device, as far as I > > remember I built all scsi modules into the kernel. Gavin. > > If you have a /dev/st0, the next question is why that error message says > you don't. It's likely a permissions thing. I don't have a tape backup > machine, so I don't know much about the command set or how it is run, but > can you run it as root? Does the error change? > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in > http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html > > -- Dr Gavin Seddon School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:13:52 -0700 Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gavin Seddon posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:57:31 +: > > >>> But when I use mt I get > >>> ' mt -f /dev/st0 eject > >>> /dev/st0: No such device or address' > > > Yes /dev/st0 is there. How should I start the device, as far as I > > remember I built all scsi modules into the kernel. Gavin. > > If you have a /dev/st0, the next question is why that error message > says you don't. It's likely a permissions thing. I don't have a > tape backup machine, so I don't know much about the command set or > how it is run, but can you run it as root? Does the error change? I think permissions are the most likely problem; that'd cause mt to be unable to open the device - many utilities don't differentiate between being unable to open something and that something not existing. Gavin; default Gentoo udev rules set the group of st devices to 'tape' (see /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules' so add your user id to the tape group. - -- Kevin F. Quinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDmFar9G2S8dekcG0RAlGBAKCxq+NPW63+YKEFgWNno6UjeGhVVwCg6KpB H/jIFOWdhX4VaFz0sBlTYa0= =oMt9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
Gavin Seddon posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:57:31 +: >>> But when I use mt I get >>> ' mt -f /dev/st0 eject >>> /dev/st0: No such device or address' > Yes /dev/st0 is there. How should I start the device, as far as I > remember I built all scsi modules into the kernel. Gavin. If you have a /dev/st0, the next question is why that error message says you don't. It's likely a permissions thing. I don't have a tape backup machine, so I don't know much about the command set or how it is run, but can you run it as root? Does the error change? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:25:07PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote: > Hi, > I have a scsi tape with an initio controller. 'dmesg' sees initio 360p. > But when I use mt I get > ' mt -f /dev/st0 eject > /dev/st0: No such device or address' > Where will the tape be? > Thanks. > > First thing I would check is the output of dmesg, you may need to reboot depending on how many messages were added since the last reboot. You should some entries where the kernel detectes the drive (by model number) and assigns it a device name (st0). As an example, look for your primary hard drive entry (hda, hde, sda etc). There should be a similar entry for st0 after it detects the tape drive. If not, that most likely means the kernel is missing some required driver(s). It sounds like you have the scsi adapter configured and loaded, do you have scsi tape support configured and loaded (if a moduled)? -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
Yes /dev/st0 is there. How should I start the device, as far as I remember I built all scsi modules into the kernel. Gavin. On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 07:40 -0700, Duncan wrote: > find /dev/ -name st0" -- Dr Gavin Seddon School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
Gavin Seddon posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:25:07 +: > Hi, > I have a scsi tape with an initio controller. 'dmesg' sees initio 360p. > But when I use mt I get > ' mt -f /dev/st0 eject > /dev/st0: No such device or address' > Where will the tape be? Well, /is/ there a /dev/st0? If so, that's a problem, but it would appear it's saying there is no such device, which indicates a problem with your device system. It could be anything from not having that device driver compiled, to not having it loaded if it's built as a kernel module, to having it loaded but it not finding the device so it doesn't create a node, to some funniness with udev, such that the device node isn't created, or is created in a different location. As I don't have such a device, it's a bit difficult to tell, from here, but one think you could do would be a "find /dev/ -name st0". That would at least tell you whether udev put the device in a subdir instead of the main /dev. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation
Clemente Aguiar posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:31 +: > How can I solve this problem? Transitional//EN"> Mensagem First, please turn off HTML. Many on FLOSS (Free, Libre, and Open Source Software) type lists consider HTML posts the mark of spammers and malware authors, and may kill filter it or simply refuse to reply. I reply, but I make it a point of asking folks to please turn it off, and may not reply (and indeed, killfile) future posts if the HTML remains. > I did a new instalattion of Gentoo 2005.r1 (AMD64). ??? You mean 2005.0-r1, correct? > After the basic stage3 instalation, kernel compilation and reboot, > everything was fine. > I then decided to recompile all: > > Code: > > emerge -e world > > > and I get an error when it gets to compile gcc > > Code: [snip] > -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -DHAVE_SYSLOG -g [snip] > -Wl,--version-script=libgcc/32/libgcc.map -o 32/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp -m32 > libgcc/32/_muldi3.o libgcc/32/_negdi2.o libgcc/32/_lshrdi3.o [snip] -fPIC with -m32? To my knowledge, that's not a good combination. 64-bit requires -fPIC on some stuff (but it should be added by the ebuild where necessary, don't do it yourself), but -m32 indicates it's compiling the 32-bit stuff here, and that shouldn't get -fPIC, AFAIK. > Here is my emerge --info > > Code: > > Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, > glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 x86_64) > = > System uname: 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz [snip] > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" > AUTOCLEAN="yes" > CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=nocona -pipe" OK, -fPIC isn't in your CFLAGS, so that isn't the problem. I wonder why it's adding it for 32-bit compilation? Someone else feel free to step in here, but that doesn't look at all right, to me. Perhaps a bug in the ebuild? If no one says -fPIC is supposed to be there for 32-bit, I'd consider filing a bug, as I'm /almost/ positive it shouldn't be there, and it's not in your cflags, so it's gotta be an issue with the ebuild. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] disk error [OT]
I would give the smartmontools package a try. It should give you a
better idea of what may be failing.
If you have problem installing from the port, then you may want to try a
Knoppix CD, as I believe it is available there also.
Ed
Jamie Dobbs wrote:
That does not look very good to me, I suspect your HDD may be on its way
out.
David Boucher wrote:
Hi !
I have started my laptop this morning and at the startup it writes many
lines like
hdc: write_intr: error=0x10 {SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=97370035,
high=5, low=13483955, sector=97370035
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
/ is then mount in read only
Is my hard disk dead ?
Or could it be another thing ?
How could I test this ?
Thanks.
David.
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation
Sebastian Redl posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:10:36 +0100: > Clemente Aguiar wrote: > >> I did a new instalattion of Gentoo 2005.r1 (AMD64). >> >> After the basic stage3 instalation, kernel compilation and reboot, >> everything was fine. >> I then decided to recompile all: > > It appears as if the necessary 32-bit libraries for something are missing. > Emerging the emulation glibc might solve the problem. Emulation glibc? Isn't glibc compiled in dual bitness, now? I know it has been for ~amd64 for some time, and would have imagined it would have worked its way into amd64, certainly for newer profiles, by now. BTW, 2005.r1??? That's supposed to be 2005.1-r1, right? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-amd64] gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation
Clemente Aguiar píše v Čt 08. 12. 2005 v 12:47 +: > > -Mensagem original- > > De: Sebastian Redl > > > > Clemente Aguiar wrote: > > > > > I did a new instalattion of Gentoo 2005.r1 (AMD64). > > > > > > After the basic stage3 instalation, kernel compilation and reboot, > > > everything was fine. > > > I then decided to recompile all: > > > > It appears as if the necessary 32-bit libraries for something are > > missing. Emerging the emulation glibc might solve the problem. > > > > Sebastian Redl > > -- > > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > I did a bit of checking and many texts say that emulation glibc is > needed, so I tried: > > emerge -v --oneshot emul-linux-x86-glibc > > and I get the following result: > ... > >>> Completed installing emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000 into > /var/tmp/portage/emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000/image/ > > >>> Merging app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000 to / > * 32bit libc is now provided by sys-libc/glibc. > >>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache... > >>> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000 merged. > ... > > Which from what I can understand what I need to emerge is > sys-libc/glibc. > Well sys-libc/glibc does not exist??? What does exist is sys-libs/glibc. > > But when I try to emerge sys-libs/glibc I get the following error: > . > checking size of long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof > (long double), 77 > See `config.log' for more details. > > !!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.5-r2 failed. > !!! Function glibc_do_configure, Line 927, Exitcode 1 > !!! failed to configure glibc > !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status > message. > . > > Seems that I am in a catch 22 situation. > Any ideas? Just a guess: Check the symlink /lib/ld-linux.so.2 It should point to ../lib32/ld-linux.so.2, not ld-2.3.5.so I hit this issue every time I compile glibc :-( -- ViNiL If John Wayne had been a Linux user, he would have used Gentoo. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
Hi, I have a scsi tape with an initio controller. 'dmesg' sees initio 360p. But when I use mt I get ' mt -f /dev/st0 eject /dev/st0: No such device or address' Where will the tape be? Thanks. -- Dr Gavin Seddon School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-amd64] gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation
> -Mensagem original- > De: Sebastian Redl > > Clemente Aguiar wrote: > > > I did a new instalattion of Gentoo 2005.r1 (AMD64). > > > > After the basic stage3 instalation, kernel compilation and reboot, > > everything was fine. > > I then decided to recompile all: > > It appears as if the necessary 32-bit libraries for something are > missing. Emerging the emulation glibc might solve the problem. > > Sebastian Redl > -- > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list > > I did a bit of checking and many texts say that emulation glibc is needed, so I tried: emerge -v --oneshot emul-linux-x86-glibc and I get the following result: ... >>> Completed installing emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000 into /var/tmp/portage/emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000/image/ >>> Merging app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000 to / * 32bit libc is now provided by sys-libc/glibc. >>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache... >>> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-glibc-1000 merged. ... Which from what I can understand what I need to emerge is sys-libc/glibc. Well sys-libc/glibc does not exist??? What does exist is sys-libs/glibc. But when I try to emerge sys-libs/glibc I get the following error: . checking size of long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (long double), 77 See `config.log' for more details. !!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.5-r2 failed. !!! Function glibc_do_configure, Line 927, Exitcode 1 !!! failed to configure glibc !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. . Seems that I am in a catch 22 situation. Any ideas? Clemente -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation
Clemente Aguiar wrote: I did a new instalattion of Gentoo 2005.r1 (AMD64). After the basic stage3 instalation, kernel compilation and reboot, everything was fine. I then decided to recompile all: It appears as if the necessary 32-bit libraries for something are missing. Emerging the emulation glibc might solve the problem. Sebastian Redl -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-amd64] gcc compile failed after 2005.1-r1 instalation
Title: Mensagem I did a new instalattion of Gentoo 2005.r1 (AMD64). After the basic stage3 instalation, kernel compilation and reboot, everything was fine. I then decided to recompile all: Code: emerge -e world and I get an error when it gets to compile gcc Code: ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.4-r1/work/build/gcc/../ld -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -DHAVE_SYSLOG -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -D_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP_ -shared -nodefaultlibs -Wl,--soname=libgcc_s.so.1 -Wl,--version-script=libgcc/32/libgcc.map -o 32/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp -m32 libgcc/32/_muldi3.o libgcc/32/_negdi2.o libgcc/32/_lshrdi3.o libgcc/32/_ashldi3.o libgcc/32/_ashrdi3.o libgcc/32/_cmpdi2.o libgcc/32/_ucmpdi2.o libgcc/32/_floatdidf.o libgcc/32/_floatdisf.o libgcc/32/_fixunsdfsi.o libgcc/32/_fixunssfsi.o libgcc/32/_fixunsdfdi.o libgcc/32/_fixdfdi.o libgcc/32/_fixunssfdi.o libgcc/32/_fixsfdi.o libgcc/32/_fixxfdi.o libgcc/32/_fixunsxfdi.o libgcc/32/_floatdixf.o libgcc/32/_fixunsxfsi.o libgcc/32/_fixtfdi.o libgcc/32/_fixunstfdi.o libgcc/32/_floatditf.o libgcc/32/_clear_cache.o libgcc/32/_enable_execute_stack.o libgcc/32/_trampoline.o libgcc/32/__main.o libgcc/32/_absvsi2.o libgcc/32/_absvdi2.o libgcc/32/_addvsi3.o libgcc/32/_addvdi3.o libgcc/32/_subvsi3.o libgcc/32/_subvdi3.o libgcc/32/_mulvsi3.o libgcc/32/_mulvdi3.o libgcc/32/_negvsi2.o libgcc/32/_negvdi2.o libgcc/32/_ctors.o libgcc/32/_ffssi2.o libgcc/32/_ffsdi2.o libgcc/32/_clz.o libgcc/32/_clzsi2.o libgcc/32/_clzdi2.o libgcc/32/_ctzsi2.o libgcc/32/_ctzdi2.o libgcc/32/_popcount_tab.o libgcc/32/_popcountsi2.o libgcc/32/_popcountdi2.o libgcc/32/_paritysi2.o libgcc/32/_paritydi2.o libgcc/32/_stack_smash_handler.o libgcc/32/_divdi3.o libgcc/32/_moddi3.o libgcc/32/_udivdi3.o libgcc/32/_umoddi3.o libgcc/32/_udiv_w_sdiv.o libgcc/32/_udivmoddi4.o libgcc/32/unwind-dw2.o libgcc/32/unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.o libgcc/32/unwind-sjlj.o libgcc/32/gthr-gnat.o libgcc/32/unwind-c.o -lc && rm -f libgcc_s_32.so && if [ -f 32/libgcc_s.so.1 ]; then mv -f 32/libgcc_s.so.1 32/libgcc_s.so.1.backup; else true; fi && mv 32/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp 32/libgcc_s.so.1 && ln -s 32/libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s_32.so /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../libc.so when searching for -lc /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../libc.a when searching for -lc /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.a when searching for -lc /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lc collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [32/libgcc_s_32.so] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.4-r1/work/build/gcc' make[2]: *** [stmp-multilib] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.4-r1/work/build/gcc' make[1]: *** [stage1_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.4-r1/work/build/gcc' make: *** [profiledbootstrap] Error 2 !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 failed. !!! Function gcc_do_make, Line 1315, Exitcode 2 !!! emake failed with profiledbootstrap !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. Here is my emerge --info Code: Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 x86_64) = System uname: 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13 dev-lang/python: 2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.16.1 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.20 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=nocona -pipe" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=nocona -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoconfig
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: memory
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:35:38 +0100 (MET) Thomas Bellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as I understand, the rules are quite easy: > > - Socket 940 -- Needs registered memory > - Socket 754 -- Can use unbuffered memory > - Socket 939 -- Can use unbuffered memory > > And I believe that at least Socket 754 CPU:s actually *requires* > unbuffered memory, and can't use registered memory at all. I'm > not entirely sure about that, though, and I don't know if Socket > 939 CPU:s can use registered memory. AMD's docs on the 754 pin CPUs says up to 3 unbuffered DIMMs and 4 registered DIMMs. So yes it does take both. I'd be surprised if the socket 939 doesn't take both types too, but I don't have the information at the moment. -- Ian. EOM -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
