Re: [gentoo-amd64] Heads-up: KDEers: Particularly kde3-ers,

2009-08-24 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag, 23. August 2009 19:04:45 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
 On Sonntag 23 August 2009, Duncan wrote:
  Those of you kde-ers, particularly kde3-ers (aka stable kde-ers),
  heads-up!
 
  If you aren't aware of the current gentoo kde (especially kde3)
  situation, you *NEED* to subscribe to the gentoo-desktop list (normally
  lower activity than here, so it shouldn't be a huge burden), AND check
  the archives for the last couple months.

 bullshit

  The short version:  kde3 is likely going to be masked, soon, apparently
  very possibly before any kde4 is ever marked stable.  The current plan is
  to leave kde3 in-tree but masked, probably until early next year, at
  which point it'll move to an overlay, kde-sunset or similarly named,
  where it'll be maintained primarily by interested users.

 maybe, you you don't have to be subscribed to -desktop to find that.
 Anyway, without an official announcement it is just a plan.

 cut unimportant crap 

  Of course, qt3 upon which kde3 depends is in similar or even worse shape
  (except that it was in arguably better shape when it went unsupported, as
  until then, people had been paid to keep it working, even if they'd have
  otherwise preferred to be working on the newer versions), apparently not
  supported any longer by its own (commercial FLOSS) upstream.

 and here we come to the real stuff. qt3 is planned to be removed from the
 tree. Nothing else.

  Unfortunately, all this is complicated by the state of kde4, in many ways
  a mirror image of kde3 -- specifically like a mirror image in that it's
  similar, but nicely reversed.  kde4 is getting all sorts of developer
  attention, but again despite what upstream says, it's anything /but/ as
  stable and smoothly functional and polished as kde3 is.

 bullshit

  I'm normally an
  early adopter, running ~arch and in fact often unmasking and even
  reaching into overlays for fresh versions, often beta or rc, sometimes
  even live-vcs versions direct from the upstream repositories.

 you are also writing way too much.

 4.3 (as every kde4 version so far) is markedly
  better than the previous version, but there's still a LOT of broken
  functionality, features still rapidly evolving, etc.

 extreme bullshit

  kde4.3 therefore at what I'd normally consider the late-beta stage.
  User's who actually used and depended on the previous version for
  anything beyond basic functionality shouldn't be upgrading yet unless
  they're prepared to spend HOURS, in this case, DAYS, even WEEKS,

 even more bullshit.

 emerge @kde4.3

 some hours later: perfectly  fine working kde 4.3. No bugs, stable, all
 funtionality needed there.

 So instead of talking you typical annoying much worded crap, could you
 please point out the problems with 4.3? Examples?

  upgrading, finding fixes and workarounds for bugs, even switching to
  alternative software solutions at times when the functionality simply
  isn't there. I estimate I've spent about 80 hours on the upgrade and
  reconfiguring, all told.

 nice. I spent maybe 3h. All told.

  switch, and users WILL need to spend SOME time reconfiguring and
  adapting, but perhaps 20-40 hours is reasonable, NOT 80!  80 hours, two
  weeks of full-time 40-hour-week equivalent work, simply indicates how
  immature and broken some aspects of the project still are,

 and more bullshit.

 So, name your examples.

 And I didn't even bother to read the rest.

 duncan, if I want to read a book, I buy a book, This is an INTERNATIONAL
 list. We are not living in nightmare land where everybody's first language
 is english.
 Reading your emails takes more time than installing kde.

 All you had said to this point could have been said in two simple sentences
 too:

 kde 3.5 is planned to go away into an overlay because qt3 is not supported
 anymore
 kde 4.X has still some problems.

 See? See the difference to you writings? Short, compact, same message. Oh,
 and of course I left out the bullshit.

 But no, you do have to write a freaking essay.

 In the future: keep it short.

In my opinion duncan is one of the people around here which make this list 
very useful and the information he is sharing within his emails is one of the 
reasons why I didn't unsubscribe yet.

I like duncans emails :).

Rgds
Bernhard




Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Recover files on ext4 partition

2009-07-09 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juli 2009 03:09:59 schrieb Duncan:
 Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net posted pan.2009.07.09.00.51...@cox.net,

 excerpted below, on  Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:51:32 +:
  Beyond that, I'd suggest contacting the maintainer (Ted Ts'o) himself,
  or more accurately, the ext4 list (much better than mailing an
  individual for something like this), as ext4 is new enough and different
  enough from ext3, it's unlikely there's standard recovery tools out
  there for it yet.

 I forgot this...

 Be sure to check the list archive tho, and look for a FAQ.  It may indeed
 be a FAQ, that they're tired of seeing on the list.  (Years ago, that
 went without saying as it was just common netiquette, but unfortunately,
 common netiquette isn't so common, any more, and it way too often needs
 to be made explicit now days.)

Thank you both for the hints.

 Just be SURE you're pointing it at the correct write location.
I'll try to work on that :).

Rgds
Bernhard



[gentoo-amd64] Recover files on ext4 partition

2009-07-08 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi,

does anyone of you have some experience in recovering a wiped out ext4
partition?

I accidentially ran mkfs.ext4 on a ext4 partition for which I do not have
a backup (I wanted to format sdg but instead I accidentially took sde :( ).

Is there a way to recover the data in this case?

Rgds
Bernhard


[gentoo-amd64] weird sound problem

2008-01-29 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi,

I did a kernel update to 2.6.24 (gentoo-sources), a update to the 
linux-headers 2.6.24 and a world recompile. After the recompile sound stops 
working. Every time I try playing sound under kde (gmplayer, amarok/xine-lib) 
I get the message could not open sound device.

mplayer gives me this:

[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: dlmisc.c:118:(snd_dlsym_verify) unable to verify version 
for symbol _snd_pcm_empty_open
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm.c:2109:(snd_pcm_open_conf) symbol _snd_pcm_empty_open 
is not defined inside (null)
[AO_ALSA] Fehler beim Öffnen der Wiedergabe: No such device or address
[AO SDL] Samplerate: 44100Hz Kanäle: Stereo Format s16le
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: dlmisc.c:118:(snd_dlsym_verify) unable to verify version 
for symbol _snd_pcm_empty_open
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm.c:2109:(snd_pcm_open_conf) symbol _snd_pcm_empty_open 
is not defined inside (null)
[AO SDL] Kann Audio nicht öffnen: No available audio device

I'm in the audio group. Logged in as root I get the same errors. 

On the other hand sound from TV works. Any ideas what is going on?

Rgds
Bernhard

--
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] weird sound problem

2008-01-29 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Dienstag 29 Januar 2008 schrieb Bernhard Auzinger:
 Hi,

 I did a kernel update to 2.6.24 (gentoo-sources), a update to the
 linux-headers 2.6.24 and a world recompile. After the recompile sound stops
 working. Every time I try playing sound under kde (gmplayer,
 amarok/xine-lib) I get the message could not open sound device.

 mplayer gives me this:

 [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: dlmisc.c:118:(snd_dlsym_verify) unable to verify
 version for symbol _snd_pcm_empty_open
 [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm.c:2109:(snd_pcm_open_conf) symbol
 _snd_pcm_empty_open is not defined inside (null)
 [AO_ALSA] Fehler beim Öffnen der Wiedergabe: No such device or address
 [AO SDL] Samplerate: 44100Hz Kanäle: Stereo Format s16le
 [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: dlmisc.c:118:(snd_dlsym_verify) unable to verify
 version for symbol _snd_pcm_empty_open
 [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm.c:2109:(snd_pcm_open_conf) symbol
 _snd_pcm_empty_open is not defined inside (null)
 [AO SDL] Kann Audio nicht öffnen: No available audio device

 I'm in the audio group. Logged in as root I get the same errors.

 On the other hand sound from TV works. Any ideas what is going on?

 Rgds
 Bernhard

I solved it by setting the ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS.

Rgds
Bernhard
--
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: NVIDIA 100.14.19 + xorg-server 1.4.0.90 + xorg-x11 7.3 = blackscreen after every restart

2008-01-01 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Dienstag 01 Januar 2008 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin:
 On Montag, 31. Dezember 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
  * Yuval Hager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Have you tried their latest, x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-169.07 ? I am
   not following closely, but it should have major fixes and improvements.
   It works for me on GeForce 7300.
  
   http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199671
 
  For this year I've already wasted too much resources on that.
  Maybe I'll have a try in a few month. 3D stuff isnt't that
  important for me - for 2D stuff the free driver works very fine.

 yeah, just copying an ebuild and replacing nv with nvidia in xorg.conf
 costs so much time and is so hard to do. Whining on the other hand does not
 take any time at all.

  BTW: the ebuild conflicts between kernel and nvidia-drivers are
  also annoying. The kernel parts should be handled differently.

 what are you talking about? conflicts? kernel parts? which kernel parts
 handled by what and why?

Maybe the problem is that he compiled in the deprecated nvidia framebuffer 
support?

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu

2007-11-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 KDE user here too.  =8^)  I use ksysguard in the panel, with 4 CPU
 monitors, one for each of my dual cores on each of my Opteron 290s.

Oh, it's 4 cores, not 8. But not bad either.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu

2007-11-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 11 November 2007 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
 On Saturday 10 Nov 2007, Bernhard Auzinger wrote:
  it's not a important question, but has anybody of you noticed when
  compiling certain packages the load on both cpu's is only about 50%. I
  have the feeling that it happens with packages that can not be split up
  into two jobs. But in this case one cpu should be on 100% load and the
  other one at ~0%. Maybe someone of you has a good explanation for this
  behaviour.

 I posted a question like this a few months ago, and I did a fair amount of
 detective work. Pretty much inconclusive, I'm afraid, but it seemed to be
 due to a motherboard chipset problem. This is a SuperMicro H8DCE; the
 problem only appeared when this replaced a faulty MSI board. I think the
 conversation ran in May, so you should be able to find it in the archive if
 you're interested.

 (I'd noticed that the BOINC scheduler was trying to get two processes run
 at full load, one on each CPU, but according to /top/ and /gkrellm/ each
 was getting just 50%, sometimes one on each CPU and sometimes both on the
 same one. And /top/ seemed confused about which CPU was running which
 tasks!)

 I don't run BOINC any more, for other reasons, so I haven't run into the
 problem recently. Kernel compilations seem to go OK, so it's all a bit of a
 mystery. I concluded at the time: I'm left with a vague feeling of
 dissatisfaction from not knowing what's going on, and a suspicion that
 something in the nForce2 chipset doesn't match what the kernel thinks.
 Kernel versions seem not to affect this problem, at least not in the range
 of versions I could find.

 --
 Rgds
 Peter.
 Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93

I don't think that it is a motherboard issue because I watched the same 
behaviour not only on my amd64X2 but also at work at a core2-duo and older 
pentium4's.

I will try to find the thread from may.

Thank you.

Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon?

2007-11-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Samstag 10 November 2007 schrieb Kris Kersey (Augustus):
 Conway,

 While it doesn't include Barcelona, you probably would find my review on
 LinuxHardware.org very useful in your decision making process.  It
 included the latest Xeon and Opteron processors using Tyan boards.  Here's
 the link:
 http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/05/1414204mode=thread

 If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to help.

 Thanks,
 Kris Kersey (Augustus)
 LinuxHardware.org Site Manager
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Gentoo Linux AMD64 Developer
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AIM: Augustus22

Why do you compare two systems with a different number of cores? 2x2Core 
athlon64 versus 2x4Core Core2Duo.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu

2007-11-10 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi everybody,

it's not a important question, but has anybody of you noticed when compiling 
certain packages the load on both cpu's is only about 50%. I have the feeling 
that it happens with packages that can not be split up into two jobs. But in 
this case one cpu should be on 100% load and the other one at ~0%. Maybe 
someone of you has a good explanation for this behaviour.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu

2007-11-10 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Thank you for your explanations. It seems to make sense that the job hops from 
one CPU to another, just too fast to be seen on the averaged processor 
statistics. I think I'll take a look at schedutils. The xfce-cpuload-plugin 
seems to be nice, but I'm kde-user :).

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] conversion sda to lvm2 questions

2007-10-13 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Samstag 13 Oktober 2007 schrieb Beso:
 can i use raid even if i got a single hd and a non raid board?! i think i
 missed this thing. i knew that i could use raid on 2 separate disks of the
 same ammount and only if i had a raid compatible board (with hardware or
 software) but i didn't know that you could use it also on a single disk.

RAID = Redundant Array of Independent Disks. I think this explains that it 
would be nonsense to have raid on a single disk. 

 i tried to copy the system some time ago and found out that there are files
 in /dev and /tmp or /var/tmp that have an enormous dimension. i have left
 them behind and then got an unusable system for some reason. the copy i had
 was from a livecd with the cp -p to preserve ownership and permission.
 for what i know from /dev i have only to get /dev/null and /dev/console and
 let all others devices be created by udev. from /tmp instead i should not
 copy anything and from /var/tmp i should copy only the ccache. are my
 suppositions correct?

Of course, copying /dev/zero is not a good idea on a running system. You will 
wait forever for this task to finish (/dev/zero, remember there comes data 
out of it, endlessly).

You don't have to copy anything of /dev. udev will provide you the solution to 
create a new /dev directory after boot.

LG
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Java on AMD64

2007-09-21 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Donnerstag 20 September 2007 schrieb Mark Knecht:
 It has been a long time since I've looked at Java on my AMD64 machine.
 I run into links, etc., and they don't work. It was frustrating two
 years ago. It just didn't work. On my machine still it doesn't, but
 maybe this is because I haven't tried to fix it in a long time, so...

 Here's a link with some Java on the page:

 http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianFunction.html

 I get the typical white box with a jigsaw puzzle piece asking me to
 'Click here to download plugin' and then a message about JRE missing.

 I currently use Blackdown but notice this 'virtual' JRE is Sun. That
 all seems a bit strange.

 lightning ~ # eix -I jre
 [I] dev-java/blackdown-jre
  Available versions:  (1.4.2)  1.4.2.03-r14
 {nsplugin}
  Installed versions:  1.4.2.03-r14(1.4.2)(01:56:19 AM
 06/02/2007)(-nsplugin) Homepage:http://www.blackdown.org
  Description: Blackdown Java Runtime Environment

 [U] virtual/jre
  Available versions:
 (1.4)   1.4.1 1.4.2
 (1.5)   1.5.0
 (1.6)   1.6.0
  Installed versions:  1.5.0(1.5)(10:30:16 PM 06/01/2007)
  Homepage:http://java.sun.com/
  Description: Virtual for JRE

 Found 2 matches.
 lightning ~ #

 I thought that before I invested too much time I'd ask if there is
 anyone who makes pages like the one above work and what you have
 installed.

 Thanks!

 Cheers,
 Mark

But if you are comfortable in using conqueror, there is another possibility. 
Because as far as I know, konqueror uses the java-vm directly (no plugin). So 
you can use the 64bit sun-jdk/jre without any problem.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] can not unmount cifs (samba) share

2007-09-16 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 16 September 2007 schrieb Tonko Mulder:
 Did you just send that message like 5 times?

 Regards, Tonko

What do you mean with like 5 times?

I sent this mail one time on 16.09.2007 at 10:33am CET.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] can not unmount cifs (samba) share

2007-09-15 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi,

I'm using cifs to mount samba-shares and recently noticed that I can't really 
unmount the shares. I can unmount them, they will be away but listed in the 
mtab forever. I'm mounting/unmounting the shares as a normal user like

mount.cifs //server/share /local_dir

and unmount with

umount.cifs /local_dir

Is this a bug or am I missing something?

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] xextproto - filesize does not match

2007-09-08 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Samstag 08 September 2007 schrieb Herbert Laubner:
 Hi,

 I am installing xorg-x11 on an amd64 machine.

 On xextproto-7.0.2 the digest verification failed. Is there a change
 giong on or is there a bugy file on the server?

 Regards,
 herb


Hi,

change the GENTOO_MIRROR and the digest verification will be ok. With 
gd.tuwien.ac.at I experienced the same. Change the mirror in your make.conf 
temporarily to the another gentoo-mirror and all will be fine.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] complete crash with ondemand scheduler

2007-08-05 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 the ondemand governor steps the processor between the least step to the
 most one. for example, i have a turion 64 with steps from 800mhz to 2ghz.
 the ondemand governor would step from 800mhz directly to 2ghz when the cpu
 is under load and then return to 800 mhz when the load drops down.

I think you are wrong, because the ondemand governor does also switch between 
all available frequencies. For example my amd64X2 is capable of 
1000,1800,2000,2200,2400MHz and the ondemand governor does switch very well 
between these frequencies if needed.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2nd HDD for var, tmp, usr/portage, swap

2007-08-01 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Freitag 20 Juli 2007 schrieb Richard Freeman:
 Bernhard Auzinger wrote:
  My question is if it makes sence to move these partitions to another
  harddisk?

 Others have responded to this well already - one thing I might add is to
 check out lvm if you have so many drives.  Once you've used it you'll
 NEVER go back.  Depending on the filesystems you use it is easy to
 resize partitions after the fact, and moving them from drive to drive is
 a breeze even while they're active.

 I'm currently running on 5 logical volumes on top of two RAID-5 md
 devices.  (With two more mirrored md devices for boot and root).  Six
 hard drives in total.  It took a little work getting to this point, but
 I can move stuff around easily while filesystems are online and with
 full redundancy on everything but swap (I could run swap on my RAID-5
 lvm partitions, but you take a performance hit there - and I don't care
 about a possible crash so much as the loss of lots of data).

 Oh, and for /tmp and /var/tmp consider using tmpfs - you don't get
 faster access times than virtual ram.  You might need to fall back to
 your hard drive for very large emerges unless you have 5-10GB of swap...

Just for the record. I decided to go LVM2 :). It runs since 10 days and I'm 
very happy with it. The setup was very quick and easy. For a few seconds I 
thought of buying a few more harddisks. Not because of the space, just 
because (vg/lv)extend excites me so much :). That stuff is cool.

Regards
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2nd HDD for var, tmp, usr/portage, swap

2007-07-20 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 Is there any way to get a unique identifier for a drive - such as a
 UUID?

Do you want the uuid or something else. With udevinfo you get a lot of 
information.

udevinfo --query=all --name=/dev/sdb4 --root

Rgds
Bernhard

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2nd HDD for var, tmp, usr/portage, swap

2007-07-20 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 Spreading them across drives could result in faster access if the
 controllers the drives are atached to allow overlapping commands.  IDE
 doesn't do this and can only have one drive active on the bus.
They are two IDE-drives and two SATA-drives. The IDE drives are each on a 
separate controller.

Thank you all for your replies. You've inspired me very well :). If the 
weather will be rainy, I will move my /var/ partition to another drive or 
maybe set up an LVM. But before I've to sleep a few  nights over it.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 3200+ - X2 4000+

2007-07-12 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
  bogomips: 3611.22
  TLB size: 1024 4K pages
 
 
 
  bogomips: 1603.39
  TLB size: 1024 4K pages
 
 
  2) Just curious: Why is there such a big difference between the 2 CPUs'
  bogomips values reported?
 
 
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

 --
 Piotr

There has to be no difference between the two cores on dual-core processors. 
That's because the bogomips-benchmark is a calculated benchmark that 
depends mostly on the clock frequency and since the two cores on dual-core 
athlons/opterons use the same clock, it's not possible to have different 
values on that type of dual-core processor. I've absolutely identical values 
(4825.77 bogomips) for both cores of my Athlon64 X2 4600+. 

If you have two processors (f.ex. two single-cores) on your mainboard, than 
you will have two slightly different values because of the slightly different 
clock of the two processors. In your case it seems that the second processor 
has a decreased clock. I'm sure you have enabled cool'n'quiet.

Rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] mount by UUID

2007-06-27 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 So when you try to run `umount /mnt/hdd_extern_1` as a plain ole user
 you get a segfault?
That's exactly what happens.

 If that's the case then I'd say it's probably a bug 
 in either umount or libuuid.
Isn't libuuid a part of e2fsprogs?

 Either way I'm sure the devs would be able 
 to help you if you file a bug.  You should probably include a backtrace
 with your bug report.
Good idea :).

Thank you.

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] mount by UUID

2007-06-27 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
I exchanged the UUID=uuid_number with /dev/disks/by-uuid/uuid_number and now 
it works. That's funny.

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] mount by UUID

2007-06-25 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi,

I recently chose to mount my external hdd's by uuid. I just replaced the 
device file  (dev/sdxy) by the uuid (UUID=X...) in my /etc/fstab.

UUID=1ad24afc-f258-4b9e-a2c3-1e34c59562d8 /mnt/hdd_extern_1 reiserfs \ 
noauto,noatime,notail,user 0 0

UUID=1f0b0c58-7274-41c8-af00-2fbe5f4fbd6f /mnt/hdd_extern_2 reiserfs \ 
noauto,noatime,notail,user 0 0

As root I can mount and unmount the hdd's without any problem. But as user I 
can just mount but not unmount them. If I try to unmount them as user (after 
mounting as user, of course) I get a segmentation fault.

Maybe someone can give me a hint, what is going on.

rgds
Brenhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] nvidia-settings blocks nvidia-drivers

2007-06-23 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Samstag 23 Juni 2007 schrieb david:
 I unmerged nvidia-settings, looks like it is included in the new
 drivers. But I still can't update world;
 amd64 ~ # emerge -p nvidia-settings

 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

 Calculating dependencies... done!
 [ebuild  N] media-video/nvidia-settings-1.0.20070302
 [blocks B ] media-video/nvidia-settings (is blocking
 x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-100.14.09)
 amd64 ~ # emerge -pv nvidia-drivers

 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

 Calculating dependencies... done!
 [ebuild   R   ] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-100.14.09  0 kB

 Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB
 amd64 ~ #

 --
 Powered by Gentoo/Linux

I think the nvidia-settings package is included into 
the nvidia-drivers-package.

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Gentoo crashing?

2007-05-15 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2007 schrieb Peter Hoff:
 I can't even get 2.6.21 to compile. I was getting unhappy about that, but
 perhaps I've been looking at it the wrong way?

My suggestion is to boot without X, without loading the graphic driver module 
(nvidia, ati) and without any other driver that is not needed for basic 
functionality (dvb, bttv, alsa, usb . . .). Maybe you should try not to load 
the network driver too. If it is not the heat, you could have some interrupt 
issues. A while ago, with my old P3, I had a similar problem. My problem was 
that my network-controller and my soundcard didn't like to share an interrupt 
together :) and the system hung up very often. For me it was unreproduceable, 
what caused my problems, but finally I got behind it by testing each 
component step by step.

So don't become desperate. Try everything you have in your mind. Sometimes the 
least promising possibility solves the problem

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] sound problems on startup

2007-05-14 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Please _do_not_ send html based e-mails.

rgds
Bernhard


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] gnupg: can't generate keys

2007-05-05 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi,

I experience some problems when generating keys when using gpg --gen-key. I 
get the the message:

gpg: waiting on lock (held by 17362) ...

and gpg never returns. It just keeps throwing that message at me forever and 
I've no clue what is going on.

By the way, the pid (17362) is everytime the same.

Maybe someone can help.

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] gnupg: can't generate keys

2007-05-05 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Samstag 05 Mai 2007 schrieb Bernhard Auzinger:
 Hi,

 I experience some problems when generating keys when using gpg --gen-key.
 I get the the message:

 gpg: waiting on lock (held by 17362) ...

 and gpg never returns. It just keeps throwing that message at me forever
 and I've no clue what is going on.

 By the way, the pid (17362) is everytime the same.

 Maybe someone can help.

 rgds
 Bernhard

Solved. It was just the pub/secring lockfile :)

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Quick Portage How to

2007-03-21 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 'unmerge'ing those you don't want will clean up portage's database of
 installed packages.  Doesn't remove /lib/modules/kernel-version/
 though or old kernels from /boot/.  Seems that manual deletion is
 required here.

That's because one may still want to use a compiled kernel after the removal 
of the kernel sources.

The second thing is that sys-kernel/gentoo-sources does only refer to the 
kernel sources and not to your self-made kernel. If the kernel were 
made/compiled by portage like any other program, portage would remove it. But 
unless this does not happen (and by the way is not possible yet), why should 
portage clean up the things it has not caused?

rgds
Bernhard


-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is swap need when there is 4g of ram?

2007-03-14 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 swappiness does not help, if swap is really needed (like when compiling
 kdepim).

I did not reconize yet that kdepim is that hungry at compile time :).

 The 'stupid' thing is, as soon as swap is used, it stays that way, 
 no matter how many hundred mb of ram are free.

The reason for that behaviour is, that in my opinion it would be nonsense to 
delete things from the swap when there is enough swap space free. But I think 
you can be sure that if there is enough ram free that the things will also be 
in the ram again. Things are kept (duplicated) in the swap space if there is 
enough swap because it's faster when it's necessary to swap out the same 
things again, I think.

That's just a theory. I don't know for sure if I'm right.

rgds
Bernhar
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is swap need when there is 4g of ram?

2007-03-14 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 j2 for MAKEOPTS and +kdeenablefinal and after some time each one of the
 makejobs want 900mb ram. There are two libs where that happens, makes
 kdepim the slowest-to-compile packet for me. Wesnoth is also an offender.
 Some versions want 500mb+ at some point when compiling.

That's pretty much. About 3 years ago I watched a similar behaviour on PyQt. 
At that time I had just 512MB of ram (and a 1.2GHz pentium3) and that tiny 
package drove me crazy because the memory requested by gcc when compiling 
PyQt was more than 512MB and the compile process did not only happen on data 
stored in the ram but also on data stored in the swap space. It was awful. My 
system was not usable for more than an hour. It was so busy swapping as I 
never saw a system swapping before. I remember that after a upgrade to 1G ram 
the PyQt package took less than five minutes. I decided to trace the memory 
usage when compiling PyQt and I recognized that it was less than a minute 
requesting so much memory. That was the first time I was convinced that 
swapping can end very very bad.

rgds
Bernhard

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] Re: persistent-net.rules

2007-03-04 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 Interesting.  I have different hardware, but use the macchanger module to
 change my MAC at every eth0 up, and don't have the problem here.  udev
 must see the original MAC address on my hardware before macchanger gets
 to it, and thus set it up correctly.  But if it's rewritten @ shutdown,
 why wouldn't it see the macchanger-randomized one then and thus get it
 wrong?


I've tried macchanger but the thing is that at boottime the address of my 
network interface is always FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF and therefore it gets a random 
mac-address from the kernel. And because of the persistent-net.rules that are 
saved at shutdown, my network interface is named something unpredictable. 
Only if I delete the udev rule by plugging it to another computer to be able 
to boot without persistent-net.rules I get a interface eth0. Otherwise it 
increments every boot (eth0, eth1, . . . ).

The funny thing is, that no matter which mac address I apply to the interface 
with macchanger, the mac address which will be written to the udev rules at 
shutdown is always the one randomly generated by the kernel and not the one I 
apply to it.

rgds
Bernhard


-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] persistent-net.rules

2007-03-04 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 Possibly a fix for the MAC address,  on the BIOS screen, press shift+f2
 then alt+f3 which should reveal extra settings, including the option to
 enter your own choice of MAC address for the nVidia adapter. The
 original mac address should be on a sticker above the paralell port. You
 don't mention which K8N neo2, so you may have two onboard NICs, and the
 stickers MAC address will only be for one of them, the other being a
 digit lower.

You are amazing. I have my mac address back again :). Thank you very much. 
From where do you know these shortcuts to get extra options in the bios menu? 
Is there a specification available? My Mainboard is a K8N Neo2 Platinum 
(MS-7025).

Thank you very much, both of you.

rgds
Bernhard
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] Re: persistent-net.rules

2007-03-04 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 Only if I delete the udev rule by plugging it to another
 computer to be able to boot without persistent-net.rules I get a interface
 eth0. Otherwise it increments every boot (eth0, eth1, . . . ).

just for the sake of completeness. I forgot to write hard disk in the 
sentence above :).

by plugging the hard disk to another computer

rgds
Bernhard

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] Re: System load during emerge

2007-03-04 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 [Later...] I've now found that if I run hdparm -d1 /dev/sda from an X
 terminal I get HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device, but
 when /etc/init.d/hdparm is run during boot I see [ok] for each drive. Looks
 like I've got some exploring to do.

As far as I know hdparm -d1 is not available, because sata drives work with 
libata (within the scsi subsystem) which uses dma for all drives.

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-amd64] persistent-net.rules

2007-03-03 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi,

does somebody know how to prevent the persistent-net.rules to be saved during 
the shutdown process?

The background is that I have a network interface with a faulty mac adress 
(FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF) on a K8N Neo2 (nforce3 ultra). So the kernel applys a 
random mac address to the network interface on every boot. At the shutdown 
process a entry with the randomly generated mac address will be written 
into /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. And that's my problem, 
because at the next boot another mac address will be applied to the network 
interface which does not match the one saved to persistent-net.rules and udev 
does not provide an interface eth0.

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] emerge world via ssh

2007-01-28 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 28 Januar 2007 schrieb Dieter Ries:
 Hi,

 how can i run emerge -vD world, when i only have the possibility to access
 the machine via ssh for a short time?

 i have tried emerge -vD world 

 but that seems to stop before even the first ebuild is compiled. Then i
 tried putting the emerge command into a bash script, and running

 emergeworld.sh

 but that had the same effect.

 There has to be a possibility...

 cu
 Dieter

As already mentioned, screen is a good way to solve this.

By the way. The compiling stops because you are starting emerge within the 
shell as child process of this shell. An if you terminate the father process 
(in this case the shell) by logging out, all child processes will be 
terminated too.

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: MAKEOPTS values for Athlon 64 X2

2007-01-17 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Mittwoch 17 Januar 2007 18:24 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin:
 if you want to spread FUD, and you are doing it right now, inform yourself.
 Ok?

 The fix was there in mere days after NVIDIA got the news.

 The firm who reported the 'problem' confused the NVIDIA problem with a much
 older Xorg problem.

I thought the nvidia bug was known for about a year?

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] fsck seems to screw up my harddisk

2006-11-27 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Montag 27 November 2006 20:32 schrieb Guido Doornberg:
  Well, I want to use Gentoo but i don't realy like the idea of spoiling

  my weekend by installing an OS thats gonna stop working 30 times
  booting later.

 I doubt this is really Gentoo-specific.
 - you're right on that, I love gentoo, but I hope you understand what I
 mean.

 1. My kernel version is gentoo-2.6.17-r7 - so it isn't an experimental
 kernel

 I can't post my emerge-info now because I don't have everything needed
 for booting (monitor and stuff)

 2. You really made me doubt about that, but I don't think that is the
 problem. I'll do some more research on that.

 3. I'll look for that next weekend =)

 Thank you =)

Maybe you could try another filesystem. I don't think that your issues depend 
on the choosen filesystem. But trying another one may gives you further hints 
what is really going on.

rgds

Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] eselect opengl set xorg-x11 keeps breaking my headers

2006-06-29 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Mittwoch 28 Juni 2006 01:12 schrieb Alex Bennee:
 Despite no longer having the emulation libraries installed eselect keep
 screwing up my headers to point at 32 bit glx stuff. This obviously
 breaks various X related compiles.

 Does anyone know how I can stop it doing this? Unfortunately its called
 during the ebuild so I can't manually fix them and re-run the build.

 --
 Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/
 Declared guilty... of displaying feelings of an almost human nature. --
 Pink Floyd, The Wall

Did my suggestions help?

rgds

Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] eselect opengl set xorg-x11 keeps breaking my headers

2006-06-28 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Mittwoch 28 Juni 2006 01:12 schrieb Alex Bennee:
 Despite no longer having the emulation libraries installed eselect keep
 screwing up my headers to point at 32 bit glx stuff. This obviously
 breaks various X related compiles.

 Does anyone know how I can stop it doing this? Unfortunately its called
 during the ebuild so I can't manually fix them and re-run the build.

 --
 Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/
 Declared guilty... of displaying feelings of an almost human nature. --
 Pink Floyd, The Wall

Try to delete the gl-headers located in the emul directory. 
Usually /usr/include/GL contains symlinks to /usr/lib, but sometimes things 
go wrong with early versions of the emul stuff (they don't disappear by 
upgrading or unmerging) and eselect places a symlink which points 
to /usr/lib32 instead of /usr/lib or /usr/lib64. /usr/lib32 again is a 
symlink to the /emul directory. Delete gl-headers in the /emul directory to 
which the symlinks in /usr/include/GL point to.

rgds

Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] totem is not starting

2006-06-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
I had similar problems when I was upgrading my memory. Finally it was a known 
issue with the Winchester's memory controller. It can't handle fast timings 
in dual channel mode, when all memory banks are filled. So I switched to a 
slower RAM timing and all worked fine.

rgds

Bernhard

Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 01:00 schrieb Dieter Ries:
 hi,
 i have a new gentoo up and running after my glibc broke. everithing seems
 fine, but when I try to launch totem media player, it doesnt start but i
 see a windows with the text:

 Totem could not startup.
 No Reason.

 This is nice for totem, but i want it to work with no reason, not to exit
 with no reason.

 console outout is as follows:

 localhost / # totem

 ** (totem:24493): WARNING **: Failed to connect to the D-BUS daemon: Unable
 to determine the address of the message bus

 ** (totem:24493): WARNING **: No GConf default audio sink key and osssink
 doesn't work ** Message: failed to render default audio sink from gconf



 does anybody know what happened to totem?

 cu
 Dieter
 --


 Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
 Feel free mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] totem is not starting

2006-06-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 09:16 schrieb Bernhard Auzinger:
 I had similar problems when I was upgrading my memory. Finally it was a
 known issue with the Winchester's memory controller. It can't handle fast
 timings in dual channel mode, when all memory banks are filled. So I
 switched to a slower RAM timing and all worked fine.

 rgds

 Bernhard

I'm sorry.

rgds

Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems after upgrading to 4GB Ram

2006-06-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 20:10 schrieb Nuitari:
  Thanks for the suggestion. They are 4 matching 1GB sticks from Crucial.
  It's worked perfectly today with any 2 of them - just not when I fit all
  4.
 
  It didn't work *at all* when I first put in 4GB, I had to recompile the
  kernel with IOMMU options - now it works, just not under load.
 
  I ran into a similar issue when it went from 512M - 1G.  Same brand
  RAM, speeds, etc.  I was slightly overclocking at the time and I ended
  up fixing things by going back to spec'd speeds.  Make sure you're not
  pushing the envelope - no guarantees when you do that and sometimes a
  hardware change can keep that from working like it used to.
 
  Sounds like a motherboard issue of some kind - maybe some kind of timing
  setting will fix it.  Don't ask me what half of those settings do,
  though...

 When I went from 2x 512mb to 2x 512 + 2x1gb, my MSI motherboard
 automatically went to DDR333 speed instead of DDR400, as specified in its
 manual. Dual-channel is still active.

Let me guess, you have a AMD64 CPU with Winchester Core? As I wrote this 
morning, the Winchester's memory controller can't handle fast memory timings, 
if all memory banks are filled. Concerning this matter, I wrote an email to 
amd a few months ago and they sad that the winchester core and its 
predecessors have half-baked memory controllers on the chip. You have to set 
the command rate timing from 1T two 2T (as duncan told before) and your 
memory will work in DDR400 mode and without failure.

If you have a venice core or later versions, you should not recognize this 
behaviour.

The limitations of the winchester's memory controller should be listed 
somewhere in the following paper.
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/25759.pdf

rgds

Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] 32-bit chroot

2006-05-31 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 Read these and they were very informative but didn't answer my basic
 question as to whether I can use my existing x86 partition as the
 chroot system.  I kinda get the impression from the howtos that this
 might not be the best idea.

It will be a big fat chroot :). You may uninstall unneeded packages. But there 
is no reason why you shouldn't use your old system for that purpose.

My 32bit chroot is nothing else than a running system.

rgds

Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: urgent: Segfaults after synchronously emerging|downloading 30GB|burnng a DVD iso image

2006-05-29 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
 What tool or command do you use to make your copies? I remember seeing an
 invocation of tar piped to tar to ensure that all dates, permissions etc
 are preserved, even on pipes and other esoteric things, but my memory being
 what it is of course I can't remember it.

I'm using flexbackup. flexbackup is a script written in perl which uses tar. 
It has always preserved the right permissions for my backups and it's very 
comfortable to use.

rgds

Berhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Nvidia forcedeth driver.

2006-05-26 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
I think something else has gone wrong with your forcedeth driver. Gordon, 
maybe you could post the detailed feedback your system gives to you when try 
using the forcedeth driver.

Sometimes it's a little bit confusing, which of both LAN adapters is eth0 and 
which eth1. I guess you have to disable the forcedeth driver from your kernel 
to use your D-LINK adapter as eth0.

rgds

Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Giving up 64 platform

2006-04-23 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Hi Allan,

I' m running a gentoo-amd64 system with multilib. Mplayer and Java work just 
fine for me and I did not recognize any instability at all. If you need help, 
there would be a lot of people in the forum inclusive myself, who would help 
you to solve your issues. Don't give up on amd64. I think it's worth a try.

Rgds

Bernhard

By the way, the only reason I use multilib support is my x-plane flight 
simulator and some with_bad_codecs_encoded videos (mplayer and win32codecs). 
For all other things I do, it exists a amd64 compileable peace of oss 
software.


Am Sonntag 23 April 2006 17:56 schrieb Allan Spagnol Comar:
 Hi folks on list. I don't know if I am the only one on the list having
 dificult with gentoo amd64 stability. Most of the internet and graphic
 world is beyond my command, like firefox and java ( always crash
 firefox ) or flash player, or mplayer ..

 I had 3 boxes running gentoo on a x86 platform without any problem,
 but 64 platform it really frustated me, its fast but most programs are
 masked. a lot of the programs I use won run unless you install a 32
 bit binary ( so what the point of using gentoo  )

 sorry for the talking. Thanks for all that help that was giving.

 An answer to end. It's worth to use gentoo x86 on a AMD64, or should I
 run a binary distribution ?

 Thanks again, Allan

 --
 An application asked:
 Requeires Windows 9x, NT4 or better,
 so I´ve installed Linux

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE 3.5 and K3B

2006-02-20 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Please characterize your issues more detailed. Post the error messages and 
tell us more about your configuration.

Rgds

Bernhard

Am Montag 20 Februar 2006 15:48 schrieb Mark Haney:
 I just upgraded to KDE 3.5.1 and I must say it's fantastic.  The only
 issue I seem to be having is some sort of shared library problem with
 hal, dbus, ivman and k3b.  I can't seem to get k3b working now no matter
 what I try with revdep-rebuild or any emerge combination.  Any ideas?


 --
 Mark Haney
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 ERC Broadband
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Re: Wow! KDE 3.5.1 Xorg 7.0 w/ Composite

2006-02-09 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
May I put my oar into your optimisation dicussion. 

It's funny, Duncan. On the one side you are saving every byte of cpu-cache. On 
the other side, you are happy by having forked bashes in your main memory. 
But how do you take control about that? I mean, how do you get the code of 
your forked bashes away from your cpu cache to have it free for kernel code?

A long time ago . . ., I was testing some CFLAGS on my own programs. I wrote a 
fast-fourier algorithm myself, only to see the impressive difference 
between Os, O3 and some other optimisation flags. I fed my fast-fourier 
algorithm with a large amount of input. But no matter how hard I tried to get 
it faster by changing the flags, it didn't work. The difference is marginal 
and not every flag brings improvement for every program. The only thing that 
changed a lot was the time gcc needs to perform those optimisations.

Bernhard
Am Donnerstag 09 Februar 2006 01:17 schrieb Duncan:
 Simon Stelling posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,  on

 Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:37:33 +0100:
  Duncan wrote:
  I should really create a page listing all the little Gentoo admin
  scripts I've come up with and how I use them.  I'm sure a few folks
  anyway would likely find them useful.
 
  The idea behind most of them is to create shortcuts to having to type in
  long emerge lines, with all sorts of arbitrary command line parameters.
  The majority of these fall into two categories, ea* and ep*, short for
  emerge --ask additional parameters and emerge --pretend ... .  Thus, I
  have epworld and eaworld, the pretend and ask versions of emerge -NuDv
  world, epsys and easys, the same for system, eplog package, emerge
  --pretend --log --verbose (package name to be added to the command line
  so eplog gcc, for instance, to see the changes between my current and
  the new version of gcc), eptree package, to use the tree output, etc.
 
  Interesting. But why do you use scripts and not simple aliases? Every
  time you launch your script the HD performs a seek (which is very
  expensive in time), copies the script into memory and then forks a whole
  bash process to execute a one-liner. Using alias, which is a bash
  built-in, wouldn't fork a process and therefore be much faster.

 My thinking, which is possibly incorrect (your input appreciated), is that
 file-based scripts get pulled into cache the first time they are executed,
 and will remain there (with a gig of memory) pretty much until I'm done
 doing my upgrades.  At the same time, they are simply in cache, not
 something in bash's memory, so if the memory is needed, it will be
 reclaimed.  As well, after I'm done and on to other tasks, the cached
 commands will eventually be replaced by other data, if need be.

 Aliases (and bash-functions) are held in memory.  That's not as flexible
 as cache in terms of being knocked out of memory if the memory is needed
 by other things.  Sure, that memory may be flushed to disk-based swap, but
 that's disk based the same as the actual script files  I'm using, so
 reading it back into main memory if it's faulted out will take something
 comparable to the time it'd take to read in the script file again anyway.
 That's little gain, with the additional overhead and therefore loss of
 having to manage the temp-copy in swapped memory, if it comes to that.

 Actually, there are some details here that may affect things.  I don't
 know enough about the following factors to be able to evaluate how they
 balance out, but the real reason I chose individual scripts is below.

 One, here anyway, tho not on most systems, I'm running four SATA disks in
 RAID.  The swap is actually not on the RAID, as the kernel manages it like
 RAID on its own, provided all four swap areas are set to the same priority
 (they are), which means swap is running on the equivalent of
 four-way-striped RAID-0.  Meanwhile, the scripts, as part of my main
 system, are on RAID-6 for redundancy, so with the same four disks backing
 the RAID-6 as the swap, I've only effectively two-way-striped storage
 there, the other two disk stripes being parity.  Thus, retrieval from the
 4-way-striped swap should in theory be more efficient than from the
 2-way-striped regular storage.  OTOH, the granularity of the stripe
 in either case, against the size of the one or two-line script, likely
 means that it'll be pulled from a single stripe (at the speed of
 reading from a single disk, tho there are parallelizing opportunities
 not available on a single disk).  It's also likely that the swap will be
 more optimally managed for fast retrieval than the location on the regular
 filesystem is.  Balanced against that we have the overhead of maintaining
 the swap tracking.

 That's assuming it would swap that out to the dedicated swap in the first
 place.  I'm not familiar with Linux's VM, but given that the aliases and
 functions would be file-based in either case, it's possible it would
 simply drop the data from main memory, relying on 

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Feasibility of Gentoo on ancient hardware?

2005-06-22 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Oh, I saw it but now. You did a stage1/stage2 install? I think you seem to be 
hardcore.

With a stage3 install, you can save a lot of time. For addictional packages 
use the packages cd. I think there exists one with precompiled packages for 
i586.

http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/gentoo/releases/x86/current/packagecd/

Regards

Bernhard

Am Mittwoch 22 Juni 2005 19:37 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
 Having had a good deal of success maintaining useful Gentoo systems on
 this dual-Opteron workstation (with lots of help from my friends
 hereabouts, of course), I thought I'd try building a minimal system on
 an old P5-60 box, to be a firewall to replace an even older 486 box
 running Debian in 32MB (half the 64MB of the P5-60), which has been
 protecting my home mininetwork for the last five years or more. That may
 have been a mistake - /mnt/gentoo/usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh is
 still compiling glibc and it's been running for two days or more
 already! I can't imagine how long 'emerge -e system' is going to take.
 (I compared where it's got to in glibc with the position of the same
 string in /var/log/portage/3023-glibc-2.3.5.log on this box and I found
 it on line 5576 of a 37321-line log file!) At this rate I think I'll
 still be poking bits around one at a time come August.

 I confess that I haven't checked the Requirements in the introductory
 docs, but has anyone any more favourable experience than this to report?
 Perhaps I ought to chuck all these antediluvian monstrosities in the
 skip and invest a couple of hundred quid on a modern box - pity to waste
 all that nice-looking hardware though.

 --
 Peter Humphrey
 Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE-meta

2005-05-21 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
kde-base/kde-meta-3.4.0 (masked by: missing keyword)

With this, portage wants to say, that the package isn't masked by any keyword. 
It's unstable and if you want to use it, you have to add the am64-keyword by 
inserting it into /etc/portage/package.unmask either.

Am Samstag 21 Mai 2005 12:44 schrieb Luigi Pinna:
 Hello!
 I tried to reinstall kde 3.4 using the split-ebuild but... kde-meta has
 no keywords! I wrote in /etc/portage/package.keywords the line:
 =kde-base/kde-meta-3.4.0 ~amd64

 but after...

 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 emerge -uDp kde-meta

 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

 Calculating dependencies
 !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy kde-meta have been masked.
 !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
 request:
 - kde-base/kde-meta-3.4.0 (masked by: missing keyword)

 For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page
 or
 section 2.2 Software Availability in the Gentoo Handbook.

 Why? The single parts (kdebase, kdepim, etc) have the *-meta ebuild and
 they compile...

 Luigi

 Ps. Now I can use mplayer's windows codecs and flash... Thanks to
 everybody!


pgpphYIHgTGlr.pgp
Description: PGP signature