Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[Christoph Mende]

On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:09:30 -1000
Joshua Hoblitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Folks,
 
 The reason I ask is that there are
 alot of people (i.e., my users) eager for a version of gcc that supports
 openmp (like gcc 4.2.1+) and many of the specialized openmp compilers
 (like onmi) won't build on amd64.

gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.2.1 both support openmp and are in the normal tree.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[Joshua Hoblitt]

Thanks... I was looking at the wrong internal portage tree. ;)

-J

--
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Mende wrote:
 On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:09:30 -1000
 Joshua Hoblitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi Folks,
  
  The reason I ask is that there are
  alot of people (i.e., my users) eager for a version of gcc that supports
  openmp (like gcc 4.2.1+) and many of the specialized openmp compilers
  (like onmi) won't build on amd64.
 
 gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.2.1 both support openmp and are in the normal tree.




pgpN5O9fHiPkn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Montag, 8. Oktober 2007, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
 Hi Folks,

 Does anyone know why a gcc  4.2.1 but  4.3 ebuild has not appeared in
 the toolchain overlay? 

maybe because gcc 4.2.1 is in the 'normal' tree already?
And gcc 4.2.1 is the latest 4.2 release?

*  sys-devel/gcc
  Latest version available: 4.2.1
  Latest version installed: 4.2.1

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list