Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Gavin Seddon
Had flu, sorry for wait...
The Fedora is 2.4 kernel which I will migrate to today and if this
doesn't solve my probs. I will swap my scsi controller.  If I remove my
tape, what should I do with it?  (don't be rude)

I have been obsessed with backups since the time when I lost 2/3 of a
book and had to spend eternity recreating.  Any 'better' removable
storage device suggestions are welcome.  Bearing in mind it needs to
hold ~15Gb and a removable hd isn't feasible.
 Gav.



On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 13:19 -0500, Drake Donahue wrote:
 in addition to lshw, there is also an lsscsi in portage
 appears initio and linux have ended their affair
 is not a second /third drive a cheaper faster safer backup than scsi tape?
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brett Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 11:46 AM
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
 
 
  On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:26:23PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
  This is my 1st Gentoo and the tape never worked on Debian.  It does work
  on Redhat/Fedora but a tape's not a good reason to use this.
  
  Is the Redhat/Fedora system it works on a 2.4 or 2.6 kernel?
  -- 
  gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
  
 
-- 
Dr Gavin Seddon
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 
University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester 
M13 9PL, U.K.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Brett Johnson
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:23:56AM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
 The Fedora is 2.4 kernel which I will migrate to today and if this
 doesn't solve my probs. I will swap my scsi controller.  If I remove my
 tape, what should I do with it?  (don't be rude)
 
 I have been obsessed with backups since the time when I lost 2/3 of a
 book and had to spend eternity recreating.  Any 'better' removable
 storage device suggestions are welcome.  Bearing in mind it needs to
 hold ~15Gb and a removable hd isn't feasible.
  Gav.

I am not sure what you're saying about migrating and removing the tape.
If you mean you're going to install Fedora (2.4 kernel), then I would
assume your tape drive will work fine. It appears that your scsi card is
not fully supported in the 2.5/2.6 kernel.

If you're looking for alternate solutions to use with gentoo/2.6 kernel,
then I would suggest investing in a new scsi card. The tape drive and
cable should be fine (assuming proper maintenance of the tape drive).

I personally have moved away from tape for smaller data sets (  100GB
), as tape has some issues. First, you need to keep the tape head clean
and second tape media  has a limited useful life span. I have been
burned a couple times by defective tape media in a restore situation.

If an external hard drive is out, how about removeable hard drives?
Remeber, the point of a backup is just to keep the data in multiple
places. You can easily add a removeable drive cage to a system and
purchase a couple extra caddy's. This way you can alternate between 2
or 3 removable hard drives for backup devices. Some removeable trays
support key locks, in case you're worried about physical security.

The method I use is the dar program in conjunction with cdrecord-prodvd.
I create a full backup monthly, then create a weekly incremental against
the full backup, and then daily backups against the weekly. This method
only requires me to burn multiple dvd's once a month (as my monthly
backup is in excess of 20GB). After that, I get away with one extra dvd
per month (ymmv). For a recovery scenario, I may have to go through
multiple restores to bring the system current, but thats a trade off I
make to save on media.

Those are just a few ideas. There are many other ways to backup data. I
believe there is even an online service you can sign up for, and back up
to their servers. IIRC you pay by the backup size in 10GB increments. 

Backup solutions are unique to each enviroment and use.
Things to consider are; hard costs of backup hardware and media, time
required to perform backup and does data have to be taken offline, ease
and automation of backup, time required to restore data, ease and
automation of restore, and physical storage of backup media (it doesn't 
do you any good to keep all your backups in the same building as the data
if the building burns down). I am sure there are other factors too, this
is just to give you an idea of things to think about when trying to
come up with a new backup solution.

Brett
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Brett Johnson
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:05:06AM -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:56:10PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
  Hi,
  I am not thinking of fedora as an option.  I will go to the 2.4 kernel
  and get removable hdds in the future.  
  Do I put the 2.4 name in '/etc/portage/package.keywords' and emerge the
  source then genkernel --menuconfig kernel?
  
 If you want to run the 2.4 kernel, you will need to switch to the x86
 build, as 2.4 kernel is not supported in amd64.

And to answer your question, if you do switch to x86, you need to change
your /etc/make.profile to point to a 2.4 profile (ie
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1/2.4)

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Gavin Seddon
Will stick with 2.6 kernel and buy usb2 hard drive.



On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 10:45 -0500, Drake Donahue wrote:
 usb2.0 external hard drive has to be feasible. less than a $100 for 80gb. 
 nominal 60MB/sec.
 usb2.0\1394b external hard drive. less than $300 for 300 gb. nominal 
 60MB\80MB/sec.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brett Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:28 AM
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work
 
 
  On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:23:56AM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
  The Fedora is 2.4 kernel which I will migrate to today and if this
  doesn't solve my probs. I will swap my scsi controller.  If I remove my
  tape, what should I do with it?  (don't be rude)
 
  I have been obsessed with backups since the time when I lost 2/3 of a
  book and had to spend eternity recreating.  Any 'better' removable
  storage device suggestions are welcome.  Bearing in mind it needs to
  hold ~15Gb and a removable hd isn't feasible.
   Gav.
 
  I am not sure what you're saying about migrating and removing the tape.
  If you mean you're going to install Fedora (2.4 kernel), then I would
  assume your tape drive will work fine. It appears that your scsi card is
  not fully supported in the 2.5/2.6 kernel.
 
  If you're looking for alternate solutions to use with gentoo/2.6 kernel,
  then I would suggest investing in a new scsi card. The tape drive and
  cable should be fine (assuming proper maintenance of the tape drive).
 
  I personally have moved away from tape for smaller data sets (  100GB
  ), as tape has some issues. First, you need to keep the tape head clean
  and second tape media  has a limited useful life span. I have been
  burned a couple times by defective tape media in a restore situation.
 
  If an external hard drive is out, how about removeable hard drives?
  Remeber, the point of a backup is just to keep the data in multiple
  places. You can easily add a removeable drive cage to a system and
  purchase a couple extra caddy's. This way you can alternate between 2
  or 3 removable hard drives for backup devices. Some removeable trays
  support key locks, in case you're worried about physical security.
 
  The method I use is the dar program in conjunction with cdrecord-prodvd.
  I create a full backup monthly, then create a weekly incremental against
  the full backup, and then daily backups against the weekly. This method
  only requires me to burn multiple dvd's once a month (as my monthly
  backup is in excess of 20GB). After that, I get away with one extra dvd
  per month (ymmv). For a recovery scenario, I may have to go through
  multiple restores to bring the system current, but thats a trade off I
  make to save on media.
 
  Those are just a few ideas. There are many other ways to backup data. I
  believe there is even an online service you can sign up for, and back up
  to their servers. IIRC you pay by the backup size in 10GB increments.
 
  Backup solutions are unique to each enviroment and use.
  Things to consider are; hard costs of backup hardware and media, time
  required to perform backup and does data have to be taken offline, ease
  and automation of backup, time required to restore data, ease and
  automation of restore, and physical storage of backup media (it doesn't
  do you any good to keep all your backups in the same building as the data
  if the building burns down). I am sure there are other factors too, this
  is just to give you an idea of things to think about when trying to
  come up with a new backup solution.
 
  Brett
  -- 
  gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
 
  
 
-- 
Dr Gavin Seddon
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 
University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester 
M13 9PL, U.K.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Richard Fish
On 12/19/05, Drake Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 usb2.0 external hard drive has to be feasible. less than a $100 for 80gb.
 nominal 60MB/sec.
 usb2.0\1394b external hard drive. less than $300 for 300 gb. nominal
 60MB\80MB/sec.

Using what hardware?  I've used more than a dozen different models of
USB2/1394 hard drives on 4 different PCs and have never seen one
exceed 30MB/s in actual thoughput, although the same disks installed
internally exceed 60MB/s.

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Knecht
On 12/19/05, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 12/19/05, Drake Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  usb2.0 external hard drive has to be feasible. less than a $100 for 80gb.
  nominal 60MB/sec.
  usb2.0\1394b external hard drive. less than $300 for 300 gb. nominal
  60MB\80MB/sec.

 Using what hardware?  I've used more than a dozen different models of
 USB2/1394 hard drives on 4 different PCs and have never seen one
 exceed 30MB/s in actual thoughput, although the same disks installed
 internally exceed 60MB/s.

 -Richard

Yeah, you won't get much more than 30MB/S out of any 1394a drive on
Linux, and even then you may have to set gap count by hand to get
there. However, faster 1394 performance is available in Linux. Here's
my 1394b drive:

lightning ~ # hdparm -tT /dev/sdb

/dev/sdb:
 Timing cached reads:   2252 MB in  2.00 seconds = 1125.44 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  172 MB in  3.03 seconds =  56.72 MB/sec
lightning ~ #

- Mark

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Richard Fish
On 12/19/05, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 there. However, faster 1394 performance is available in Linux. Here's
 my 1394b drive:

Ah thanks, good to know.  Making a mental note to make sure my next
laptop has a 1394_b_ port, or to pickup a new cardbus card...

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Knecht
On 12/19/05, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 12/19/05, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  there. However, faster 1394 performance is available in Linux. Here's
  my 1394b drive:

 Ah thanks, good to know.  Making a mental note to make sure my next
 laptop has a 1394_b_ port, or to pickup a new cardbus card...

 -Richard

I'm sure they're out there somewhere but I've personalyl never seen a
laptop with 1394b.

Good luck whatever you do.

cheers,
Mark

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-16 Thread Gavin Seddon
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:36 -0800, Steve Herber wrote:
 Besides lspci and lsusb, I like lshw.
 
   sys-apps/lshw
 
 From the man page:
 
 lshw is a small tool to extract detailed information  on  the  hardware
 configuration of the machine. It can report exact memory configuration,
 firmware version, mainboard configuration, CPU version and speed, cache
 configuration,  bus speed, etc. on DMI-capable x86 or IA-64 systems and
 on some PowerPC machines (PowerMac G4 is known to work).
Hi,
'lshw' not found.
Also when I ran 'cdrecord -scanbus' 
'
cdrecord -scanbus
Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004
Jörg Schilling
cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.14-gentoo-r2
cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer.
cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or
Solaris.
cdrecord: No such file or directory. Cannot open '/dev/pg*'. Cannot open
SCSI driver.
cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. Make sure you
are root.
cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'.'
Any ideas
Gav.






-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-16 Thread Gavin Seddon
Hi, lshw gave '
'   *-scsi UNCLAIMED
description: SCSI storage controller
product: 360P
vendor: Initio Corporation
physical id: 6
bus info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:06.0
version: 02
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: scsi bus_master
resources: ioport:c400-c4ff iomemory:ff5fe000-ff5fefff
irq:5'
-- 
Dr Gavin Seddon
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 
University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester 
M13 9PL, U.K.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-16 Thread Brett Johnson
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:56:38PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
 description: SCSI storage controller
 product: 360P
 vendor: Initio Corporation
 version: 02
http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/showproduct.php?product=50sort=8cat=310page=1
 from 2003 where the author could not get it working in 2.5 kernel. What 
version kernel was your previous OS?
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-16 Thread Gavin Seddon
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 09:17 -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
 On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:56:38PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:
  description: SCSI storage controller
  product: 360P
  vendor: Initio Corporation
  version: 02
 http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/showproduct.php?product=50sort=8cat=310page=1
  from 2003 where the author could not get it working in 2.5 kernel. What 
 version kernel was your previous OS?
This is my 1st Gentoo and the tape never worked on Debian.  It does work
on Redhat/Fedora but a tape's not a good reason to use this.

My kernel is
'kernel-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.14-gentoo-r2'


-- 
Dr Gavin Seddon
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 
University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester 
M13 9PL, U.K.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-16 Thread Drake Donahue

in addition to lshw, there is also an lsscsi in portage
appears initio and linux have ended their affair
is not a second /third drive a cheaper faster safer backup than scsi tape?
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work



On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:26:23PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote:

This is my 1st Gentoo and the tape never worked on Debian.  It does work
on Redhat/Fedora but a tape's not a good reason to use this.


Is the Redhat/Fedora system it works on a 2.4 or 2.6 kernel?
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-12 Thread Gavin Seddon
I thought comments should be posted at the top of the rply so users
don't have to scroll thru' endless postings to reach the necessary
'bit'.  
Also, No, I cannot ping this machine when it locks-up.  I tried this
first.
I will build kernels with both kinds of board to see which works.



On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 04:57 -0700, Duncan wrote:
 Gavin Seddon posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
 below,  on Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:50:56 +:
 
  Is there a way of determining the board type, other than opening the box
  and removing the card.  I don't have it's original box.
  Thanks.
  
  
  On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 07:39 -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
   
  What model initio board do you have? There are two
  different initio drivers, and the one called initio is for the 9100
  series chipset. It's possible loading the wrong chipset could lock up
  the pc, or at least the console. When the console locks up, I like to go
  to a different terminal (pc) and see if I can ping the frozen pc. If so,
  then try to ssh in (assuming ssh is running) and see if I can shut it
  down remotely.
 
 Annoying very.
 Q:  Top posting is...?
 
 (Of course, note that you should trim quotes to the context to which you
 are replying as well, which top-quoting, as opposed to top-posting,
 encourages.  If you would have trimmed what you were quoting to the
 above, sufficient to establish context, then I would not have needed to do
 it for you, here, and the context would have been sufficiently established
 so all I would have needed to do would have been to post my reply, plus
 possibly trimming out deeper nested quoting, if you had included it, since
 it's no longer necessary to establish the context to which I'm now
 replying.)
 
 To answer your question, try lspci (ls for the PCI bus).  If the output
 isn't verbose enough to give you the detail you need, try lspci -v (for
 verbose).  It's a /very/ handy program to keep in your virtual toolbox,
 particularly if you don't fancy opening up your box all the time to read
 stuff off of the various chips and cards, let alone that even doing that
 wouldn't directly give you the same level of detail that lspci -v does.
 lspci is part of pciutils, in case you don't already have it merged, but
 you likely do, at least if you have either alsa-utils or hotplug merged.
 
 FWIW, there's also a parallel lsusb, part of (no surprise) usbutils. =8^)
 
 -- 
 Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
 Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
 and if you use the program, he is your master.  Richard Stallman in
 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
 
 
-- 
Dr Gavin Seddon
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 
University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester 
M13 9PL, U.K.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-12 Thread Steve Herber

Besides lspci and lsusb, I like lshw.

sys-apps/lshw


From the man page:


lshw is a small tool to extract detailed information  on  the  hardware
configuration of the machine. It can report exact memory configuration,
firmware version, mainboard configuration, CPU version and speed, cache
configuration,  bus speed, etc. on DMI-capable x86 or IA-64 systems and
on some PowerPC machines (PowerMac G4 is known to work).

It currently supports DMI (x86 and  IA-64  only),  OpenFirmware device
tree  (PowerPC only), PCI/AGP, CPUID (x86), IDE/ATA/ATAPI, PCMCIA (only
tested on x86), SCSI and USB.

How much am I supposed to trim from the quoted article???


Steve Herber[EMAIL PROTECTED]   work: 206-221-7262
Security Engineer, UW Medicine, IT Services home: 425-454-2399

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Duncan wrote:


Gavin Seddon posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below,  on Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:50:56 +:


Is there a way of determining the board type, other than opening the box
and removing the card.  I don't have it's original box.
Thanks.


On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 07:39 -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:



What model initio board do you have? There are two
different initio drivers, and the one called initio is for the 9100
series chipset. It's possible loading the wrong chipset could lock up
the pc, or at least the console. When the console locks up, I like to go
to a different terminal (pc) and see if I can ping the frozen pc. If so,
then try to ssh in (assuming ssh is running) and see if I can shut it
down remotely.



To answer your question, try lspci (ls for the PCI bus).  If the output
isn't verbose enough to give you the detail you need, try lspci -v (for
verbose).  It's a /very/ handy program to keep in your virtual toolbox,
particularly if you don't fancy opening up your box all the time to read
stuff off of the various chips and cards, let alone that even doing that
wouldn't directly give you the same level of detail that lspci -v does.
lspci is part of pciutils, in case you don't already have it merged, but
you likely do, at least if you have either alsa-utils or hotplug merged.

FWIW, there's also a parallel lsusb, part of (no surprise) usbutils. =8^)

--
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master.  Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html

--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: initio seen, mt -f doesn't work

2005-12-08 Thread Gavin Seddon
Yes /dev/st0 is there.  How should I start the device, as far as I
remember I built all scsi modules into the kernel.
Gavin.
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 07:40 -0700, Duncan wrote:
 find /dev/ -name st0
-- 
Dr Gavin Seddon
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 
University of Manchester
Oxford Road, Manchester 
M13 9PL, U.K.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list