Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Ideas for projects...
Josh Saddler a écrit : Ryan Hill wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of Council-driven projects. How far was Curtis from finishing www-redesign? The whole thing was pretty much scrapped. The CSS was done to some extent, but our underlying xsl backend hadn't been finished. As far as I know the redesign has been suspended indefinitely. *and then* Curtis disappeared some months ago, to top it off. Is there any chance this project could resurface but in a more incremental way, instead of hitting straight for the home run? Just an idea :) Rémi -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-misc/pglogd
Masked www-misc/pglogd for removal on 13.02.2007. Dead upstream, no release in 2 years and doesn't work with PostgreSQL 8.X releases. An alternative for the Apache webserver is mod_log_sql. -- Best regards, Luca Longinotti aka CHTEKK LongiTEKK Networks Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Dev: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SysCP Dev: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TILUG Supporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for projects...
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of Council-driven projects. packages.g.o is a really helpful tool - which could be even more helpful if there where some people behind it... and also the list of aging ebuilds with unstable keywords could be another project that perhaps could be revitalised through the council's action... kind regards Thilo pgpUMiduwnGv0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-apps/mkcfm
Masked for removal today (January 13, 2007). Package never went stable on any arches, doesn't build against newer libXfont versions[1], and is deprecated upstream[2][3]. Josh [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157112 [2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-November/020106.html [3] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5553 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Changing licenses/BSD
Anyone oppose the attached patch for making the BSD license more readable? I just came across this way for writing it in one package and think it would be easier to understand this way. Regards, Petteri Index: BSD === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/licenses/BSD,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 BSD --- BSD 11 Aug 2002 23:27:44 - 1.3 +++ BSD 13 Jan 2007 18:43:22 - @@ -4,14 +4,14 @@ Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: -* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, -* this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. -* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright -* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the -* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. -* Neither the name of the ORGANIZATION nor the names of its -* contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from -* this software without specific prior written permission. +1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, + this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright + notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the + documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. +3. Neither the name of the ORGANIZATION nor the names of its + contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from + this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] New profiles/ChangeLog
On Fri, 2007-12-01 at 09:29 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: There's a ChangeLog file in profiles/ChangeLog now. Please use it when making changes to things in profiles/*... Almost all entries un profiles/ChangeLog are related to package.mask. We had a little discussion in #gentoo-dev and found it redundant. I think we should exclude changes to package.mask from that changelog otherwise it will drown in noise. -- Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/centericq needs a new maintainer
On Tue, 2007-09-01 at 09:35 +0100, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: net-im/centericq is without an ebuild maintainer and has an open security bug #160793 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160793 Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug. Its also unmaintained upstream and is showing its age. Its now masked and will be removed in 30 days if no one comes forward, and becomes a new quasi-upstream. -- Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-portage-dev] Making doins die with FEATURES=stricter if the destination file exists
Now doins silently overwrites files. Would probably be useful to make it at least echo a message about this and maybe die with FEATURES=stricter. What do you think? Regards, Petteri -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
