Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies

2007-06-17 Thread Kent Fredric

On 6/18/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > Paludis allows users to do some-cat/foo[>=4.0&<4-3] and
>> > some-cat/foo[=4.1|=4.2|=4.3] . The syntax isn't particularly pretty,
>> > but it's cleaner than requiring duplication of the cat/pkg. Combined
>> > with :slot deps it should give you everything you need.
>>
>> Seems not bad, do you have plans to refine it before proposing it for
>> the pms?
>
> Well, I'm happy with it like that...
>
but as you said, it ain't pretty: what about simply replacing [] with ()?
&& to match || in portage and logical AND in C etc. seems wise too.
Allow both if you *have* to maintain backwards-compatibility, but it makes
it more like portage syntax, which folks are used to:
some-cat/foo(>=4.0&&<4.3) seems clean, for this example.

To my mind, | seems like a good second-level operator, so one could have:
cat-foo/bar(~3.6||~3.7|>=4.0&&<4.3|>=5.1) while still using the operators
everyone is used to for most things.

(& makes no sense in that context, of course.)


If you can, try integrate a name based syntax into the requirement.
using decorative characters alone may have their uses, but there are
only so many you can use, and so many combinations you can create
before all your code starts looking like perl's acme eyedrops. I say
name based, because this allows some degree of permitting forward
development & enhancement without majorly breaking an existing system
:)

( im not much of a lisper, but lisp a lot of functionality for the
cost of very minimal symbol abuse . .im not saying we should use lisp
syntax, but maybe a page from their book in terms of expandability )
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNOSPicAMreil [EMAIL PROTECTED]"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > Paludis allows users to do some-cat/foo[>=4.0&<4-3] and
>> > some-cat/foo[=4.1|=4.2|=4.3] . The syntax isn't particularly pretty,
>> > but it's cleaner than requiring duplication of the cat/pkg. Combined
>> > with :slot deps it should give you everything you need.
>> 
>> Seems not bad, do you have plans to refine it before proposing it for
>> the pms?
> 
> Well, I'm happy with it like that...
> 
but as you said, it ain't pretty: what about simply replacing [] with ()?
&& to match || in portage and logical AND in C etc. seems wise too.
Allow both if you *have* to maintain backwards-compatibility, but it makes
it more like portage syntax, which folks are used to:
some-cat/foo(>=4.0&&<4.3) seems clean, for this example.

To my mind, | seems like a good second-level operator, so one could have:
cat-foo/bar(~3.6||~3.7|>=4.0&&<4.3|>=5.1) while still using the operators
everyone is used to for most things.

(& makes no sense in that context, of course.)


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
> piece of software. We're not debian.

Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to
the new -project ml if and when, or indeed the user forums.

As for potentially useful, so was Internet Explorer, last time I looked at
what you could do with its Object Model. I still ain't voting to bring it
to Gentoo.. ;)


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] merging man page documentation into eclasses

2007-06-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 11 June 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> keeping documentation of functions in a separate file (man pages in this
> case) has obvious bit rot problems written all over it, so i'd like to
> merge the documentation into the respective eclasses so that the man pages
> can be automatically generated

ive added docs to eutils.eclass and you can find the awk script in 
app-portage/eclass-manpages/files/eclass-to-manpage.awk for people who want 
to review
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-06-17 23h59 UTC

2007-06-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2007-06-17 23h59 UTC.

Removals:
x11-wm/ion3 2007-06-11 21:52:31 mabi
www-misc/libapreq   2007-06-13 12:24:30 chtekk
dev-perl/AxKit  2007-06-13 12:25:41 chtekk
dev-lisp/cl-modlisp 2007-06-13 12:31:49 chtekk
dev-lisp/cl-imho2007-06-13 12:33:07 chtekk
www-apache/mod_backhand 2007-06-13 12:33:57 chtekk
www-apache/mod_lisp 2007-06-13 12:33:57 chtekk
net-www/mod_bandwidth   2007-06-13 12:35:33 chtekk
net-www/mod_dav 2007-06-13 12:35:33 chtekk
net-www/mod_gzip2007-06-13 12:35:33 chtekk
net-www/mod_mp3 2007-06-13 12:35:33 chtekk
net-www/mod_ssl 2007-06-13 12:35:33 chtekk
net-www/mod_throttle2007-06-13 12:35:33 chtekk
net-www/gentoo-webroot-default  2007-06-13 14:17:09 chtekk
net-www/lingerd 2007-06-13 14:17:09 chtekk
dev-tex/preview-latex   2007-06-14 06:56:51 opfer
app-crypt/kth-krb   2007-06-16 15:44:25 seemant

Additions:
sec-policy/selinux-games2007-06-11 12:18:15 kaiowas
sec-policy/selinux-inetd2007-06-11 12:29:32 kaiowas
sec-policy/selinux-ppp  2007-06-11 12:32:48 kaiowas
sec-policy/selinux-pyzor2007-06-11 12:35:59 kaiowas
sec-policy/selinux-razor2007-06-11 12:37:49 kaiowas
sec-policy/selinux-tcpd 2007-06-11 12:40:26 kaiowas
rox-extra/rox-wifi  2007-06-12 16:41:15 lack
media-libs/capseo   2007-06-14 14:30:57 trapni
media-libs/libcaptury   2007-06-14 14:37:53 trapni
media-sound/bitmeter2007-06-14 15:12:53 drac
sci-chemistry/jmol  2007-06-15 08:21:59 je_fro
app-editors/ersatz-emacs2007-06-15 08:53:21 ulm
app-editors/uemacs-pk   2007-06-15 08:59:35 ulm
sys-apps/more   2007-06-15 23:54:44 lavajoe
app-portage/eclass-manpages 2007-06-16 08:07:34 vapier
sci-misc/pythoncad  2007-06-16 17:01:34 cedk
xfce-extra/xfburn   2007-06-16 18:47:22 drac
net-misc/batmand2007-06-16 23:31:07 cedk
kde-misc/kate-symbolviewer-plugin   2007-06-17 09:15:39 philantrop
mail-filter/simscan 2007-06-17 11:46:24 hollow
sys-fs/fuse-python  2007-06-17 12:51:13 jmglov
dev-libs/libxdg-basedir 2007-06-17 18:47:47 flameeyes
app-editors/fe  2007-06-17 19:15:38 ulm
kde-misc/quadkonsole2007-06-17 20:27:41 philantrop
media-video/devede  2007-06-17 21:56:09 drac

--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
Removed Packages:
x11-wm/ion3,removed,mabi,2007-06-11 21:52:31
www-misc/libapreq,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:24:30
dev-perl/AxKit,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:25:41
dev-lisp/cl-modlisp,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:31:49
dev-lisp/cl-imho,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:33:07
www-apache/mod_backhand,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:33:57
www-apache/mod_lisp,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:33:57
net-www/mod_bandwidth,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:35:33
net-www/mod_dav,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:35:33
net-www/mod_gzip,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:35:33
net-www/mod_mp3,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:35:33
net-www/mod_ssl,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:35:33
net-www/mod_throttle,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 12:35:33
net-www/gentoo-webroot-default,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 14:17:09
net-www/lingerd,removed,chtekk,2007-06-13 14:17:09
dev-tex/preview-latex,removed,opfer,2007-06-14 06:56:51
app-crypt/kth-krb,removed,seemant,2007-06-16 15:44:25
Added Packages:
sec-policy/selinux-games,added,kaiowas,2007-06-11 12:18:15
sec-policy/selinux-inetd,added,kaiowas,2007-06-11 12:29:32
sec-policy/selinux-ppp,added,kaiowas,2007-06-11 12:32:48
sec-policy/selinux-pyzor,added,kaiowas,2007-06-11 12:35:59
sec-policy/selinux-razor,added,kaiowas,2007-06-11 12:37:49
sec-policy/selinux-tcpd,added,kaiowas,2007-06-11 12:40:26
rox-extra/rox-wifi,added,lack,2007-06-12 16:41:15
media-libs/capseo,added,trapni,2007-06-14 14:30:57
media-libs/libcaptury,added,trapni,2007-06-14 14:37:53
media-sound/bitmeter,added,drac,2007-06-14 15:12:53
sci-chemistry/jmol,added,je_fro,2007-06-15 08:21:59
app-editors/ersatz-emacs,added,ulm,2007-06-15 08:53:21
app-editors/uemacs-pk,added,ulm,2007-06-15 08:59:35
sys-apps/more,added,lavajoe,2007-06-15 23:54:44
app-portage/ecla

Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

George Shapovalov wrote:
> Sunday, 17. June 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) Ви написали:
>> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and
>> installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there
>> a standard way to do this?
> I'd say - split the package in two (or how many pieces there are). Such 
> procedure implies that the parts are already well isolated, so the split 
> should not be that hard to do. Trying to force it "in one go" is not trivial 
> usually, unless what you are talking about is some bootstrap procedure. 
> However in that case there should be a certain way of "proper bootstrapping" 
> for the package described in its install docs.
> 
> George

Splitting the package is a good idea indeed.

If it is needed a bootstrapping , you could build a binary version of
the necessary components of the package, that's what we do with ghc and
many of the languages packages inside dev-lang.

Regards,

- --

Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org"
Gentoo Linux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGdbYfaTNpke9pJcURAmm6AKCMZQZC6tvFbgHu9dUb0c8ahpQfIgCgiLMU
YnKpHz22OvjdyYLlF8l7+9k=
=99fq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Josh Saddler wrote:
> As we've established earlier, being closed-source is not sufficient
> reason for removing any program from Portage; you should have read the
> rest of the thread.

No but fascist license conditions are; you should have read the ion3
discussion.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Agreed, although I think most people would agree with the principle
> being alluded to.  I don't think many people had issues with making
> users fetch their java files, as they generally had stable URLs and were
> hosted for a long time.  The real issue is with software where old
> versions are completely deprecated a day after something newer is
> available.  Many games fall into this zone, and as a result they rarely
> become stable packages.
>
Good point; it seems to me to imply that this isn't in fact a QA issue, but
a license one. In which case, it comes down to: if a provider wants their
software in Gentoo, they either accept it will be forever unstable, or
forget about their nonsensical license terms.

As usual, this is only my opinion. I believe skype in fact make money from
their software being in Gentoo? I really cannot understand why there is
more sympathy for their position and so little for the ion3 author (apart
from his insane mail to arch of course ;) who afaict hasn't made a lot from
his work, apart from the odd paypal donation, which many users want to
keep. Or is it that Skype are a big company so we have to kowtow? /me is
well-confused.

(This is not for games, where practical consideration means updates are
needed quickly, and are thus usually kept in ~ as noted. Although, using
one of tuomov's ideas could change that too.. teh sigh.)


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:06:32 +0200
_JusSx_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Let's remove it from portage. why should we use it? I run it for a
> bit I can say it's awful... it is closed-source, is not it? so I
> think it's better not to install it...

Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
piece of software. We're not debian.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Josh Saddler
_JusSx_ wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
>> A little background info: Right now there are three versions of
>> net-im/skype in the tree:
>>
>> 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version)
>> 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version
>> 3- the 1.4 series with a ~/hardmask version
>>
>> Also the skype license states that we cannot mirror it's files (this
>> will be need later)
>>
>> The 1.4 series will have a version released soon that skype wants to
>> become the standard stable version, it has many new features and bette=
r
>> audio quality.
>>
>> I as Gentoo Dev and Skype Betatester was informed that starting on Jun=
e
>> 19th Skype will no longer provide downloads for the 1.2 and 1.3 versio=
n,
>> and that means that 1.4 will be released some time before. For Gentoo
>> that means that starting from the 19th users on the stable profile wil=
l
>> not be able to install skype as no files will be available from upstre=
am.
>>
>> So the thing is, as soon as Skype releases the 1.4 stable version I'm
>> going to have it in tree and we need to have it tested ASAP on the
>> stable profile. My thing is with the time between, we will have 5 days=

>> tops or users will not be able to install.
>>
>> Suggestions:
>> 1- in the 19th remove skype < 1.4 from the tree
>> 2- Make < 1.4 ebuilds "empty" and leave them on the tree and ewarn the=

>> users to use the unstable skype
>>
>>
>> The first option will trigger portage errors and prompt users to open
>> bugs until we have a stable 1.4, the second gives us a chance to expla=
in
>> the issue.
>>
>> Any alternatives?
>>
>> --=20
>> Gustavo Felisberto
>> (HumpBack)
>> Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~humpback
>> Blog: http://blog.felisberto.net/
>> 
>> It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at
>> http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html .
>> -
>>
>>
> Let's remove it from portage. why should we use it? I run it for a bit =
I
> can say it's awful... it is closed-source, is not it? so I think it's
> better not to install it...

As we've established earlier, being closed-source is not sufficient
reason for removing any program from Portage; you should have read the
rest of the thread.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building
> and installing something and then using that to build something else.
> Is there a standard way to do this?

Perhaps you could build the build tools and install them to some
directory under the temporary build directory and use them from there by
adding that directory to $PATH or by calling them with full pathnames. 

Do the build tools in question need to be installed along with the
desired end product, or are they nothing more than integrated build
prerequisites?

-- 
"Such things have often happened and still happen,
 and how can these be signs of the end of the world?"
  -- Julian, Emperor of Rome 361-363 A.D.


pgp7smkKwYLtj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread George Shapovalov
Sunday, 17. June 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) Ви написали:
> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and
> installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there
> a standard way to do this?
I'd say - split the package in two (or how many pieces there are). Such 
procedure implies that the parts are already well isolated, so the split 
should not be that hard to do. Trying to force it "in one go" is not trivial 
usually, unless what you are talking about is some bootstrap procedure. 
However in that case there should be a certain way of "proper bootstrapping" 
for the package described in its install docs.

George
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)

Hi list,

I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and 
installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a 
standard way to do this?


Marijn

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Martin Jackson

Christian Heim wrote:

On Sunday 17 June 2007 14:43:59 Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:

i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
bind's maintaining?


What happened to mjolnir (as in Martin Jackson) ? Didn't he also join the bind 
herd, to help you fix stuff ?


I'm still here...somewhat arch-limited and having a real life too. :) 
The latest stabilization problems cropped up on arches I don't have 
access to.


Thanks,
Marty
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Christian Heim
On Sunday 17 June 2007 14:43:59 Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
>   i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> bind's maintaining?

What happened to mjolnir (as in Martin Jackson) ? Didn't he also join the bind 
herd, to help you fix stuff ?

Regards,

   Christian

-- 
Christian Heim 
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Konstantin V. Arkhipov
On Sunday 17 June 2007 19:12:51 Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a):
> > > Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> > >>  i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> > >> bind's maintaining?
> > >
> > > What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs?
> >
> > Not really... 8 bugs altogether, 2 enhancements, 2 stabilization, 1
> > LDAP-related, 2 DLZ related, 1 hardened.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/3cwhjv
>
> Thanks Jakub :) I saved this search-command and try to help w/ bind.

thank you.

-- 
voxus
:wq


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a):
> > Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> >>i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with 
> >> bind's 
> >> maintaining?
> > 
> > What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs?
> 
> Not really... 8 bugs altogether, 2 enhancements, 2 stabilization, 1
> LDAP-related, 2 DLZ related, 1 hardened.
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/3cwhjv

Thanks Jakub :) I saved this search-command and try to help w/ bind.

wkr,
  Tobias


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread _JusSx_
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
> A little background info: Right now there are three versions of
> net-im/skype in the tree:
> 
> 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version)
> 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version
> 3- the 1.4 series with a ~/hardmask version
> 
> Also the skype license states that we cannot mirror it's files (this
> will be need later)
> 
> The 1.4 series will have a version released soon that skype wants to
> become the standard stable version, it has many new features and better
> audio quality.
> 
> I as Gentoo Dev and Skype Betatester was informed that starting on June
> 19th Skype will no longer provide downloads for the 1.2 and 1.3 version,
> and that means that 1.4 will be released some time before. For Gentoo
> that means that starting from the 19th users on the stable profile will
> not be able to install skype as no files will be available from upstream.
> 
> So the thing is, as soon as Skype releases the 1.4 stable version I'm
> going to have it in tree and we need to have it tested ASAP on the
> stable profile. My thing is with the time between, we will have 5 days
> tops or users will not be able to install.
> 
> Suggestions:
> 1- in the 19th remove skype < 1.4 from the tree
> 2- Make < 1.4 ebuilds "empty" and leave them on the tree and ewarn the
> users to use the unstable skype
> 
> 
> The first option will trigger portage errors and prompt users to open
> bugs until we have a stable 1.4, the second gives us a chance to explain
> the issue.
> 
> Any alternatives?
> 
> -- 
> Gustavo Felisberto
> (HumpBack)
> Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~humpback
> Blog: http://blog.felisberto.net/
> 
> It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at
> http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html .
> -
> 
> 
Let's remove it from portage. why should we use it? I run it for a bit I
can say it's awful... it is closed-source, is not it? so I think it's
better not to install it...



-- 
Linux is only free if your time has no value

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Jakub Moc
Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a):
> Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
>>  i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with 
>> bind's 
>> maintaining?
> 
> What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs?

Not really... 8 bugs altogether, 2 enhancements, 2 stabilization, 1
LDAP-related, 2 DLZ related, 1 hardened.

http://tinyurl.com/3cwhjv

-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Konstantin V. Arkhipov
On Sunday 17 June 2007 17:02:31 Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> > i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> > bind's maintaining?
>
> What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? How
> much attention do these packages need?

there is only one quite critical bug - 181703, which prevents stabilization of 
9.4.

-- 
voxus
:wq


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
>   i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with 
> bind's 
> maintaining?

What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? How
much attention do these packages need?

wkr,
  Tobias


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Konstantin V. Arkhipov

i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with 
bind's 
maintaining?

-- 
voxus
:wq


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.