Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 19:57 +0100, Markus Meier wrote:
> novideo   5

These should probably really go away and use package.use and such to use
the already-existing videos USE flag.

> branding: Enable Gentoo specific branding
> [questionable, as used for splashes/shortcuts/artwork]

Well, my personal opinion here is that we should enable this by default
on *at least* the desktop profiles, as providing sensible defaults and
branding isn't outside the scope of the project.  We still stay as close
to upstream as possible with this stuff and only use it for branding or
optional Gentoo-specific minor config changes.  Also, it can still be
disabled for people who want everything as upstream intended.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2007-12-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 25 décembre 2007 à 18:19 +, Christian Heim a écrit :
> Okay, today was another tree-wrecking^Hcleaning day. Find below the
> packages that got assigned to maintainer-needed due to no maintainer
> being available.
> 
> As usual you are free to pick them up, if you'd like to maintain them...
> 

if noones wants them, I'll take the following:

>  - app-admin/sudo
 but probably belongs to base-system
>  - dev-util/ccache
 but probably belongs to toolchain

and finally,
>  - net-wireless/rt2x00
 I might need this one for work, but it's not set in stone yet so if
anybody has the hardware, please pick this one up.

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs

2007-12-26 Thread Petteri Räty
Christian Heim kirjoitti:
> 
> As usual you are free to pick them up, if you'd like to maintain them...
> 
>  - dev-java/scala-bin

java herd takes this

Regards,
Petteri



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2007-12-26 Thread Bernd Steinhauser
Gilles Dartiguelongue schrieb:
>>  - net-wireless/rt2x00
>  I might need this one for work, but it's not set in stone yet so if
> anybody has the hardware, please pick this one up.
> 

rt2x00 will be introduced in kernel 2.6.24, so that package might be
deprecated then.

Bernd
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Old ebuilds in bugzilla

2007-12-26 Thread Bernd Steinhauser
Hi,

I was searching a bit through bugzilla for some ebuilds for programs,
that are not yet in portage and I found, there are a lot of programs
hanging in buzilla, because no one did take them for maintenance.

Now some of them are quite old (no comments/activity for 2 years) and I
tried some of them and found out, that sometimes they don't even
compile anymore.
Now I was wondering, if there is a standard procedure for things
like this; I searched the mailing list for sth. like this, but didn't find
anything there.
So my question is, is there some kind of standard procedure for old
ebuilds that lay around bugzilla, and if not, maybe there should be one?

I was thinking about something like this:
- Categorize ebuild requests, so one category should contain the programs,
that aren't developed anymore, one category those, that are still developed,
but won't work with a current toolchain/system, and those programs, that
will still work with current systems.
- Add them to some kind of tracker, so some users that are up to it can try
to fix them, and report that, and if it not fixable, resolve the bugs as
wontfix.
- Maybe make use of the vote system, so bugs with ebuilds, that are
quite old
and don't have votes, will be closed after something like 2 years with no
activity (but that would include to tell users, that they have to vote).

Maybe there are better ways handling this.
But I think, there is at least a problem with the number of "dead" ebuilds
in bugzilla, because I think, that at least those, that will still work
should be
picked out.

Bernd
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Re: Old ebuilds in bugzilla

2007-12-26 Thread Markus Ullmann
Raised that a month or two ago here, conclusion:

If you find something dead, just ping someone with appropriate rights to
wontfix it.

When you care about that pkg, either find a maintainer for it or take it
up to sunrise overlay yourself. :)

Greetz
-Jokey



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-dev] Fonts Team Status

2007-12-26 Thread Ryan Hill

After the dev-ercizing yesterday, and after talking it over with
the remaining Fonts team members (matsuu & lu_zero), it seems I've
inherited the lead position of the Fonts team.  This post is an FYI
and a Request for Help.  All members of the fonts team (including me)
are very busy with other projects at this time.  If there's anyone
out there interested in helping us out, feel free to join. :)  Most
of the work is basic maintenance, version bumps and stabilizing,
though there are a couple bigger bugs that need attention soon.

Thanks.


--
   looks like christmas at fifty-five degrees
   this latitude weakens my knees
   EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD  C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 (0xF9A40662)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2007-12-26 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Dec 25, 2007 7:19 PM, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  - media-gfx/f-spot

I'll adopt this one if nobody wants it.

Denis.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Asterisk 1.4 in Portage

2007-12-26 Thread Doug Klima
Howdy all,

As some people might have noticed, I've wanted to bring Asterisk 1.4 to
the tree proper. The big holdup is the zaptel ebuild, which needs to be
revamped and brought in as well for the 1.4.x series. I've already
rewritten most of it, the only issue is I don't have hardware to test
(nor do I want any). So I'd like if someone out there that used/had
zaptel hardware would pick up the ebuild. If you're interested, drop me
a line. I'll send you over a 1.4.x ebuild.

--
Doug Klima
Gentoo Developer
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Git support on cvs.gentoo.org

2007-12-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
In a similar vein to my post about Git for overlays.gentoo.org, 
I'm pleased to announce Git support for cvs.gentoo.org.

Like other cvs.gentoo.org services, they are developer-commit only, and
are replicated to anoncvs.gentoo.org for anonymous access.

If you want a Git repository, please file your request at bug 196025.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgpkw1jHx88eb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Developer testers wanted for Git-support on overlays.gentoo.org

2007-12-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi folks,

I'm looking for some more testers for something shiny and new:
Namely the new Git support for overlay hosting (actually, you can host
any Gentoo-related Git repo with it, it'll be the home of Uberlord's new
*RC, and PMS ultimately).

I already set up the existing folk with Git overlays from overlays.g.o,
but I need more testers. For now I'm asking specifically for developers
for testing, but those repos will ultimately be open to any authorized
committer (eg ciaranm for PMS, uberlord for *RC).

Anybody willing to be a tester, please ping me via email or on IRC.
(email me if I'm not actually present at IRC when you want me).

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgp1PKuX7voTM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs

2007-12-26 Thread Saleem Abdulrasool
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Christian Heim wrote: 

>  - app-shells/zsh-completion

If no one else wants this, Ill take it.

-- 
Saleem Abdulrasool
compnerd (at) gentoo (dot) org


pgp7WQMyDxPzR.pgp
Description: PGP signature