[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-01-11 23h59 UTC
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2009-01-11 23h59 UTC. Removals: net-news/straw 2009-01-05 22:41:32 eva net-misc/logjam 2009-01-05 22:49:25 eva net-misc/nxclient-2xterminalserver 2009-01-07 09:00:15 voyageur net-misc/nxserver-2xterminalserver 2009-01-07 09:00:15 voyageur kde-misc/kio_perldoc2009-01-08 02:24:55 darkside dev-lang/prc-tools 2009-01-08 02:26:40 darkside dev-lang/palmos-sdk 2009-01-08 02:27:10 darkside www-apps/trac-webadmin 2009-01-08 21:25:38 wrobel sys-apps/mktemp 2009-01-09 06:10:29 vapier app-office/oooqs2009-01-11 20:24:09 suka app-office/ooqstart-gnome 2009-01-11 20:24:09 suka Additions: net-wireless/iw 2009-01-05 05:03:08 rbu dev-dotnet/atk-sharp2009-01-05 17:13:17 loki_val dev-dotnet/gdk-sharp2009-01-05 17:14:06 loki_val dev-dotnet/glib-sharp 2009-01-05 17:14:53 loki_val dev-dotnet/gtk-dotnet-sharp 2009-01-05 17:17:07 loki_val dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-gapi 2009-01-05 17:18:19 loki_val dev-dotnet/pango-sharp 2009-01-05 17:19:37 loki_val net-voip/telepathy-sofiasip 2009-01-06 03:42:22 tester app-office/hourglass2009-01-06 08:14:53 ali_bush dev-python/rpyc 2009-01-06 11:02:37 grozin dev-python/pyPdf2009-01-06 11:07:25 grozin net-libs/ice2009-01-07 15:19:18 b33fc0d3 net-libs/icee 2009-01-07 15:24:59 b33fc0d3 net-misc/nxsadmin 2009-01-07 15:35:10 voyageur sys-boot/unetbootin 2009-01-08 18:12:03 jer mail-filter/procmail-lib2009-01-09 16:48:12 dertobi123 app-dicts/gwaei 2009-01-09 17:39:39 matsuu dev-lang/logtalk2009-01-10 04:36:28 keri app-dicts/aspell-de-alt 2009-01-10 11:13:31 ulm dev-perl/X-Osd 2009-01-10 12:57:38 beandog media-plugins/hexter2009-01-10 13:49:35 aballier media-plugins/xsynth-dssi 2009-01-10 14:04:42 aballier media-plugins/gmpc-playlistsort 2009-01-10 17:34:22 angelos media-plugins/banshee-lyrics2009-01-10 21:39:14 loki_val app-dicts/sword-armeastern 2009-01-11 00:04:42 beandog app-dicts/sword-armwestern 2009-01-11 00:06:46 beandog app-dicts/sword-bashautin 2009-01-11 00:08:06 beandog app-dicts/sword-burjudson 2009-01-11 00:09:09 beandog app-dicts/sword-dbd 2009-01-11 00:10:41 beandog app-dicts/sword-emtv2009-01-11 00:11:48 beandog app-dicts/sword-family 2009-01-11 00:13:35 beandog app-dicts/sword-finpr92 2009-01-11 00:15:48 beandog app-dicts/sword-frebbb 2009-01-11 00:18:32 beandog app-dicts/sword-frecrampon 2009-01-11 00:19:45 beandog app-dicts/sword-fremartin 2009-01-11 00:21:06 beandog app-dicts/sword-fresegond 2009-01-11 00:22:12 beandog app-dicts/sword-geneva 2009-01-11 00:23:04 beandog dev-perl/pcsc-perl 2009-01-11 01:37:45 nerdboy sys-apps/pcsc-tools 2009-01-11 01:56:57 nerdboy dev-java/sbaz 2009-01-11 03:54:28 ali_bush -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 Removed Packages: net-news/straw,removed,eva,2009-01-05 22:41:32 net-misc/logjam,removed,eva,2009-01-05 22:49:25 net-misc/nxclient-2xterminalserver,removed,voyageur,2009-01-07 09:00:15 net-misc/nxserver-2xterminalserver,removed,voyageur,2009-01-07 09:00:15 kde-misc/kio_perldoc,removed,darkside,2009-01-08 02:24:55 dev-lang/prc-tools,removed,darkside,2009-01-08 02:26:40 dev-lang/palmos-sdk,removed,darkside,2009-01-08 02:27:10 www-apps/trac-webadmin,removed,wrobel,2009-01-08 21:25:38 sys-apps/mktemp,removed,vapier,2009-01-09 06:10:29 app-office/oooqs,removed,suka,2009-01-11 20:24:09 app-office/ooqstart-gnome,removed,suka,2009-01-11 20:24:09 Added Packages: net-wireless/iw,added,rbu,2009-01-05 05:03:08 dev-dotnet/atk-sharp,added,loki_val,2009-01-05 17:13:17 dev-dotnet/gdk-sharp,added,loki_val,2009-01-05 17:14:06 dev-dotnet/glib-sharp,added,loki_val,2009-01-05 17:14:53 dev-dotnet/gtk-dotnet-sharp,added,loki_val,2009-01-05 17:17:07 dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-gapi,added,loki_val,2009-01-05 17:18:19 dev-dotnet/pango-sharp,added,loki_val,2009-01-
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman -d or not -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Veller wrote: > How do we use the -d config switch of repoman? > Do I use it if i bump packages, add new dependencies? > Is it mainly for the maintainers of the profile/arch? It's a good idea to use it when adding any new dependencies, since that's the most common time when it really matters. The rationale for not doing it by default is that it approximately doubles the time consumed by repoman to check dependencies (more profiles == more time). - -- Thanks, Zac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklqUeQACgkQ/ejvha5XGaNiqACeL8vTZ5e3QXrUgwK4KgxPuu+1 N2gAoL7T/ZmnhiHvgIf0wUsN40+rtHLQ =wx7T -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] repoman -d or not -d
How do we use the -d config switch of repoman? Do I use it if i bump packages, add new dependencies? Is it mainly for the maintainers of the profile/arch? Sorry, if I've missed the discussion. Thanks, Torsten
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates
On Sunday 11 January 2009 08:23:14 Magnus Granberg wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2009 09.39.08 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 10 January 2009 23:52:15 Magnus Granberg wrote: > > > On Sunday 11 January 2009 04.26.00 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:03:17 Ryan Hill wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > > not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some > > > > > > other distros are now carrying: > > > > > > - the -Wformat-security flag is enabled by default > > > > > > - the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag is enabled by default > > > > > > > > > > > > if you dont want this stuff, you can use the flag > > > > > > -Wno-format-security and the flag -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE respectively > > > > > > > > > > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P > > > > > > > > gcc-4.3.2-r0 is still the stable candidate. nothing has changed. > > > > > > Any patches ready? > > > > patches for what ? > > For the FORTIFY and Wformat thing but i will see when it hit the tree. the patches are going into 4.3.2-r3. i'm testing them locally before i push out 4.3.2-r3. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates
On Sunday 11 January 2009 09.39.08 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2009 23:52:15 Magnus Granberg wrote: > > On Sunday 11 January 2009 04.26.00 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:03:17 Ryan Hill wrote: > > > > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some > > > > > other distros are now carrying: > > > > > - the -Wformat-security flag is enabled by default > > > > > - the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag is enabled by default > > > > > > > > > > if you dont want this stuff, you can use the flag > > > > > -Wno-format-security and the flag -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE respectively > > > > > > > > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P > > > > > > gcc-4.3.2-r0 is still the stable candidate. nothing has changed. > > > > Any patches ready? > > patches for what ? > -mike For the FORTIFY and Wformat thing but i will see when it hit the tree.
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:31:03 +0100 Benedikt Böhm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Benedikt Boehm (hollow) schrieb: > > > hollow 09/01/10 21:41:41 > > > > > > Modified: package.mask > > > Log: > > > mask sys-apps/baselayout-vserver for removal > > > > > > Revision ChangesPath > > > 1.9378 profiles/package.mask > > > > > > file : > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&view=markup > > > plain: > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&content-type=text/plain > > > diff : > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.9377&r2=1.9378 > > > > > > Index: package.mask > > > === > > > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > > > retrieving revision 1.9377 > > > retrieving revision 1.9378 > > > diff -u -r1.9377 -r1.9378 > > > --- package.mask 10 Jan 2009 17:17:32 - 1.9377 > > > +++ package.mask 10 Jan 2009 21:41:41 - 1.9378 > > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > > > > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > > > 1.9377 2009/01/10 17:17:32 ulm Exp $ +# > > > $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9378 > > > 2009/01/10 21:41:41 hollow Exp $ # # When you add an entry to the > > > top of this file, add your name, the date, and # an explanation > > > of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely @@ -31,6 > > > +31,11 @@ > > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > > > > > +# Benedikt Böhm (10 Jan 2009) > > > +# baselayout-vserver is unmaintained and obsoleted by > > > +# baselayout-2/openrc. please upgrade. removal in 30 days. > > > +sys-apps/baselayout-vserver > > > + > > > # Rémi Cardona (09 Jan 2009) > > > # old virtual left from the transition from monolithic > > > # to modular X. Use x11-libs/libXft directly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is bad, because: > > > > - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry > > `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog > entry. for the same reason packages have ChangeLogs. cvs logs don't come with the tree. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/45198 -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Benedikt Boehm (hollow) schrieb: > > hollow 09/01/10 21:41:41 > > > > Modified: package.mask > > Log: > > mask sys-apps/baselayout-vserver for removal > > > > Revision ChangesPath > > 1.9378 profiles/package.mask > > > > file : > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&view=markup > > plain: > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&content-type=text/plain > > diff : > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.9377&r2=1.9378 > > > > Index: package.mask > > === > > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > > retrieving revision 1.9377 > > retrieving revision 1.9378 > > diff -u -r1.9377 -r1.9378 > > --- package.mask10 Jan 2009 17:17:32 - 1.9377 > > +++ package.mask10 Jan 2009 21:41:41 - 1.9378 > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9377 > > 2009/01/10 17:17:32 ulm Exp $ > > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9378 > > 2009/01/10 21:41:41 hollow Exp $ > > # > > # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, > > and > > # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely > > @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ > > > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > > > +# Benedikt Böhm (10 Jan 2009) > > +# baselayout-vserver is unmaintained and obsoleted by > > +# baselayout-2/openrc. please upgrade. removal in 30 days. > > +sys-apps/baselayout-vserver > > + > > # Rémi Cardona (09 Jan 2009) > > # old virtual left from the transition from monolithic > > # to modular X. Use x11-libs/libXft directly > > > > > > > > > > This is bad, because: > > - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog entry. > - - you forgot the last rites mail indeed > - - baselayout-2/openrc isn't stable yet, in fact it's even masked in > profiles/targets/vserver/package.mask i don't care. baselayout-vserver is a hack, the vserver profiles are deprecated since ages (although i think the restructuring revived them), and the vserver team (that's only me currently) doesn't support anything else beside openrc. Greets, Bene pgpTyRoGxJdYC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates
On Saturday 10 January 2009 23:52:15 Magnus Granberg wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2009 04.26.00 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:03:17 Ryan Hill wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some other > > > > distros are now carrying: > > > > - the -Wformat-security flag is enabled by default > > > > - the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag is enabled by default > > > > > > > > if you dont want this stuff, you can use the flag > > > > -Wno-format-security and the flag -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE respectively > > > > > > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P > > > > gcc-4.3.2-r0 is still the stable candidate. nothing has changed. > > Any patches ready? patches for what ? -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
