Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-5.10.1 status update
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:10:39 +0100, Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote: * Torsten Vellert...@gentoo.org: After that I'll minimize my perl work if no more people join to help. Plan revised: I stop doing perl work right now. Thanks Thanks to you for all your work on cleaning our perl setup, bringing 5.10.1 in-tree with almost nothing else than when will it be done? bugzilla comments. That is a big achievement Now who has a free time generator machine so more devs (like me) can help? -- Bernard Cafarelli (Voyageur) Gentoo developer (NX, GNUstep, net-misc, net-ftp, ...)
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Several KDE3-only applications.
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (28 Oct 2009) # KDE3-only applications, removed from portage in 30 days. kde-misc/basket kde-misc/dolphin kde-misc/kalbum kde-misc/kaptain kde-misc/katapult kde-misc/kate-symbolviewer-plugin kde-misc/kerry kde-misc/kexchange kde-misc/kima kde-misc/kio-sword kde-misc/kkbswitch kde-misc/kleds kde-misc/knetdockapp kde-misc/knetstats kde-misc/komparator kde-misc/kompose kde-misc/kooldock kde-misc/kopete-ktts kde-misc/krusader-2 kde-misc/ksensors kde-misc/ksmoothdock kde-misc/kvdrmon kde-misc/mtaskbar kde-misc/pwmanager kde-misc/quadkonsole kde-misc/rsibreak-0.10 kde-misc/strigiapplet kde-misc/yakuake-2.9.6 # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (27 Oct 2009) # KDE3-only. Doesn't compile. # # kde-misc/katalog, bug 278031 # kde-misc/kblogger, bugs 260989 and 277820 # kde-misc/kbeam, bugs 276961 and 279788 # # Masked for removal in 30 days. kde-misc/kbeam kde-misc/katalog kde-misc/kblogger # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (26 Oct 2009) # Doesn't work with new xfce-base/exo API, bug #289867. # Replaced by media-video/parole. # Masked for removal in 30 days. media-video/xfmedia # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (25 Oct 2009) # Masked for security. CVE-2009-{3603,3604,3606,3608,3609}. # # http://bugs.gentoo.org/290470 # # Replaced by kde-base/okular. Removed in 30 days. kde-base/kpdf
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read the thread. normal is not the same thing as always. unless you're the maintainer, you have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had people delete older versions of packages on me simply because they made this invalid assumption without talking to the maintainer. the rest of the thread is irrelevant as this point was not made. Yes I have no idea. That's why I asked on gentoo-dev-announce for maintainers to tell me if they are kept on purpose so the point was made already at the very start. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Several KDE3-only applications.
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (26 Oct 2009) # Doesn't work with new xfce-base/exo API, bug #289867. # Replaced by media-video/parole. # Masked for removal in 30 days. media-video/xfmedia This is not a KDE3-only application. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Several KDE3-only applications.
Petteri Räty wrote: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (26 Oct 2009) # Doesn't work with new xfce-base/exo API, bug #289867. # Replaced by media-video/parole. # Masked for removal in 30 days. media-video/xfmedia This is not a KDE3-only application. Regards, Petteri Heh. True. It's a old media player for Xfce4, moved into archive/ in upstream git. Last commit 2008 (translation update only), segfaults with video files (due to new X.org, and by new I mean X.org 7.0 :-). Masked for removal by upstream recommendation. It doesn't, or ever will, work with the new xfce-base/exo API unless someone ports it. That's what you get for maintaining 2 desktops. :-)
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:51:34 +0200 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read the thread. normal is not the same thing as always. unless you're the maintainer, you have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had people delete older versions of packages on me simply because they made this invalid assumption without talking to the maintainer. the rest of the thread is irrelevant as this point was not made. Yes I have no idea. That's why I asked on gentoo-dev-announce for maintainers to tell me if they are kept on purpose so the point was made already at the very start. Still, it has already been stated but: please file bugs! A big tracker would probably be messy, one bug / herd or category could be better. You did file some bugs at some point, where I was in the assigned herd and did proceed quickly I think. Why did you stop? Some were just straight removal, some did need some other removal in order to be clean (this may be due to the fact that packages didnt work with latest versions but didn't have restricted deps on the package that would have to be removed). I am not following -dev very carefully and am too lazy to dig in a list posted on -dev-announce to find out if I need to do something or not. A bug makes that easy to track and is the usual way of getting ebuild changes done in the tree. We rant on users who report bugs on -dev, I'm afraid the the same applies to developers :) Also, remark that your script is flawed, I see some freebsd stuff in your list which are certainly the best visible version on some profiles. Again, this will be better tracked in a bug. Alexis. signature.asc Description: PGP signature