[gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages
Today I got http://bugs.gentoo.org/340517 filed against chromium-bin. The machine that compiled the package had only gcc-4.4.3 installed. It'd probably be difficult to solve the problem using dependencies (the bug reporter had gcc-4.4.3 installed, but active version was 4.3.4). I was thinking about using a lower version of gcc on the builder, like 4.1.2 or 4.3.4. However, I'm not sure how likely this is to cause C++ ABI mismatch issues. I remember some problems with half of KDE compiler with one GCC version and half with a more recent version. What do you think? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 03:45:50PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: app-admin/makepasswd I'll take this one. Tom pgpswrYKYXI8c.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages
On Monday, October 11, 2010 10:40:43 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Today I got http://bugs.gentoo.org/340517 filed against chromium-bin. The machine that compiled the package had only gcc-4.4.3 installed. It'd probably be difficult to solve the problem using dependencies (the bug reporter had gcc-4.4.3 installed, but active version was 4.3.4). dupe of Bug 297685 -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: scons-utils.eclass
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:43:50 +0300 Gökdeniz Karadağ gokden...@gmail.com wrote: It was discussed in the thread with subject: New eclass: scons.eclass Thanks for the update. This leads me to two suggestions for future eclass addition announcements: 1) Refer to the original gentoo-dev thread(s) (as recorded on archives.g.o). 2) If in that thread discussion leads to a change in the name for the proposed eclass, rename the thread accordingly. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/2010 09:40 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Today I got http://bugs.gentoo.org/340517 filed against chromium-bin. The machine that compiled the package had only gcc-4.4.3 installed. It'd probably be difficult to solve the problem using dependencies (the bug reporter had gcc-4.4.3 installed, but active version was 4.3.4). I was thinking about using a lower version of gcc on the builder, like 4.1.2 or 4.3.4. However, I'm not sure how likely this is to cause C++ ABI mismatch issues. I remember some problems with half of KDE compiler with one GCC version and half with a more recent version. What do you think? This is where the -bin package should be shipping all its libs that it will require, just as firefox-bin does. If you are rolling the -bin package you should include them yourself, and set the launch script to read its install dir before system dir, this is just how we resolve such issues with firefox-bin. - -- == Jory A. Pratt anarchy -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Mozilla Lead GPG: 2C1D 6AF9 F35D 5122 0E8F 9123 C270 3B43 5674 6127 == -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyzurgACgkQwnA7Q1Z0YSdmDACfbbXOi0zLvpcRHvChx2iOzYww dlYAnAz8BeOaYLJd4/wrny+xf8nba0K7 =X3Nd -END PGP SIGNATURE-