Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass
On 20 July 2012 15:33, Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:37:32 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
I got a few more suggestions on IRC, and I have updated the eclass
accordingly. Please check the attached new version, also available at
https://gitorious.org/gentoo-qt/qt/blobs/master/eclass/l10n.eclass
Pseudo inlining
# Add linguas useflags
if [[ -n ${PLOCALES} ]]; then
for u in ${PLOCALES}; do
IUSE+= linguas_${u}
done
fi
no need to guard the loop against empty $PLOCALES.
l10n_for_each_locale_do() {
local locs x
locs=$(l10n_get_locales)
if [[ -n ${locs} ]]; then
for x in ${locs}; do
${@} ${x} || die failed to process enabled
${x} locale done
fi
}
same here, no guarding required and ${@} should be quoted as it may
contain args with spaces. Also in l10n_for_each_disabled_locale_do.
Okay, I will make those changes.
# ones. This function is normally used internally in this eclass, not
by # l10n.eclass consumers.
l10n_get_locales() {
I'd mark this function @INTERNAL then, at least until someone can
presents a use case.
If you are sufficiently sure this function shouldn't be used by
consumers you could remove the function
There are use cases, e.g. net-im/qtwitter-0.10.0-r1 for which I have
an editted -r10 revision in my dev overlay. I'm sure it could be handled
with l10n_for_each_locale_do, but the migration is more straight-forward
by simply using l10n_get_locales in this case.
This is why I worded it normally instead of only. Maybe the wording
could be improved?
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:29:44 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
# ones. This function is normally used internally in this eclass,
not by # l10n.eclass consumers.
l10n_get_locales() {
I'd mark this function @INTERNAL then, at least until someone can
presents a use case.
If you are sufficiently sure this function shouldn't be used by
consumers you could remove the function
There are use cases, e.g. net-im/qtwitter-0.10.0-r1 for which I have
an editted -r10 revision in my dev overlay. I'm sure it could be
handled with l10n_for_each_locale_do, but the migration is more
straight-forward by simply using l10n_get_locales in this case.
This is why I worded it normally instead of only. Maybe the
wording could be improved?
The primary concern should be expressiveness. That said, qttwitter
looks like a good example use case. You have convinced me.
src_configure() {
qmake4 PREFIX=/usr LANGS=$(l10n_get_locales)
}
Maybe l10n_get_enabled_locales would read even more natural here?
Either way I'd drop the internal entirely as it also provides a simple
way to sanitize LINGUAS without relying on the package manager. ie.
setting 'LINGUAS=$(l10n_get_locales)' in an ebuild would enable the
possible EAPI 5 behaviour described later in this thread, which would
allow direct use of LINGUAS. The only difference being the backup
locale.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2012 08:44 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il 22/07/2012 14:38, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto:
It would seem to me that we could get all these QA warning out of the
way very quickly by adding -frecord-gcc-switches to the *FLAGS in the
base profile (it appears to be platform agnostic but if I'm wrong we can
add it for supported arches).
Ehm no that's not a good idea because it can actually cause problems.
Some ebuilds do s/-O2/${CFLAGS} s/gcc/$(tc-getCC)/ (in this order) and
then -frecord-gcc-switches will fail.
Other packages call ld directly, and then -frecord-gcc-switches in
LDFLAGS will fail...
Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles,
but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just
yourself running this QA?
Even something simply like detecting CFLAGS=-frecord-gcc-switches set
but not FFLAGS and then teasing the user into fixing it would seem
worthwhile to me.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=3iiT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] About replacing man with man-db
As explained at: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284822 There are multiple issues with sys-apps/man that could be solved switching to sys-apps/man-db instead, the problem is that the process looks to be blocked by: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289884 After checking that bug report, looks like a patch already exists to fix that one: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289884#c19 But moving is still stalled, what else is pending? Thanks a lot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS
Il 23/07/2012 10:30, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto: Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles, but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just yourself running this QA? Add it to the dev profile (I think we have one?) via bashrc, then we should have something. If something breaks on a dev box, I'd say the best effort can be made to fix it. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] net-misc/quagga needs help
It has security bugs opened for a long time: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408507 Also, current version fails to build, and the same occurs while trying to bump to the latest version: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421861 Help with this is needed, otherwise we will probably need to hardmask it due security bugs (and it not being installable just now) Thanks for your help signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/2012 01:44 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il 23/07/2012 10:30, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto: Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles, but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just yourself running this QA? Add it to the dev profile (I think we have one?) via bashrc, then we should have something. If something breaks on a dev box, I'd say the best effort can be made to fix it. We do have a dev profile, and I agree that is a good place to start. Is there a good way to add that to the dev profile? I'm mostly curious if there is a way to do it without angering llvm/clang users? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQDZzwAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKAHkP/2akntlGkp9uTbOAp0zMZK+2 uI/nSIf7EMiv8sebWVXkSOpnucOpcrZdnXhLCzhb5rEcF+2tjwXQZw5vtsl5OCNr pGngn6r5qoQRBQt5WGBg9q73BY0vskN+LOLEPkq3tEYzJuTnS+a238oMZp8E3AvQ 9oH2eSLUqBJlsJtujj4Qu/VyITT7K4wfFRoL57epXdli600VES/L6owPmSbmyeoV JR3tX8uNW56Ua7yZOfP7fl0nDUGPiCp80hjiwuetdNw0SDGp8+xToysS5ZsNjhhl jSo0WeDO4TJG87uxovHWbT+iBWBEm/cbk4APsCbMZc96ef1v7jo1IYzZFCDaYiMP vB0xJJibQJqSDNqx6Fg6V+lM14HxGvy0ufdz4gUuQL1GsBJX5B/924+87akx32iR 8m1Z/iarxvcvox3hqHEdiRUIwUnjvt5CSlCh3Y5/yTKDIJqyGzQQ1N3yv7jEHCPB iXCrl007R75t7Zgp/2SHWcstzRQeLJhDem8JElhIoreH9EaAFO+9ZdQAHgjcknxt b9YUKrkoI1kPaH+NoDq0o5w0SpesF5fngJFbd/aAxcolMzPsjlsH5LJB/A/3rWrk +fzsa4rGof5Z4zyUVzaC2t5/rDnlrU0qitBDrmC11fP7KsAMnvA83AJ+H/5AmdDR xwWR8gYaXbaWseERW9qE =NrWq -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/quagga needs help
Pacho Ramos wrote: Help is needed I'd actually just run bird instead. fails to build: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421861 Did anyone report it upstream? //Peter pgp7wB8cqKxOl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/quagga needs help
Il 23/07/2012 14:10, Peter Stuge ha scritto: Did anyone report it upstream? Not me ... because I wouldn't know which one to care about. The problem with upstream is that you have what they call master that is not really stable, then what they call 'Release Engineering' that looks like a kernel stable branch but they introduce new features there (instead of master) first. Then there is the concept that they don't really care about doing new releases to fix build or run failures because they say that's what integrators and distributors should be paid to deal with. I agree with you, I'd rather run bird. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have any comments about it? The idea is to show this news item on all Gentoo systems. Is that even possible / desirable? I've talked with both the PR and Docs team before about this change. I'll try to help the docs team updating the handbook. Title: Changes on new stages Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2012-07-27 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Starting with catalyst 2.0.10, make.conf and make.profile will be moved from /etc to /etc/postfix. Releng build boxes will be updated to this catalyst version during the next few days. So I expect stages built after July 30th to have make.conf and make.profile on /etc/portage. - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQDedfAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEP0xwQAJaX1KgYTVDpyfO+A1loKuz2 nY/lTPHs5w9vONaBm04dxt8zsuW84dhhOOxwWvOwWzV4DXpsPmiQpX/3QuNY86Nz B7npuvemDNh+tOvMhuzZeXKZhlAoFDG/onIJegcQnwLfk1urSfGnUQqXNdInkvlP nWMebJTb7dI9R06W+hQPKvviW+EeuUfuA3DmfPKv9j1G2iUJCcXyi2aDWN5RNZlJ AnoSI8xllIWeqh8G5ushwVLqtlA9kmBx0HV7EotCk+A/z0ITrtT1AEZvMrGgt9Kf jSzVTMVVR9/nYn3/NvreahGak+ztKCa/eRuARm5bTjXBR8IohNL/mhsydH9YSxjY h/RMb7ESXyGfSwfCgAosb9EaM6TO3HPHfX7KmKJTnrgyA9vn3jckgNcCyTPyJome OqZenKYo+6StnDbRq7Vmmo/woZ4SAALIhtxEbs/kP0Hdi8X4HYQc9OxBssDANHdR L85ILLzBMhcFfPsxIxM3R3GGae7MsfnS/cymOluHu8J+KqsLTgYXnPJoJ8RDk4Em 4D5kIXFVbld92begBA8VecmjE+s7sNCgmRSCZzyovikP9vevrmVvgsFsW6evUDJu KOqmGrF4JNFU0l/nr/qs5wz1YDA/vAurcvNELxDd1whWtB0I7fdzbuchIYkxtAuN lMn8FElQKkT68B+5HZeE =dx+o -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
Il 23/07/2012 17:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto: from /etc to /etc/postfix. Are you really sure? I don't think Portage looks for it there ... ;) -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: snip Starting with catalyst 2.0.10, make.conf and make.profile will be moved from /etc to /etc/postfix. Releng build boxes will be updated to s/postfix/portage/ snip -- Doug Goldstein
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24-07-2012 00:19, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il 23/07/2012 17:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto: from /etc to /etc/postfix. Are you really sure? I don't think Portage looks for it there ... ;) Thanks Diego for catching the typo. It's obviously /etc/portage and not /etc/postfix. - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQDeqrAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPq8oQAJ14P7XIvQtk04sNYpufT8H/ C9iPyo7iduDT/z8Uj8OlFu/4GPsUs+bjege4coOY0XOU1L6lolAR/1IsfanmufNc LrkmqR6nmVbNhs/WsNnaJ1mXY6ietfkk1FWGZcLq9KJsIPwFz3hAnbghu0Kupefs SpiFrwwVmHH2RV5KXJ+IL8Y6m9v6vI7C4qjkiuYsomq+i89FOvhwowTqxLqfR9WH Sp8cM3hV67lTjCjT2lPqlbSp3vkVWdWP58C+Tn/VRSQjNBYJ8Gf1PmySzhDJruom WO/SDfWNo1+1QTbrImkrpFMwDGK3PQSlyMAPUXrlbTPXB5uHs8JATb+2OESgOBIN 1ZI8ykiCLnD790ULmEkLKvhxqMrw7PmHwjQQIUp+bLcHYjIugk6sk5z9pGji516g jQH0cvRKe53R7hnj4GgD0DRK3hqUBOr5AmIbaDKLSfaEuH/mJVJBKzejMIv7bHzY s/rXWvWrZQhke2qciljL6u7OzeRK6z316zWud4doNgbpUbocpgFLGyqCZPCOazPf 6LiFJd2VM9hqSkzJbVY3nQlNuXnIPexhhuNOCTXwM71TpTSIeKsnIVthvm8dljm5 h9MJEwgqGhzfyzCOsvCtrTTfbLAax4kA1DR0DrtId6bWh8b3VGDwkzREVo5rKaxc c3n/ygY3YlfhlYSwJUXg =0dTE -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
On 07/23/2012 07:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Hi. I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have any comments about it? The idea is to show this news item on all Gentoo systems. Is that even possible / desirable? I've talked with both the PR and Docs team before about this change. I'll try to help the docs team updating the handbook. Title: Changes on new stages Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2012-07-27 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Starting with catalyst 2.0.10, make.conf and make.profile will be moved from /etc to /etc/postfix. Releng build boxes will be updated to Why are we wanting to use a known packages config location? I am refering to mail-mta/postfix of course. this catalyst version during the next few days. So I expect stages built after July 30th to have make.conf and make.profile on /etc/portage. Jory signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/2012 08:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Hi. I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have any comments about it? The idea is to show this news item on all Gentoo systems. Is that even possible / desirable? I've talked with both the PR and Docs team before about this change. I'll try to help the docs team updating the handbook. Title: Changes on new stages Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2012-07-27 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Starting with catalyst 2.0.10, make.conf and make.profile will be moved from /etc to /etc/postfix. Releng build boxes will be updated to this catalyst version during the next few days. So I expect stages built after July 30th to have make.conf and make.profile on /etc/portage. A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this yet... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQDewnAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKZ9EP/jAKyQwBVTQZjHQSPLA0Twqw WeZaTlhqTYJdoG3I6RNcC6MMIDCu9FVGuNsZNsv2nv5+K7jViGgxGnY1jThDKSvK 7rtO8gXsiKwjzLxn5WKePXU9eH7IctrZ9vq6V5WoaE8M0U9YlFTeC2Ni7+/SCvlg H+lDGFrAyvlDmbscvb5b33BnPim43ZXqATUPzInsdejUAHLRJ72YpF61UGBFhvq+ GVs+iSzSWmUiq0c6l56J3dTuuNdUFthyABuNEsF77BqyqVjAQDrGOsqUYPOjweKL +Bl9uc4d6XJJuCC7WXOPnMWcJ1/xCDYIq4kGrbwEah/3xxTHHJk4IPRjJecP/RnO u1ae92ZvEvqf6teULGQw3HM9JOVRxy0N+jixaA7S4PMz4dAhFobuPxEz+gJxENly jZtPupAOAyKmAuGQKq8ArtnMxKHrfaUSjQ/jaROYDqltAH+OyD7hgVWrhEasdGb5 2lXZ0b5uu7qqiXOZa+e6Wm7cAD85rOfmT96SmgjYHMfZYTF54NgYctPVd3udNuNY oGxk4BNxp7LyqRY9dQO+fEmCu+oLAGKF1okUTwXbxh02R0RmHnwu5LEFqBjDIl5l ZZnbFfQb/W1RQEk7s4iZQROt/QAQ6T6X2WsxvncGejBnjzmGLRTjxqv3adKJIfyr tBlM9iy7QZ2crhR4DbeM =KtOa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] Re: news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have any comments about it? What action if any do you want Gentoo users to take. If I read that news item the first question I'd have is where SHOULD I keep those files? Should I leave them alone? Should I move them? Will anything bad happen either way? If the answer is that we're changing the defaults but plan to support the old way for a very long time, then spell that out. Otherwise you'll get a million people asking about it. Rich
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:28 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this yet... ufed is on the endanged species list, along with a few other app-portage utilities. It hasn't been developed or maintained for some time now. If it is to survive, It'll need someone to step up and update it. -- Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24-07-2012 01:33, Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have any comments about it? What action if any do you want Gentoo users to take. If I read that news item the first question I'd have is where SHOULD I keep those files? Should I leave them alone? Should I move them? Will anything bad happen either way? If the answer is that we're changing the defaults but plan to support the old way for a very long time, then spell that out. Otherwise you'll get a million people asking about it. This is just a heads-up for Gentoo users that got used to find make.conf and make.profile under /etc in stages, that these files will stop being there and will instead be under /etc/portage. So we are changing the defaults. About supporting the old way, that is beyond Releng and up to Portage and maintainers of portage tools. I was told at least Portage has no plan to drop support for /etc in the foreseeable future. Rich - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQDgFYAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPzdwP/16ArdOg1k+2vX1xAbwDSnMs Bjw7XIn9EsPmk1hT5FKZTUrwgeihXudMtHHCMKXexH4Ena9F9hu5NNblV2Aklv4u zPQVc6GOvf3oWUgzPGDC/2AFb701aIKzNHLPaiWVIX0f8USly4rho+yulg0WYjRG pHXH9c2szLsRgGOVcgxLmwMeqAFl2D2iywp7ASLPBPjMCqJDaGJXhHgUr1EvaoET sLwtyfeW0pvSiPZkyHs2+dBPvRnup2fsv1VZwvpBFNeopItCg76rTEhxDouH8zN/ xZz37mw4+6et2+9L0u1R8oQsDmEyw7XPQ8Q1JuibHsim0K/bdhxoINVJXLAE425T aaJNUx5jL3taY12fS1mcIjfIpFZwqTf8CUUjkIY+OOEYNltjlXCK6JyWbj0a7wEN BCneLC21aKWvdR15HuyK7CP//8qhPkAtpt9QwbT+qNryI1hX80IMXnl3Ey6hIG88 aD14U/AyzK8OCZBpKpYt8RKMVHyOTrpqxfHTPJhF2rkn6lH1aT781k0a70Njc/uK 0wRXrb5jwXPCehCXF4LVdNfPqB5AmAg+JkRbBkwHRu96U2ioncCd1w+h5NTlnNLL NvVoDiXKO+5ouH8qrSzf5Y28CVZa8r94VpoQOgND3N7DM5GOin/ok3S2k1PhbELd k6dHPEF4bJcCsUg+PblX =Bjnh -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: This is just a heads-up for Gentoo users that got used to find make.conf and make.profile under /etc in stages, that these files will stop being there and will instead be under /etc/portage. So we are changing the defaults. I'd spell that out then - just say that no action is required for existing installations, but be aware of the new location on new installs, or feel free to move them if you want. Rich
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
On Jul 23, 2012 9:43 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:28 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this yet... ufed is on the endanged species list, along with a few other app-portage utilities. It hasn't been developed or maintained for some time now. If it is to survive, It'll need someone to step up and update it. I don't see a bug for this change for ufed. I can take care of this change in ufed. -- Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org
Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 22:22 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote: On Jul 23, 2012 9:43 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:28 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this yet... ufed is on the endanged species list, along with a few other app-portage utilities. It hasn't been developed or maintained for some time now. If it is to survive, It'll need someone to step up and update it. I don't see a bug for this change for ufed. I can take care of this change in ufed. -- Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org Thank you. Also I believe it does not support /etc/portage/package.use as well. Contact Fuzzyray about any change in ufed's status. He recently started a thread in the gentoo-portage-dev list to review the status of packages we maintain. Ufed being one without a maintainer/developer. -- Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
Il 23/07/2012 20:34, Ben de Groot ha scritto: I'm assuming this is true for make.globals as well? That should be added then. And as others have said, there really need to be instructions what if anything should be done about current installations. I actually thought make.globals was going to be installed in /usr/share/portage nowadays? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
