[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Michał Górny]

W dniu nie, 13.05.2018 o godzinie 14∶57 -0400, użytkownik Alec Warner
napisał:
> Dear Gentoo Community,
> 
> Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
> posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org the following:
> 
>  - You must be a member of the list to post.
>  - You must be on the whitelist to post.
> 
> The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org addresses. Additions
> of addresses to the whitelist can be made by any developer. To modify the
> whitelist, please read this wiki page for instructions:
> 
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/
> Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
> 
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964
> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.

I have added all known proxied maintainers for now, as requested by many
of them.  Proxy-maint will take care of monitoring their actions
and revoking if there's any doubt about their goodwill.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Michał Górny]

W dniu nie, 13.05.2018 o godzinie 17∶28 -0400, użytkownik Alec Warner
napisał:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. 
> wrote:
> 
> > On 13/05/2018 20:57, Alec Warner wrote:
> > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/
> > > Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
> > 
> > I'm wondering,
> >  currently
> > says for me "No repositories found".
> > 
> > Am I using a wrong address, or does the new repo need gitweb setup?
> > 
> > FWIW of course I can use git, it's just in some cases (especially casual
> > browsing) gitweb can be more convenient.
> > 
> 
> Its not a public repo, so it isn't listed. If you think it should be
> public, ask council; its a 1 line config change on our side.
> 

I don't think publishing it is a good idea.  Spammers are going to love
the easy list of e-mail addresses.  Also GDPR may apply.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2018-05-13 23:59 UTC

[Robin H. Johnson]

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2018-05-13 23:59 UTC.

Removals:
app-portage/unsandbox  20180508-23:10 zlogene   22ee15aaf5f
dev-python/PyFoam  20180504-21:23 asturmc0f4950c467
media-gfx/scantailor   20180504-21:24 asturm5abccc3ff79
media-libs/atlas-c++   20180509-07:00 tuponeea4d68dc510
media-libs/varconf 20180509-06:53 tupone34478056775
ros-meta/geometry_experimental 20180512-11:04 aballier  376807769a1
sci-chemistry/avogadro 20180507-22:24 zlogene   eb9a93f86bf
xfce-extra/xfce-theme-manager  20180507-22:22 zlogene   96d2c7c06bf

Additions:
games-util/springlobby 20180322-23:14 mgorny9e6f93c2c3c
net-im/libcommuni  20180501-20:19 mgorny6455ce2a691
net-wireless/osmo-fl2k 20180507-15:26 chithanh  3f7470626a6
ros-meta/geometry2 20180512-11:04 aballier  bb6e399daf0
sec-policy/selinux-redis   20180511-02:45 perfinion 8faca51adc8
sys-fs/zfs-auto-snapshot   20180401-06:33 mgorny5d769a2585b
x11-wm/i3-gaps 20180509-18:12 johu  0cb1e8bf4d5

--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
Removed Packages:
ros-meta/geometry_experimental,removed,aballier,20180512-11:04,376807769a1
media-gfx/scantailor,removed,asturm,20180504-21:24,5abccc3ff79
media-libs/atlas-c++,removed,tupone,20180509-07:00,ea4d68dc510
media-libs/varconf,removed,tupone,20180509-06:53,34478056775
app-portage/unsandbox,removed,zlogene,20180508-23:10,22ee15aaf5f
dev-python/PyFoam,removed,asturm,20180504-21:23,c0f4950c467
sci-chemistry/avogadro,removed,zlogene,20180507-22:24,eb9a93f86bf
xfce-extra/xfce-theme-manager,removed,zlogene,20180507-22:22,96d2c7c06bf
Added Packages:
games-util/springlobby,added,mgorny,20180322-23:14,9e6f93c2c3c
ros-meta/geometry2,added,aballier,20180512-11:04,bb6e399daf0
sys-fs/zfs-auto-snapshot,added,mgorny,20180401-06:33,5d769a2585b
sec-policy/selinux-redis,added,perfinion,20180511-02:45,8faca51adc8
x11-wm/i3-gaps,added,johu,20180509-18:12,0cb1e8bf4d5
net-im/libcommuni,added,mgorny,20180501-20:19,6455ce2a691
net-wireless/osmo-fl2k,added,chithanh,20180507-15:26,3f7470626a6

Done.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] eapi7-ver.eclass: Support EAPIs 0 to 6.

[Ulrich Mueller]

Pushed.


pgpXWj3WGLB6c.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.26 stabilization soon

[Andreas K. Huettel]

The number of blocker bugs has decreased a lot, so unless something both new 
and serious is coming up I'm going to ask for glibc-2.26 stabilization on
   6/June/2018 
(that is a month after uploading the latest patchset). We really need to get 
this rolling, since the glibc-2.28 release is already approaching. 

If you still have glibc-2.26 related bugs for your packages, please have a 
look at the following link, and contact me if you encounter unsolvable 
problems.

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Toolchain#glibc-2.26

The biggest trend in the blockers seems to be a delay in ppc stabilizations.

2.27 will be rekeyworded when 2.26 is stable. The impact of 2.27 and 2.28 will 
hopefully be smaller, since then we've successfully made the RPC transition, 
and since these releases contain less breaking changes.

2.25 and earlier will remain available, but be masked because of unresolved 
security issues.

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Alec Warner]

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. 
wrote:

> On 13/05/2018 20:57, Alec Warner wrote:
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/
> > Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
>
> I'm wondering,
>  currently
> says for me "No repositories found".
>
> Am I using a wrong address, or does the new repo need gitweb setup?
>
> FWIW of course I can use git, it's just in some cases (especially casual
> browsing) gitweb can be more convenient.
>

Its not a public repo, so it isn't listed. If you think it should be
public, ask council; its a 1 line config change on our side.

-A


>
> Paweł
>
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Paweł Hajdan , Jr .]

On 13/05/2018 20:57, Alec Warner wrote:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/
> Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist

I'm wondering,
 currently
says for me "No repositories found".

Am I using a wrong address, or does the new repo need gitweb setup?

FWIW of course I can use git, it's just in some cases (especially casual
browsing) gitweb can be more convenient.

Paweł



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Openstack Summit MeetUp

[Matthew Thode]

On 18-05-13 13:11:30, Jack Morgan wrote:
> Gentoo,
> 
> I will be attending the Openstack Summit in Vancouver, BC. The
> conference is May 21-24th. I would like to organize a Gentoo meetup for
> those attending or living in the area. I personally will be there from
> May 20th - 26th.
> 
> Please reply if you are interested in meeting and which day(s)/time(s)
> you are available. I'm looking forward to it!
> 

This is the ONE summit I'm not going to :(  I do plan on attending the
PTG in Denver and the Summit in Berlin though.

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

On 05/13/2018 08:57 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.

People have had the necessary time for a long time already, so I don't
see a wait as being required.

-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Openstack Summit MeetUp

[Jack Morgan]

Gentoo,

I will be attending the Openstack Summit in Vancouver, BC. The
conference is May 21-24th. I would like to organize a Gentoo meetup for
those attending or living in the area. I personally will be there from
May 20th - 26th.

Please reply if you are interested in meeting and which day(s)/time(s)
you are available. I'm looking forward to it!



Thanks,
-- 
Jack Morgan
Pub 4096R/761D8E0A 2010-09-13 Jack Morgan 
Fingerprint = DD42 EA48 D701 D520 C2CD 55BE BF53 C69B 761D 8E0A

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Geaaru]

I think that for not official gentoo dev and proxy maint team list could be
build from bug.gentoo.org issue list that are open.

I try to contact proxy maint team.

Ty for reply.
G.

On Sun, May 13, 2018, 21:38 Alec Warner  wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Geaaru  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not a gentoo dev but currently I have an official issue to
>> bugs.gentoo.org as proxy ebuild maintainer for same packages.
>>
>
> Contact proxy-ma...@gentoo.org and ask that they sponsor you.
>
> We may want to consider just whitelisting all proxy-maintainers; proxy
> maint, is there a list someplace?
>
> -A
>
>
>>
>> What is the right process for require insert of my email in whitelist?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> G.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 13, 2018, 20:57 Alec Warner  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Gentoo Community,
>>>
>>> Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
>>> posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org the following:
>>>
>>>  - You must be a member of the list to post.
>>>  - You must be on the whitelist to post.
>>>
>>> The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org addresses.
>>> Additions of addresses to the whitelist can be made by any developer. To
>>> modify the whitelist, please read this wiki page for instructions:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964
>>> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
>>> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Alec Warner]

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Geaaru  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm not a gentoo dev but currently I have an official issue to
> bugs.gentoo.org as proxy ebuild maintainer for same packages.
>

Contact proxy-ma...@gentoo.org and ask that they sponsor you.

We may want to consider just whitelisting all proxy-maintainers; proxy
maint, is there a list someplace?

-A


>
> What is the right process for require insert of my email in whitelist?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> G.
>
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018, 20:57 Alec Warner  wrote:
>
>> Dear Gentoo Community,
>>
>> Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
>> posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org the following:
>>
>>  - You must be a member of the list to post.
>>  - You must be on the whitelist to post.
>>
>> The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org addresses.
>> Additions of addresses to the whitelist can be made by any developer. To
>> modify the whitelist, please read this wiki page for instructions:
>>
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/
>> Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964
>> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
>> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.
>>
>>
>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Geaaru]

Hi,

I'm not a gentoo dev but currently I have an official issue to
bugs.gentoo.org as proxy ebuild maintainer for same packages.

What is the right process for require insert of my email in whitelist?

Thanks in advance.

G.


On Sun, May 13, 2018, 20:57 Alec Warner  wrote:

> Dear Gentoo Community,
>
> Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
> posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org the following:
>
>  - You must be a member of the list to post.
>  - You must be on the whitelist to post.
>
> The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org addresses.
> Additions of addresses to the whitelist can be made by any developer. To
> modify the whitelist, please read this wiki page for instructions:
>
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964
> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.
>
>
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Alec Warner]

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Alec Warner  wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Toralf Förster  wrote:
>
>> On 05/13/2018 08:57 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>> Dear Gentoo Community,
>>
>> Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
>> posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org the following:
>>
>>  - You must be a member of the list to post.
>>  - You must be on the whitelist to post.
>>
>> The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org addresses.
>> Additions of addresses to the whitelist can be made by any developer. To
>> modify the whitelist, please read this wiki page for instructions:
>>
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Mailing_
>> Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964
>> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
>> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> why is "anta...@gentoo.org"  at the whtielist. IMO
>> that is superfluous, or ?
>>
> I was just testing the whitelist out on a different list to make sure it
> worked as I expected.
>

Just to be clear, whitelisting of gentoo.org addresses is not required.


>
> -A
>
>>
>> --
>> Toralf
>> PGP 23217DA7 9B888F45
>>
>>
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Alec Warner]

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Toralf Förster  wrote:

> On 05/13/2018 08:57 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> Dear Gentoo Community,
>
> Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
> posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org the following:
>
>  - You must be a member of the list to post.
>  - You must be on the whitelist to post.
>
> The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org addresses.
> Additions of addresses to the whitelist can be made by any developer. To
> modify the whitelist, please read this wiki page for instructions:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Mailing_
> Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964
> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> why is "anta...@gentoo.org"  at the whtielist. IMO
> that is superfluous, or ?
>
I was just testing the whitelist out on a different list to make sure it
worked as I expected.

-A

>
> --
> Toralf
> PGP 23217DA7 9B888F45
>
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Toralf Förster]

On 05/13/2018 08:57 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> Dear Gentoo Community,
>
> Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
> posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
>  the following:
>
>  - You must be a member of the list to post.
>  - You must be on the whitelist to post.
>
> The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org
>  addresses. Additions of addresses to the
> whitelist can be made by any developer. To modify the whitelist,
> please read this wiki page for instructions:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist
> 
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964 
> [2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
> opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.
>
>
Hi,


why is "anta...@gentoo.org" at the whtielist. IMO that is superfluous, or ?

-- 
Toralf
PGP 23217DA7 9B888F45



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

[Alec Warner]

Dear Gentoo Community,

Gentoo-dev whitelisting[1][2] is nearly ready for deployment. The new
posting guidelines to post on gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org the following:

 - You must be a member of the list to post.
 - You must be on the whitelist to post.

The whitelist automatically whitelists all @gentoo.org addresses. Additions
of addresses to the whitelist can be made by any developer. To modify the
whitelist, please read this wiki page for instructions:

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/
Mailing_Lists#Managing_the_Gentoo-Dev_whitelist

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964
[2] The whitelist is not yet live, but I wanted to give folks an
opportunity to populate the whitelist before enabling it; so have at it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

[Aaron W. Swenson]

On 2018-05-05 04:49, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:52:11PM +0200, Patrice Clement wrote:
> > The following packages are up for grabs:
> ...
> > net-misc/s3cmd
> I'll take s3cmd, since my dayjob uses it heavily.

I know I’m listed on the metadata, but I’ve never done anything more
than compile it at some point in the past.

You’re welcome to be the sole maintainer.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature