[gentoo-dev] Re: Xorg 1.6/libxcb 1.4 stabilization news item

2009-10-01 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o

Rémi Cardona wrote:

Hi guys,

Could anyone write up a one-liner news item for the xorg-server 1.6 
stabilization with there 2 upgrade guides :


http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.6-upgrade-guide.xml


http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml


I tried figuring out how to write one myself, but failed miserably 
because of the entirely non-intuitive GLEP.


Basically, all stable users should see that news item.

Thanks in advance to the benevolent soul who will write it and commit
it :)

Thanks


Perhaps something simple like this? (HTH):


xorg-server 1.6.

We're pleased to announce the stabilization of xorg-server-1.6. Users 
should review the following two guides before upgrading to 1.6:


http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.6-upgrade-guide.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml





[gentoo-dev] Re: Xorg 1.6/libxcb 1.4 stabilization news item

2009-10-02 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o

Rémi Cardona wrote:

Le 02/10/2009 10:22, Petteri Räty a écrit :

"Thus, at least 72 hours before a proposed news item is committed,
it must be posted to the gentoo-dev mailing list and Cc:ed to
p...@gentoo.org (exceptions may be made in exceptional
circumstances). Any complaints — for example regarding wording,
clarity or accuracy — must be addressed before the news item goes
live."

p...@gentoo.org hasn't been CC:ed as far as I see.


Josh now has commented on it.

May I request a faster commit time since I didn't expect Samuli to 
stabilize everything so quickly?




I'm not a dev; but I strongly agree that you get it out ASAP - I almost
upgraded two days ago :-)



Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for hardened profile about gcc.

2010-10-24 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 10/23/10 20:28, Magnus Granberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> Was thinking to post a news item for the hardened profile about the
> new GCC 4.4.4-r2  that have been stabled on x86 and amd64.

Thank you for this milestone!

"We have enable SSP support by default on this and on newer versions
for arches where it is supported..."

As I read the above quote, 4.4.5 and 4.5.x also have SSP support enabled by
default; is this what was meant?

Thanks Again