Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo desktop system built with musl libc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Anthony G. Basile schrieb: Hi everyone, Tigger alert ... shameless plug. I sent the following to the musl-libc email list yesterday. I thought other gentoo devs may be interested in what I've been up to with musl: [...] Very interesting! Thank you! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV1HeZAAoJEBgiZgGABV/M9Y4P/jw471thGOe3BcCJqPyetl93 WUVpY/k2sKfvtM9QYRGAbe0MK2MC/iH7rH3c+bpPshACD65nX6ngaE0lz99K6Q/A 2N6BAp5X9S0tGeJqyJyq2JYY7hyW6lm/zIv27nWhYTL/VIpRuCPkBk7T4XUDdxe3 EgI+ynuvfAnq2OsQ/+ftstOU1xLpmI19bVZ54ztB0FkXVRvdvCxe4u0XBH8bIwrV TbgShSdQpyjlzFRPTSmGLg1BXYOC8XBwg9mrNC39g4PrjTOVgn4/04MN+ZWAYo9Y 4yviknLTiPhzjHJrSkrdQDn5soK7nEBVViT/z63x4mopkOG5RnktmEjLAcK7JTwo 8z/F/LBLSLGnlgzYVPKBuXfScs4QQ6gSh2lxOQYAvO+xGR90+72LxYQk/bk0TKod h/wWy6ERk9ial1kgyA9WOiQBrQd0hCfAc1Fzh8hy8E9Xa6WXdh52Wk9Isu6245F/ 5w6Mn6o16jIxvLHIV92NMZu2RyZEr3qERLoXol0gJQ6qZJgFMUPvwsUdM4xqJPrB yxGNCvHe2Uit9JvL98suACcogNMdD4QNbxMt2Zukm89kg0OJEk79YNy9lrjWnSZG xk9iJAGVT0Ej4wEI/RFKujcuTM3DjGIC4OaMYExkECfIpWm7FoDGvy1J0Ky0XY58 k6ChOqwbumL+cbD0EGEI =h9Q2 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype
Patrick McLean: On what planet is fstab pure legacy? +1
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependency
Mike Gilbert wrote: There are people that don't want c++ and gcc:4.7 can still bootstrap without. Those people know what they are doing and could un-force the use flag. That would prevent people from accidentally disabling it via USE=-*. Are we talking about forcing +cxx globally or for gcc (+toolchain)? Has this been a major problem in the past? Shouldn't people who set USE=-* also know what they are doing? I'm not normally one to prevent people from shooting themselves, but in this case the safety would be simple to toggle. What if there was some other reason someone had to set a +cxx for some package in package.use.force, and I'm missing out that reason with my -cxx in profiles/package.use.force that I need to circumvent your safety-measure?
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependency
hasufell wrote: Are we talking about forcing +cxx globally or for gcc (+toolchain)? Has this been a major problem in the past? Shouldn't people who set USE=-* also know what they are doing? * don't ever assume that the user knows what he is doing * still allow him to break things if he really chooses to * don't make excuses for gentoo bugs like not properly checking the toolchain for validity, including necessary package dependencies/requirements +1, that's what I wanted to express.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependency
Mike Gilbert wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 14/11/14 01:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE=-cxx? It is, but I think if that's disabled you're on your own. :-) Perhaps we should add a package.use.force entry for this. Is there any reason not to? There are people that don't want c++ and gcc:4.7 can still bootstrap without.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Project: Hardened musl
Anthony G. Basile dixit: Hi everyone, I'd like to announce a new subproject of Hardened Gentoo, Hardened musl [1]. This is awesome, thanks! I'm really looking forward to see a complete desktop working with musl. I will soon try it out and experiment with it. Best regards, Alex
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
Pacho Ramos dixit: Due to nirbheek's lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: x11-themes/gtk-engines-murrine I'm using it, but don't know how to maintain a package yet. Just letting you know, before you have to throw it out of the tree, I'll take it. Greetings, Alex
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags
Alec Warner dixit: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags Without expecting to have any weight on the discussion, I just wanted to let you know: As a system maintainer I like to use the categories, e.g. when doing 'eix -I media-fonts/' or in package.use 'media-fonts/* X'.
