Brian Harring wrote:
| Seriously? Without an implementation, your spec of what should happen
| will have loads of errors?
Yes. It will describe what people think is allowed, rather than what
really is.
Don't think so; making the point that if attempting to write the spec
to target what 'people think'... that's rather subjective, and it's
easy for a subgroup of people to get ideas that don't match what
others think.
Possible I'm being too literal, if so feel free to correct me.
Ok, try this.
Yes. [Without an implementation] It [the spec] will describe what
people think is allowed, rather than what
really is [allowed].
That is how I understood Ciaran's comment. Which means you compleatly
inverted it.
Regards
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
