[gentoo-dev] imagemagick-6.3.0.5 without truetype doesn't compile

2007-02-18 Thread Mohammed Hagag

emerging imagemagick-6.3.0.5 without truetype USE flag "which depends
on propritary corefonts" fails with compilation error.

--
Mohamed M. Hagag
محمد محمود حجاج
http://bintoo.sf.net/drpl/
http://mohamedhagag.wordpress.com
ï¿½ï¿½í¢‡^����(� ��X��X�

[gentoo-dev] no binaries amarok-1.4.5 !

2007-02-18 Thread Mohammed Hagag

amarok-1.4.5 doesn't install any thing except the .po files when
emerging without the kde USE flag, is this normal ?


--
Mohamed M. Hagag
محمد محمود حجاج
http://bintoo.sf.net/drpl/
http://mohamedhagag.wordpress.com


[gentoo-dev] the *box ebuilds and x11

2007-02-05 Thread Mohammed Hagag

Hi all, Today i discovered that *box ebuilds doesn't depend on x11 is
this a common ? or should i submit a bug ?

i'm tried to emerge blackbox fluxbox openbox and all of them didn't
depend on x11.

--
Mohamed M. Hagag
محمد محمود حجاج
http://bintoo.sf.net/drpl/
http://mohamedhagag.wordpress.com

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/amaya needs new maintainer

2006-04-22 Thread Mohammed Hagag
i think that i did it this is the amaya-9.5.ebuild attached it's
working for me and i hope it'll work for every one.

it builds amaya-9.5-fullsrc with all its dependencies (freetype -
wxwidgets - mesa) these are installed locally into amaya folder so
they won't affect the original system ones - i really hope so :) - try
it and if needed - i'm sure it's needed - modify it .

On 4/22/06, Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www-client/amaya is without an active maintainer and has an open
> security bug :
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129874
>
> It needs a bump to 9.5, and it also needs a maintainer/herd. If nobody
> steps in to fix it, package will have to be masked then removed from
> portage.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (Koon)
> Gentoo Linux Security Team
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/amaya needs new maintainer

2006-04-22 Thread Mohammed Hagag
i think that i did it this is the amaya-9.5.ebuild attached it's
working for me and i hope it'll work for every one.

it builds amaya-9.5-fullsrc not with all its dependencies (freetype -
wxwidgets - mesa) these are installed locally into amaya folder so
they won't affect the original system ones - i really hope so :) - try
it and if needed - i'm sure it's needed - modify it .

On 4/22/06, Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www-client/amaya is without an active maintainer and has an open
> security bug :
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129874
>
> It needs a bump to 9.5, and it also needs a maintainer/herd. If nobody
> steps in to fix it, package will have to be masked then removed from
> portage.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (Koon)
> Gentoo Linux Security Team
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>


amaya-9.5.ebuild
Description: Binary data


[gentoo-dev] [Re:] gnome-system-tools

2006-04-21 Thread Mohammed Hagag
I found that if i add --enable-disks and replace --disable-network
with --enable-network in the ebuild, then every thing works very well.

the modified ebuild attached to this message.
i think we should make it avaliable by default.

>I'm wondering why gnome-system-tools didn't complete till now, the
>network-admin is being disabled since gnome-2.10 and also disks.
>
>i want to know:
>what we need to get these tools to work ?
>is this a difficult proccess ?
>what i need to know to got them work ?
>are there any one working on them ?
>why gentoo uses a diffrent network configuration file format ??


gnome-system-tools-2.14.0-r99.ebuild
Description: Binary data


[gentoo-dev] gnome-system-tools

2006-04-21 Thread Mohammed Hagag
I'm wondering why gnome-system-tools didn't complete till now, the
network-admin is being disabled since gnome-2.10 and also disks.

i want to know:
what we need to get these tools to work ?
is this a difficult proccess ?
what i need to know to got them work ?
are there any one working on them ?
why gentoo uses a diffrent network configuration file format ??

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list