Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on VMWare - few ideas

2006-03-05 Thread tuxp3
Well, for some time now, whenever I'm in windows I usually have VMWare
running my Gentoo install, but the GUI never works.. but the only thing I
need is deamon server processes (apache/samba) and I'm happy. Would like
to have more info on getting X to work, but meh.

(note, this is running a REAL gentoo inside of vmware. The only thing I
forget to do sometimes is shutdown the Gentoo VM before shutting down
windows.)

Tux

 On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 16:32:55 +0900
 Kalin KOZHUHAROV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What is it worth:
  For windoze people it will be a great way to experience/play
  with Gentoo

 Where is the big difference to booting a livecd in vmware? Ok, you can
 write to the disk (image), but I don't think that alone is worth it.

  For the challengers, using hardmasked-and-brake-my-gentoo
  ebuilds in a nice snadbox will be easy

 untar a stage3 (or stage4 if you want) tarball, chroot.

  Just a quick preview of the next release or any other feature
  bug

 See first comment.

 Marius

 --
 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
 --
 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86

2005-11-30 Thread tuxp3
 On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 23:41 -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
 Out of curiosity, if this goes into effect before 2006.0 is released,
 then ALL the stages for x86 and the livecd would be built with gcc34? If
 so then I think this may benefit alot of users, especially ones that do
 a stage1/2 just so they can shove gcc34 into there system at an early
 stage. Also, if gcc34 gets moved to x86, would gcc40 be ~x86? This I see
 as a bigger problem for those of us that are already running gcc34. But
 I'm sure many ~x86 users would welcome that, after all what fun is ~x86
 without some breakage every now and then ;-)

 2006.0 is still a ways off, but yes, all of the stages would be built
 with gcc 3.4 exclusively.  Of course, this would happen whether we made
 the change globally (for x86) or if we only did it via profile.  The
 problem with doing it via profile is we *already have* people on 2005.0
 and 2005.1 profiles running gcc 3.4, so it means causing a much more
 disruptive upgrade for all ~x86 users, or anyone who has merged gcc 3.4
 explicitly already.

 --
 Chris Gianelloni
 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
 x86 Architecture Team
 Games - Developer
 Gentoo Linux

Again, would anyone know what will happen to ~x86 gcc?, Will it become
gcc40 or just use the stable x86 gcc for everyone? (except those who are
already playing with gcc40 at their own risk)

Tux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list