Re: [gentoo-dev] My turn to wear the cursed medalion of retirement
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:10:49AM +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote: [some stuff] I just ran into recently with some latex stuff and you really were very helpful and showed a lot of patience - thanks a lot for that and all the other work you did for Gentoo. Sorry to see you go. cheers, Wernfried -- Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org pgpX3KxMs2cAI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] My turn to wear the cursed medalion of retirement
/me reads one Scroll of Blessing -- Jim Ramsay Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] My turn to wear the cursed medalion of retirement
Hi Alexandre, Good luck in your new life. My only comment is that I think you copped out by not submitting your proposals for any sort of peer review. You succumbed to the possibility (that you seem to think is more of a probability -- you may be right, I don't know) that it would not be received well. I think it's a shame to succumb to such a fear (or any fear), and I wish you hadn't. I do understand where you're coming from, however, and I tend to agree with most of your ideas on the addition of bureaucratic layers and rules regulations. I struggle with whether or not that's simply a necessary by-product of the size and scope (I use the term loosely) of the project. Thanks, Seemant signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] My turn to wear the cursed medalion of retirement
Hi Alexandre. I too would like to hear what your ideas are for the metastructure of gentoo. Please if you dont feel up to officially submitting them then at least submit them to this list. Alistair On 3/19/07, Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Alexandre, Good luck in your new life. My only comment is that I think you copped out by not submitting your proposals for any sort of peer review. You succumbed to the possibility (that you seem to think is more of a probability -- you may be right, I don't know) that it would not be received well. I think it's a shame to succumb to such a fear (or any fear), and I wish you hadn't. I do understand where you're coming from, however, and I tend to agree with most of your ideas on the addition of bureaucratic layers and rules regulations. I struggle with whether or not that's simply a necessary by-product of the size and scope (I use the term loosely) of the project. Thanks, Seemant