Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion

2005-05-21 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen 
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 15:23 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
 in any case it should be _pY as your snapshot is newer than the current 
 version. _p stands for patch level, _pre for prerelease. In case of cvs 
 ebuilds patch levels are more appropriate as the new version is often not 
 known.

Thanks - I'll keep that in mind.

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion

2005-05-20 Thread Paul de Vrieze 
On Monday 16 May 2005 15:04, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:

 The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
 for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
 orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
 allowed by portage.

in any case it should be _pY as your snapshot is newer than the current 
version. _p stands for patch level, _pre for prerelease. In case of cvs 
ebuilds patch levels are more appropriate as the new version is often not 
known.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net


pgpJx3HZxt37N.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion

2005-05-20 Thread Paul de Vrieze 
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:27, Marius Mauch wrote:

 Well, it's valid with portage-2.1, but not 2.0.

Concerning that, how far are we from it being testable by the general 
developer population?

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net


pgpUaDXjWhOxK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion

2005-05-16 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen 
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 15:04 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
 The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
 for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
 orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
 allowed by portage.

I meant to write 'orinoco-0.15_rc3_pre20050516.ebuild' of course.

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion

2005-05-16 Thread Donnie Berkholz 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
 The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
 for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
 orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
 allowed by portage.
 
 I can't go with just orinoco-0.15_pre20050516.ebuild as _rcX is
 considered newer than _preY.

How about rc2_p20050516?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCiOp3XVaO67S1rtsRAok8AKD3dkxsKsP+zr4F72UgRcEkGzvhYwCfVwB0
KxOD3PruBa+zU5McrlWD5F8=
=7q8G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list