Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raúl Porcel wrote: > Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Raúl Porcel wrote: >>> Agreed from mozilla. >>> firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag >> Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are >> more than one of these flags (firefox/seamonkey/xulrunner) supported by >> package AND enabled by user? Some of those local flag descriptions >> suggest that USE="firefox xulrunner" results in using xulrunner (so it >> has higher priority). So is that recommended, and how about seamonkey? > > > Sorry, didn't saw this msg. > > I don't know of any guideline. Anyway all apps should start to use Well maybe I could've just read the USE flags descriptions closely and it would be clear to me that the preference order should probably be: xulrunner > firefox > seamonkey > xulrunner, since that's what they really want instead of using firefox > or seamonkey. When ff-3.0 is released no app will be able to build > against ff, since ff will build against xulrunner. So, what i said, apps > should use xulrunner as primary option, now that xulrunner is up-to-date > and working fine. We should probably fix profiles/default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop/make.defaults then (and possibly other profiles?), as it has only firefox in USE? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGaVXwtbrAj05h3oQRAifRAKCmsFjAuyHUdBUgxCsAjjxd5ojfuACfcYF4 rx+vUQNY81RxzrfZCEvmxxQ= =sqC9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner
Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Raúl Porcel wrote: >> Agreed from mozilla. > >> firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag > > Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are > more than one of these flags (firefox/seamonkey/xulrunner) supported by > package AND enabled by user? Some of those local flag descriptions > suggest that USE="firefox xulrunner" results in using xulrunner (so it > has higher priority). So is that recommended, and how about seamonkey? Sorry, didn't saw this msg. I don't know of any guideline. Anyway all apps should start to use xulrunner, since that's what they really want instead of using firefox or seamonkey. When ff-3.0 is released no app will be able to build against ff, since ff will build against xulrunner. So, what i said, apps should use xulrunner as primary option, now that xulrunner is up-to-date and working fine. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raúl Porcel wrote: > Agreed from mozilla. > > firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are more than one of these flags (firefox/seamonkey/xulrunner) supported by package AND enabled by user? Some of those local flag descriptions suggest that USE="firefox xulrunner" results in using xulrunner (so it has higher priority). So is that recommended, and how about seamonkey? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGZwt/tbrAj05h3oQRAsJkAJ99aXhbnYoqdtKuud77ZXcPS5MZMwCeNLuu N9/sEqDf7P3/f9v7CGxfy/0= =/OQC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner
Agreed from mozilla. firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 17:44 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > use.local.desc:dev-java/swt:xulrunner - Build native browser integration > against xulrunner > use.local.desc:dev-python/gnome-python-extras:xulrunner - Enable support for > xulrunner instead of firefox > use.local.desc:dev-util/devhelp:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner > instead of firefox > use.local.desc:gnome-extra/yelp:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner > instead of firefox > use.local.desc:media-video/totem:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner > instead of firefox > use.local.desc:net-news/liferea:xulrunner - Enable xulrunner as renderer in > liferea > use.local.desc:www-client/epiphany-extensions:xulrunner - Enable support for > xulrunner instead of firefox > use.local.desc:www-client/epiphany:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner > instead of firefox > > List is likely to grow in future. > > Any objections? > > - Samuli Suominen ++ from gnome Daniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner
use.local.desc:dev-java/swt:xulrunner - Build native browser integration against xulrunner use.local.desc:dev-python/gnome-python-extras:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner instead of firefox use.local.desc:dev-util/devhelp:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner instead of firefox use.local.desc:gnome-extra/yelp:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner instead of firefox use.local.desc:media-video/totem:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner instead of firefox use.local.desc:net-news/liferea:xulrunner - Enable xulrunner as renderer in liferea use.local.desc:www-client/epiphany-extensions:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner instead of firefox use.local.desc:www-client/epiphany:xulrunner - Enable support for xulrunner instead of firefox List is likely to grow in future. Any objections? - Samuli Suominen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
