[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/pvfs2: ChangeLog pvfs2-2.6.3-r1.ebuild
On 13:36 Sat 13 Oct , Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote: 1.1 sys-cluster/pvfs2/pvfs2-2.6.3-r1.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/pvfs2/pvfs2-2.6.3-r1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/pvfs2/pvfs2-2.6.3-r1.ebuild?rev=1.1content-type=text/plain if kernel_is 2 4; then BUILD_TARGETS=just_kmod24 ECONF_PARAMS=--with-kernel24=${KV_DIR} MODULE_NAMES=pvfs2(fs::src/kernel/linux-2.4) Feel free to drop 2.4 support. if kernel_is gt 2 6 20 ; then epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PV}-register_sysctl_table.patch fi if kernel_is ge 2 6 22 ; then epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PV}-kmem-and-dtor-fix.patch fi Mixing 'gt' and 'ge' is a bad idea. Thanks, Donnie -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/pvfs2: ChangeLog pvfs2-2.6.3-r1.ebuild
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13:36 Sat 13 Oct , Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote: if kernel_is gt 2 6 20 ; then epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PV}-register_sysctl_table.patch fi if kernel_is ge 2 6 22 ; then epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PV}-kmem-and-dtor-fix.patch fi Mixing 'gt' and 'ge' is a bad idea. Just outa curiosity, why? -- Each night Father fills me with dread When he sits on the foot of my bed. I'd not mind that he speaks; In gibbers and squeaks, But for the seventeen years he's been dead. -- Edward Gorey pgpgSZPixPSBi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/pvfs2: ChangeLog pvfs2-2.6.3-r1.ebuild
On 23:45 Sat 13 Oct , Drake Wyrm wrote: Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13:36 Sat 13 Oct , Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote: if kernel_is gt 2 6 20 ; then epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PV}-register_sysctl_table.patch fi if kernel_is ge 2 6 22 ; then epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PV}-kmem-and-dtor-fix.patch fi Mixing 'gt' and 'ge' is a bad idea. Just outa curiosity, why? Because it's inconsistent and one generally assumes that people will be consistent with the way they test numbers. That way you only need to read the number rather than continually checking every single line to see how exactly it's tested for. Thanks, Donnie -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list