[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/magicpoint: ChangeLog magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I know the difference, but thanks. That comment has been added because I tried it with emake -j1...it still failed, so I chose to use make. And then forgot to remove the comment. i dont see how (in the normal case) `emake -j1` would fail where `make` does not ... they expand to the same effective behavior `emake -j1` would generally turn into `make -j2 -j1` which has the same behavior as the default `make` To prove you wrong, I tried it again...commit is on the way. Whatever happened the first time... V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/magicpoint: ChangeLog magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild
On 09:58 Mon 24 Sep , Christian Faulhammer (opfer) wrote:
opfer 07/09/24 09:58:29
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild
Log:
version bump, a lot of bugfixes; on Gentoo side we have better Emacs
support; in total fixing bugs 150312, 83313 and 186754
(Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
# no parallel make possible!
make -j1 Makefiles || die emake failed
make clean || die emake clean failed
make BINDIR=/usr/bin LIBDIR=/etc/X11 || die emake failed
use emacs cp contrib/*.el ${S} \
elisp-compile *.el || die elisp-compile failed
}
src_install() {
make \
DESTDIR=${D} \
BINDIR=/usr/bin \
LIBDIR=/etc/X11 \
install || die make install
make \
DESTDIR=${D} \
DOCHTMLDIR=/usr/share/doc/${PF} \
MANPATH=/usr/share/man \
MANSUFFIX=1 \
install.man || die emake install.man failed
Why not emake for all of these?
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/magicpoint: ChangeLog magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 09:58 Mon 24 Sep , Christian Faulhammer (opfer) wrote: opfer 07/09/24 09:58:29 Modified: ChangeLog Added:magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild Log: version bump, a lot of bugfixes; on Gentoo side we have better Emacs support; in total fixing bugs 150312, 83313 and 186754 (Portage version: 2.1.3.9) # no parallel make possible! make -j1 Makefiles || die emake failed make clean || die emake clean failed make BINDIR=/usr/bin LIBDIR=/etc/X11 || die emake failed [...] make \ [...] make \ [...] Why not emake for all of these? Because it fails, magicpoint's build system is really old and weird. The comment above should state that, but the leftover -j1 I tried would confuse the reader. Plus the stupid die comments. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/magicpoint: ChangeLog magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild
On Monday 24 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 09:58 Mon 24 Sep , Christian Faulhammer (opfer) wrote: opfer 07/09/24 09:58:29 Modified: ChangeLog Added:magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild Log: version bump, a lot of bugfixes; on Gentoo side we have better Emacs support; in total fixing bugs 150312, 83313 and 186754 (Portage version: 2.1.3.9) # no parallel make possible! make -j1 Makefiles || die emake failed make clean || die emake clean failed make BINDIR=/usr/bin LIBDIR=/etc/X11 || die emake failed [...] make \ [...] make \ [...] Why not emake for all of these? Because it fails, magicpoint's build system is really old and weird. The comment above should state that, but the leftover -j1 I tried would confuse the reader. Plus the stupid die comments. most people associate emake with run in parallel when in reality, that is merely one of the things it provides if something doesnt work in parallel, you use `emake -j1` ... using `make` generally doesnt make sense anywhere -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/magicpoint: ChangeLog magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Because it fails, magicpoint's build system is really old and weird. The comment above should state that, but the leftover -j1 I tried would confuse the reader. Plus the stupid die comments. most people associate emake with run in parallel when in reality, that is merely one of the things it provides if something doesnt work in parallel, you use `emake -j1` ... using `make` generally doesnt make sense anywhere I know the difference, but thanks. That comment has been added because I tried it with emake -j1...it still failed, so I chose to use make. And then forgot to remove the comment. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/magicpoint: ChangeLog magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild
On Monday 24 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Because it fails, magicpoint's build system is really old and weird. The comment above should state that, but the leftover -j1 I tried would confuse the reader. Plus the stupid die comments. most people associate emake with run in parallel when in reality, that is merely one of the things it provides if something doesnt work in parallel, you use `emake -j1` ... using `make` generally doesnt make sense anywhere I know the difference, but thanks. That comment has been added because I tried it with emake -j1...it still failed, so I chose to use make. And then forgot to remove the comment. i dont see how (in the normal case) `emake -j1` would fail where `make` does not ... they expand to the same effective behavior `emake -j1` would generally turn into `make -j2 -j1` which has the same behavior as the default `make` -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
