Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:52:10PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:18 +0200 Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: 100 bugs? 150 bugs? 100 is better: that usually equates to a few days of backlog, whereas 150 bugs might very well denote an entire week's work. Alright, adjusted to 100 bugs for now :) -- Alex Alexander | wired + Gentoo Linux Developer ++ www.linuxized.com pgpeoLuDjVCjk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@
If you need some data, here's a plot of the last 7 months... Cheers, A https://data.nanotube-research.de/gentoo/plot-0.png On Saturday 13 November 2010 22:07:08 Alex Alexander wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:52:10PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:18 +0200 Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: 100 bugs? 150 bugs? 100 is better: that usually equates to a few days of backlog, whereas 150 bugs might very well denote an entire week's work. Alright, adjusted to 100 bugs for now :) -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@
On 23:06 Sat 13 Nov , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: If you need some data, here's a plot of the last 7 months... Cheers, A https://data.nanotube-research.de/gentoo/plot-0.png Good work Andreas :) Nice plotting. -- Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) ( Gentoo Lisp Project ) pgplklkTfec5t.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:18 +0200 Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: 100 bugs? 150 bugs? 100 is better: that usually equates to a few days of backlog, whereas 150 bugs might very well denote an entire week's work. jer
[gentoo-dev] Re: 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@
Il giorno mer, 10/11/2010 alle 16.40 +0100, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto: On the other hand, whenever someone sends mail in this thread, the matter is usually resolved within a day. :) What if we automate sending of Bug wranglers queue full messages once a day when the queue is over a given number? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:40:02 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote: Il giorno mer, 10/11/2010 alle 16.40 +0100, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto: On the other hand, whenever someone sends mail in this thread, the matter is usually resolved within a day. :) What if we automate sending of Bug wranglers queue full messages once a day when the queue is over a given number? Should be easier and therefore quicker to implement than all the other planned enhancements, like automated assignment. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 150 bugs at bug-wranglers@
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:05:44PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:40:02 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote: Il giorno mer, 10/11/2010 alle 16.40 +0100, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto: On the other hand, whenever someone sends mail in this thread, the matter is usually resolved within a day. :) What if we automate sending of Bug wranglers queue full messages once a day when the queue is over a given number? Should be easier and therefore quicker to implement than all the other planned enhancements, like automated assignment. jer this is actually one line using pybugz, a few more including the mail code. I can run that once a day and send an email when a threshold is met. what do you think is best? 100 bugs? 150 bugs? -- Alex Alexander | wired + Gentoo Linux Developer ++ www.linuxized.com pgpZ2OfKEfJtX.pgp Description: PGP signature
