[gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-27 23h59 UTC
On 04/28/2014 11:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote: What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages don't give an understandable reason. It was added to the tree by someone outside the Qt team without permission. Since it's not ready for the tree yet, it was immediately removed again. So the Qt team is overriding the QA team now? Is it alphabetical? What does the QA team have to do with this?
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-27 23h59 UTC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/28/2014 9:41 AM, Sergey Popov wrote: 28.04.2014 17:30, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote: What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages don't give an understandable reason. It was added to the tree by someone outside the Qt team without permission. Since it's not ready for the tree yet, it was immediately removed again. So the Qt team is overriding the QA team now? Is it alphabetical? As a Qt team lead i want to say that there is no permission for me or pesa(as the main maintainer of Qt Framework packages) for importing Qt 5 in tree. So, i kindly asks zlogene to remove that stuff from main tree. As QA team member - there was no serious QA issue here - ebuilds, even semi-broken, was bringed with apropriate masks, so - no damage on users's systems. Saying that a Qt team member did something wrong because he reverted an action taken by someone who happens to be a member of the QA team is like saying that I can't revert something done by a council member to one of my packages just because they happen to be on the council. As Pinkbyte said, there was no QA issue here, just a developer being quick on the trigger, so the membership of any parties in QA is irrelevant to the discussion. Chris Reffett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNeW8IACgkQ23laikJhg1RQ6wCbBVdKKUe0J9n74CPBOmOdWmvz JqEAmgM5PuT29aF5Djyp6X1thdo2z/WX =E9g0 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-27 23h59 UTC
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:30:45 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote: What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages don't give an understandable reason. It was added to the tree by someone outside the Qt team without permission. Since it's not ready for the tree yet, it was immediately removed again. So the Qt team is overriding the QA team now? Is it alphabetical? It reads patrick, not QA team; you can see it happen twice, what is (not so) interesting is the net result: You can't sort it at all. Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every week ... ... and we really don't need a new sub thread for every odd happening. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-27 23h59 UTC
Tom Wijsman: Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every week ... Not sure if that is relieving.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-27 23h59 UTC
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:35:20 + hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Tom Wijsman: Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every week ... Not sure if that is relieving. If only we could cure an occasional cold. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-27 23h59 UTC
Tom Wijsman: On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:35:20 + hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Tom Wijsman: Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every week ... Not sure if that is relieving. If only we could cure an occasional cold. Not sure how every week is occasional.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-27 23h59 UTC
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:55:42 + hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Tom Wijsman: On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:35:20 + hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Tom Wijsman: Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every week ... Not sure if that is relieving. If only we could cure an occasional cold. Not sure how every week is occasional. Every week someone occasionally catches a cold somewhere. This month I recall multiple profile and mask changes reverted, a compatibility patch that was added to a package reverted, the list goes on ...; it is still occasional, until someone starts to make it a habit. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
