Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Empty project: ADA

2016-08-24 Thread Luke A. Guest
I've sent a patch to this list which adds Ada support. I believe the Ada
stuff already in Gentoo should be removed and we can start again, fresh.
If we can get this patch in, then use the ada-overlay, then ebuilds can
start to be migrated from there to the main repo, it'll be much cleaner
than what it is now, which is a total hackfest.


On 24/08/16 07:29, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On 08/22/2016 05:58 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Ada is empty
> While not using any Ada thing myself, occasionally I'm in need to fully
> bootstrap upstream gcc, which requires C,C++,Ada compilers these days.
>
> There's some basically accepted patches in [1] already: I've expected George
> to be back and catch up here eventually - but stranded. I may not update and
> commit them before I need to hack upstream gcc-trunk again...
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/547358
>
> /haubi/
>
>




[gentoo-dev] Re: Empty project: ADA

2016-08-24 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 08/22/2016 05:58 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Ada is empty

While not using any Ada thing myself, occasionally I'm in need to fully
bootstrap upstream gcc, which requires C,C++,Ada compilers these days.

There's some basically accepted patches in [1] already: I've expected George
to be back and catch up here eventually - but stranded. I may not update and
commit them before I need to hack upstream gcc-trunk again...

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/547358

/haubi/